ADVERTISEMENT

"Diminished faculties" but no charges says special counsel in Biden document case.

O

Orangeclad

Rowdy Reptile
Jul 5, 2001
2,501
5,566
113
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RussellCasse
Capt Ron 1 said:
This ruling just gave Trump a free pass. Trump has WAY, WAY more reasons to justify why he had documents.
Click to expand...
I believe this is the case in Florida?

That judge seems sane, you may be right.

Any of the other locations I don't think it would matter. We live in a 3rd world country.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: NavigatorII
Capt Ron 1 said:
This ruling just gave Trump a free pass. Trump has WAY, WAY more reasons to justify why he had documents.
Click to expand...
Not even the issue. Trump's problem is, and has always been, the fact that he didn't give the documents back when they repeatedly asked him for them. And then what the trial will determine is what extent he tried to hide/conceal them.

Trump always does something that is the root cause for his problems and you guys always want to blame somebody else. If he had just given the damn documents back one of the many times he was asked (like the others did) there would be no issue.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: emekz1, goldmom and BCSpell
Orangeclad said:
No charges for Biden after Special Counsel probe into improper handling of classified documents

www.foxnews.com

No charges for Biden after Special Counsel probe into improper handling of classified documents

The Justice Department released findings of an investigation into President Biden's handling of classified documents
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com

Special counsel says Biden couldn't remember when leaving Vice Presidency or when his son Beau died.

We need to warm up the 25th amendment.
Click to expand...
Have you checked on who is currently #2?

mr-bill-oh-no-mens-t-shirt.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldmom
Illegal-shift said:
Not even the issue. Trump's problem is, and has always been, the fact that he didn't give the documents back when they repeatedly asked him for them. And then what the trial will determine is what extent he tried to hide/conceal them.

Trump always does something that is the root cause for his problems and you guys always want to blame somebody else. If he had just given the damn documents back one of the many times he was asked (like the others did) there would be no issue.
Click to expand...
So even though the special counsel said Biden "willfully retained and disclosed highly classified material when he was a private citizen", no charges are brought. Of course a two tiered justice system.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: NavigatorII, BCSpell, RussellCasse and 1 other person
Illegal-shift said:
Not even the issue. Trump's problem is, and has always been, the fact that he didn't give the documents back when they repeatedly asked him for them. And then what the trial will determine is what extent he tried to hide/conceal them.

Trump always does something that is the root cause for his problems and you guys always want to blame somebody else. If he had just given the damn documents back one of the many times he was asked (like the others did) there would be no issue.
Click to expand...
This is just 100% bullchit. What law is broken for not returning documents? PLEASE explain this. You cannot just get mad at someone and decide you want to charge them. You HAVE to charge them w a crime. That crime WOULD NOT be possession of documents, it COULD be obstruction. Please study up before posting garbage like you did. Leave your liberal emotional dribble out and please just bring facts. You watch to much CNN man. I hope you realize not many people do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCSpell and RussellCasse
Orangeclad said:
So even though the special counsel said Biden "willfully retained and disclosed highly classified material when he was a private citizen", no charges are brought. Of course a two tiered justice system.
Click to expand...
Where does it talk about them asking him to give them back and him not doing so? Where does it talk about them having to subpoena him because he wouldn't comply and then where is the section talking about him trying to still hide and keep some of the documents even after subpoena?

Just another case of false equivalence. If Trump did what Biden did he wouldn't have been charged anything either. That fact that they tried to retrieve the documents from him for so long before doing anything about it should be proof enough of that.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: LordofallSocks
Capt Ron 1 said:
This is just 100% bullchit. What law is broken for not returning documents? please, explain this. You cannot just get mad at someone. You HAVE to charge them w a crime. That crime WOULD NOT be possession of documents, it COULD be obstruction. Please study up before posting garbage like you did. Leave your liberal emotional dribble out and please just bring facts. You watch to much CNN man. I hope you realize not many people do.
Click to expand...
I just explained it in my last post. I am not the one who needs to study. How would you even know what CNN says if your not watching it? I watch CNN and Fox. I suspect you don't because you hate hearing both sides of the story.
 
  • Like
Reactions: emekz1
Illegal-shift said:
I just explained it in my last post. I am not the one who needs to study. How would you even know what CNN says if your not watching it? I watch CNN and Fox. I suspect you don't because you hate hearing both sides of the story.
Click to expand...
LOLOLOLOL I KNEW you had to watch CNN to come up with that BS reason. Because it just is not true. You gave yourself up...but no worries, it was very obvious with that ridiculous reasoning.
 
My faith in federal law enforcement is rock bottom. They are straight Soviet style justice; and they don’t even hide it anymore. How about the prolife people praying at the baby killing center that got 11 years?
 
jsfgators said:
My faith in federal law enforcement is rock bottom. They are straight Soviet style justice; and they don’t even hide it anymore. How about the prolife people praying at the baby killing center that got 11 years?
Click to expand...
If it makes you feel any better I rather doubt that would hold up on appeal. Peaceful protest is absolutely covered by the first amendment, that FACE act is unconstitutional.
 
Capt Ron 1 said:
This ruling just gave Trump a free pass. Trump has WAY, WAY more reasons to justify why he had documents.
Click to expand...
If they then prosecute Trump, which I am sure they will, this will be "Lawfare" in full.

Good for the special counsel for highlight the obvious on Biden.

Biden's anger is a clear sign of early onset dementia, which I would wish on no one, but hey Joe, you didn't "just have dinner with Mitterand".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Capt Ron 1 and LordofallSocks
Orangeclad said:
So even though the special counsel said Biden "willfully retained and disclosed highly classified material when he was a private citizen", no charges are brought. Of course a two tiered justice system.
Click to expand...
So I murdered a guy 10 years ago.

But today I'm just a feeble old man, that a jury would sympathize with...so no charges should be brought.

That's in a nutshell how I read this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: treygator29, NavigatorII and LordofallSocks
grandhavendiddy said:
If they then prosecute Trump, which I am sure they will, this will be "Lawfare" in full.

Good for the special counsel for highlight the obvious on Biden.

Biden's anger is a clear sign of early onset dementia, which I would wish on no one, but hey Joe, you didn't "just have dinner with Mitterand".
Click to expand...
Biden's legal team playing cover is an interesting move.

He got off because he's feeble and has a bad memory, but his lawyers argue that the SC overstated how feeble and how bad his memory was during the interview.

You can't make this stuff up...his lawyers are in essence arguing against the issue that led to the decision, and the SC isn't calling them on the carpet for it. This is hierarchy. We live in an asymmetrical society.

 
Look for the dims to use the 25th Amendment before the end of March and elevate Kammie and force her to name Michael as her VP. And then they will install Michael as the presidential nominee
 
Capt Ron 1 said:
This is just 100% bullchit. What law is broken for not returning documents? PLEASE explain this. You cannot just get mad at someone and decide you want to charge them. You HAVE to charge them w a crime. That crime WOULD NOT be possession of documents, it COULD be obstruction. Please study up before posting garbage like you did. Leave your liberal emotional dribble out and please just bring facts. You watch to much CNN man. I hope you realize not many people do.
Click to expand...
You nailed that bozo. He keeps talking about all anybody had to do was give the documents back and all is forgiven. COOPERATION IS NOT A DEFENSE UNDER THE LAW. So the bank robber steals 10,000 today but brings it back tomorrow and all is forgiven?
Forget comparing Biden to Trump.
Biden committed a crime with his handling of confidential material. He stole that material as a senator or VP and not entitled in either role.
The special prosecutor knows it was a crime by virtue of his failure to charge based on Biden's age and poor memory and not on the law itself.
If any dem here thinks Joe Biden didn't break the law, please state why.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dezyDeco, RussellCasse and fatman76
Orangeclad said:
You nailed that bozo. He keeps talking about all anybody had to do was give the documents back and all is forgiven. COOPERATION IS NOT A DEFENSE UNDER THE LAW. So the bank robber steals 10,000 today but brings it back tomorrow and all is forgiven?
Forget comparing Biden to Trump.
Biden committed a crime with his handling of confidential material. He stole that material as a senator or VP and not entitled in either role.
The special prosecutor knows it was a crime by virtue of his failure to charge based on Biden's age and poor memory and not on the law itself.
If any dem here thinks Joe Biden didn't break the law, please state why.
Click to expand...
LOL, you truly have a dizzying intellect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: emekz1
Capt Ron 1 said:
This is just 100% bullchit. What law is broken for not returning documents? PLEASE explain this. You cannot just get mad at someone and decide you want to charge them. You HAVE to charge them w a crime. That crime WOULD NOT be possession of documents, it COULD be obstruction. Please study up before posting garbage like you did. Leave your liberal emotional dribble out and please just bring facts. You watch to much CNN man. I hope you realize not many people do.
Click to expand...

Correct. Here is the thing. If Trump gets convicted, they will wait until Joe is out of office and bring charges. This report sets the table for that.

Again, this is chess. Your move Joe.
 
Capt Ron 1 said:
LOLOLOLOL I KNEW you had to watch CNN to come up with that BS reason. Because it just is not true. You gave yourself up...but no worries, it was very obvious with that ridiculous reasoning.
Click to expand...
Well, anybody who wants the truth needs to listen to both sides.

But I have come to understand that doesn't interest you.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: emekz1 and LordofallSocks
oh shifty shiff- you would not know the truth if it hit you in the face
 
RussellCasse said:
And yet you’re the only one that sees it your way.

Oh the irony.
Click to expand...
And you see that the phony troll offered not one bit of constructive rebuttal. Shows his very diminished ability. I'm sure that bozo doesn't even know what the special prosecutor means by saying "willfully retained".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RussellCasse
Orangeclad said:
And you see that the phony troll offered not one bit of constructive rebuttal. Shows his very diminished ability. I'm sure that bozo doesn't even know what the special prosecutor means by saying "willfully retained".
Click to expand...

Here is the funny part. On twitter, every leftist has been holding onto…”you have to show intent” for biden taking and keeping classified docs.

“Willfully retained” retained will be important when he leaves office: willfully retained shows he knew, and still did it.

It shows intent.

He is cooked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeclad
RussellCasse said:
Here is the funny part. On twitter, every leftist has been holding onto…”you have to show intent” for biden taking and keeping classified docs.

“Willfully retained” retained will be important when he leaves office: willfully retained shows he knew, and still did it.

It shows intent.

He is cooked.
Click to expand...
They're saying that trying to link it to the precedent set in the Clinton server case. They're also using intent out of context, the entire phrase in the Espionage act of 1917 is "intent to interfere."
 
  • Like
Reactions: RussellCasse
What was SENATOR Biden's "intent" when he removed (stole) classified material from a skiff? Did that happen by accident or did he pull a Sandy Berger and put the material in his socks and down his shorts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dezyDeco and RussellCasse
LordofallSocks said:
They're saying that trying to link it to the precedent set in the Clinton server case. They're also using intent out of context, the entire phrase in the Espionage act of 1917 is "intent to interfere."
Click to expand...

Of course. And in almost 100% of criminal cases, intent is proven with circumstantial evidence, just like this case.
 
Orangeclad said:
What was SENATOR Biden's "intent" when he removed (stole) classified material from a skiff? Did that happen by accident or did he pull a Sandy Berger and put the material in his socks and down his shorts.
Click to expand...

That’s been my point all along. You can’t “accidentally” take classified materials out of a SCIF. You have to INTENTionally do it.

That said, and I have been consistent on this….handling classified materials laws are broken hundreds, if not thousands of times daily.

These cases are nothingburgers. But, there is a reason Trump had those materials, and the left went after him, and now do not want the contents revealed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dezyDeco
Capt Ron 1 said:
This is just 100% bullchit. What law is broken for not returning documents? PLEASE explain this. You cannot just get mad at someone and decide you want to charge them. You HAVE to charge them w a crime. That crime WOULD NOT be possession of documents, it COULD be obstruction. Please study up before posting garbage like you did. Leave your liberal emotional dribble out and please just bring facts. You watch to much CNN man. I hope you realize not many people do.
Click to expand...
Ron, I understand your emotion but bless your heart stick to fishin’.
 
  • Like
Reactions: emekz1 and Illegal-shift
As someone who voted for Joe twice in the same election, Joe definitely has dementia and the country is being run by a bunch of marxist clowns.
 
fatman76 said:
Biden's legal team playing cover is an interesting move.

He got off because he's feeble and has a bad memory, but his lawyers argue that the SC overstated how feeble and how bad his memory was during the interview.

You can't make this stuff up...his lawyers are in essence arguing against the issue that led to the decision, and the SC isn't calling them on the carpet for it. This is hierarchy. We live in an asymmetrical society.

View embedded media
Click to expand...
10,000 percent. It is outrageous.
 
  • Love
Reactions: fatman76
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

BillytheC

How many more proven LIES will it take for you libs

Replies
26
Views
248
The Parking Lot
jb1215
jb1215
R

As Trump faces charges in docs case, special counsel is quietly continuing Jan. 6 probe

Replies
1
Views
77
The Parking Lot
Mdfgator
M
R

Top Trump campaign aide revealed as key figure in classified documents case, shown strategic map, report says

Replies
1
Views
87
The Parking Lot
Mdfgator
M
L
  • Locked

Merrick Garland Names Special Counsel on Trump; Still No Special Counsel on Hunter Biden

Replies
83
Views
1K
The Parking Lot
FresnoGator
FresnoGator
R

Special Master Has a Simple Test That May Be Disaster for Trump

Replies
7
Views
581
The Parking Lot
Mdfgator
M
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back