ADVERTISEMENT

Walls are closing in on DJT.... *All of Trump Charged threads have been merged - post here*

On the 87th attempt, have the dems FINALLY got Trump?


  • Total voters
    48
Smarter than that, I live a clean life, don’t need to trick people out of there money or lie to get my way, i would never compare or want to have trumps standards there trash, by the way he sends out fundraising emails daily, have you donated yet?
WHY HELL YES I HAVE....and will more later!
 
Am I seeing where the Bragg's case against Trump fell apart? No arrest? LOL
Can you imagine how many little sissy snowflake libs are looking up at the sky crying today?? LOLOL Screaming at the top of their lungs...looking for a safety pin, and a safe safe space!!! LOLOL Friggin lil babies
 
I really hate to keep doing this to @gatorspeed and @RayGravesGhost, but it's for your own growth, proper. They will keep hoodwinking you as long as you keep letting them.


And here's the document itself - https://dam.tmz.com/document/4c/o/2018/12/25/4c9959d4e1725062a54030b72a10a3f0.pdf

"I am denying this affair because it never happened".
 
  • Haha
Reactions: gatorspeed
I really hate to keep doing this to @gatorspeed and @RayGravesGhost, but it's for your own growth, proper. They will keep hoodwinking you as long as you keep letting them.


And here's the document itself - https://dam.tmz.com/document/4c/o/2018/12/25/4c9959d4e1725062a54030b72a10a3f0.pdf

"I am denying this affair because it never happened".
Ghost your dumb as a stump lol you and your love for fluffy sheep and the only big word you can pronounce “ Hoodwink “ lol
 
I believe exculpatory evidence is not require to be given to a Grand Jury. Grand juries are not there to determine guilt or innocence. They are not there to review possible defenses or evidence favorable to the defendant. They are only there to determine if the evidence given by the DA is enough to meet the elements of the crime being charged. If so, then the DA can indict.
 
I believe exculpatory evidence is not require to be given to a Grand Jury. Grand juries are not there to determine guilt or innocence. They are not there to review possible defenses or evidence favorable to the defendant. They are only there to determine if the evidence given by the DA is enough to meet the elements of the crime being charged. If so, then the DA can indict.
BS. I'm applying the @gatorspeed standard to Bragg: I don't like him, some people said online that he's a meanie. so that's good enough for me. Put him in jail.
 
I really hate to keep doing this to @gatorspeed and @RayGravesGhost, but it's for your own growth, proper. They will keep hoodwinking you as long as you keep letting them.


And here's the document itself - https://dam.tmz.com/document/4c/o/2018/12/25/4c9959d4e1725062a54030b72a10a3f0.pdf

"I am denying this affair because it never happened".
Its all fake. Stormy Daniels is not her real name, its her stage name. She can't sign any type of legal document using Stormy Daniels.
 
  • Like
Reactions: emekz1
If you were to look up stupid in Wikipedia, this photo would be front and center. 😂

246d76adc7a9fc963cfce676d2514b5f

Where'd you get that picture of RayGravesGhost?
 


"Gregg Jarrett: I mentioned it yesterday, I think, when Bob Costello got into that Grand Jury room and told them, “Wait a minute. You don’t have the hundreds of pages I handed over to Alvin Bragg over here? You only have six cherry-picked documents?” You know, hiding from grand juries exculpatory information is reprehensible and unconscionable. And the conduct of Alvin Bragg and his henchman Mark Pomeranz, who specifically says in his book, “We’re targeting zombies because we don’t like his beliefs,” those guys should face disbarment proceedings."

So sounds like he turned in 600 pages of evidence to Bragg, and Bragg gave the Grand Jury 6 pages.

Totally on the up and up.

And all the radical Libs will ask, seriously, "is that wrong"?
 
I believe exculpatory evidence is not require to be given to a Grand Jury. Grand juries are not there to determine guilt or innocence. They are not there to review possible defenses or evidence favorable to the defendant. They are only there to determine if the evidence given by the DA is enough to meet the elements of the crime being charged. If so, then the DA can indict.

That is correct. However, in most cases, it's counter-intuitive for the DA not to provide something that's going to destroy his case once it gets beyond the indictment phase.

Oftentimes DA's will use a Grand Jury to kill a weak case rather than giving up on it all together. That way one party can't say, "you didn't even try."

"I did try....the Grand Jury said no."
 
That is correct. However, in most cases, it's counter-intuitive for the DA not to provide something that's going to destroy his case once it gets beyond the indictment phase.

Oftentimes DA's will use a Grand Jury to kill a weak case rather than giving up on it all together. That way one party can't say, "you didn't even try."

"I did try....the Grand Jury said no."
And, if the its that bad to begin with, a smart DA wouldn't even bring the case to the Grand Jury.
 
There is no grasping with that Letter. Cohen's attorney states that Cohen made the payments to Stormy with his own $ and never got paid back from Trump. It destroys the case the DA is trying to make.
This is the clown you support, boys 75 years old and lives on truth social running his mouth
 
  • Like
Reactions: emekz1


Good gravy in Cleveland on a Tuesday!

So in less than a week, we've gone from TRUMP'S ARREST IS IMMINENT to Bragg BLAMING Trump for him not getting arrested cause he "created a false expectation".

LMAO! So what Bragg is saying is that Trump outsmarted ray ray and @gatorspeed.

"Arrest? What arrest????" LMAO!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: fatman76
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT