Daily reminder:
If you INFRINGE me to 2 “arms” my right to bear arms has been infringed.
Shall not be limited
If you INFRINGE me to 2 “arms” my right to bear arms has been infringed.
Shall not be limited
The REAL part of this is....this same guy that drives the Prius is the EXACT same guy afraid of firearms, and refuses tro get one to protect his family and loved ones. AND...they are Brandon supportersSome people need a truck.
If you find a guy who mocks other guys for driving a Prius or whatever, they're probably driving a truck with no actual need for a truck. Watch for it, you'll see it.
that's not how infringement works. shall not be infringed = congress shall make no law.If you're 'bearing arms', your right to 'bear arms' has not been infringed.
If you have a right to eat cake and you're eating cake, your right to eat cake has not been infringed.
So you expect the elderly, the disabled, those of small stature, and women to fight fairly?Right, the people who need guns to protect themselves are the manly ones. 😂
OK, I'll bite. If I'm eating cake but I can only have two pieces, that's infringement.If you're 'bearing arms', your right to 'bear arms' has not been infringed.
If you have a right to eat cake and you're eating cake, your right to eat cake has not been infringed.
I don't have a gun or a truck. The difference between you and I is I'm not terrified of either. I understand both are simply inanimate objects that can't hurt me. You don't seem to get that.Right, the people who need guns to protect themselves are the manly ones. 😂
Are you talking about a gunfight or Theo's responses ITT?People who attack others usually do so when they believe that they have an advantage. Just food for thought.
Theo also believes Alec Baldwin and he can't wait for that stupid movie to be released.Are you talking about a gunfight or Theo's responses ITT?
Maybe we found Baldwins sock?Theo also believes Alec Baldwin and he can't wait for that stupid movie to be released.
I think in high school Bubba Lee got the head cheerleader that Theo loved, and Bubba drove a loud, big truck with a gun rack in the window. The head cheerleader loved Bubba Lee cause he was a 'real man', and Theo was just a nerd with a pocket protector and broken glasses that got ignored.Theo also believes Alec Baldwin and he can't wait for that stupid movie to be released.
And Bubba still gets laid more. 🤣I think in high school Bubba Lee got the head cheerleader that Theo loved, and Bubba drove a loud, big truck with a gun rack in the window. The head cheerleader loved Bubba Lee cause he was a 'real man', and Theo was just a nerd with a pocket protector and broken glasses that got ignored.
Every day he comes to this board and others like it trying to get even with Bubba Lee. I think that's what is happening here. Therapy is a good option.
If the dealer ad says they will give you 'free cars' and they give you two cars, that is the end of their responsibility. They have given you free cars just like they said.OK, I'll bite. If I'm eating cake but I can only have two pieces, that's infringement.
The caveat being I paid for the cake so I can eat as many pieces as I pay for.
I haven't said that. Did Ghost say I did? If you pay attention, he makes a lot of stuff up.So you expect the elderly, the disabled, those of small stature, and women to fight fairly?
That's a decidedly odd take.
On a side note, when they say 'congress', does that include the states?that's not how infringement works. shall not be infringed = congress shall make no law.
So being weak and fearful aren't good reasons to bear arms?I haven't said that. Did Ghost say I did? If you pay attention, he makes a lot of stuff up.
Besides, that is a good example of weak people needing guns to protect themselves. The elderly, women......and gun nuts.
Being weak and fearful is a fine reason to bear arms.So being weak and fearful aren't good reasons to bear arms?
I don't care to be stabbed or shot, I've never met anyone that has that enjoyed it and I imagine it's painful. Additionally, I'm an old, "fluffy" retiree. I get the feeling that you think I should learn Karate or mixed martial arts rather than take the much easier and lazier route of carrying a firearm.
You say you believe that everyone has a right to self defense. However, you seem to have some rather unreasonable qualifiers attached, no?
I will agree that some people own both guns and trucks because it makes them feel manly and powerful but surely thus bit of puffery can coexist with self defense and utility?
Theo this is wrong, and honestly one of your dumber troll attempts. Companies tried this and got sued because of it. And lost cause they were wrong just like you are. That's why all their 'free' campaigns clearly state the limit on the number of 'free' items you can get.If the dealer ad says they will give you 'free cars' and they give you two cars, that is the end of their responsibility. They have given you free cars just like they said.
So being weak and fearful and NOT bearing arms is better?Being weak and fearful is a fine reason to bear arms.
Theo has figured out how the Constitution works. Gentlemen, we are making progress.Anyway, the first specifically says no law will be made. The second is different, it says you have the right to bear arms but it doesn't say anything about additional laws (as long as those laws don't override your right to bear arms).
Interesting. Then you should understand ones needs very well extend past 2 arms.I have no problem with responsible adults getting a gun for whatever need they have.
I haven't said anything about anyone's needs extending beyond two guns.Interesting. Then you should understand ones needs very well extend past 2 arms.
Home protection: nothin says hello better than a shotgun being prepared.
Carry in public: maybe a 9mm or something similar
Carry in bear country: maybe a shotgun or a 44 mag.
Deer or medium size game Hunting: maybe a .30-6 or similar
Small game: .22 or similar
Large game: maybe a .338 or similar caliber
Militia: maybe an AR or AK. Preferably full auto capable. Maybe even larger caliber full auto like a fifty cal. Probably need multiple arms in this category.
Our founders were very intelligent. Shall not be limited.
I suspect Theo's view of 'responsible' gun ownership is anything but.Interesting. Then you should understand ones needs very well extend past 2 arms.
And as everyone here has told you, that is wrong. You have even been shown the court cases where this was tried and you admitted that ends that 'debate'.What I've said is, someone could limit it to two guns and not literally set aside the second.
I understand the gun nut position very well.And as everyone here has told you, that is wrong. You have even been shown the court cases where this was tried and you admitted that ends that 'debate'.
This is another example of you being dishonest. Why is it so hard for you to have an honest conversation on this topic? What are you afraid of?
No, you said what I quoted you said. Which was…I haven't said anything about anyone's needs extending beyond two guns.
What I've said is, someone could limit it to two guns and not literally set aside the second.
So you think 7 would be a more reasonable number?
I'm asking how many guns you need for everything you want to do.No, you said what I quoted you said. Which was…
“I have no problem with responsible adults getting a gun for whatever need they have.”
Now you want to limit my needs as well?
And no. 7 isn’t reasonable. As I stated in the well regulated militia need in my post you quoted, you will have several different arms needed. I suggest you stock up on those needs, because the fight is coming to us…whether you like it or not.
I cannot fathom that last part.No, you said what I quoted you said. Which was…
“I have no problem with responsible adults getting a gun for whatever need they have.”
Now you want to limit my needs as well?
And no. 7 isn’t reasonable. As I stated in the well regulated militia need in my post you quoted, you will have several different arms needed. I suggest you stock up on those needs, because the fight is coming to us…whether you like it or not.
I'm waiting for my two free government guns. When do we get them?😂If the dealer ad says they will give you 'free cars' and they give you two cars, that is the end of their responsibility. They have given you free cars just like they said.
Note: I have not said there is an existing limit on guns. Ghost will probably tell you I said that but he makes a lot of stuff up.
By 'gun nut' you mean anyone that believes we should follow the Constitution as written, right?I understand the gun nut position very well.
As many as he wants.I'm asking how many guns you need for everything you want to do.
Just further validation that todays “moderates” aren’t moderates just because they self identify as such. No different than a man who tucks or cuts isn’t a woman.By 'gun nut' you mean anyone that believes we should follow the Constitution as written, right?
The irony is, that's about the most extremist position you could take.
And it still doesn't change the fact that you continue to be dishonest about this entire conversation.
Unlimited. My needs, just like anything else….are always changing.I'm asking how many guns you need for everything you want to do.
We think what would be reasonable is for you to focus your attention on limiting gun access for criminals, not for law-abiding citizens.I haven't said anything about anyone's needs extending beyond two guns.
What I've said is, someone could limit it to two guns and not literally set aside the second.
So you think 7 would be a more reasonable number?
Is there a Constitutional amendment that says “the right to own cars shall not be infringed” and the dealer is saying two cars is all you can have? i.e. I can’t buy another car?If the dealer ad says they will give you 'free cars' and they give you two cars, that is the end of their responsibility. They have given you free cars just like they said.
Note: I have not said there is an existing limit on guns. Ghost will probably tell you I said that but he makes a lot of stuff up.
That’s a moving target.I'm asking how many guns you need for everything you want to do.
Theo may go through menopause just reading this.I also like my steaks Med rare and coach HS sports (and I’m a “yelly” style coach), and I try to lift at least 3 times per week.. I also work on my own cars, unless it’s something crazy (I didn’t do the timing chain on my wife’s V8 Range Rover Sport, for example).
I even pee standing up. I’m pretty much the epitome of evil.
I understand you guys have been trained to think everyone who doesn't worship guns is a bleeding heart liberal but I have no problem shooting people who break into the country.
I hate to break this to you but real men only drive Fords, Chevys or Dodges.That’s a moving target.
Right now I feel pretty safe so three handguns, a bolt action 30-06 hunting rifle (it’s like shooting a small cannon) with a scope and a .22 LR semi auto rifle are probably sufficient.
But check in later, I may change my mind. An AR may be in the cards come bonus time.
Oh, and I drive a 2014 Tundra. It has 4 seats, a 6-1/2 foot bed and a big scary 5.7L V8. I get 11mpg in town.
I also like my steaks Med rare and coach HS sports (and I’m a “yelly” style coach), and I try to lift at least 3 times per week.. I also work on my own cars, unless it’s something crazy (I didn’t do the timing chain on my wife’s V8 Range Rover Sport, for example).
I even pee standing up. I’m pretty much the epitome of evil.
If you have a 'right' to own cars and you own cars, you're good to go.Is there a Constitutional amendment that says “the right to own cars shall not be infringed” and the dealer is saying two cars is all you can have? i.e. I can’t buy another car?
Because otherwise your analogy makes no sense.