ADVERTISEMENT

Whups...Jan 6th hearings are imploding LOL

I don't see anywhere in that were it's restricted to Black's.

You said slavery doesn't exist in the United States...what does that have to do with it being restricted to black people?

Seems to cover any race that is a criminal that's been tried and convicted by a jury.

So thank you for admitting that it exists in America


OMG.... Whatever are we gonna do about this????

Those poor incarcerated criminals could still be sold into slavery...
So, just for curiosity, how many incarcerated criminals have been sold so far???

What does being sold have to do with anything?

You said slaves don't exist in the United States...now you're asking about how they're transferred?

Only a complete and total moe-ron would even bring this up....
BINGO!

YOU brought this up you dumbass...

But I agree you're a complete and total moe-ron for claiming that salvery doesn't exist in America

When it CLEARLY still exists as a legal option in the 13th amendment of the Constitution

And we haven't even begun to discuss its existence illegally in the US

But as Bugs says...you're a "ultra maroon"

 
@RayGravesGhost you, the media, and the politicians you support gave deflection a nice try. However, this Article sums up how most of the Country feels. No one cares about Jan 6th. It’s the economy stupid.



Jim Jordan? LOL

Since Jordan is too pussy to actually testify about his actions on Jan 6 that automatically invalidates him as a source about anything to do with Jan 6

That...and the fact that he provides cover for homosexual abusers

He needs to spend his time going through his call log

 
Last edited:
Jim Jordan? LOL

Since Jordan is too pussy to actually testify about his actions on Jan 6 that automatically invalidates him as a source about anything to do with Jan 6

That...and the fact that he provides cover for homosexual abusers

He needs to spend his time going through his call log

288221489_564339298388619_4512953118393737988_n.jpg
 
So back to the point then...

Does that make US military leaders belong exclusively to the POTUS at all times?
No it doesn't.

There is a law limiting his powers...they are not "his" by law

Whether or not Congress has the balls to challenge the POTUS when he violates that is a different question.

By law NO general can be fired by a POTUS since Congress hasn't declared war since WWII...and therefore by law they haven't been any President owned military in over 70 years

The typos above make your post impossible to understand.

You aren't allowed to "own" people in this country so that is a given.

However a president can absolutely fire a general, in times of war or peace.

Here's an opinion on the subject from Charles Dunlap Jr, J.D. who is the executive director of Duke Law School's Centre on Law, Ethics and National Security and a former Deputy Judge Advocate General for the USAF.

The context we are addressing is not one involving criminal misconduct, per se, but rather a situation where the President has lost confidence in the leadership of a particular general or even a group of generals.

Frankly, it is literally unthinkable that any officer these days, and particularly a general officer, would not acquiesce to a President’s request to retire under such circumstances, but let’s consider the options if one or more refused to go.

Here’s the easy part: can the President relieve any officer from any command or, for that matter, any particular position in the armed forces?

In my opinion, yes. The power to do so is inherent in the President’s Commander-in-Chief authority under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, and it cannot be fettered by Congress. For example, the controversial relief from command of General Douglas MacArthur by President Harry Truman during the Korean War was, according to the conclusions of the Congressional committees that examined the case, “within the constitutional power of the President.”

It is also important to note that the most senior generals – that is, the three and four star generals – only hold those grades during the period in which they occupy positions designated as being ones of “importance and responsibility” per 10 U.S.C. § 601.

Accordingly, if the President chooses to terminate that assignment, and the officer does not apply for voluntary retirement, then he or she will typically revert to their permanent grade, usually as a two-star major general. There are very significant financial implications to the reversion to the lower grade (by military pay standards that is; even after decades of service most two-star generals make less than first-year associates at big law firms).

In any event, if an officer (especially one who had been a three or four-star general) is relieved from his or her position and reverts to the lower rank of major general and still refuses to request retirement, the President may be able to dismiss the officer from the armed forces entirely.



You're wrong here @RayGravesGhost . Entirely.
 
https://www.baltimoresun.com/opinio...0201208-rvdjpk462bc2hcfmj6oz2vs32i-story.html
Slavery is still constitutionally legal in the U.S.; that must end | COMMENTARY
By Baltimore Sun Editorial Board
Dec 08, 2020 at 10:27 am

Slavery is still constitutionally legal in the United States. It was mostly abolished after the 13th Amendment was ratified following the Civil War in 1865, but not completely. Lawmakers at the time left a certain population unprotected from the brutal, inhumane practice — those who commit crimes.

Included in the 13th Amendment was this stipulation: “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.” In essence, one simple clause created a new form of slavery that led to a mass incarceration epidemic that denied African Americans basic human rights, with ramifications that still exist today.

Holy crap Captain Strawman. Slavery is not legal in the US.

Some prison inmates can be compelled to do "hard labor" as a condition of their incarceration. However, outside of military justice, I don't know that it ever happens.

Some prisoners choose to work jobs that either a) shorten their sentence, b) provide them with some type of on the job training c) fill their days with something other than the monotony of sitting in a cell all day.
 
So the proud boys & oath keepers didn't breach anything at 10:30am?
We're they authorized to be there?

When you find yourself debating semantics to defend a planned organized violent attack on our nation's Capitol then you know you have a losing hand...

BTW, why did it take trump 2 hours to even tweet?

The attack at Pearl Harbor took 2 hours also...
I guess no one should have been concerned about the US response that day either

Too stupid
What would a tweet have done? Really?

It’s asinine to think a tweet is going to affect a riot in any meaningful way.
 
She was inciting a riot on The Colbert Show?

trump is going to jail for conspiracy to overthrow the government you fool

You know...the Green Bay sweep fake electors, the pressuring of state election officials to make up votes, the corrupt attempted firing of DOJ & Pentagon officials, the fraud around the Stop The Steal fundraising...

You know...basic trump shit
Who did he conspire with? Has he been charged?

Where are the emails, texts and other correspondence showing him working with someone to overthrow the govt? The J6 committee has acquired tons of digital communications and it hasn’t been presented?

What was his plan - rush the capitol unarmed and steal podiums and put your feet on Pelosi’s desk? What a criminal mastermind.

Someday you’ll look back and realize how ridiculous all of this is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly
Who did he conspire with? Has he been charged?

Where are the emails, texts and other correspondence showing him working with someone to overthrow the govt? The J6 committee has acquired tons of digital communications and it hasn’t been presented?

What was his plan - rush the capitol unarmed and steal podiums and put your feet on Pelosi’s desk? What a criminal mastermind.

Someday you’ll look back and realize how ridiculous all of this is.
Someday? That day was 1/7 ...
 
What would a tweet have done? Really?

It’s asinine to think a tweet is going to affect a riot in any meaningful way.
Well at least he did something the same day. Kamala waited for 71 days of death and destruction to condemn riots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BamaFan1137
The typos above make your post impossible to understand.

You aren't allowed to "own" people in this country so that is a given.

However a president can absolutely fire a general, in times of war or peace.

Here's an opinion on the subject from Charles Dunlap Jr, J.D. who is the executive director of Duke Law School's Centre on Law, Ethics and National Security and a former Deputy Judge Advocate General for the USAF.

The context we are addressing is not one involving criminal misconduct, per se, but rather a situation where the President has lost confidence in the leadership of a particular general or even a group of generals.

Frankly, it is literally unthinkable that any officer these days, and particularly a general officer, would not acquiesce to a President’s request to retire under such circumstances, but let’s consider the options if one or more refused to go.

Here’s the easy part: can the President relieve any officer from any command or, for that matter, any particular position in the armed forces?

In my opinion, yes. The power to do so is inherent in the President’s Commander-in-Chief authority under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, and it cannot be fettered by Congress. For example, the controversial relief from command of General Douglas MacArthur by President Harry Truman during the Korean War was, according to the conclusions of the Congressional committees that examined the case, “within the constitutional power of the President.”

It is also important to note that the most senior generals – that is, the three and four star generals – only hold those grades during the period in which they occupy positions designated as being ones of “importance and responsibility” per 10 U.S.C. § 601.

Accordingly, if the President chooses to terminate that assignment, and the officer does not apply for voluntary retirement, then he or she will typically revert to their permanent grade, usually as a two-star major general. There are very significant financial implications to the reversion to the lower grade (by military pay standards that is; even after decades of service most two-star generals make less than first-year associates at big law firms).

In any event, if an officer (especially one who had been a three or four-star general) is relieved from his or her position and reverts to the lower rank of major general and still refuses to request retirement, the President may be able to dismiss the officer from the armed forces entirely.



You're wrong here @RayGravesGhost . Entirely.
You're wrong here @RayGravesGhost . Entirely. Again

FIFY
 
So why is trump consistently viewed as one of the worst, if not the absolute worst, by historians?

And please save us the leftist partisan victim bullshit as they rate other republican presidents positively

And lets wait til after trump gets criminally indicted...that should help his campaign for worst president ever really take off... LOL
Biden setting records. This is what Jan 6 theater is all about

 
Holy crap Captain Strawman. Slavery is not legal in the US.

Some prison inmates can be compelled to do "hard labor" as a condition of their incarceration. However, outside of military justice, I don't know that it ever happens.

Some prisoners choose to work jobs that either a) shorten their sentence, b) provide them with some type of on the job training c) fill their days with something other than the monotony of sitting in a cell all day.


Better go to Congress and tell this bipartisan group of legislators they don't know what they're doing...there is no loophole in the 13th amendment

https://www.yahoo.com/news/group-federal-lawmakers-working-remove-194235460.html
Group of federal lawmakers working to remove slavery loophole in U.S. Constitution

CBS 47 FOX 30
ACTION NEWS JAX

Kirstin Garriss
Fri, June 17, 2022, 3:42 PM

Juneteenth is now a federal holiday marking the end of slavery, but a group of lawmakers says there’s a loophole that has allowed another form of slavery to evolve with forced involuntary labor inside the nation’s prison system.

The ACLU estimates that incarcerated workers produce at least two $2 billion in goods and $9 billion dollars worth of prison maintenance services a year, but those prisoners don’t earn much.

Daniel Rosen said he knows firsthand after serving 6 years in prison.

“You feel like property of the state. A lot prison uniforms say property of that state and it’s not about clothes you’re wearing it’s about the person,” said Rosen, a formerly incarcerated individual who now works for Worth Rises.


Rosen and Robert Willis, who spent 7 years in prison collectively, are part of a national push to improve workforce conditions for prisoners. These two formerly incarcerated men say they understand being held accountable for their crimes, but they say the process should be humane.

“Being dehumanized, not appreciated, and it actually affects you when you return back into society because you just spent the last number of years being you know in slave-like conditions,” said Robert Willis, formerly incarcerated individual and now Justice Advocacy Coordinator for Latino Justice.

A new ACLU report examining prison labor at the state and federal levels shows some states pay prisoners an average of 15 and 52 cents per hour but the state prison systems in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas don’t pay at all for most of its prison work

In a statement to the Washington News Bureau, the Federal Bureau of Prisons said humane treatment is a top priority and that “an inmate’s job assignment shall be made with consideration of the institution’s security and operational needs, and should be consistent with the safekeeping of the inmate and protection of the public.”

Georgia Congresswoman Nikema Williams is leading the effort to remove the slavery clause from the 13th amendment that still allows it as punishment for a crime.

“We’re building towards the future, we’re correcting those things from the past and this is one of those stains of our past that we absolutely need to address, she said.

Congresswoman Williams said she has more than 130 sponsors for the bill in the House which includes some Republican support.

“This an education piece, because I’ll be honest with you, before I came to Congress, I didn’t realize that this was a part of the Constitution,” said Williams. “I’m grateful to be having conversations with you so that we can make sure that people understand that this is still legal in our United States Constitution and that’s why we have to remove it…it’s about making sure that people are aware, and then taking the action to actually do something about it.”

Williams said she will need a two-thirds majority to pass because this is a Constitutional amendment. But Some Republicans aren’t supportive of the measure.

“Requiring convicted, able-bodied criminals, to perform meaningful work is in no way comparable to the atrocity of slave ownership,” said Congressman Ralph Norman (R – South Carolina) in a written statement. “This is another glaring example of how soft on crime the Democrat party has become. Prison is not a bed & breakfast, and it’s not asking too much for convicted criminals to work, especially since the rest of society is shouldered with the massive costs of their incarceration.”

But for Rosen and Willis, they say removing that clause sends a message to the prison system.

“That human rights matter because at the end of the day this is a human rights issue,” said Willis.

The ACLU is also pushing for incarcerated workers to get the same labor protections as other workers which would include earning minimum wage, setting health and safety standards and protection from discrimination.
 
Better go to Congress and tell this bipartisan group of legislators they don't know what they're doing...there is no loophole in the 13th amendment

https://www.yahoo.com/news/group-federal-lawmakers-working-remove-194235460.html
Group of federal lawmakers working to remove slavery loophole in U.S. Constitution

CBS 47 FOX 30
ACTION NEWS JAX

Kirstin Garriss
Fri, June 17, 2022, 3:42 PM

Juneteenth is now a federal holiday marking the end of slavery, but a group of lawmakers says there’s a loophole that has allowed another form of slavery to evolve with forced involuntary labor inside the nation’s prison system.

The ACLU estimates that incarcerated workers produce at least two $2 billion in goods and $9 billion dollars worth of prison maintenance services a year, but those prisoners don’t earn much.

Daniel Rosen said he knows firsthand after serving 6 years in prison.

“You feel like property of the state. A lot prison uniforms say property of that state and it’s not about clothes you’re wearing it’s about the person,” said Rosen, a formerly incarcerated individual who now works for Worth Rises.


Rosen and Robert Willis, who spent 7 years in prison collectively, are part of a national push to improve workforce conditions for prisoners. These two formerly incarcerated men say they understand being held accountable for their crimes, but they say the process should be humane.

“Being dehumanized, not appreciated, and it actually affects you when you return back into society because you just spent the last number of years being you know in slave-like conditions,” said Robert Willis, formerly incarcerated individual and now Justice Advocacy Coordinator for Latino Justice.

A new ACLU report examining prison labor at the state and federal levels shows some states pay prisoners an average of 15 and 52 cents per hour but the state prison systems in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas don’t pay at all for most of its prison work

In a statement to the Washington News Bureau, the Federal Bureau of Prisons said humane treatment is a top priority and that “an inmate’s job assignment shall be made with consideration of the institution’s security and operational needs, and should be consistent with the safekeeping of the inmate and protection of the public.”

Georgia Congresswoman Nikema Williams is leading the effort to remove the slavery clause from the 13th amendment that still allows it as punishment for a crime.

“We’re building towards the future, we’re correcting those things from the past and this is one of those stains of our past that we absolutely need to address, she said.

Congresswoman Williams said she has more than 130 sponsors for the bill in the House which includes some Republican support.

“This an education piece, because I’ll be honest with you, before I came to Congress, I didn’t realize that this was a part of the Constitution,” said Williams. “I’m grateful to be having conversations with you so that we can make sure that people understand that this is still legal in our United States Constitution and that’s why we have to remove it…it’s about making sure that people are aware, and then taking the action to actually do something about it.”

Williams said she will need a two-thirds majority to pass because this is a Constitutional amendment. But Some Republicans aren’t supportive of the measure.

“Requiring convicted, able-bodied criminals, to perform meaningful work is in no way comparable to the atrocity of slave ownership,” said Congressman Ralph Norman (R – South Carolina) in a written statement. “This is another glaring example of how soft on crime the Democrat party has become. Prison is not a bed & breakfast, and it’s not asking too much for convicted criminals to work, especially since the rest of society is shouldered with the massive costs of their incarceration.”

But for Rosen and Willis, they say removing that clause sends a message to the prison system.

“That human rights matter because at the end of the day this is a human rights issue,” said Willis.

The ACLU is also pushing for incarcerated workers to get the same labor protections as other workers which would include earning minimum wage, setting health and safety standards and protection from discrimination.
Don’t worry, Soros DA’s are “reducing incarceration” by letting all of the violent criminals off the hook and out of prison.

If you don’t arrest and convict was a crime committed? I think not.

So there won’t be anyone to force into slave labor soon.
 
Better go to Congress and tell this bipartisan group of legislators they don't know what they're doing...there is no loophole in the 13th amendment

https://www.yahoo.com/news/group-federal-lawmakers-working-remove-194235460.html
Group of federal lawmakers working to remove slavery loophole in U.S. Constitution

CBS 47 FOX 30
ACTION NEWS JAX

Kirstin Garriss
Fri, June 17, 2022, 3:42 PM

Juneteenth is now a federal holiday marking the end of slavery, but a group of lawmakers says there’s a loophole that has allowed another form of slavery to evolve with forced involuntary labor inside the nation’s prison system.

The ACLU estimates that incarcerated workers produce at least two $2 billion in goods and $9 billion dollars worth of prison maintenance services a year, but those prisoners don’t earn much.

Daniel Rosen said he knows firsthand after serving 6 years in prison.

“You feel like property of the state. A lot prison uniforms say property of that state and it’s not about clothes you’re wearing it’s about the person,” said Rosen, a formerly incarcerated individual who now works for Worth Rises.


Rosen and Robert Willis, who spent 7 years in prison collectively, are part of a national push to improve workforce conditions for prisoners. These two formerly incarcerated men say they understand being held accountable for their crimes, but they say the process should be humane.

“Being dehumanized, not appreciated, and it actually affects you when you return back into society because you just spent the last number of years being you know in slave-like conditions,” said Robert Willis, formerly incarcerated individual and now Justice Advocacy Coordinator for Latino Justice.

A new ACLU report examining prison labor at the state and federal levels shows some states pay prisoners an average of 15 and 52 cents per hour but the state prison systems in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas don’t pay at all for most of its prison work

In a statement to the Washington News Bureau, the Federal Bureau of Prisons said humane treatment is a top priority and that “an inmate’s job assignment shall be made with consideration of the institution’s security and operational needs, and should be consistent with the safekeeping of the inmate and protection of the public.”

Georgia Congresswoman Nikema Williams is leading the effort to remove the slavery clause from the 13th amendment that still allows it as punishment for a crime.

“We’re building towards the future, we’re correcting those things from the past and this is one of those stains of our past that we absolutely need to address, she said.

Congresswoman Williams said she has more than 130 sponsors for the bill in the House which includes some Republican support.

“This an education piece, because I’ll be honest with you, before I came to Congress, I didn’t realize that this was a part of the Constitution,” said Williams. “I’m grateful to be having conversations with you so that we can make sure that people understand that this is still legal in our United States Constitution and that’s why we have to remove it…it’s about making sure that people are aware, and then taking the action to actually do something about it.”

Williams said she will need a two-thirds majority to pass because this is a Constitutional amendment. But Some Republicans aren’t supportive of the measure.

“Requiring convicted, able-bodied criminals, to perform meaningful work is in no way comparable to the atrocity of slave ownership,” said Congressman Ralph Norman (R – South Carolina) in a written statement. “This is another glaring example of how soft on crime the Democrat party has become. Prison is not a bed & breakfast, and it’s not asking too much for convicted criminals to work, especially since the rest of society is shouldered with the massive costs of their incarceration.”

But for Rosen and Willis, they say removing that clause sends a message to the prison system.

“That human rights matter because at the end of the day this is a human rights issue,” said Willis.

The ACLU is also pushing for incarcerated workers to get the same labor protections as other workers which would include earning minimum wage, setting health and safety standards and protection from discrimination.
Do you know what bipartisan means?

Here is the list:
Merkley and Williams were joined in the introduction by U.S. Representatives Cori Bush (MO-01), Karen Bass (CA-37), Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC), Henry C. “Hank” Johnson, Jr. (GA-04), Danny K. Davis (IL-07), Jared Huffman (CA-02), Alma S. Adams, Ph.D. (NC-12), André Carson (IN-07), Katherine Clark (MA-05), Emanuel Cleaver, II (MO-05), Bill Foster (IL-11), Ayanna Pressley (MA-07), Bonnie Watson Coleman (NJ-12), Al Green (TX-09), Barbara Lee (CA-13), and Jahana Hayes (CT-05), and U.S. Senators Richard Durbin (D-IL), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Edward J. Markey (D-MA), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Alex Padilla (D-CA), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), and Bernie Sanders (I-VT).
 
Do you know what bipartisan means?

Here is the list:
Merkley and Williams were joined in the introduction by U.S. Representatives Cori Bush (MO-01), Karen Bass (CA-37), Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC), Henry C. “Hank” Johnson, Jr. (GA-04), Danny K. Davis (IL-07), Jared Huffman (CA-02), Alma S. Adams, Ph.D. (NC-12), André Carson (IN-07), Katherine Clark (MA-05), Emanuel Cleaver, II (MO-05), Bill Foster (IL-11), Ayanna Pressley (MA-07), Bonnie Watson Coleman (NJ-12), Al Green (TX-09), Barbara Lee (CA-13), and Jahana Hayes (CT-05), and U.S. Senators Richard Durbin (D-IL), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Edward J. Markey (D-MA), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Alex Padilla (D-CA), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), and Bernie Sanders (I-VT).
Holy crap that’s a who’s who of liberal crazy
 
You watch more Trump videos in a week than I have my entire life. I’d love to back and add up just what you’ve posted in the last few days.

It’s almost like he’s your daddy or something.

trump created a lot of content that shows how incompetent he is...

What's amazing is all of you sycophants all act like you've never seen those videos before

LOL
 
Do you know what bipartisan means?

Here is the list:
Merkley and Williams were joined in the introduction by U.S. Representatives Cori Bush (MO-01), Karen Bass (CA-37), Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC), Henry C. “Hank” Johnson, Jr. (GA-04), Danny K. Davis (IL-07), Jared Huffman (CA-02), Alma S. Adams, Ph.D. (NC-12), André Carson (IN-07), Katherine Clark (MA-05), Emanuel Cleaver, II (MO-05), Bill Foster (IL-11), Ayanna Pressley (MA-07), Bonnie Watson Coleman (NJ-12), Al Green (TX-09), Barbara Lee (CA-13), and Jahana Hayes (CT-05), and U.S. Senators Richard Durbin (D-IL), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Edward J. Markey (D-MA), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Alex Padilla (D-CA), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), and Bernie Sanders (I-VT).
Inmate count list at Bellevue?

 
  • Haha
Reactions: FresnoGator
You watch more Trump videos in a week than I have my entire life. I’d love to back and add up just what you’ve posted in the last few days.

It’s almost like he’s your daddy or something.
Literally….in his head. Might be the most TDS poster that has come across, and that’s saying something. Even most the other TDS posters realize these “hearings” are a Nothingburger.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: Dr. Curmudgeon
Do you know what bipartisan means?

Here is the list:
Merkley and Williams were joined in the introduction by U.S. Representatives Cori Bush (MO-01), Karen Bass (CA-37), Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC), Henry C. “Hank” Johnson, Jr. (GA-04), Danny K. Davis (IL-07), Jared Huffman (CA-02), Alma S. Adams, Ph.D. (NC-12), André Carson (IN-07), Katherine Clark (MA-05), Emanuel Cleaver, II (MO-05), Bill Foster (IL-11), Ayanna Pressley (MA-07), Bonnie Watson Coleman (NJ-12), Al Green (TX-09), Barbara Lee (CA-13), and Jahana Hayes (CT-05), and U.S. Senators Richard Durbin (D-IL), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Edward J. Markey (D-MA), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Alex Padilla (D-CA), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), and Bernie Sanders (I-VT).

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/bipartisan

bipartisan​

[ bahy-pahr-tuh-zuhn ]

adjective
representing, characterized by, or including members from two parties or factions:Government leaders hope to achieve a bipartisan foreign policy.




Is that the entire list of 130 co-sponsors? No, it isn't.
Did you miss Chris Stewart of Utah ?

So, which question would you like to answer?

Do you know what the word bipartisan means or don't you know how to read?
 
He lives rent-free in your mind, Sir.

He doesn't live in my mind...but he certainly does live in the minds of all trumpanzees who do nothing but blabber about the loser of the last election

And we all know that is rent-free living...they have no choice because donald is freeloader con man...got $250 million out of his idiotic supporters AFTER losing the election.

Don't believe me?

Where's trump university now? (shut down)
Where's the legal defense fund (never existed)
USFL? (died because of trump)
trump Casinos? (long gone)
 

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/bipartisan

bipartisan​

[ bahy-pahr-tuh-zuhn ]

adjective
representing, characterized by, or including members from two parties or factions:Government leaders hope to achieve a bipartisan foreign policy.




Is that the entire list of 130 co-sponsors? No, it isn't.
Did you miss Chris Stewart of Utah ?

So, which question would you like to answer?

Do you know what the word bipartisan means or don't you know how to read?
Yes, i certainly do, haha. And having 1 or 2 RINOs does not make something bipartisan, as you claim. It's disingenuous at best and hucksterism at worst ...
 
Holy crap Captain Strawman. Slavery is not legal in the US.

Some prison inmates can be compelled to do "hard labor" as a condition of their incarceration. However, outside of military justice, I don't know that it ever happens.

Some prisoners choose to work jobs that either a) shorten their sentence, b) provide them with some type of on the job training c) fill their days with something other than the monotony of sitting in a cell all day.
Lol bro we still have shotgun squads in Florida.
 
What's really funny is that fatman & curmudgeon immediately took fresno's mistake as "the list"...nothing like mindless partisanship in 2022

trumpanzees are good at that sort of thing
 
  • Wow
Reactions: FresnoGator
@gatorspeed Still waiting on the 5 that died THAT day. Or are you going to admit you either got fooled or lied?
they are LIARS...just remember that, and everything will become clear. Ask yourself WHAT are they doing right now, here. They are DISTRACTING from 9% inflation, a crashing stock market, rates rising so high people will not be able to buy new houses, gas prices that are doubled, 700 Americans left behind in Afghanistan, a supply chain crisis, etc. And they want to talk about TRUMP?? LOLOL Bullc###. I think every time ANY lib socialist does this ANYWHERE, we do NOT fall for the banana in the tailpipe, and post ALL of Brandon's accomplishments!
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly
What's really funny is that fatman & curmudgeon immediately took fresno's mistake as "the list"...nothing like mindless partisanship in 2022

trumpanzees are good at that sort of thing
It was no "mistake", it was a direct quote from the press release you linked, haha.

You are like Obama playing chess, you knock over all of the pieces and strut around like you won ...
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT