ADVERTISEMENT

Recap of 2000 Mules

Checking back to see if anyone has come up with the names of these 2000 mules yet?

😎
Guillermina Fuentes is the first one I’m aware of, there are 3 more cases in Yuma that are being prosecuted as a direct result of evidence TTV provided. She pleaded not guilty until the evidence was presented, she’s now pleading guilty and seeking a deal.

A county supervisor in Yuma is also being recalled based on his invovlement, it looks like he was running one of the non-profits the ballots were eminanting from.

In MI Nessel is getting major pressure to investigate. She’s corrupt, but if the public pressure reaches a high enough level…

Like anything else with election fraud it’s committed quickly and takes forever to prosecute, but it’s coming. Stay tuned, keep asking this question- it’s a good one.




 
I know there's another tread on this topic but I saw the movie last night and figured we can use this for others who saw the documentary to share their thoughts. Sorry, its a little long.

The documentary is pretty much what you have heard and would expect. Any person with common sense would come to the same, obvious conclusion--the Dems cheated and committed massive fraud to steal an election. There is no question or doubt on that. The documentary breaks it down and explains it how it happened. They show the fraud being committed. It leaves no doubt. The movie said it best--It was the perfect crime...Until the video was found. Which led to the geo tracking.

The Dems knew they needed to cheat to win so they used Covid. Covid was the excuse to provide the push for change to mail-in ballots. They knew that was the easiest way to conduct voting fraud. They paid off states to change voting rules regardless of legality, and they used the Lib media to provide them protection and push their bogus voter suppression BS. They happily accepted Mark Zuckerberg's $400M+ donations for all the additional drop boxes in the 5 key states and the main cities & counties of target.

The data collection used in the study was conducted by a Researcher who has 40 years of election voting research history. Its actually very interesting to see how they pulled the data and conducted their research. To determine which Mules they tracked they set the standards on Mules who made 10 stops or more per night stuffing 5 ballots per stop (video shows the number of ballots being dropped). So the standards were pretty high, they didnt just select anyone who participated in the ballot stuffing. Some of what they found:

--Cameras showed Mules delivering multiple ballots to drop boxes at 1am, 2am, 4am, always at night, as they were instructed by the state Dems, bc no one would be around. But some Mules were brazen enough to do it in broad daylight while people were in line to vote.
--They had over 4 million minutes of video recordings showing ballot drops.
--Mules were required to take pictures of each drop box so they received credit and get paid for each.
--Starting Dec 23 Mules had to wear gloves because on Dec 22nd the FBI found some voting fraud in Arizona and did so by tracing fingerprints on the fake ballots.
--The geotracking showed the route followed for some of the same Mules showing theyd make 10 stops in the middle of the night to different drop boxes. And then do it again the next night. And then again the next night.
The movie had a funny comment--Who doesnt submit their vote at 4am?

The research revealed average breakdowns of the numbers of fake ballots stuffed (the Mule, # of stops, route followed, 5 ballots per stop, how many days the Mule did this) and how it would affect the voting results in the 5 key states. 3 of the states wouldve flipped. Then they showed the numbers if they lowered the stops down to 8 instead of 10--it showed all 5 states wouldve flipped easily. When they dropped it down to a more reasonable 3 stops it resulted in over 2M votes being altered.

Upon seeing the evidence, one of the key items the film answered is why the Dems and the media are always so quick to say there wasnt any cheating or fraud going on, always blaming it on Reps not accepting the results (besides because they benefitted from the cheating). It isnt that they WONT answer questions on it, its because they CANT answer questions on it. The evidence caught on camera and location tracking is so strong and clear for all to see. They dont know how to answer to counter the evidence so the Dems ignore it and the media hides it. There's no questions they were partners in this.

It was a very interesting study and film. I recommend people to see it. Its just sad its a true story and was covered up by the media. Its easily the biggest voter fraudulent event in election voting history.
And managed to pull this off, with hundreds of thousands in the know, and did it without any evidence. Pull the other leg, it's got bells on.
 
It’s not the DOJ, this is a local problem…which is good. It’s easier for someone to step up and do the right thing on that level.
Election Fraud in a National Election is not under the FBI and DoJ?
WTF-over???
😏

But I guess maybe with the level of corruption in the FBI and DoJ, having it under local jurisdiction will at least give some chance for justice, in a few cities/states.... 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly
And managed to pull this off, with hundreds of thousands in the know, and did it without any evidence. Pull the other leg, it's got bells on.
The entire thing started with whistleblowers. They didn’t feature them because they wanted to remain anonymous, but it’s what started TTV’s research.

They found exactly what the WB’s told them, every detail.Witnesses DID come forward. None of this would have happened if not.

Now who else would come forward? Are you calling the cops if you happen to see someone shove 10 ballots in a Dropbox?

And people are getting prosecuted with this evidence, I have no clue what you’re talking about. It’s up to the AG’s in these states to want to prosecute - it’s on a silver platter. The AVERAGE mule hit 38 drop boxes. Some hit more than 50. I can’t come up with a reasonable explaination for that, can you?

Instead of ignoring this why not just check it out? Come back and let’s have an adult conversation about your concerns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly and BCSpell
Election Fraud in a National Election is not under the FBI and DoJ?
WTF-over???
😏

But I guess maybe with the level of corruption in the FBI and DoJ, having it under local jurisdiction will at least give some chance for justice, in a few cities/states.... 😉
That’s my point - states control their elections. That was the crux behind Trump challenging electors, the people constitutionally assigned to make election rules were superseded by SOS and Governors making the results prima facie unconstitutional.

States have tremendous control over prosecution of election fraud. DOJ comes in if there’s some wider conspiracy…which there may be but first things first,
 
  • Like
Reactions: instaGATOR
Guillermina Fuentes is the first one I’m aware of, there are 3 more cases in Yuma that are being prosecuted as a direct result of evidence TTV provided. She pleaded not guilty until the evidence was presented, she’s now pleading guilty and seeking a deal.

A county supervisor in Yuma is also being recalled based on his invovlement, it looks like he was running one of the non-profits the ballots were eminanting from.

In MI Nessel is getting major pressure to investigate. She’s corrupt, but if the public pressure reaches a high enough level…

Like anything else with election fraud it’s committed quickly and takes forever to prosecute, but it’s coming. Stay tuned, keep asking this question- it’s a good one.




So MAYBE one lady in Arizona so far.

Will check back in a few months to see the rest.
 
The Repubs know/knew the problems that the US would face, IF it was proven that the Dems did steal the election. So as typical, the Repubs just want to bury their heads in the sand and just go along to get along and hope next time will be better.
90% of republicans are really democrats. I have no idea why we can't see this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G8TR73 and BCSpell
I called this in 2020. Here's how the sheep will respond.

1 - No one cheated
2 - There wasn't much cheating
3 - There wasn't enough cheating to make a difference
4 - The cheating wasn't organized - WE ARE NOW HERE
5 - There wasn't enough cheating to swing a state
6 - There wasn't enough cheating to swing the election
7 - I don't care if they cheated
 
I called this in 2020. Here's how the sheep will respond.

1 - No one cheated
2 - There wasn't much cheating
3 - There wasn't enough cheating to make a difference
4 - The cheating wasn't organized - WE ARE NOW HERE
5 - There wasn't enough cheating to swing a state
6 - There wasn't enough cheating to swing the election
7 - I don't care if they cheated
#7 is the prevailing theme, they already feel that way - even if they haven't come out and said it yet the other 6 aren't possible without it
 
I called this in 2020. Here's how the sheep will respond.

1 - No one cheated
2 - There wasn't much cheating
3 - There wasn't enough cheating to make a difference
4 - The cheating wasn't organized - WE ARE NOW HERE
5 - There wasn't enough cheating to swing a state
6 - There wasn't enough cheating to swing the election
7 - I don't care if they cheated
You just quoted sadgator and the Lizard.
 
The entire thing started with whistleblowers. They didn’t feature them because they wanted to remain anonymous, but it’s what started TTV’s research.

They found exactly what the WB’s told them, every detail.Witnesses DID come forward. None of this would have happened if not.

Now who else would come forward? Are you calling the cops if you happen to see someone shove 10 ballots in a Dropbox?

And people are getting prosecuted with this evidence, I have no clue what you’re talking about. It’s up to the AG’s in these states to want to prosecute - it’s on a silver platter. The AVERAGE mule hit 38 drop boxes. Some hit more than 50. I can’t come up with a reasonable explaination for that, can you?

Instead of ignoring this why not just check it out? Come back and let’s have an adult conversation about your concerns.
Because remember. When asked if we should count every vote, or count every legal vote, this high moral person said “count every vote”
 
Have we looked at Biden blue state approval lately? Does anyone really believe 81 million of us are stupid enough to vote for a shrub who promised what we see before us?
 
I called this in 2020. Here's how the sheep will respond.

1 - No one cheated
2 - There wasn't much cheating
3 - There wasn't enough cheating to make a difference
4 - The cheating wasn't organized - WE ARE NOW HERE
5 - There wasn't enough cheating to swing a state
6 - There wasn't enough cheating to swing the election
7 - I don't care if they cheated
@LizardGrad89 was at Level 7 Nov 2, 2020. :mad:
 
Didn't Trump sit in the low 20's at one point? Yet you still believe he got all his votes.

You all aren't just dumber than your dogs, you are dumber than your dogs' TOYS.
 
Didn't Trump sit in the low 20's at one point? Yet you still believe he got all his votes.

You all aren't just dumber than your dogs, you are dumber than your dogs' TOYS.
And like Pavlov's dog, we ring, you come.

goodfellas-laughing.gif
 
Wow! I never expected the Little Loopy Lizzy to reappear, especially all filled with piss & vinegar.... I was just keeping 2000 on the front page.

Anyone that still claims that Brandon was the winner in a fair and legal election is either dumber than dirt, or they are pushing socialism/communism in America with full knowledge and intentions, i.e. TRAITORS TO A FREE AMERICA.
 
Last edited:
not true:

Ok, I misremembered. Still, his low was 34%, KINDA SIMILAR to Biden at 33%, yet I don't recall anyone ever saying they don't believe he got all the votes he got. I don't remember that ever being a topic at all. Probably because a president's approval rating 2 years after the election, and their votes, HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH EACH OTHER.
 
Ok, I misremembered. Still, his low was 34%, KINDA SIMILAR to Biden at 33%, yet I don't recall anyone ever saying they don't believe he got all the votes he got. I don't remember that ever being a topic at all. Probably because a president's approval rating 2 years after the election, and their votes, HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH EACH OTHER.
straw man ...
 
Ok, I misremembered. Still, his low was 34%, KINDA SIMILAR to Biden at 33%, yet I don't recall anyone ever saying they don't believe he got all the votes he got. I don't remember that ever being a topic at all. Probably because a president's approval rating 2 years after the election, and their votes, HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH EACH OTHER.
One had the media carrying the water for him, the other suffered from relentless attacks and phony impeachments. Approval ratings are not comparable.

Would you like to present some honest and factual rebuttals to what was found in 2k Mules? I’d love an adult conversation on the subject.
 
One had the media carrying the water for him, the other suffered from relentless attacks and phony impeachments. Approval ratings are not comparable.

Would you like to present some honest and factual rebuttals to what was found in 2k Mules? I’d love an adult conversation on the subject.
Trump shows at an airport in northern blue Minnesota. An estimated 23,000 show to greet him. Biden shows in Scranton at a rare campaign rally. Dozens show, many wearing MAGA hats and jeering. Biden called them "chumps."

I recommend Rigged by Mollie Hemingway. There are not 81 million Americans stupid enough to vote for the nightmare before us. Have we checked out Biden approval in blue states?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT