ADVERTISEMENT

Whups...Jan 6th hearings are imploding LOL

@RayGravesGhost

One of them told people to go home peacefully, the other told rioters they should continue. Can you tell the board which one is which. Here are the options. President Trump and Kamala Harris.


this-is-so-basic-kamala-harris.gif
 
She was inciting a riot on The Colbert Show?

trump is going to jail for conspiracy to overthrow the government you fool

You know...the Green Bay sweep fake electors, the pressuring of state election officials to make up votes, the corrupt attempted firing of DOJ & Pentagon officials, the fraud around the Stop The Steal fundraising...

You know...basic trump shit
 
She was inciting a riot on The Colbert Show?

trump is going to jail for conspiracy to overthrow the government you fool

You know...the Green Bay sweep fake electors, the pressuring of state election officials to make up votes, the corrupt attempted firing of DOJ & Pentagon officials, the fraud around the Stop The Steal fundraising...

You know...basic trump shit
Yes she was inciting riots to overthrow the the Government. Her and Joe succeeded.




hypocrite-smells.gif
 
Raygravesghost…..let us hear you scream RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA from the mountain tops. The walls are closing in!!!!
 
She was inciting a riot on The Colbert Show?

trump is going to jail for conspiracy to overthrow the government you fool

You know...the Green Bay sweep fake electors, the pressuring of state election officials to make up votes, the corrupt attempted firing of DOJ & Pentagon officials, the fraud around the Stop The Steal fundraising...

You know...basic trump shit
Obviously you're one of these lib-tard hacks who fails to realize who the real rabble-rousers are here. Why don't you look up Maxine Waters (Democrat) telling people to give Trump supporters a hard time in public, or Kamala Harris supporting the Minnesota Freedom Fund allowing BLM rioters to be released from jail to continue causing anarchy in the streets, or even Chucky-Boy Schumer's latest threat against both SCOTUS Justices Neil Gorsuch or Brett Cavanaugh? Trump has done nothing close to inciting violence like your Demo-Communist superheroes have.
 
Obviously you're one of these lib-tard hacks who fails to realize who the real rabble-rousers are here. Why don't you look up Maxine Waters (Democrat) telling people to give Trump supporters a hard time in public, or Kamala Harris supporting the Minnesota Freedom Fund allowing BLM rioters to be released from jail to continue causing anarchy in the streets, or even Chucky-Boy Schumer's latest threat against both SCOTUS Justices Neil Gorsuch or Brett Cavanaugh? Trump has done nothing close to inciting violence like your Demo-Communist superheroes have.

 
Obviously you're one of these lib-tard hacks who fails to realize who the real rabble-rousers are here. Why don't you look up Maxine Waters (Democrat) telling people to give Trump supporters a hard time in public, or Kamala Harris supporting the Minnesota Freedom Fund allowing BLM rioters to be released from jail to continue causing anarchy in the streets, or even Chucky-Boy Schumer's latest threat against both SCOTUS Justices Neil Gorsuch or Brett Cavanaugh? Trump has done nothing close to inciting violence like your Demo-Communist superheroes have.


And obviously you're unaware that the Republican party as a whole supports violent insurrection...


https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/04/us/politics/republicans-jan-6-cheney-censure.html

G.O.P. Declares Jan. 6 Attack ‘Legitimate Political Discourse’​

 
I believe Trump endorsed who look like me recently like Herschel Walker for Senate. Not to mention he caused AA/Hispanic unemployment to go down to historic lows for people who look like me. Apparently, Democrat plantation slaves (i.e. Biden lovers) like yourself will spew out the usual hate rhetoric you're well-known for. No truth, no premise, no evidence.....just hatred based on animalistic emotions. You poor soul you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sunburnt Indian
I believe Trump endorsed who look like me recently like Herschel Walker for Senate. Not to mention he caused AA/Hispanic unemployment to go down to historic lows for people who look like me. Apparently, Democrat plantation slaves (i.e. Biden lovers) like yourself will spew out the usual hate rhetoric you're well-known for. No truth, no premise, no evidence.....just hatred based on animalistic emotions. You poor soul you.

What does any of that have to do with anything?

Herschel Walker is the very definition of a plantation slave
trump gave him his 1st professional contract and bought his loyalty

Herschel should change his name to "Stephen"...this photo from election night


raw
 
What does any of that have to do with anything?

