ADVERTISEMENT

Thanksgiving coldest on record in the NEast

iu
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
Oh look, this guy is back with his awesome portfolio and his owning of people on the internet. How many have you owned this week, Sparky?
Awww! You're still bitter over my portfolio not looking as effed up as yours. I see that I'm still getting under your thin skin. Your(lame attempt at) insults towards me are still pathetically weak. I can probably see why you're so easily triggered.
 
Awww! You're still bitter over my portfolio not looking as effed up as yours. I see that I'm still getting under your thin skin. Your(lame attempt at) insults towards me are still pathetically weak. I can probably see why you're so easily triggered.

Well, you keep saying that but I’ve yet to see any evidence. So I just assume you’re lying. I picture you as some loser that works at some dead end job that always gets passed over come promotion time. You obviously aren’t very well educated based on the BS websites you keep referencing.

And it’s laughable that someone thats obviously not very bright could get under my skin. I guess that’s another one of ways you “own” people. Seriously, you post like a teenager with all of your ownage and triggered comments. I’m embarrassed for you. Do you talk that way in real life?
 
PS. I got a kick out of reading about the instructors at Lysander. They are all Resisters, preppers, and the founder is a high school dropout and ex Con. Not a scientist in the whole group.

You guys really embarrass yourselves posting such trash.

oh hush @BSC911

I happen to like the Lysander school of warming :D:D
 
Well, you keep saying that but I’ve yet to see any evidence. So I just assume you’re lying. I picture you as some loser that works at some dead end job that always gets passed over come promotion time. You obviously aren’t very well educated based on the BS websites you keep referencing.

And it’s laughable that someone thats obviously not very bright could get under my skin. I guess that’s another one of ways you “own” people. Seriously, you post like a teenager with all of your ownage and triggered comments. I’m embarrassed for you. Do you talk that way in real life?
Is that your response? For someone who brings up laughable yet it's obvious I hurt your feelings when you resort to weak ass teenage responses such as a loser with a dead end job and not well educated. Is that the best you got? I also see your responses to me are limited and selective as I have responded to about 3-4 of your ignorant posts.
 
Is that your response? For someone who brings up laughable yet it's obvious I hurt your feelings when you resort to weak ass teenage responses such as a loser with a dead end job and not well educated. Is that the best you got? I also see your responses to me are limited and selective as I have responded to about 3-4 of your ignorant posts.

It was only a guess. Call it a psychological profile.

Which other posts do you you want me to respond to. Your silly memes? Hardly worthwhile.
 
It was only a guess. Call it a psychological profile.

Which other posts do you you want me to respond to. Your silly memes? Hardly worthwhile.
So I guess the Obama meme, while true, really ticked you off.
 
So I guess the Obama meme, while true, really ticked you off.
To be honest, I didn’t even see it. I never respond to memes because most are just plain dumb and used by people that can’t form a coherent argument.
 
To be honest, I didn’t even see it. I never respond to memes because most are just plain dumb and used by people that can’t form a coherent argument.
No different than your pointless and lame arguments using apple.com and buzzfeed. Got it.
 
To be honest, I didn’t even see it. I never respond to memes because most are just plain dumb and used by people that can’t form a coherent argument.

Feel free to link to any coherent arguments you think you have raised here.

Failure to respond will be taken as an admission that you can't find any.
 
Obama dumps $14 million into real estate that will be under water in 12 years. Obama plays the Gorleone ruse for profit.

Again, when the Medieval Warming returns, I'm all ears.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
oh hush @BSC911

I happen to like the Lysander school of warming :D:D
I like you. You seem to be the only one on here who understands that it’s all a game. The others take this stuff way too seriously. I guess that’s why they are so easily manipulated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
@BSC911



The absolute worst case of professional incompetence and dishonesty is in the area of climate science. Tony Heller has exposed some of the egregious dishonesty of mainstream environmentalists in a video he’s titled “My Gift To Climate Alarmists.” Environmentalists and their political allies attribute the recent increase in deadly forest fires to global warming. However, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service, forest fires reached their peak in the 1930s and have declined by 80% since then. Environmentalists hide the earlier data and make their case for the effects of global warming by showing the public and policymakers data from 1980 that shows an increase in forest fires

Climate scientists claim that rising sea levels are caused by man-made global warming. Historical data from the tide gauge in Lower Manhattan shows that sea levels have been rising from about the time when Abraham Lincoln was president to now. Heller says that sea levels have been rising for about 20,000 years. He points out that anthropologists believe that when the sea level was very low people were able to walk from Siberia to North America.


Hot weather is often claimed to be a result of man-made climate change. Heller presents data showing the number of days in Waverly, Ohio, above 90 degrees. In 1895, there were 73 days above 90 degrees. In 1936, there were 82 days above 90 degrees. Since the 1930s, there has been a downward trend in the number of days above 90 degrees. If climatologists hide data from earlier years and started at 1955, they show an increase in the number of above 90-degree days from eight or nine to 30 or 40. Thus, to deceive us into thinking the climate is getting hotter, environmentalists have selected a starting date that fits their agenda.

You might ask: “Who is Tony Heller? Does he work for big oil?” It turns out that he is a scientist and claims to be a lifelong environmentalist. From what I can tell, he has no vested interests. In that respect, he is different from those who lead the environmental movement, who often either work for or are funded by governments.


Once in a while environmentalists reveal their true agenda. Ottmar Edenhofer, lead author of the IPCC’s fourth summary report released in 2007, speaking in 2010 advised: “One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. Instead, climate change policy is about how we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth.” U.N. climate chief Christiana Figueres said that the true aim of the U.N.’s 2014 Paris climate conference was “to change the (capitalist) economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution.” Christine Stewart, Canada’s former Minister of the Environment said: “No matter if the science is all phony, there are collateral environmental benefits. … Climate change (provides) the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world.” Tim Wirth, former U.S. Undersecretary of State for Global Affairs and the person most responsible for setting up the Kyoto Protocol said: “We’ve got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.”

Not all scientists are dishonest and not all news reporters are leftists with an agenda. But one wonders at the deafening silence where there’s clear, unambiguous evidence. For example, if ocean levels have been rising for some 20,000 years, why do scientists allow environmentalists to get away with the claim that it’s a result of man-made global warming? Why aren’t there any reporters to highlight leftist statements such as those by Edenhofer, Stewart and others who want to ride global warming as a means to defeat capitalism and usher in socialism and communism? I would prefer to think that the silence of so many scientists represent their fears as opposed to their going along with the environmental extremist agenda.
 
Last edited:
The mistake you make is assuming @BSC911 is open to learning and getting smarter on this topic.

He is not. He rejects anything that doesn't support his belief that cow farts will make the planet too warm for human life in just 12 years.

He sees a picture of a glacier breaking apart and thinks it proves the man-made climate change hoax. While a critical thinker sees the same picture and asks "But that happens every summer, doesnt it?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatordad3
@BSC911



The absolute worst case of professional incompetence and dishonesty is in the area of climate science. Tony Heller has exposed some of the egregious dishonesty of mainstream environmentalists in a video he’s titled “My Gift To Climate Alarmists.” Environmentalists and their political allies attribute the recent increase in deadly forest fires to global warming. However, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service, forest fires reached their peak in the 1930s and have declined by 80% since then. Environmentalists hide the earlier data and make their case for the effects of global warming by showing the public and policymakers data from 1980 that shows an increase in forest fires

Climate scientists claim that rising sea levels are caused by man-made global warming. Historical data from the tide gauge in Lower Manhattan shows that sea levels have been rising from about the time when Abraham Lincoln was president to now. Heller says that sea levels have been rising for about 20,000 years. He points out that anthropologists believe that when the sea level was very low people were able to walk from Siberia to North America.


Hot weather is often claimed to be a result of man-made climate change. Heller presents data showing the number of days in Waverly, Ohio, above 90 degrees. In 1895, there were 73 days above 90 degrees. In 1936, there were 82 days above 90 degrees. Since the 1930s, there has been a downward trend in the number of days above 90 degrees. If climatologists hide data from earlier years and started at 1955, they show an increase in the number of above 90-degree days from eight or nine to 30 or 40. Thus, to deceive us into thinking the climate is getting hotter, environmentalists have selected a starting date that fits their agenda.

You might ask: “Who is Tony Heller? Does he work for big oil?” It turns out that he is a scientist and claims to be a lifelong environmentalist. From what I can tell, he has no vested interests. In that respect, he is different from those who lead the environmental movement, who often either work for or are funded by governments.


Once in a while environmentalists reveal their true agenda. Ottmar Edenhofer, lead author of the IPCC’s fourth summary report released in 2007, speaking in 2010 advised: “One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. Instead, climate change policy is about how we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth.” U.N. climate chief Christiana Figueres said that the true aim of the U.N.’s 2014 Paris climate conference was “to change the (capitalist) economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution.” Christine Stewart, Canada’s former Minister of the Environment said: “No matter if the science is all phony, there are collateral environmental benefits. … Climate change (provides) the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world.” Tim Wirth, former U.S. Undersecretary of State for Global Affairs and the person most responsible for setting up the Kyoto Protocol said: “We’ve got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.”

Not all scientists are dishonest and not all news reporters are leftists with an agenda. But one wonders at the deafening silence where there’s clear, unambiguous evidence. For example, if ocean levels have been rising for some 20,000 years, why do scientists allow environmentalists to get away with the claim that it’s a result of man-made global warming? Why aren’t there any reporters to highlight leftist statements such as those by Edenhofer, Stewart and others who want to ride global warming as a means to defeat capitalism and usher in socialism and communism? I would prefer to think that the silence of so many scientists represent their fears as opposed to their going along with the environmental extremist agenda.

I hope this one is better than the usual ones you guys post. Busy right now but will check it out later.
 

OK. I watched it. It’s not bad. Other than Stossells smarmy voice, and pejorative terms like Alarmist and Government Control, at least they some real scientists on there. What I took was.

1. Yes, the earth is warming
2. Yes, the seas are rising
3. Yes, CD is a greenhouse gas.
4. We will adapt

OK, fine. I agree with that. And I agree that some may be exaggerating the effects and timing of CC. But it seems disingenuous to say we will adapt but then criticize the government for wanting to do something about it. Some of the arguments were extremely weak, like comparing Holland to Miami.

But at least the panel recognizes that is a real thing, unlike some of the nutters on here.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DGlockUF
OK. I watched it. It’s not bad. Other than Stossells smarmy voice, and pejorative terms like Alarmist and Government Control, at least they some real scientists on there. What I took was.

1. Yes, the earth is warming
2. Yes, the seas are rising
3. Yes, CD is a greenhouse gas.
4. We will adapt

OK, fine. I agree with that. And I agree that some may be exaggerating the effects and timing of CC. But it seems disingenuous to say we will adapt but then criticize the government for wanting to do something about it. Some of the arguments were extremely weak, like comparing Holland to Miami.

But at least the panel recognizes that is a real thing, unlike some of the nutters on here.

Im not a nutter. I’m a denier :eek::D

Hoax
 
nail, younger daughter flew from Denver to San Diego yesterday. Good thing she didn't try today. Denver is undergoing severe global cooling.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: gatordad3
nail, younger daughter flew from Denver to San Diego yesterday. Good thing she didn't try today. Denver is undergoing severe global cooling.

Sunny

state run CBS local tells me they have deployed the national guard to look for @BSC911 stuck in a 6 foot snow drift

https://denver.cbslocal.com/2019/11/26/colorado-national-guard-snow-response-winter-
storm/





The Winter Storm Warning continues until 2 p.m. Tuesday with another 3-5 inches expected, on top of what fell overnight Monday into Tuesday, before the snow stops.

The National Weather Service advises, “Conditions will NOT be favorable for the busy holiday travel period leading up to, during, and after Thanksgiving, especially in the mountains.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatordad3
Sunny

state run CBS local tells me they have deployed the national guard to look for @BSC911 stuck in a 6 foot snow drift

https://denver.cbslocal.com/2019/11/26/colorado-national-guard-snow-response-winter-
storm/





The Winter Storm Warning continues until 2 p.m. Tuesday with another 3-5 inches expected, on top of what fell overnight Monday into Tuesday, before the snow stops.

The National Weather Service advises, “Conditions will NOT be favorable for the busy holiday travel period leading up to, during, and after Thanksgiving, especially in the mountains.”
I’m spending Thanksgiving in Florida. I’ll be wearing shorts. I hope that helps.

Newsflash. Denver get cold in the winter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
I’m spending Thanksgiving in Florida. I’ll be wearing shorts. I hope that helps.

Newsflash. Denver get cold in the winter.

So wearing jorts on Thanksgiving in the hottest state in the US is your 'proof' that man made climate change is real?
 
I’m spending Thanksgiving in Florida. I’ll be wearing shorts. I hope that helps.

Newsflash. Denver get cold in the winter.
Weather in Florida has always fluctuated during the winter season. The simple reason why Florida residents occasionally wear shorts year round.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT