ADVERTISEMENT

Proprietary COVID-19 and Vaccine thread

Covid case numbers are declining and will soon be plummeting as this Delta surge comes to an end. Between the number of people who have now been vaccinated in addition to the large number who were infected during this surge we are likely bordering on herd immunity.

I think the admin knows that another “surge” won’t have the impact that we saw with Delta due to so many now having antibodies. The mandates are a last ditch effort to get shots in arms because the fear tactics aren’t going to have quite the same effect in the coming months...unless they just go ahead and release a totally new virus lol
Inclined to agree. I think we’ve done enough in the last month and a half to push our community as far as it probably needs to go or at least close enough that forcing vaccines on people through a mandate is unnecessary, authoritarian, totalitarian, and just plain wrong.
 
That's all we will ever get. Just enough to make us think something might happen.

Nothing will ever happen. They got away with it cause we refuse to hold them accountable. We put our faith in politicians who are in on it with them.

We will never learn.
People would be sitting in jail right now and the election results switched if the Reps had stuffed those drop off boxes with bogus ballots like the Dems did. I bet when they finally release the findings in AZ 100K or more ballots will point to clear fraud and of course almost all of them with a Biden vote. Its funny how the media was so confident on that race right after the polls closed. They knew the fIx was in on the main swing states except FL because all those secretaries of state were Trump haters except in FL. If they tried their mess in FL they know it would have been out there early after the election with that SoS.
 
sucks, 60 is far too young....sorry for your loss and the fact he left behind a 9YO, so sad

Also didn't know you were a lax bro - respekt

I coach a HS team in NoVA
Thanks. Yeah, have some friends that were close with him since college and they are devastated because of the daughter.

Yo, respekt back at you. Played in HS, D-3, and club for several years and ran the club at UF for a year.

NoVa is some serious lax.

Got a few good lax stories that I'll post if you're interested ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
People would be sitting in jail right now and the election results switched if the Reps had stuffed those drop off boxes with bogus ballots like the Dems did. I bet when they finally release the findings in AZ 100K or more ballots will point to clear fraud and of course almost all of them with a Biden vote. Its funny how the media was so confident on that race right after the polls closed. They knew the fIx was in on the main swing states except FL because all those secretaries of state were Trump haters except in FL. If they tried their mess in FL they know it would have been out there early after the election with that SoS.

As I recall, it was only FOX that called Arizona for Biden. The other networks waited until it was official.
 
We now have 172 COVID positive admissions across the system.
Three hospitals across 3 states

HUGE DECLINE OVER FROM THE PEAK 3 WEEKS AGO OF > 330 FOR SYSTEM AND WELL OVER 200 FOR HOSPITAL 1....................THIS COVID SURGE IS OVER!!!




Hospital 1

Census: 461 (ED holds: 2 and PACU holds: 2)

Available Non-COVID Med/Surg Beds: 49

Available ICUs: 3

COVID Unit Census: 111

COVID Unit beds available: 20

ED visits: 106

FED visits: 72

Confirmed COVID positive inpatients: 109 (92 unvaccinated)



Hospital 2


Census: 188 (7 holding in ER)

Available Non-COVID Med/Surg Beds: 1

Available ICUs: None

COVID Unit Census: 54

COVID Unit beds available: 1

ED visits: 69

FED visits: 61

Confirmed COVID positive inpatients: 55 (53 unvaccinated)



Hospital 3


Census: 40 (MedSurg 13 / ICU 2 / L&D 5 / SBH 20)

Available Non-COVID beds: 6

Available ICU beds: 3

COVID Unit census: 7

COVID Unit beds available: 6

ED visits: 56

Confirmed COVID positive inpatients: 8 (6 unvaccinated)



@Tmi512 @testy524 @SORT14 @dingyibvs
 



Unbelievable what is going on in this country in the last few years.
This is 90% a political act.

The media is helping Hiden distract from abandoning Americans in Afghanistan.

If this actually goes through, the Supreme Court strikes it down.

Then the dems use that to fundraise off of for 2022 and 2024.

The wheels on the bus go round and round...
 
We now have 172 COVID positive admissions across the system.
Three hospitals across 3 states

HUGE DECLINE OVER FROM THE PEAK 3 WEEKS AGO OF > 330 FOR SYSTEM AND WELL OVER 200 FOR HOSPITAL 1....................THIS COVID SURGE IS OVER!!!




Hospital 1

Census: 461 (ED holds: 2 and PACU holds: 2)

Available Non-COVID Med/Surg Beds: 49

Available ICUs: 3

COVID Unit Census: 111

COVID Unit beds available: 20

ED visits: 106

FED visits: 72

Confirmed COVID positive inpatients: 109 (92 unvaccinated)



Hospital 2


Census: 188 (7 holding in ER)

Available Non-COVID Med/Surg Beds: 1

Available ICUs: None

COVID Unit Census: 54

COVID Unit beds available: 1

ED visits: 69

FED visits: 61

Confirmed COVID positive inpatients: 55 (53 unvaccinated)



Hospital 3


Census: 40 (MedSurg 13 / ICU 2 / L&D 5 / SBH 20)

Available Non-COVID beds: 6

Available ICU beds: 3

COVID Unit census: 7

COVID Unit beds available: 6

ED visits: 56

Confirmed COVID positive inpatients: 8 (6 unvaccinated)



