ADVERTISEMENT

In before the gun confiscation NUTS.....

Gun crimes?

In the state of Florida possessing a firearm during the commission of a felony is a sentence enhancement.

You'd have to parse what you mean specifically, as a gun crime can be anything from unlawful possession of a firearm by a prohibited person to brandishing.
I meant gun crimes of aggression......using a gun to attempt a crime. But however you count it, I'd think actual homicides would be a smallish part.
 
I meant gun crimes of aggression......using a gun to attempt a crime. But however you count it, I'd think actual homicides would be a smallish part.
Most definitely.

Most armed robbers don't shoot their victims.

"Deadly weapon" crimes would include crimes where a firearm was present but not fired, injuries by firearm, as well accidents deemed to be rooted in negligence.

I can honestly say I don't know where to find these statistics in one place, I imagine Dr. Kleck or someone doing research in that vein might have a published study.
 
I just know how it's going to go.

I'll list some number of innocent people killed by gunfire.

You're response will be that guns didn't do that because they are inanimate.

You gun cult friends will then pat you on the back for straightening me out with the 'facts'.

Did I miss something?
Nw you seem to understand the TRUTH...even though it makes you look so silly. I have a test for you. Go borrow someone's gun and put it where no one can touch it. Watch it VERY close. Then tell me how long it takes to do something bad. Please stay there without taking you eyes off of it. Guns are sneaky, you know......
 
There's no point in trying to answer your question. I understand you don't think guns can hurt anyone because they're inanimate.
No reasonable person believes guns can't hurt someone.

In fact, the fact they can is why they shouldn't be banned.

But if we banned everything that could hurt people we couldn't drive nails, chop an onion, fertilize our lawns, have painkillers, play baseball or golf, etc.

The point that you refuse to concede but fully understand is that a gun is incapable of causing harm by itself. It takes a person to decide to load, aim and pull the trigger.
 
Theo will argue about guns on the sports board in 3...2...1....

He even started gun arguments on other threads that have nothing to do with firearm discussions.
Must be some sort of a masochist because the only thing that KEEPS happening with Theo in these threads...is he gets slapped around.
 
The point that you refuse to concede but fully understand is that a gun is incapable of causing harm by itself. It takes a person to decide to load, aim and pull the trigger.
Bingo. That's why if you want to solve the gun violence problem, you focus on the PERSON (criminal) not the tool (gun).

Theo either knows this and he's trolling for some bizarre reason, or he truly thinks simply removing guns from the equation also eliminates gun violence. Simple logic should tell him that's clearly not going to happen, but maybe he's simply so emotional about guns that he can't think straight.

Either way, it's bizarre behavior to those of us that actually want to see gun violence decreased. He should be on the same side as us, yet we are the 'gun nuts', for some reason. Even those of us that don't own a gun.
 
No reasonable person believes guns can't hurt someone.

In fact, the fact they can is why they shouldn't be banned.

But if we banned everything that could hurt people we couldn't drive nails, chop an onion, fertilize our lawns, have painkillers, play baseball or golf, etc.

The point that you refuse to concede but fully understand is that a gun is incapable of causing harm by itself. It takes a person to decide to load, aim and pull the trigger.
One day Theo is gonna find himself on the losing end of a shuffleboard game lawsuit where the puck went amuck. 😂 That puck didn't just push itself. 😂
 
No reasonable person believes guns can't hurt someone.

In fact, the fact they can is why they shouldn't be banned.

But if we banned everything that could hurt people we couldn't drive nails, chop an onion, fertilize our lawns, have painkillers, play baseball or golf, etc.

The point that you refuse to concede but fully understand is that a gun is incapable of causing harm by itself. It takes a person to decide to load, aim and pull the trigger.
I agree but some here don't.

For maybe the hundredth time.....I don't want to ban guns. Not many people do. Banning guns is not something you really need to worry about despite what the gun companies tell you.

Gee, why don't we ban knives or hammers or whatever.......dumb. Very dumb.

Obviously, a gun sitting by itself isn't going to commit a crime but that's meaningless. A hand grenade sitting in a closet isn't going to cause damage but everyone fully recognizes that hand grenades are dangerous weapons and shouldn't be freely disbursed.
 
I agree but some here don't.

For maybe the hundredth time.....I don't want to ban guns. Not many people do. Banning guns is not something you really need to worry about despite what the gun companies tell you.

Gee, why don't we ban knives or hammers or whatever.......dumb. Very dumb.

Obviously, a gun sitting by itself isn't going to commit a crime but that's meaningless. A hand grenade sitting in a closet isn't going to cause damage but everyone fully recognizes that hand grenades are dangerous weapons and shouldn't be freely disbursed.
You’ve created this “gun company boogeyman”.

Where are you seeing all of these comms from ANY gun company?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BamaFan1137
You’ve created this “gun company boogeyman”.

Where are you seeing all of these comms from ANY gun company?
Have you ever heard of the gun lobby? The NRA? All fighting for the financial benefit of the gun companies.

Where do you think their money comes from?
 
I agree but some here don't.

For maybe the hundredth time.....I don't want to ban guns. Not many people do. Banning guns is not something you really need to worry about despite what the gun companies tell you.

Gee, why don't we ban knives or hammers or whatever.......dumb. Very dumb.

Obviously, a gun sitting by itself isn't going to commit a crime but that's meaningless. A hand grenade sitting in a closet isn't going to cause damage but everyone fully recognizes that hand grenades are dangerous weapons and shouldn't be freely disbursed.



