ADVERTISEMENT

Ron DeSantis stands no chance against a political barbarian like Donald Trump...

600k to 1.5 million.

Per this study conducted by the CDC commissioned by President Obama.

So, you believe there were more defensive gun uses than actual gun crimes? Between 1,600+ and 4,100+ EVERY DAY? We'd be hearing about them all the time, right? Those numbers defy common sense.

Where do those numbers originate? They survey gun owners. What do you think they're going to say?

It'd be like surveying BLM people about how many times they've experienced racism. What do you think they're going to say? You think those totals would be remotely accurate?


Note: I'm not saying there aren't any defensive uses. I know there are. But those numbers are greatly exaggerated for obvious reasons.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: EvilWayz
So, you believe there were more defensive gun uses than actual gun crimes? Between 1,600+ and 4,100+ EVERY DAY? We'd be hearing about them all the time, right? Those numbers defy common sense.
Who would tell you about them? The same media that vilifies guns and 'gun nuts' is going to report defensive uses?

LOL ok.
 
This is exactly what Trump needs to do attack RINOS and RATS not conservatives

CPAC speech

"We are never going back to the party of Paul Ryan and Karl Rove and Jeb Bush,” Trump said.

” Trump says before him the GOP was ruled by freaks: never going back to the party of Paul Ryan
@grandhavendiddy note the excellent messaging and discipline from President Trump: No need to attack DeSantis and Haley at CPAC. Trump knows the CPAC audience is smarter than the average dem/RINO, so he can just make the case that the RINOs are bad, then let the audience decide if they think DeSantis and Haley are aligned with them.
 
So, you believe there were more defensive gun uses than actual gun crimes? Between 1,600+ and 4,100+ EVERY DAY? We'd be hearing about them all the time, right? Those numbers defy common sense.

Where do those numbers originate? They survey gun owners. What do you think they're going to say?

It'd be like surveying BLM people about how many times they've experienced racism. What do you think they're going to say? You think those totals would be remotely accurate?


Note: I'm not saying there aren't any defensive uses. I know there are. But those numbers are greatly exaggerated for obvious reasons.
I think the key componet you are missing is that I dont have to excuse my gun ownership to you or anyone else. Its the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Needs. Where the rubber meets the road "gun nuts" are not going to turn over their firearms peacefully. So whats your next move?
 
I think the key componet you are missing is that I dont have to excuse my gun ownership to you or anyone else. Its the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Needs. Where the rubber meets the road "gun nuts" are not going to turn over their firearms peacefully. So whats your next move?
So you recognize those defensive use numbers are ridiculous.
 
So you recognize those defensive use numbers are ridiculous.
I dont follow any of the statistics. I am probably what you would consider to be a gun nut. I dont own guns because of the statistics. I have a God given right to own them, I ahve a God given right to defend myself, and I have zero faith in the state to protect my family.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Capt Ron 1
I dont follow any of the statistics. I am probably what you would consider to be a gun nut. I dont own guns because of the statistics. I have a God given right to own them, I ahve a God given right to defend myself, and I have zero faith in the state to protect my family.
I respect your honesty and your right to have that opinion. You don't really care how many people die....you love your guns.

That's what gun fanatics need to be saying instead of all the BS about the constitution and ridiculous 'logic' trying to defend guns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: emekz1
So, you believe there were more defensive gun uses than actual gun crimes? Between 1,600+ and 4,100+ EVERY DAY? We'd be hearing about them all the time, right? Those numbers defy common sense.

Where do those numbers originate? They survey gun owners. What do you think they're going to say?

It'd be like surveying BLM people about how many times they've experienced racism. What do you think they're going to say? You think those totals would be remotely accurate?


Note: I'm not saying there aren't any defensive uses. I know there are. But those numbers are greatly exaggerated for obvious reasons.
I'm at Walmart and a kid comes up to me and demands my wallet.

I draw my gun. Kid sees gun and hauls ass.

In your esteemed opinion is that a defensive gun use?

There's a crime committed a couple times a minute. There's 90 million gun owners. Even using the lowest number, it's completely plausible.

The CDC compiled that report from multiple studies. I very much doubt anyone who claims to be a scientist is going to take a bunch of gun fondlers at their word especially when president Obama was the one wanting the study to use against us.

The CDC is hardly a pro gun institution.
 
Last edited:
I respect your honesty and your right to have that opinion. You don't really care how many people die....you love your guns.

That's what gun fanatics need to be saying instead of all the BS about the constitution and ridiculous 'logic' trying to defend guns.
You think I'm a 'gun nut' and I've never owned a gun in my life. You are trying to project your own close mindedness onto others.

As I recall, you also questioned why anyone should pay any special attention to the United States Constitution.
 
I'm at Walmart and a kid comes up to me and demands my wallet.

I draw my gun. Kid sees gun and hauls ass.

In your esteemed opinion is that a defensive gun use?

The CDC compiled that report from multiple studies.

The CDC is hardly a pro gun institution.
Of course that would be a legitimate defensive gun use but thousands of such events every day? As Pedo Joe would say "come on, man!"

Surveying gun owners is obviously going to result in unreliable numbers. No different than surveying any other group with an agenda.

Survey peta members about how many animals they've saved. You think that would be remotely accurate?
 
Of course that would be a legitimate defensive gun use but thousands of such events every day? As Pedo Joe would say "come on, man!"
How many times are guns fired every day that are illegally owned and with intent to do harm? Think we need some additional context here.
 
You think I'm a 'gun nut' and I've never owned a gun in my life. You are trying to project your own close mindedness onto others.

As I recall, you also questioned why anyone should pay any special attention to the United States Constitution.
I'm saying the constitution doesn't affect how gun nuts view guns in any way. It's simply referenced because they see it as defending guns. Like a convenient crutch.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: EvilWayz
Of course that would be a legitimate defensive gun use but thousands of such events every day? As Pedo Joe would say "come on, man!"

Surveying gun owners is obviously going to result in unreliable numbers. No different than surveying any other group with an agenda.

Survey peta members about how many animals they've saved. You think that would be remotely accurate?
You've missed the point. The majority of dgu go unreported.

Did you even read that dry ass document to discover their methodology?
 
How many times are guns fired every day that are illegally owned and with intent to do harm? Think we need some additional context here.
That's very difficult to research. You can find a lot about death and injury by firearms but not much about general gun crime. I think I've seen estimates in the mid hundred thousands before.
 
But they don't worship guns because the constitution says so.
Again, you have no idea what their thought process is.

Guns will always be an emotional issue for you. People like you will always believe more gun control and fewer guns means fewer deaths, despite the fact that gun violence INCREASES the vast majority of times when gun control is pushed.

If you could think logically about guns, you could see that. But this is an emotional issue for you, and always will be, I fear.
 
So you think RDS should run to a microphone whenever a RINO or a Lib endorses him or just says something that potentially favors him?
I think right now there is a perception among some Trump supporters that DeSantis wants and encourages the support of RINOs like Ryan and Bush.

I'm fine with DeSantis letting that perception permeate if he wants by not addressing it. I bet Trump is too.
 



I doubt DeSantis will be able to overcome Trump even with a huge war chest from those Bush and Paul Ryan connected billionaires.
 
  • Like
Reactions: emekz1
I think right now there is a perception among some Trump supporters that DeSantis wants and encourages the support of RINOs like Ryan and Bush.

I'm fine with DeSantis letting that perception permeate if he wants by not addressing it. I bet Trump is too.

This has a "did Trump reject Duke's endorsement today" feel to it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldmom
But they don't worship guns because the constitution says so.

I have several guns. I've yet to worship any of them.

You don't believe that guns are used as often as claimed in defensive purposes? Fine.

You do believe that guns are used for offensive purposes as often as claimed??? Hmmm....

The vast majority of gun deaths are suicide. You'd be more comfortable if they used a rope or pills???
 
  • Like
Reactions: Capt Ron 1
DeSantis deserves everything coming his way for having those crooks setting up his campaign. It is hilarious Murdoch and company at Fox News are dumb enough to keep bringing Karl Rove and company on air to rip Trump and praise DeSantis though. Next think you know those idiots will probably have Mitt Romney on air praising DeSantis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: emekz1
DeSantis deserves everything coming his way for having those crooks setting up his campaign. It is hilarious Murdoch and company at Fox News are dumb enough to keep bringing Karl Rove and company on air to rip Trump and praise DeSantis though. Next think you know those idiots will probably have Mitt Romney on air praising DeSantis.

If DeSantis beats Trump in the primary (not a prediction, a hypothetical), will you vote for him in the general?
 
I'm not the one asking for proof and then dismissing it.

I dont have to be open minded. I'm right.

You've always been a retard on this particular subject I don't know why I bothered.
You don't have to be open minded because you're right? :D

That's a keeper!
 
Yes. It doesn't matter if there's zero dgus. The second amendment isn't about self defense. You're trying a bullshit end run around something you don't like.
The second amendment was and still is the way for the masses to protect their Constitutional rights from government intrusion. The founding fathers not only knew this but lived it. It's neither self defense nor hunting rights. "A well regulated militia". There's a reason no nation has invaded us before.

red-dawn-wolverines.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldmom
The second amendment was and still is the way for the masses to protect their Constitutional rights from government intrusion. The founding fathers not only knew this but lived it. It's neither self defense nor hunting rights. "A well regulated militia". There's a reason no nation has invaded us before.

red-dawn-wolverines.gif
Britain has but we know how that turned out.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT