Calling him names isn't really destroying him. If anything, it makes Trump look worse (if that's possible).
I do hope DeSantis waits until 2028. I want him fully focused on Florida.
Trump will and should run in 2024 and DeSantis in 2028.
Taking shots at DeSantis does no one any good. Classic Trump flaw: undisciplined.
Like to limit it to actual stuff that happened? They make liberal indoctrination hard, those rascals.
It should be to what really happened and what specific, narrow cohorts, were truly involved and, in turn, the broad set of the country who were abolitionists.
The 1619 project had some compelling points and broader constructs (e.g. in a broad economy, free/slave labor does drive profitability to other segments and is not isolated - that is right). It also had some profoundly flawed and ideologically driven precepts (e.g. American Revolution done to protect slavery).
It should also highlight that there was a profound slave network in place in Africa for centuries and that the Spanish/Portugese and British tapped into those existing slave networks.
It should also highlight that if you see a wealthy Nigerian American (read: Emmanuel Acho, who I happen to like and respect a great deal) there is a likelihood that his family wealth came from African based slave networks.
It should also highlight that if you see brown communities with spanish descent that there is a likelihood that s/he's family profited off of the slave trade and is not also a "victim community".
Again, if we want to have a more fulsome discussion - let's do it and be able to have the multi-lateral discussion that is required.
If not, then the discussion is not about learning and understanding (which it should be), it's about power.