Such an IDIOTIC comparison...but am I surprised? I can tell you many ways a hang grenade IS dangerous. But a gun is NOT. ANYONE saying different is a boob. I have had from 1 gun to 50 at times this past 60 years or so. NEVEDR, EVER has one of my guns hurt anyone. Now I have shot birds, and some other animals...and they died. My gun, being an intimate object did NOT hurt those things. I did. If you used HALF of your energy (if you were REALLY worried about gun violence..which you are SO FOS..because you are NOT) understanding and helping with the REAL problem..you may do some good. With whst you do here you just make a fool of yourself. If you raised helll when liberal prosecutors refused to charge violent criminals and demanded they stay in jail where they belong..you THEN would be helping. But you choose to bark at a piece of steel that just does what someone makes it do. Guns do NOT have brains, son.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatordad3
Have you ever heard of the gun lobby? The NRA? All fighting for the financial benefit of the gun companies.

Where do you think their money comes from?
And how many times in the past month have you
1) Rec’d a call from NRA?
2) Rec’d an email from the NRA?
3) Had a commercial pop up on TV from them?
4) Had someone personally approach you on their behalf?

My guess is zero. You’re going after a lobby for doing its job and working with politicians to protect the rights their organization was founded to protect.

And the entire point of special interests is to protect…special interests. The NRA gets an insane amount of small donations from individuals for a lobby. Those people are part of the established system we have where they pay people to advocate for rights they want to protect. Oh the horror.

And going after firearm manufacturers and retailers for donating to the same lobby is also ridiculous - their businesses feed families and give people gainful employment. Are they somehow any different than any other for profit industry that wants to survive?

You act like there’s an NRA sign on every corner and a TV commercial every break. I don’t hear from the NRA at all. I can’t tell if you’re more afraid of guns or the people that want to protect the right to own them…
 
There are many articles re. NRA funding.


https://www.opensecrets.org/news/20...om-its-charities-and-funded-political-groups/
There are, and you know what? Private donations ebb and flow with the priorities of our politicians.

Obama sold a ton of guns and generated a groundswell of private donations.

Biden is more worried about naps, the oil industry and diaper changes.

 
Have you ever heard of the gun lobby? The NRA? All fighting for the financial benefit of the gun companies.

Where do you think their money comes from?
I'll be honest, if it wasn't for your posts on this board, I would never hear the terms 'NRA' or 'gun companies' or 'gun lobby'. You are literally the only person online or offline that I interact with who ever uses any of those terms.

Maybe I just don't connect with enough extremeists, idk.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NavigatorII
There are many articles re. NRA funding.


https://www.opensecrets.org/news/20...om-its-charities-and-funded-political-groups/
Doesn't surprise me at all that they are losing members. I never see a single piece of communications from them. This is the group that you think is all powerful and manipulating millions of gun owners? LOL

You are making @fatman76's point almost as well as he is.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: fatman76
You act like there’s an NRA sign on every corner and a TV commercial every break. I don’t hear from the NRA at all. I can’t tell if you’re more afraid of guns or the people that want to protect the right to own them…
I don't think I've seen a single NRA commercial in my life. It's possible, but I don't remember it. I think I saw Trump speak at an NRA convention once, that might be the only even minor exposure I've ever had with the org in my life.

@GatorTheo makes it even harder to take him seriously ranting about the all-powerful NRA/gun lobby. How is someone influencing my opinion if I never interact with them? LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
There are, and you know what? Private donations ebb and flow with the priorities of our politicians.

Obama sold a ton of guns and generated a groundswell of private donations.

Biden is more worried about naps, the oil industry and diaper changes.

It's OK that the gun industry lobbies for their financial well-being. All industries do the same. Tobacco, oil, etc.. I'm not criticizing the gun industry for doing so.
 
Is mdfgator RayGravesGhost? Minus calling people racist, he has the same MO, insults and nonsensical nicknames, posting links from a single website, "trumpanzee," and creating posts where he is the sole respondent.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NavigatorII
It's OK that the gun industry lobbies for their financial well-being. All industries do the same. Tobacco, oil, etc.. I'm not criticizing the gun industry for doing so.
My point is throughout modern history the amount of small private donations vs corporate have fluctuated wildly, and it’s all based on narratives from politicians and how threatened people feel.

The industry knows the threat is always there, the general population has a million other things to worry about unless Obama is promising legislation and EO’s.
 
I'll be honest, if it wasn't for your posts on this board, I would never hear the terms 'NRA' or 'gun companies' or 'gun lobby'. You are literally the only person online or offline that I interact with who ever uses any of those terms.

Maybe I just don't connect with enough extremeists, idk.
And how many examples has he provided the board with?
 
Is mdfgator RayGravesGhost? Minus calling people racist, he has the same MO, insults and nonsensical nicknames, posting links from a single website, "trumpanzee," and creating posts where he is the sole respondent.
Actually the common belief is that he is bsuck
 
And how many examples has he provided the board with?
None. He thinks guns are the issue, and that's why he hates the NRA. Cause he thinks the NRA is tricking people into buying guns.

He's operating from a position of complete ignorance on multiple levels. That plus him being terrified of guns is a nasty combination.
 
My point is throughout modern history the amount of small private donations vs corporate have fluctuated wildly, and it’s all based on narratives from politicians and how threatened people feel.

The industry knows the threat is always there, the general population has a million other things to worry about unless Obama is promising legislation and EO’s.
That's the point I tried to make to @GatorTheo. He and the left do more to spark gun sales than the NRA ever could.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT