And the grift goes on ...
anncoulter.substack.com
Not arguing with you, you didn't write the article, but Coulter's TDS is showing big time...
1)
Cellphone tracking isn't precise enough - I love this one. This tells me she didn't watch 2000 Mules. The local police in one of the cities TTV got data for actually used their geofencing to make arrests in murder (explained in the documentary). Police routinely issue geofencing warrants to make arrests in violent protests. The Gubernatorial candidate in MI was arrested based on geolocation on Jan 6th, as were several hundred others (nearly all of them in fact, used geolocation to prove their presence at the riot). She also fails to mention that they got ping data for a month before and after to make sure these were
new patterns of behavior, all explained in the documentary.
2)
In all five battleground states D'Souza considers, it is perfectly legal for third parties to drop off ballots for others - fair but in some states (Georgia) you have to file with the state for permission to do so, which no one did. Others, like PA, it's only family members. Dropping 10+ ballots at 38 drop boxes repeatedly over several days is certainly not family. And even if it's legal to drop, that still doesn't mean the ballots themselves were legal. She's also ignoring the entire thing started because a whistleblower came to them and explained the entire payment and delivery scheme.
3)
Even if every cellphone dot represented a left-wing organizer illegally dropping off another person's ballot, that still wouldn't make the ballot invalid - sure, it's easy to believe that people were getting paid $10/ballot to deliver perfectly legal ballots that could have been mailed postage paid. Thousands of people dropping hundreds of ballots per day, over several days is totally legit and normal in any election (just the 10 drop box / 5 non-profit threshold captured an estimated 400k ballots, reduce the threshold and that number increases). I'm sorry if I'm not buying this entire scheme was just a good hearted attempt to make sure perfectly legal ballots got dropped off in time.
4)
He lost White Men - fine but he picked up massive gains in the minority vote. He got 12MM more votes than 2016. She ignores those two critical points. And if the ballot trafficking is as bad as it seems, how do you know who he lost/gained ground with? You have to ignore the first to discuss the second. Second, if he was so hated by his base why did his vote total increase so much? Obama got 4MM fewer votes in 2012 and still won reelection. Incumbents that increase their vote totals always win.
The rest is gibberish. Trump's base isn't worried about him pushing for massive amnesty, the Dreamers issue is a unique situation. And they aren't worried about him "taking the guns". He's talking about red flag laws which is a sticky subject with conservatives. They make sense and we all support taking guns from crazy people, the problem is who gets to decide who's crazy and who's sane?
Regardless she's gone full Corporate FoxNews TDS on us, and this article is hard proof.