Herschel Walker is the very definition of a plantation slave
trump gave him his 1st professional contract and bought his loyalty

Herschel should change his name to "Stephen"...this photo from election night


raw
Ah, but it was the Democrat Party you love and support who started and institutionalized slavery my delusional friend. And did you know your boy Poopy Joe💩 is the last of the yellow-dog Dixiecrats who throughout his entire career campaigned against black people before realizing he could use them for his dirty work of anarchy and intimidation of the public?? Of course you don't because you're one of these......

iu
 
And obviously you're unaware that the Republican party as a whole supports violent insurrection...


https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/04/us/politics/republicans-jan-6-cheney-censure.html

G.O.P. Declares Jan. 6 Attack ‘Legitimate Political Discourse’​

I have no problem with violent insurrection. This wasn't it. 800 hundred idiots wandering around the Capitol, respecting the velvet ropes and taking selfies with their feet up does not an insurrection make.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: instaGATOR
What does any of that have to do with anything?

Herschel Walker is the very definition of a plantation slave
trump gave him his 1st professional contract and bought his loyalty

Herschel should change his name to "Stephen"...this photo from election night


raw
Every slave on every plantation at the start of the Civil War was owned by a White or Black Democrat.

Every Confederate state had Black Democrat Slave owners.

Now the Black pseudo-slaves are on the welfare dole in Blue Democrat controlled housing 'projects' instead of on the plantations. Same game, different set-up and rules, but still controlling and destroying the lives and the futures of Blacks.

The KKK has long been the domestic terrorist arm of the Democrats.
Now days, they have switched to BLM and ANTIFA for that continued role....
 
Ah, but it was the Democrat Party you love and support who started and institutionalized slavery my delusional friend.

WRONG. Learn some US history before you go spouting off dumb shit and make all of us brothers look bad...

Slavery in the US started before there were any Democrats or Republicans you delusional ass

And did you know your boy Poopy Joe💩 is the last of the yellow-dog Dixiecrats who throughout his entire career campaigned against black people before realizing he could use them for his dirty work of anarchy and intimidation of the public??
I guess you're the sort of Uncle Tom that excuses the GOP for its "Southern Strategy" policy huh?

I would even show pity on you and provide the citations...
If you don't know already you need to go do the work yourself



Of course you don't because you're one of these......

iu


Says the Uncle Tom plantation slave wannabe that associates himself with a political party that openly admitted that it uses race politics as a party strategy

And no that wasn't back in the 1800's...that's been their policy & re-election strategy since 1970

The party had to actually admit & apologize for what they did

Problem is they've continued to this day


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy#:~:text=In American politics, the Southern,to racism against African Americans.

In American politics, the Southern strategy was a Republican Party electoral strategy to increase political support among white voters in the South by appealing to racism against African Americans.[1][2][3] As the civil rights movement and dismantling of Jim Crow laws in the 1950s and 1960s visibly deepened existing racial tensions in much of the Southern United States, Republican politicians such as presidential candidate Richard Nixon and Senator Barry Goldwater developed strategies that successfully contributed to the political realignment of many white, conservative voters in the South who had traditionally supported the Democratic Party rather than the Republican Party. It also helped to push the Republican Party much more to the right relative to the 1950s.[4]

The phrase "Southern Strategy" refers primarily to "top down" narratives of the political realignment of the South which suggest that Republican leaders consciously appealed to many white Southerners' racial grievances in order to gain their support.[5] This top-down narrative of the Southern Strategy is generally believed to be the primary force that transformed Southern politics following the civil rights era. The scholarly consensus is that racial conservatism was critical in the post-Civil Rights Act realignment of the Republican and Democratic parties.[citation needed][6][7] Several aspects of this view have been debated by some historians and political scientists.[8][9][10][11][12]

The perception that the Republican Party had served as the "vehicle of white supremacy in the South," particularly during the Goldwater campaign and the presidential elections of 1968 and 1972, made it difficult for the Republican Party to win back the support of black voters in the South in later years.[4] In 2005, Republican National Committee chairman Ken Mehlman formally apologized to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) for exploiting racial polarization to win elections and ignoring the black vote.[13][14]




You just another CJ bro...

 
I guess you're the sort of Uncle Tom that excuses the GOP for its "Southern Strategy" policy huh?








