Hey @FresnoGator, what's the latest on Rivals adding a Facepalm emoji?
Walls are closing in on DJT.... *All of Trump Charged threads have been merged - post here*
- Thread starter Illegal-shift
- Start date
Sometimes DA's will use Grand Jury's to help develop a case or, like I said above, allow the GJ to kill it rather than killing it themselves...which gives them political cover.
The problem in this case, and the reason that we know it was ABSOLUTELY political and an example of a weaponized DA, is that he didn't provide evidence to the GJ that he would have had to present in a trial.
By supressing some of the evidence he might have been able to secure an indictment, and that indictment was the HUGE political win that he was looking for, but he would have had no chance at trial. So beyond the political win, the indictment itself would be absolutely useless.
I can say, I do not like or agree with a ton of Trump tweets/posts and the constant attacks and name calling, but this one you added to this thread, is pretty spot on. Trump is 100% correct in what he posted.
Unlike the glorified IDIOT(and ANYONE who supports him) that was installed illegally in the white house now...Trump is ALWAYS right.
Is that authentic? I gotta ask. Does she sign legal documents with her porn name? 😂
Is that a legal document, or a press release/memo? It's addressed to "To whom it may concern".
And if the accusation uses her porn name, then she'd probably reply to it in the same.
Legal documents would be signed with her real name, if you want it to be legally binding.
they do when people do their papers and test for them
Sounds like SOMEONE is speaking with FULL knowledge here. EXCEPT...Trump became a BILLIONAIRE!! LOL Are YOU a billionaire, son?? (more than likely a hundred air)
So who else is gonna try and lie in a criminal investigation for trump?
https://abcnews.go.com/US/meadows-top-trump-aides-ordered-testify-jan-6/story?id=98101813
ByJohn Santucci, Katherine Faulders, and Jonathan Karl
March 24, 2023, 1:36 PM
A federal judge has rejected former President Donald Trump's claims of executive privilege and has ordered Mark Meadows and other former top aides to testify before a federal grand jury investigating Trump's efforts to overturn the election leading up to the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, multiple sources familiar with the matter tell ABC News.
Meadows, Trump's former chief of staff, was subpoenaed along with the other former aides by Special counsel Jack Smith for testimony and documents related to the probe.
Trump's legal team had challenged the subpoenas by asserting executive privilege, which is the right of a president to keep confidential the communications he has with advisers.
In a sealed order last week, Judge Beryl Howell rejected Trump's claim of executive privilege for Meadows and a number of others, including Trump's former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, his former national security adviser Robert O'Brien, former top aide Stephen Miller, and former deputy chief of staff and social media director Dan Scavino, according to sources familiar with the matter.
Former Trump aides Nick Luna and John McEntee, along with former top DHS official Ken Cuccinelli, were also included in the order, the sources said.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/meadows-top-trump-aides-ordered-testify-jan-6/story?id=98101813
Meadows, other top Trump aides ordered to testify in Jan. 6 probe as judge rejects claims of executive privilege
Trump's attorneys had challenged the subpoenas by asserting executive privilege.ByJohn Santucci, Katherine Faulders, and Jonathan Karl
March 24, 2023, 1:36 PM
A federal judge has rejected former President Donald Trump's claims of executive privilege and has ordered Mark Meadows and other former top aides to testify before a federal grand jury investigating Trump's efforts to overturn the election leading up to the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, multiple sources familiar with the matter tell ABC News.
Meadows, Trump's former chief of staff, was subpoenaed along with the other former aides by Special counsel Jack Smith for testimony and documents related to the probe.
Trump's legal team had challenged the subpoenas by asserting executive privilege, which is the right of a president to keep confidential the communications he has with advisers.
In a sealed order last week, Judge Beryl Howell rejected Trump's claim of executive privilege for Meadows and a number of others, including Trump's former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, his former national security adviser Robert O'Brien, former top aide Stephen Miller, and former deputy chief of staff and social media director Dan Scavino, according to sources familiar with the matter.
Former Trump aides Nick Luna and John McEntee, along with former top DHS official Ken Cuccinelli, were also included in the order, the sources said.
Last edited:
So it has the credibility of anything BScuck has ever posted?
😂
He got anal raped by a pack of wild boars. He's still got tusk marks in his ass. 😂
I have not noticed..this story seems to have lost all the stem it had...Have "the walls closed in on Trump" yet? Did I miss something...or did those idiots get fooled AGAIN for the twenty four hundredth time?
Yep, Peter cried wolf and when he actually will see a wolf it will consume his flock.
bob Costello told a number of lies on the courthouse steps...this is what trump supporters are left clinging to
trump supporters openly calling for the weaponization of the DOJ....
Seriously people you just can't make this up
Seriously people you just can't make this up
