Racism/Sexism continues in Biden Admin
- Thread starter jfegaly
- Start date
To be fair, we already knew who they were. The guys that put politics above all in their lives.
Much of SC nominations are based off tradition and precedent. A few dems here have tried to excuse Hiden's racist pick of Jackson by claiming RINO Bush Sr did the same thing with picking Thomas.
Actually, he didn't. Thomas was a black judge REPLACING a black judge. Jackson is a black judge replacing a white judge.
But.....Jackson also clerked under Breyer, so she checks both boxes. Just like Kavanaugh was picked cause he clerked under the judge he replaced, Kennedy. And ACB was a woman replacing a woman.
But the Hiden pick is different cause he said all along he would be picking a black woman. It's a racist pick and every non-racist can point that out without deflecting.
The racists and their enablers are the ones defending the move. As we see ITT.
You sir are a complete moron. It is best you quit now that you have revealed how ignorant you truly are. Good bye
That’s not the subject. I suggest you look at the title of the post again.
one of us is on topic, one isn’t.
Hint: it’s not you.
Your question on Trump was already answered ITT. How many times do you have to read something before you comprehend it?
Go back and read everything again until you do. It will be good practice for you.
Last edited:
Tomorrow @kalimgoodman's son, who loves basketball, comes home from middle school bawling.
Dad asks what happened? Son says during PE none of his teammates would pick him for their basketball team because they didn't like the color of his skin.
How would @kalimgoodman react? The exact opposite of how he's reacting here when Hiden does the same thing.
See the dems know right from wrong. They just put their politics above all in their lives.
Question, did it bother you when Trump made a "sexist" announcement that he was picking a woman?
Why would I include her? I have no idea what the background is regarding her pick. I just stated that SC judge nominations are often influenced by the judges they are replacing and offered examples of both dems and republicans doing this.
Curious that this is what you choose to comment on in this thread.
You guys complain about Biden promising to nominate a Black woman to SCOTUS. Yet Reagan promised to nominate a woman to SCOTUS. How can you be bothered by one and not the other?
And that's a sexist pick, just like Hiden is making a racist one.
What are you confused about here?
But it doesn't work on me, cause I don't let my politics run my life and decide my morals.
Notice @Uniformed_ReRe hasn't once condemned Hiden for picking a judge cause she was black.
If Trump had said he was picking ACB cause she was white, he would have been the first one here catching the vapors.
But now he can't say anything cause he didn't when Hiden did the same thing.
I can, cause I don't let my politics run my life. Easy.
Oh I know all that. (Insert pronoun) thought they could catch you in a gotcha question, you’re obviously a lot smarter than that.
I still don’t know if ReRe is a he/she him/her it/them or any of the other kazillion combos
What I do know is BSC identifies as a merkin
It’s like they don’t even read the thread or something, and think others must be hypocrites because they are.
#projecting
How bad does your head hurt from banging it against a wall? I've been there and come across the same wall. Very painful.
Lol. Well it’s not quite as bad once you know he is an admitted troll.
That's precisely what it is.
One of the most revealing things ever posted here came from @LizardGrad89 right after the election when he was furious that we wanted to audit the results in states where there was obvious fraud.
He posted what he thought was the gotcha post of all time: "Have you guys ever considered what happens if you audit and find out that TRUMP cheated?"
He thought that would immediately shut us up. Because he assumed we would want to bury cheatng if Trump did it, just like he wanted to bury cheating Hiden did.
We want a fair election. They want to win the election.
'Count every vote!'
this has not been a good thread for our buddy @kalimgoodman.🤭😭😭
That's why I don't understand this "anger". It's so immature. Reality is they don't care, they just want something to whine about.
So dems have gone from blindly defending racism, to now they are trying to shame the people who are pointing out the racism?
@Uniformed_ReRe tell me again how this isn't pure evil.
As long as you are intellectually consistent about calling a spade a spade, regardless of party, then fair enough.
Speaking of consistent, why are you more worried about what I think about Sandra Day O Connor than you are about Hiden making a racist pick?
I mean, we all know why, you needed a change of topic. Just like @kalimgoodman does.
Is it really that hard for you guys to just admit your guy is a racist? Is it really that hard for you both to call him out on that?
Rhetorical question. Carry on.
Brandon doubled up on Reagan's sexist pick.
Not to be outdone, he went racist and sexist....
Not to be outdone, he went racist and sexist....
I’m not worried about either. I’m just checking for intellectual consistency. If Hiden’s nomination is racist and sexist then Reagan’s nomination was sexist. Either both are true or neither are true.
I repeat. This thread is doing it’s job. Now everyone knows.
I guess that we'll have to see if Brandon's choice is a competent as SDO was....
(the proof is in the pudding, or putting...)
Ok then. Balls in your court
I am looking for someone to fill a management position in one of my businesses. I am only taking applications from white males. You cool with that?
do you need a fry cook? I know someone who maybe interested 🤔🤭😎
We are on the same page. I truly don't care about either. I just want them to be just as mad about other presidents doing it. I even searched the forum for when RGB died and not find one thread that was created criticizing Trump for promising a woman, surprising right?
I also don't think it's sexist or racist. I truly believe it's about adding diversity, which I'm ok with. Especially since the courts had zero black woman in 200+ years. Time to break that barrier.
8 months...not a number of years.
This and the number of her decisions being overturned are the only glaring issues with her nomination.
Yes, it bothered me. I've said so more than once on this board.