Says the Uncle Tom plantation slave wannabe that associates himself with a political party that openly admitted that it uses race politics as a party strategy
I wouldn't put up with this shit if I was you, @BayouGator1995
 
She was inciting a riot on The Colbert Show?

One cannot incite a riot on The Colbert Show?

It's like home base in a game of tag or something? Help me with your "logic" here.

Using your logic, a Trumper can say something equally stupid like..."Trump was wearing black socks. You can't incite a riot while wearing black socks."

Get smarter. Quickly if possible.
 
Also, there are certain powers that the Congress may have, and may authorize for the president, that don't necessarily exist if war is not declared through Congress.


So back to the point then...

Does that make US military leaders belong exclusively to the POTUS at all times?
No it doesn't.

There is a law limiting his powers...they are not "his" by law

Whether or not Congress has the balls to challenge the POTUS when he violates that is a different question.

By law NO general can be fired by a POTUS since Congress hasn't declared war since WWII...and therefore by law they haven't been any President owned military in over 70 years
 
So back to the point then...

Does that make US military leaders belong exclusively to the POTUS at all times?
No it doesn't.

There is a law limiting his powers...they are not "his" by law

Whether or not Congress has the balls to challenge the POTUS when he violates that is a different question.

By law NO general can be fired by a POTUS since Congress hasn't declared war since WWII...and therefore by law they haven't been any President owned military in over 70 years
Well, one thing is for sure, if Congress is lead by the Repubs, they will not be challenge the POTUS on anything.
 
WRONG. Learn some US history before you go spouting off dumb shit and make all of us brothers look bad...

Slavery in the US started before there were any Democrats or Republicans you delusional ass


I guess you're the sort of Uncle Tom that excuses the GOP for its "Southern Strategy" policy huh?

I would even show pity on you and provide the citations...
If you don't know already you need to go do the work yourself






Says the Uncle Tom plantation slave wannabe that associates himself with a political party that openly admitted that it uses race politics as a party strategy

And no that wasn't back in the 1800's...that's been their policy & re-election strategy since 1970

The party had to actually admit & apologize for what they did

Problem is they've continued to this day


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy#:~:text=In American politics, the Southern,to racism against African Americans.

In American politics, the Southern strategy was a Republican Party electoral strategy to increase political support among white voters in the South by appealing to racism against African Americans.[1][2][3] As the civil rights movement and dismantling of Jim Crow laws in the 1950s and 1960s visibly deepened existing racial tensions in much of the Southern United States, Republican politicians such as presidential candidate Richard Nixon and Senator Barry Goldwater developed strategies that successfully contributed to the political realignment of many white, conservative voters in the South who had traditionally supported the Democratic Party rather than the Republican Party. It also helped to push the Republican Party much more to the right relative to the 1950s.[4]

The phrase "Southern Strategy" refers primarily to "top down" narratives of the political realignment of the South which suggest that Republican leaders consciously appealed to many white Southerners' racial grievances in order to gain their support.[5] This top-down narrative of the Southern Strategy is generally believed to be the primary force that transformed Southern politics following the civil rights era. The scholarly consensus is that racial conservatism was critical in the post-Civil Rights Act realignment of the Republican and Democratic parties.[citation needed][6][7] Several aspects of this view have been debated by some historians and political scientists.[8][9][10][11][12]

The perception that the Republican Party had served as the "vehicle of white supremacy in the South," particularly during the Goldwater campaign and the presidential elections of 1968 and 1972, made it difficult for the Republican Party to win back the support of black voters in the South in later years.[4] In 2005, Republican National Committee chairman Ken Mehlman formally apologized to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) for exploiting racial polarization to win elections and ignoring the black vote.[13][14]




You just another CJ bro...

THIS has to be the BIGGEST crock of a shit-post I've ever seen! You clearly demonstrated that you're vastly uneducated and don't know history in the slightest! Time to take your ignorant ass to school, son....

You say the Democrat Party didn't start slavery in the US, here's where you're wrong as two-left shoes....they started the KKK who were the harbingers of slavery of black people....



And for someone who posts BS like the "Southern Strategy" which entails the Great Switch myth used by Democrat morons like yourself it's clearly evident you've been grossly miseducated by whatever effed-up school system you came out of. Learn the TRUTH about the obvious lie you bought into.....


Whether you realize it or not, you just made yourself a damn fool posting myths that have been long-since debunked for the last 20-30 years now. But you're a Democrat plantation slave-type, so you don't know any better. Try actually READING TRUE history before posting BS, amateur.
 
Whether or not Congress has the balls to challenge the POTUS when he violates that is a different question.

Can't avoid it.
Can't get around it.
So just continue to EAT IT dry with no salt....



Keeping what's important on this BS-C911 thread, front and center....

 
So back to the point then...

Does that make US military leaders belong exclusively to the POTUS at all times?
No it doesn't.



By law NO general can be fired by a POTUS since Congress hasn't declared war since WWII...and therefore by law they haven't been any President owned military in over 70 years
Would you like a list of every general and admiral fired by a president since WW2?
 
THIS has to be the BIGGEST crock of a shit-post I've ever seen! You clearly demonstrated that you're vastly uneducated and don't know history in the slightest! Time to take your ignorant ass to school, son....

Democratic Party founded 1828
Republican Party founded 1854

So I guess you believe no institutionalized slavery existed before 1828 in the US?

Talk about uneducated...

You say the Democrat Party didn't start slavery in the US, here's where you're wrong as two-left shoes....they started the KKK who were the harbingers of slavery of black people....


The KKK didn't exist until after the Civil War...founded 1865

Slavery started in 1619


The first Africans to reach the colonies that England was struggling to establish were a group of some 20 enslaved people who arrived at Point Comfort, Virginia, near Jamestown, in August 1619, brought by British privateers who had seized them from a captured Portuguese slave ship.




And for someone who posts BS like the "Southern Strategy" which entails the Great Switch myth used by Democrat morons like yourself it's clearly evident you've been grossly miseducated by whatever effed-up school system you came out of. Learn the TRUTH about the obvious lie you bought into.....

So the Republican party officially admitting to and apologizing for the Southern Strategy didn't occur in 2005?

Yep...never happened

In 2005, Republican National Committee chairman Ken Mehlman formally apologized to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) for exploiting racial polarization to win elections and ignoring the black vote.[13][14]

Here is a quote from the speech...

"Despite this history, the Democratic Party by the 1960s had something real and tangible to overcome this legacy. Lyndon Johnson, a Democratic President, signed what in my opinion were the most important laws of the 20th century: the civil rights act, voting rights act, open housing law.

By the 70s and into the 80s and 90s, the Democratic Party solidified its gains in the African American community, and we Republicans did not effectively reach out.

Some Republicans gave up on winning the African American vote, looking the other way or trying to benefit politically from racial polarization. I am here today as the Republican Chairman to tell you we were wrong."




Whether you realize it or not, you just made yourself a damn fool posting myths that have been long-since debunked for the last 20-30 years now. But you're a Democrat plantation slave-type, so you don't know any better. Try actually READING TRUE history before posting BS, amateur.




In 1981, the legendarily brutal campaign consultant Lee Atwater, after a decade as South Carolina's most effective Republican operative, was working in Ronald Reagan's White House when he was interviewed by Alexander Lamis, a political scientist at Case Western Reserve University. In this audio, made public for the first time ever, Atwater lays out how Republicans can win the vote of racists without sounding racist themselves.
 
Last edited:
Slavery began long before the U.S. existed, in AFRICA.

Africans that lost in tribal wars became the slaves of those that won.
They sold the slaves to Portueguse traders for manufactured good.
The Portueguse transported them to America and other places and sold them.
And there are still active slave markets in Afirca today, although Liberia, established by freed American slaves, did finally abolish slavery in 2010...

It is believed the first Africans brought to the Northern colony of Virginia, 400 years ago this month, were Kimbundu-speaking peoples from the kingdom of Ndongo, located in part of present-day Angola ...

Blacks enslaved Blacks for fun and profit, and still do to this day.

White Christians in England abolished slavery in the 1830's, and White Christians in America did so a few decades later in America.

Point of Order: Blacks did and still do enslave each other, while White Christians end slavery whenever and wherever they can....

Less than 18% of all whites in the South every owned a single slave, but the ignorant, or the biased with an agenda, continue to attempt to blame 100% of all Southerners for Slavery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BayouGator1995
Again another trumpanzee trying to run deflection by bringing up irrelevant topics


  • The idiot bayou believes slavery didn't exist before the 2 major political parties were founded

  • He thinks the KKK started institutional slavery
KKK wasn't founded until after the Civil War. I guess that's one way to believe the war wasn't about slavery...just believe slavery started after the war over

  • And he doesn't believe the Republican National Cmte Chairman actually apologized for the party using racial polarization to win elections ...or the words of Lee Atwater.

Do you agree with bayou's "alternative" facts?

Even you cited the fact that slavery in the US predated the 2 major political parties by about 200 years

Hell, there historical evidence that African slaves were in what became the USA as early as the 1400 & 1500's
 
African Blacks have been enslaving each other since the beginning of recorded history going back at least 5,000 years, and to the ignorant/biased, it's still America/Whites/South's fault.

Slavery still exists in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, and other areas today.

Where it doesn't exist today is in America or Europe, where the Founders came from to set up the best and freest country in the world.

Why don't you tell me the Black founded and controlled country where everyone in the world wants to immigrate to. I'll wait.................................................
 
Slavery still exists in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, and other areas today.

Where it doesn't exist today is in America or Europe, where the Founders came from to set up the best and freest country in the world.


https://www.baltimoresun.com/opinio...0201208-rvdjpk462bc2hcfmj6oz2vs32i-story.html
Slavery is still constitutionally legal in the U.S.; that must end | COMMENTARY
By Baltimore Sun Editorial Board
Dec 08, 2020 at 10:27 am

Slavery is still constitutionally legal in the United States. It was mostly abolished after the 13th Amendment was ratified following the Civil War in 1865, but not completely. Lawmakers at the time left a certain population unprotected from the brutal, inhumane practice — those who commit crimes.

Included in the 13th Amendment was this stipulation: “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.” In essence, one simple clause created a new form of slavery that led to a mass incarceration epidemic that denied African Americans basic human rights, with ramifications that still exist today.
 
We know the GOP is going to force Hunter to come before them. How will the Dems/Biden handle that as it will definitely make them look really bad. About the only way to avoid a catastrophe would be for Hunter to take the 5th but if Biden pardons him I don't think he can use the 5th. Maybe they make the senile Biden retire with Harris promising to pardon Hunter after he takes the 5th.
 
https://www.baltimoresun.com/opinio...0201208-rvdjpk462bc2hcfmj6oz2vs32i-story.html
Slavery is still constitutionally legal in the U.S.; that must end | COMMENTARY
By Baltimore Sun Editorial Board
Dec 08, 2020 at 10:27 am

Slavery is still constitutionally legal in the United States. It was mostly abolished after the 13th Amendment was ratified following the Civil War in 1865, but not completely. Lawmakers at the time left a certain population unprotected from the brutal, inhumane practice — those who commit crimes.

Included in the 13th Amendment was this stipulation: “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.” In essence, one simple clause created a new form of slavery that led to a mass incarceration epidemic that denied African Americans basic human rights, with ramifications that still exist today.

I don't see anywhere in that were it's restricted to Black's.
Seems to cover any race that is a criminal that's been tried and convicted by a jury.


OMG.... Whatever are we gonna do about this????

Those poor incarcerated criminals could still be sold into slavery...
So, just for curiosity, how many incarcerated criminals have been sold so far???

Only a complete and total moe-ron would even bring this up....
BINGO!
 
We know the GOP is going to force Hunter to come before them. How will the Dems/Biden handle that as it will definitely make them look really bad. About the only way to avoid a catastrophe would be for Hunter to take the 5th but if Biden pardons him I don't think he can use the 5th. Maybe they make the senile Biden retire with Harris promising to pardon Hunter after he takes the 5th.
You can't be pardoned, until AFTER YOU'VE BEEN CONVICTED OF A CRIME....

Only charge Hunter with 1-2 crimes.
He gets convicted and Joe pardons him.
Once Joe & Ho are out, bring additional charges on all of them...
 
You sure about that or has it never been tested in court? Was Nixon convicted of anything? I thought he was pardoned.
I'm no ambulance chaser, so I'm not sure,,,,

There are many different types of clemency that fall under the President’s power. They include: pardon, amnesty, commutation, and reprieve.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gator Fever
I'm no ambulance chaser, so I'm not sure,,,,

There are many different types of clemency that fall under the President’s power. They include: pardon, amnesty, commutation, and reprieve.

Reading up on it it sounds like a few Presidents did it before Ford for people after the civil war and some other things. Couldn't find anything where the supreme court ever took up a case that challenged a pre-emptive pardon though.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT