Holy crap your TDS is level 1000.
For one time in your life try to put Trump to the side. He’s just in the way. Every one of those points is a de facto policy position. It would be no different if you were running on the Republican side, it's not about the opponent.
A few of RFK's policy positions have been consistent - his environmentalism, isolationist foreign policy - but he's never taken the stance he did in that tweet on issues like the 2020 riots, Covid lockdowns (he blamed Fauci more than Trump), and tax cuts. If you have time go listen to the 3 hour Rogan interview where he took very libertarian positions on most issues. Economically he was center-left, environmentally hard left (although he goes about it with much more common sense, and he takes on clean air and water more than global warming, which I 100% support), but he wasn’t close to where he is now. It’s a great interview, you should listen.
And I don’t know if you’re keeping up but the judge gave the jury 3 categories of crimes to consider with no specific crime mentioned or guidance on how any of Trump’s actions may have violated any specific laws. That’s why he wouldn’t let the FEC expert witness testify - they would actually have knowledge of how the NDA payment did or did not result in a crime (also they would have learned that - if Trump had violated federal election laws - would have been a Federal crime this court had no jurisdiction over...and the FEC/Biden DOJ declined to prosecute).
Merchan intentionally left the jury in the dark, he didn't even given his jury instructions in writing for them to reference. That's extremely dangerous, and by all reports there's one lone sympathetic juror who knows his life will be ruined if he hangs the jury. I think there's a very good chance they convict here, and convict on an unspecified crime which is incredibly unconstitutional.
Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt REQUIRES the prosecution lay out the specifics of every element of a specific crime.