@Tmi512 @testy524 @SORT14 @dingyibvs

Total COVID patients 172
Total UNVACCINATED COVID patients 151
Total VACCINATED COVID patients 21

Percentage of hospitalized UNVACCINATED patients: 88%

Total ventilated COVID Patients: 34
Total UNVACCINATED COVID ventilated patients: 34
Percentage of UNVACCINATED COVID ventilated patients: 100%
 
  • Like
Reactions: SORT14
We now have 172 COVID positive admissions across the system.
Three hospitals across 3 states

HUGE DECLINE OVER FROM THE PEAK 3 WEEKS AGO OF > 330 FOR SYSTEM AND WELL OVER 200 FOR HOSPITAL 1....................THIS COVID SURGE IS OVER!!!




Hospital 1

Census: 461 (ED holds: 2 and PACU holds: 2)

Available Non-COVID Med/Surg Beds: 49

Available ICUs: 3

COVID Unit Census: 111

COVID Unit beds available: 20

ED visits: 106

FED visits: 72

Confirmed COVID positive inpatients: 109 (92 unvaccinated)



Hospital 2


Census: 188 (7 holding in ER)

Available Non-COVID Med/Surg Beds: 1

Available ICUs: None

COVID Unit Census: 54

COVID Unit beds available: 1

ED visits: 69

FED visits: 61

Confirmed COVID positive inpatients: 55 (53 unvaccinated)



Hospital 3


Census: 40 (MedSurg 13 / ICU 2 / L&D 5 / SBH 20)

Available Non-COVID beds: 6

Available ICU beds: 3

COVID Unit census: 7

COVID Unit beds available: 6

ED visits: 56

Confirmed COVID positive inpatients: 8 (6 unvaccinated)



@Tmi512 @testy524 @SORT14 @dingyibvs

It will head north as we head into winter
 
@GhostOfMatchesMalone @Gator Fever @fatman76 @kjfreeze
@Tmi512

THIS, is what we call actual medical evidence based on research straight from the source:

Monitoring Incidence of COVID-19 Cases, Hospitalizations, and Deaths, by Vaccination Status — 13 U.S. Jurisdictions, April 4–July 17, 2021​

Early Release / September 10, 2021 / 70

Heather M. Scobie, PhD1; Amelia G. Johnson, DrPH1; Amitabh B. Suthar, PharmD2; Rachel Severson, MS3; Nisha B. Alden, MPH3; Sharon Balter, MD4; Daniel Bertolino, MPH5; David Blythe, MD6; Shane Brady, MPH7; Betsy Cadwell, MSPH1; Iris Cheng, MS5; Sherri Davidson, PhD8; Janelle Delgadillo9; Katelynn Devinney, MPH5; Jeff Duchin, MD10; Monique Duwell, MD6; Rebecca Fisher, MPH4; Aaron Fleischauer, PhD11; Ashley Grant, MPH12; Jennifer Griffin, PhD4; Meredith Haddix, MPH4; Julie Hand, MSPH12; Matt Hanson, MD10; Eric Hawkins, MS13; Rachel K. Herlihy, MD3; Liam Hicks, MPH7; Corinne Holtzman, MPH14; Mikhail Hoskins, MPH11; Judie Hyun, MHS6; Ramandeep Kaur, PhD8; Meagan Kay, DVM10; Holly Kidrowski, MPH14; Curi Kim, MSPH6; Kenneth Komatsu, MPH7; Kiersten Kugeler, PhD1; Melissa Lewis, MPH1; B. Casey Lyons, MPH2; Shelby Lyons, MPH12; Ruth Lynfield, MD14; Keegan McCaffrey7; Chelsea McMullen, MS15; Lauren Milroy, MPH13; Stephanie Meyer, MPH14; Leisha Nolen, MD9; Monita R. Patel, PhD1; Sargis Pogosjans, MPH10; Heather E. Reese, PhD1; Amy Saupe, MPH14; Jessica Sell, MPH5; Theresa Sokol, MPH12; Daniel Sosin, MD15; Emma Stanislawski, MPH15; Kelly Stevens, MS8; Hailey Vest, MPH13; Kelly White, MPH13; Erica Wilson, MD11; Adam MacNeil, PhD1; Matthew D. Ritchey2; Benjamin J. Silk, PhD1 (View author affiliations)
View suggested citation

Summary

What is already known about this topic?
The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization, and death is higher in unvaccinated than vaccinated persons, and the incidence rate ratios are related to vaccine effectiveness.
What is added by this report?
Across 13 U.S. jurisdictions, incidence rate ratios for hospitalization and death changed relatively little after the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant reached predominance, suggesting high, continued vaccine effectiveness against severe COVID-19. Case IRRs decreased, suggesting reduced vaccine effectiveness for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infections.
What are the implications for public health practice?
Getting vaccinated protects against severe illness from COVID-19, including the Delta variant. Monitoring COVID-19 incidence by vaccination status might provide early signals of potential changes in vaccine effectiveness that can be confirmed through robust controlled studies.
Article Metrics

Altmetric:​



Citations:​


Views:​

Views equals page views plus PDF downloads

Metric Details
Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Table
References
Related Materials
This figure shows fully vaccinated people had less risk of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death.


COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infection surveillance helps monitor trends in disease incidence and severe outcomes in fully vaccinated persons, including the impact of the highly transmissible B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Reported COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths occurring among persons aged ≥18 years during April 4–July 17, 2021, were analyzed by vaccination status across 13 U.S. jurisdictions that routinely linked case surveillance and immunization registry data. Averaged weekly, age-standardized incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for cases among persons who were not fully vaccinated compared with those among fully vaccinated persons decreased from 11.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.8–15.8) to 4.6 (95% CI = 2.5–8.5) between two periods when prevalence of the Delta variant was lower (<50% of sequenced isolates; April 4–June 19) and higher (≥50%; June 20–July 17), and IRRs for hospitalizations and deaths decreased between the same two periods, from 13.3 (95% CI = 11.3–15.6) to 10.4 (95% CI = 8.1–13.3) and from 16.6 (95% CI = 13.5–20.4) to 11.3 (95% CI = 9.1–13.9). Findings were consistent with a potential decline in vaccine protection against confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and continued strong protection against COVID-19–associated hospitalization and death. Getting vaccinated protects against severe illness from COVID-19, including the Delta variant, and monitoring COVID-19 incidence by vaccination status might provide early signals of changes in vaccine-related protection that can be confirmed through well-controlled vaccine effectiveness (VE) studies.
Two surveillance indicators that potentially can be used to monitor and describe vaccine breakthrough COVID-19 cases and severe outcomes are the percentage of vaccinated persons among cases (PVC) and an IRR between unvaccinated and vaccinated patients. PVC increases with increasing vaccination coverage or decreasing VE (1,2), complicating interpretation of this metric. IRRs are more stable, directly related to VE, and easier to communicate publicly in terms of vaccine impact (2). Most jurisdictions focus on assessing COVID-19 outcomes in fully vaccinated persons (≥14 days after completion of all recommended doses of an FDA-authorized COVID-19 vaccine) and have readily implemented comparisons to not fully vaccinated persons, including persons who are partially vaccinated (<14 days since completing the primary series or did not complete the series) or unvaccinated (did not receive any COVID-19 vaccine); some jurisdictions also monitor trends in partially vaccinated persons.
 
Last edited:
Aggregate weekly numbers of COVID-19 cases and COVID-19–associated hospitalizations and deaths among persons aged ≥18 years with specimen collection dates during April 4–July 17, 2021, were analyzed by age group (18–49, 50–64, and ≥65 years) and vaccination status across 13 public health jurisdictions.* All participating jurisdictions had established processes for linking case surveillance and vaccination data from state/local immunization registries; this method usually assumes that cases among persons not matched to the registry are among unvaccinated persons. Eleven jurisdictions provided hospitalization data, and all submitted mortality data. Standard definitions were used for 1) COVID-19 cases,† 2) COVID-19 cases in fully vaccinated or not fully vaccinated persons,§ 3) COVID-19–associated hospitalizations,¶ and 4) COVID-19–associated deaths,** with specimen collection dates used as time points.
Two analysis periods, April 4–June 19 and June 20–July 17, were designated, based on weeks with <50% or ≥50% weighted prevalence of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant for the 13 jurisdictions.†† The percentages of total cases, hospitalizations, and deaths by vaccination status were calculated for each period and age group. The expected PVC was assessed using the formula: PVC = [PPV–(PPV*VE)]/[1–(PPV*VE)], where PPV is the proportion of the population vaccinated, or vaccination coverage (1). PVC was calculated using VE estimates of 80%, 90%, and 95%. Vaccination coverage was estimated by age group using the sum of fully vaccinated persons divided by the 2019 U.S. intercensal population estimates.§§ Weekly age-specific incidences by vaccination status were calculated as the number of cases, hospitalizations, or deaths divided by the number of persons either fully vaccinated or not fully vaccinated (obtained by subtracting the number of fully vaccinated persons from total population estimates). Average weekly incidence in each period was age standardized using the 2000 U.S. Census standard population.¶¶ IRRs were calculated by dividing the incidence among persons not fully vaccinated by that among fully vaccinated persons; 95% CIs were calculated to account for variation in weekly rates. To aid interpretation of changes in IRRs, age-standardized crude VE was estimated as (1 – [incidence in vaccinated/incidence in unvaccinated]). A sensitivity analysis examined the impact of excluding partially vaccinated persons from IRRs using data available from nine jurisdictions. SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute) and R (version 4.0.3; R Foundation) were used to conduct all analyses. This activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.***
During April 4–July 17, a total of 569,142 (92%) COVID-19 cases, 34,972 (92%) hospitalizations, and 6,132 (91%) COVID-19–associated deaths were reported among persons not fully vaccinated, and 46,312 (8%) cases, 2,976 (8%) hospitalizations, and 616 (9%) deaths were reported among fully vaccinated persons in the 13 jurisdictions (Table). The weekly prevalence of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant increased from <1% to 90% during April 4–July 17. Full vaccination coverage increased from 19% to 54%; in the final week, coverage ranged by age group from 45% (in persons aged 18–49 years) to 73% (≥65 years).
During April 4–June 19, fully vaccinated persons accounted for 5% of cases, 7% of hospitalizations, and 8% of deaths overall; these percentages were higher during June 20–July 17 (18%, 14%, and 16%, respectively). Using the reported 37% vaccination coverage for the 13 jurisdictions during April 4–June 19 and an assumption of 90% VE, vaccinated persons would have been expected to account for 6% of cases (close to the 5% observed). With 53% coverage reported during June 20–July 17, vaccinated persons were expected to account for 10% of cases at a constant VE of 90%; the observed 18% would have been expected at a lower VE of 80%.
Averaged weekly, age-standardized rates (events per 100,000 persons) were higher among persons not fully vaccinated than among fully vaccinated persons for reported cases (112.3 versus 10.1), hospitalizations (9.1 versus 0.7), and deaths (1.6 versus 0.1) during April 4–June 19, as well as during June 20–July 17 (89.1 versus 19.4; 7.0 versus 0.7; 1.1 versus 0.1, respectively). Higher hospitalization and death rates were observed in older age groups, regardless of vaccination status, resulting in a larger impact of age-standardization on overall incidence for these outcomes.
Within each age group, the percentage of vaccinated persons among cases, hospitalizations, and deaths increased with increasing vaccination coverage (Figure 1). As the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant surpassed 50%, the percentage of vaccinated persons among cases in each age group increased at rates corresponding to benchmarks for lower VE (i.e., from approximately 90% to <80%). Increases in the percentages of vaccinated persons aged ≥65 years among COVID-19–associated hospitalizations and deaths also appeared higher than expected. During June 20–July 17, age-standardized rates of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths among persons not fully vaccinated increased weekly; among fully vaccinated persons, case rates increased, but rates of hospitalizations and deaths remained largely unchanged (Figure 2).
Age-standardized IRRs for cases in persons not fully vaccinated versus fully vaccinated decreased from 11.1 (95% CI = 7.8–15.8) during April 4–June 19 to 4.6 (95% CI = 2.5–8.5) during June 20–July 17, while IRRs decreased slightly from 13.3 (95% CI = 11.3–15.6) to 10.4 (95% CI = 8.1–13.3) for hospitalizations and from 16.6 (95% CI = 13.5–20.4) to 11.3 (95% CI = 9.1–13.9) for deaths during the same two periods. Persons aged ≥65 years had larger declines in IRRs for hospitalization and death than did younger age groups (Table). The change in age-standardized IRRs for cases between the April 4–June 19 and June 20–July 17 periods represented potential changes in crude VE from 91% to 78% for infection, from 92% to 90% for hospitalization, and from 94% to 91% for death (Supplementary Figure 1, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/109531). A sensitivity analysis excluding partially vaccinated persons in nine jurisdictions yielded similar trends but higher IRRs and VE estimates for hospitalizations and deaths (Supplementary Table, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/109533). Variability in IRRs was also observed among jurisdictions (Supplementary Figure 2, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/109532).
Top

