These goobers also think Trump supporters here are paid for by the DNC. We aren't talking Mensa candidates here.Gun nuts? What the hell are you talking about?? Tell me, how do I know if I am in a gun cult?
These goobers also think Trump supporters here are paid for by the DNC. We aren't talking Mensa candidates here.Gun nuts? What the hell are you talking about?? Tell me, how do I know if I am in a gun cult?
So, you believe there were more defensive gun uses than actual gun crimes? Between 1,600+ and 4,100+ EVERY DAY? We'd be hearing about them all the time, right? Those numbers defy common sense.600k to 1.5 million.
Per this study conducted by the CDC commissioned by President Obama.
Priorities for Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence | The National Academies Press
Read online, download a free PDF, or order a copy in print or as an eBook.nap.nationalacademies.org
Who would tell you about them? The same media that vilifies guns and 'gun nuts' is going to report defensive uses?So, you believe there were more defensive gun uses than actual gun crimes? Between 1,600+ and 4,100+ EVERY DAY? We'd be hearing about them all the time, right? Those numbers defy common sense.
@grandhavendiddy note the excellent messaging and discipline from President Trump: No need to attack DeSantis and Haley at CPAC. Trump knows the CPAC audience is smarter than the average dem/RINO, so he can just make the case that the RINOs are bad, then let the audience decide if they think DeSantis and Haley are aligned with them.This is exactly what Trump needs to do attack RINOS and RATS not conservatives
CPAC speech
"We are never going back to the party of Paul Ryan and Karl Rove and Jeb Bush,” Trump said.
” Trump says before him the GOP was ruled by freaks: never going back to the party of Paul Ryan
Thousands a day? You'd hear it from non-MSM sources all the time. No way the MSM could even begin to cover up such numbers.Who would tell you about them? The same media that vilifies guns and 'gun nuts' is going to report defensive uses?
LOL ok.
I think the key componet you are missing is that I dont have to excuse my gun ownership to you or anyone else. Its the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Needs. Where the rubber meets the road "gun nuts" are not going to turn over their firearms peacefully. So whats your next move?So, you believe there were more defensive gun uses than actual gun crimes? Between 1,600+ and 4,100+ EVERY DAY? We'd be hearing about them all the time, right? Those numbers defy common sense.
Where do those numbers originate? They survey gun owners. What do you think they're going to say?
It'd be like surveying BLM people about how many times they've experienced racism. What do you think they're going to say? You think those totals would be remotely accurate?
Note: I'm not saying there aren't any defensive uses. I know there are. But those numbers are greatly exaggerated for obvious reasons.
So you recognize those defensive use numbers are ridiculous.I think the key componet you are missing is that I dont have to excuse my gun ownership to you or anyone else. Its the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Needs. Where the rubber meets the road "gun nuts" are not going to turn over their firearms peacefully. So whats your next move?
I dont follow any of the statistics. I am probably what you would consider to be a gun nut. I dont own guns because of the statistics. I have a God given right to own them, I ahve a God given right to defend myself, and I have zero faith in the state to protect my family.So you recognize those defensive use numbers are ridiculous.
I do hear about it all the time. Guess we get our information from different sources.Thousands a day? You'd hear it from non-MSM sources all the time. No way the MSM could even begin to cover up such numbers.
I respect your honesty and your right to have that opinion. You don't really care how many people die....you love your guns.I dont follow any of the statistics. I am probably what you would consider to be a gun nut. I dont own guns because of the statistics. I have a God given right to own them, I ahve a God given right to defend myself, and I have zero faith in the state to protect my family.
I'm at Walmart and a kid comes up to me and demands my wallet.So, you believe there were more defensive gun uses than actual gun crimes? Between 1,600+ and 4,100+ EVERY DAY? We'd be hearing about them all the time, right? Those numbers defy common sense.
Where do those numbers originate? They survey gun owners. What do you think they're going to say?
It'd be like surveying BLM people about how many times they've experienced racism. What do you think they're going to say? You think those totals would be remotely accurate?
Note: I'm not saying there aren't any defensive uses. I know there are. But those numbers are greatly exaggerated for obvious reasons.
You think I'm a 'gun nut' and I've never owned a gun in my life. You are trying to project your own close mindedness onto others.I respect your honesty and your right to have that opinion. You don't really care how many people die....you love your guns.
That's what gun fanatics need to be saying instead of all the BS about the constitution and ridiculous 'logic' trying to defend guns.
Of course that would be a legitimate defensive gun use but thousands of such events every day? As Pedo Joe would say "come on, man!"I'm at Walmart and a kid comes up to me and demands my wallet.
I draw my gun. Kid sees gun and hauls ass.
In your esteemed opinion is that a defensive gun use?
The CDC compiled that report from multiple studies.
The CDC is hardly a pro gun institution.
How many times are guns fired every day that are illegally owned and with intent to do harm? Think we need some additional context here.Of course that would be a legitimate defensive gun use but thousands of such events every day? As Pedo Joe would say "come on, man!"
I'm saying the constitution doesn't affect how gun nuts view guns in any way. It's simply referenced because they see it as defending guns. Like a convenient crutch.You think I'm a 'gun nut' and I've never owned a gun in my life. You are trying to project your own close mindedness onto others.
As I recall, you also questioned why anyone should pay any special attention to the United States Constitution.
You've missed the point. The majority of dgu go unreported.Of course that would be a legitimate defensive gun use but thousands of such events every day? As Pedo Joe would say "come on, man!"
Surveying gun owners is obviously going to result in unreliable numbers. No different than surveying any other group with an agenda.
Survey peta members about how many animals they've saved. You think that would be remotely accurate?
How could you possibly know what impacts their thinking?I'm saying the constitution doesn't affect how gun nuts view guns in any way.
That's very difficult to research. You can find a lot about death and injury by firearms but not much about general gun crime. I think I've seen estimates in the mid hundred thousands before.How many times are guns fired every day that are illegally owned and with intent to do harm? Think we need some additional context here.
That's because you don't under how the bill of rights works.I'm saying the constitution doesn't affect how gun nuts view guns in any way. It's simply referenced because they see it as defending guns. Like a convenient crutch.
But they don't worship guns because the constitution says so.How could you possibly know what impacts their thinking?
Believe it or not, some Americans actually believe in the Constitution and what it stands for.
Your mind is made up. No point talking to you further about it.But they don't worship guns because the constitution says so.
You seem pretty open minded about it.Your mind is made up. No point talking to you further about it.
I'm not the one asking for proof and then dismissing it.You seem pretty open minded about it.![]()
Again, you have no idea what their thought process is.But they don't worship guns because the constitution says so.
I think right now there is a perception among some Trump supporters that DeSantis wants and encourages the support of RINOs like Ryan and Bush.So you think RDS should run to a microphone whenever a RINO or a Lib endorses him or just says something that potentially favors him?
I think right now there is a perception among some Trump supporters that DeSantis wants and encourages the support of RINOs like Ryan and Bush.
I'm fine with DeSantis letting that perception permeate if he wants by not addressing it. I bet Trump is too.
More like "Did you stop beating your wife yet. "This has a "did Trump reject Duke's endorsement today" feel to it.
But they don't worship guns because the constitution says so.
DeSantis deserves everything coming his way for having those crooks setting up his campaign. It is hilarious Murdoch and company at Fox News are dumb enough to keep bringing Karl Rove and company on air to rip Trump and praise DeSantis though. Next think you know those idiots will probably have Mitt Romney on air praising DeSantis.
If DeSantis beats Trump in the primary (not a prediction, a hypothetical), will you vote for him in the general?
Yes but I never compromise in a primary.
You don't have to be open minded because you're right?I'm not the one asking for proof and then dismissing it.
I dont have to be open minded. I'm right.
You've always been a retard on this particular subject I don't know why I bothered.
Yes. It doesn't matter if there's zero dgus. The second amendment isn't about self defense. You're trying a bullshit end run around something you don't like.You don't have to be open minded because you're right?
That's a keeper!
The second amendment was and still is the way for the masses to protect their Constitutional rights from government intrusion. The founding fathers not only knew this but lived it. It's neither self defense nor hunting rights. "A well regulated militia". There's a reason no nation has invaded us before.Yes. It doesn't matter if there's zero dgus. The second amendment isn't about self defense. You're trying a bullshit end run around something you don't like.
Britain has but we know how that turned out.The second amendment was and still is the way for the masses to protect their Constitutional rights from government intrusion. The founding fathers not only knew this but lived it. It's neither self defense nor hunting rights. "A well regulated militia". There's a reason no nation has invaded us before.
![]()
And so it began..... now our biggest enemy by far lives amongst us.Britain has but we know how that turned out.