Discussion​

In 13 U.S. jurisdictions, rates of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths were substantially higher in persons not fully vaccinated compared with those in fully vaccinated persons, similar to findings in other reports (2,3). After the week of June 20, 2021, when the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant became predominant, the percentage of fully vaccinated persons among cases increased more than expected for the given vaccination coverage and a constant VE. The IRR for cases among persons not fully vaccinated versus fully vaccinated decreased substantially; IRRs for hospitalizations and deaths changed less overall, but moderately among adults aged ≥65 years. Findings from this crude analysis of surveillance data are consistent with recent studies reporting decreased VE against confirmed infection but not hospitalization or death, during a period of Delta variant predominance and potential waning of vaccine-induced population immunity (46).†††
The findings in this report are subject to at least five limitations. First, combining unvaccinated and partially vaccinated persons resulted in lower IRR and VE estimates. Second, variable linkage of case surveillance, vaccination, hospitalization, and mortality data might have resulted in misclassifications that could influence IRR estimates; no substantial differences in ascertainment of outcomes by vaccination status were noted in jurisdictions that were able to assess this. Lags in reporting of deaths might have affected the second period differentially. Third, this was an ecological study in which IRRs lacked multivariable adjustments and causality could not be assessed (i.e., possible differences in testing or behaviors in vaccinated and unvaccinated persons). VE is being assessed through ongoing controlled studies. Fourth, the period when the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant reached ≥50% overall prevalence was assumed to be the first week when most cases were infected with the Delta variant, but the week varied by jurisdiction. Finally, the data assessed from 13 jurisdictions accounted for 25% of the U.S. population, and therefore might not be generalizable.
Monitoring COVID-19 outcomes in populations over time by vaccination status is facilitated through reliable linkage of COVID-19 case surveillance and vaccination data. However, interpreting state-level variation by week might be challenging, especially for severe outcomes with small numbers. The framework used in this analysis allows for comparisons of observed IRRs and percentages of vaccinated cases, hospitalizations, and deaths to expected values. The data might be helpful in communicating the real-time impact of vaccines (e.g., persons not fully vaccinated having >10 times higher COVID-19 mortality risk) and guiding prevention strategies, such as vaccination and nonpharmacologic interventions.
 
Top

Return to your place in the textFIGURE 1. Observed versus expected percentage of fully vaccinated persons among COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths based on population vaccination coverage* and assumed 80%–95% vaccine effectiveness,† by week§ and age group — 13 U.S. jurisdictions,¶ April 4–July 17, 2021

The figure is a series of nine scatter plots showing observed versus expected percentage of fully vaccinated persons among COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths based on population vaccination coverage and assumed 80%–95% vaccine effectiveness, by week and age group, in 13 U.S. jurisdictions, during April 4–July 17, 2021.

Abbreviations: PVC = percentage of vaccinated persons occurring among outcomes; PPV = proportion of the population that is vaccinated; VE = vaccine effectiveness.
* Vaccination coverage was estimated using the sum of fully vaccinated persons (submitted by the jurisdictions) divided by the combined 2019 U.S. intercensal population estimates by age group.
† The expected PVC, represented by the light gray lines, was assessed using the formula: PVC = [PPV-(PPV*VE)]/1-(PPV*VE), where benchmarks are added at different VE values (80%, 90%, and 95%). Observed values that approach or go above the 80% VE line indicate decreased VE.
§ Two analysis periods, April 4–June 19 and June 20–July 17, were designated based on the threshold week when the weighted percentage of lineages from whole-genome sequencing results submitted to or performed by CDC reached 50% for the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant across the 13 jurisdictions. Weekly values are plotted, with the two analysis periods and most recent week for the analysis period shown.
¶ Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Indiana, Los Angeles County (California), Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York City (New York), North Carolina, Seattle/King County (Washington), and Utah.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uniformed_ReRe
"In 13 U.S. jurisdictions, rates of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths were substantially higher in persons not fully vaccinated compared with those in fully vaccinated persons, similar to findings in other reports (2,3)."

IOW cherry pick 13 areas to get the results you want.

Case closed!

Goodness critical thinking is a lost art in this country.
 
@GhostOfMatchesMalone @Gator Fever @fatman76 @kjfreeze

THIS, is what we call actual medical evidence based on research straight from the source:

Monitoring Incidence of COVID-19 Cases, Hospitalizations, and Deaths, by Vaccination Status — 13 U.S. Jurisdictions, April 4–July 17, 2021​

Early Release / September 10, 2021 / 70

Heather M. Scobie, PhD1; Amelia G. Johnson, DrPH1; Amitabh B. Suthar, PharmD2; Rachel Severson, MS3; Nisha B. Alden, MPH3; Sharon Balter, MD4; Daniel Bertolino, MPH5; David Blythe, MD6; Shane Brady, MPH7; Betsy Cadwell, MSPH1; Iris Cheng, MS5; Sherri Davidson, PhD8; Janelle Delgadillo9; Katelynn Devinney, MPH5; Jeff Duchin, MD10; Monique Duwell, MD6; Rebecca Fisher, MPH4; Aaron Fleischauer, PhD11; Ashley Grant, MPH12; Jennifer Griffin, PhD4; Meredith Haddix, MPH4; Julie Hand, MSPH12; Matt Hanson, MD10; Eric Hawkins, MS13; Rachel K. Herlihy, MD3; Liam Hicks, MPH7; Corinne Holtzman, MPH14; Mikhail Hoskins, MPH11; Judie Hyun, MHS6; Ramandeep Kaur, PhD8; Meagan Kay, DVM10; Holly Kidrowski, MPH14; Curi Kim, MSPH6; Kenneth Komatsu, MPH7; Kiersten Kugeler, PhD1; Melissa Lewis, MPH1; B. Casey Lyons, MPH2; Shelby Lyons, MPH12; Ruth Lynfield, MD14; Keegan McCaffrey7; Chelsea McMullen, MS15; Lauren Milroy, MPH13; Stephanie Meyer, MPH14; Leisha Nolen, MD9; Monita R. Patel, PhD1; Sargis Pogosjans, MPH10; Heather E. Reese, PhD1; Amy Saupe, MPH14; Jessica Sell, MPH5; Theresa Sokol, MPH12; Daniel Sosin, MD15; Emma Stanislawski, MPH15; Kelly Stevens, MS8; Hailey Vest, MPH13; Kelly White, MPH13; Erica Wilson, MD11; Adam MacNeil, PhD1; Matthew D. Ritchey2; Benjamin J. Silk, PhD1 (View author affiliations)
View suggested citation

Summary

What is already known about this topic?
The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization, and death is higher in unvaccinated than vaccinated persons, and the incidence rate ratios are related to vaccine effectiveness.
What is added by this report?
Across 13 U.S. jurisdictions, incidence rate ratios for hospitalization and death changed relatively little after the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant reached predominance, suggesting high, continued vaccine effectiveness against severe COVID-19. Case IRRs decreased, suggesting reduced vaccine effectiveness for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infections.
What are the implications for public health practice?
Getting vaccinated protects against severe illness from COVID-19, including the Delta variant. Monitoring COVID-19 incidence by vaccination status might provide early signals of potential changes in vaccine effectiveness that can be confirmed through robust controlled studies.
Article Metrics

Altmetric:​



Citations:​


Views:​

Views equals page views plus PDF downloads

Metric Details
Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Table
References
Related Materials
This figure shows fully vaccinated people had less risk of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death.


COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infection surveillance helps monitor trends in disease incidence and severe outcomes in fully vaccinated persons, including the impact of the highly transmissible B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Reported COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths occurring among persons aged ≥18 years during April 4–July 17, 2021, were analyzed by vaccination status across 13 U.S. jurisdictions that routinely linked case surveillance and immunization registry data. Averaged weekly, age-standardized incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for cases among persons who were not fully vaccinated compared with those among fully vaccinated persons decreased from 11.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.8–15.8) to 4.6 (95% CI = 2.5–8.5) between two periods when prevalence of the Delta variant was lower (<50% of sequenced isolates; April 4–June 19) and higher (≥50%; June 20–July 17), and IRRs for hospitalizations and deaths decreased between the same two periods, from 13.3 (95% CI = 11.3–15.6) to 10.4 (95% CI = 8.1–13.3) and from 16.6 (95% CI = 13.5–20.4) to 11.3 (95% CI = 9.1–13.9). Findings were consistent with a potential decline in vaccine protection against confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and continued strong protection against COVID-19–associated hospitalization and death. Getting vaccinated protects against severe illness from COVID-19, including the Delta variant, and monitoring COVID-19 incidence by vaccination status might provide early signals of changes in vaccine-related protection that can be confirmed through well-controlled vaccine effectiveness (VE) studies.
Two surveillance indicators that potentially can be used to monitor and describe vaccine breakthrough COVID-19 cases and severe outcomes are the percentage of vaccinated persons among cases (PVC) and an IRR between unvaccinated and vaccinated patients. PVC increases with increasing vaccination coverage or decreasing VE (1,2), complicating interpretation of this metric. IRRs are more stable, directly related to VE, and easier to communicate publicly in terms of vaccine impact (2). Most jurisdictions focus on assessing COVID-19 outcomes in fully vaccinated persons (≥14 days after completion of all recommended doses of an FDA-authorized COVID-19 vaccine) and have readily implemented comparisons to not fully vaccinated persons, including persons who are partially vaccinated (<14 days since completing the primary series or did not complete the series) or unvaccinated (did not receive any COVID-19 vaccine); some jurisdictions also monitor trends in partially vaccinated persons.
Just to further the understanding for those a little rusty in statistics, the confidence interval (CI) is a statistic that estimates the range of the possible true mean for the population. The CI should never go from a negative number to a positive number (thus including zero). So, for this statement:

“Averaged weekly, age-standardized incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for cases among persons who were not fully vaccinated compared with those among fully vaccinated persons decreased from 11.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.8–15.8) to 4.6 (95% CI = 2.5–8.5) between two periods when prevalence of the Delta variant was lower…”

The average decrease in score between unvaccinated vs vaccinated was 11.1 to 4.6 and the true population average for unvaccinated is highly likely to fall within 7.8 to 15.8 to a range of 2.5 to 8.5 for vaccinated. To get overlap, you’d have to look at the tails – the extreme scores. We can see that you would need to be at the extreme lower end for the unvaccinated population (7.8) to have the same/similar results as those in the extreme high end for the vaccinated population (8.5). The vaccine puts the probabilities statistically in your favor.
 
OVERWHEMLING EVIDENCE VACCINATIONS SAVE LIVES AND HOSPITAL UTILIZATION/RESORUCE UTILIZATION

April 4-June 19
Total number of cases: 615,454
Total Hospitalizations: 37,948
Total Hospitalizations in NOT FULLY VACCINATED: 34,972
Total Hospitalizations in FULLY VACCINATED: 2,976
Total Deaths from COVID in NOT FULLY VACCINATED: 6,132
Total Deaths from COVID in FULLY VACCINATED: 616

Total % Deaths in NOT FULLY VACCINATED: 91% of all COVID Deaths over this time frame
Total % of Hospitalizations in NOT FULLY VACCINATED: 92% of all COVID Hospitalizations over this time frame

States Studied: ** Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Indiana, Los Angeles County (California), Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York City (New York), North Carolina, Seattle/King County (Washington), and Utah.

@GhostOfMatchesMalone @Gator Fever @fatman76 @kjfreeze @BamaFan1137 @goldmom @greyghost14 @SORT14 @testy524 @dingyibvs
@Tmi512
 
Last edited:
Just to further the understanding for those a little rusty in statistics,
Dude. This is epic gaslighting. You don't have to be rusty in anything besides objectivity to note this here:

"In 13 U.S. jurisdictions, rates of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths were substantially higher in persons not fully vaccinated compared with those in fully vaccinated persons, similar to findings in other reports (2,3)."

You don't draw meaningful conclusions from cherry-picked data.

You know that. The internet doctor knows that.

Everyone here knows this is another of his 'bet I can get a rise out of them' ploys. And it seems to be working about as well as his previous attempts.

Since you are now Liking it, I can only assume you are now in on the gaslighting with him.

Do better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gator Fever
Aggregate weekly numbers of COVID-19 cases and COVID-19–associated hospitalizations and deaths among persons aged ≥18 years with specimen collection dates during April 4–July 17, 2021, were analyzed by age group (18–49, 50–64, and ≥65 years) and vaccination status across 13 public health jurisdictions.* All participating jurisdictions had established processes for linking case surveillance and vaccination data from state/local immunization registries; this method usually assumes that cases among persons not matched to the registry are among unvaccinated persons. Eleven jurisdictions provided hospitalization data, and all submitted mortality data. Standard definitions were used for 1) COVID-19 cases,† 2) COVID-19 cases in fully vaccinated or not fully vaccinated persons,§ 3) COVID-19–associated hospitalizations,¶ and 4) COVID-19–associated deaths,** with specimen collection dates used as time points.
Two analysis periods, April 4–June 19 and June 20–July 17, were designated, based on weeks with <50% or ≥50% weighted prevalence of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant for the 13 jurisdictions.†† The percentages of total cases, hospitalizations, and deaths by vaccination status were calculated for each period and age group. The expected PVC was assessed using the formula: PVC = [PPV–(PPV*VE)]/[1–(PPV*VE)], where PPV is the proportion of the population vaccinated, or vaccination coverage (1). PVC was calculated using VE estimates of 80%, 90%, and 95%. Vaccination coverage was estimated by age group using the sum of fully vaccinated persons divided by the 2019 U.S. intercensal population estimates.§§ Weekly age-specific incidences by vaccination status were calculated as the number of cases, hospitalizations, or deaths divided by the number of persons either fully vaccinated or not fully vaccinated (obtained by subtracting the number of fully vaccinated persons from total population estimates). Average weekly incidence in each period was age standardized using the 2000 U.S. Census standard population.¶¶ IRRs were calculated by dividing the incidence among persons not fully vaccinated by that among fully vaccinated persons; 95% CIs were calculated to account for variation in weekly rates. To aid interpretation of changes in IRRs, age-standardized crude VE was estimated as (1 – [incidence in vaccinated/incidence in unvaccinated]). A sensitivity analysis examined the impact of excluding partially vaccinated persons from IRRs using data available from nine jurisdictions. SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute) and R (version 4.0.3; R Foundation) were used to conduct all analyses. This activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.***
During April 4–July 17, a total of 569,142 (92%) COVID-19 cases, 34,972 (92%) hospitalizations, and 6,132 (91%) COVID-19–associated deaths were reported among persons not fully vaccinated, and 46,312 (8%) cases, 2,976 (8%) hospitalizations, and 616 (9%) deaths were reported among fully vaccinated persons in the 13 jurisdictions (Table). The weekly prevalence of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant increased from <1% to 90% during April 4–July 17. Full vaccination coverage increased from 19% to 54%; in the final week, coverage ranged by age group from 45% (in persons aged 18–49 years) to 73% (≥65 years).
During April 4–June 19, fully vaccinated persons accounted for 5% of cases, 7% of hospitalizations, and 8% of deaths overall; these percentages were higher during June 20–July 17 (18%, 14%, and 16%, respectively). Using the reported 37% vaccination coverage for the 13 jurisdictions during April 4–June 19 and an assumption of 90% VE, vaccinated persons would have been expected to account for 6% of cases (close to the 5% observed). With 53% coverage reported during June 20–July 17, vaccinated persons were expected to account for 10% of cases at a constant VE of 90%; the observed 18% would have been expected at a lower VE of 80%.
Averaged weekly, age-standardized rates (events per 100,000 persons) were higher among persons not fully vaccinated than among fully vaccinated persons for reported cases (112.3 versus 10.1), hospitalizations (9.1 versus 0.7), and deaths (1.6 versus 0.1) during April 4–June 19, as well as during June 20–July 17 (89.1 versus 19.4; 7.0 versus 0.7; 1.1 versus 0.1, respectively). Higher hospitalization and death rates were observed in older age groups, regardless of vaccination status, resulting in a larger impact of age-standardization on overall incidence for these outcomes.
Within each age group, the percentage of vaccinated persons among cases, hospitalizations, and deaths increased with increasing vaccination coverage (Figure 1). As the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant surpassed 50%, the percentage of vaccinated persons among cases in each age group increased at rates corresponding to benchmarks for lower VE (i.e., from approximately 90% to <80%). Increases in the percentages of vaccinated persons aged ≥65 years among COVID-19–associated hospitalizations and deaths also appeared higher than expected. During June 20–July 17, age-standardized rates of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths among persons not fully vaccinated increased weekly; among fully vaccinated persons, case rates increased, but rates of hospitalizations and deaths remained largely unchanged (Figure 2).
Age-standardized IRRs for cases in persons not fully vaccinated versus fully vaccinated decreased from 11.1 (95% CI = 7.8–15.8) during April 4–June 19 to 4.6 (95% CI = 2.5–8.5) during June 20–July 17, while IRRs decreased slightly from 13.3 (95% CI = 11.3–15.6) to 10.4 (95% CI = 8.1–13.3) for hospitalizations and from 16.6 (95% CI = 13.5–20.4) to 11.3 (95% CI = 9.1–13.9) for deaths during the same two periods. Persons aged ≥65 years had larger declines in IRRs for hospitalization and death than did younger age groups (Table). The change in age-standardized IRRs for cases between the April 4–June 19 and June 20–July 17 periods represented potential changes in crude VE from 91% to 78% for infection, from 92% to 90% for hospitalization, and from 94% to 91% for death (Supplementary Figure 1, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/109531). A sensitivity analysis excluding partially vaccinated persons in nine jurisdictions yielded similar trends but higher IRRs and VE estimates for hospitalizations and deaths (Supplementary Table, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/109533). Variability in IRRs was also observed among jurisdictions (Supplementary Figure 2, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/109532).
Top

Discussion​

In 13 U.S. jurisdictions, rates of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths were substantially higher in persons not fully vaccinated compared with those in fully vaccinated persons, similar to findings in other reports (2,3). After the week of June 20, 2021, when the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant became predominant, the percentage of fully vaccinated persons among cases increased more than expected for the given vaccination coverage and a constant VE. The IRR for cases among persons not fully vaccinated versus fully vaccinated decreased substantially; IRRs for hospitalizations and deaths changed less overall, but moderately among adults aged ≥65 years. Findings from this crude analysis of surveillance data are consistent with recent studies reporting decreased VE against confirmed infection but not hospitalization or death, during a period of Delta variant predominance and potential waning of vaccine-induced population immunity (46).†††
The findings in this report are subject to at least five limitations. First, combining unvaccinated and partially vaccinated persons resulted in lower IRR and VE estimates. Second, variable linkage of case surveillance, vaccination, hospitalization, and mortality data might have resulted in misclassifications that could influence IRR estimates; no substantial differences in ascertainment of outcomes by vaccination status were noted in jurisdictions that were able to assess this. Lags in reporting of deaths might have affected the second period differentially. Third, this was an ecological study in which IRRs lacked multivariable adjustments and causality could not be assessed (i.e., possible differences in testing or behaviors in vaccinated and unvaccinated persons). VE is being assessed through ongoing controlled studies. Fourth, the period when the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant reached ≥50% overall prevalence was assumed to be the first week when most cases were infected with the Delta variant, but the week varied by jurisdiction. Finally, the data assessed from 13 jurisdictions accounted for 25% of the U.S. population, and therefore might not be generalizable.
Monitoring COVID-19 outcomes in populations over time by vaccination status is facilitated through reliable linkage of COVID-19 case surveillance and vaccination data. However, interpreting state-level variation by week might be challenging, especially for severe outcomes with small numbers. The framework used in this analysis allows for comparisons of observed IRRs and percentages of vaccinated cases, hospitalizations, and deaths to expected values. The data might be helpful in communicating the real-time impact of vaccines (e.g., persons not fully vaccinated having >10 times higher COVID-19 mortality risk) and guiding prevention strategies, such as vaccination and nonpharmacologic interventions.

TLDR
 
Dude. This is epic gaslighting. You don't have to be rusty in anything besides objectivity to note this here:

"In 13 U.S. jurisdictions, rates of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths were substantially higher in persons not fully vaccinated compared with those in fully vaccinated persons, similar to findings in other reports (2,3)."

You don't draw meaningful conclusions from cherry-picked data.

You know that. The internet doctor knows that.

Everyone here knows this is another of his 'bet I can get a rise out of them' ploys. And it seems to be working about as well as his previous attempts.

Since you are now Liking it, I can only assume you are now in on the gaslighting with him.

Do better.
Nobody is gaslighting you. Don't be so sensitive. And a sample of 570k is perfectly substantial. Yes, I will "like" data-driven posts and real information. You have the choice to ignore it, but don't ask me to.
 
Nobody is gaslighting you. Don't be so sensitive. And a sample of 570k is perfectly substantial. Yes, I will "like" data-driven posts and real information. You have the choice to ignore it, but don't ask me to.
To be fair, this is actually correct. You guys are attempting to gaslight.

As I said, it's working about as well as internet doctor's previous attempts to 'get a rise' out of posters here.

But now that it's confirmed you are simply a mouthpiece for him, there's no reason to continue to read your posts, so on Ignore you go.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Uniformed_ReRe
Dude. This is epic gaslighting. You don't have to be rusty in anything besides objectivity to note this here:

"In 13 U.S. jurisdictions, rates of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths were substantially higher in persons not fully vaccinated compared with those in fully vaccinated persons, similar to findings in other reports (2,3)."

You don't draw meaningful conclusions from cherry-picked data.

You know that. The internet doctor knows that.

Everyone here knows this is another of his 'bet I can get a rise out of them' ploys. And it seems to be working about as well as his previous attempts.

Since you are now Liking it, I can only assume you are now in on the gaslighting with him.

Do better.
In medical research, the larger the sample size the more reliable the results. Pulling the data from 13 representative states with a total off over 614,000 cases is a massive sample size.
Is what it is, never expected you or @jfegaly to accept it, but I did want to show you guys what it looks like to actually SHOW EVIDENCE and not just post a tweet from an article with no raw data in it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: testy524
To be fair, this is actually correct. You guys are attempting to gaslight.

As I said, it's working about as well as internet doctor's previous attempts to 'get a rise' out of posters here.

But now that it's confirmed you are simply a mouthpiece for him, there's no reason to continue to read your posts, so on Ignore you go.
Suit yourself.
 
In medical research, the larger the sample size the more reliable the results. Pulling the date from 13 representative states with a total off over 614,000 cases is a massive sample size.
Is what it is, never expected you for @jfegaly to accept it, but I did want to show you guys what it looks like to actually SHOW EVIDENCE and not just post a tweet from an article with no raw data in it.
What's the vaccination rates in those 13 states versus the other 37?

What's the covid cases and deaths in those 13 states versus the other 37?

The list goes on and on. Amazing that you thought no one would catch that.

Garbage in, garbage out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT