If your going to be one of those posters that can't make their point without having to name call and personally attack other posters, you should atleast show respect and call me Mr. Stupid.
OK stupid just for the record...
- criminal referrals are NOT unconstitutional
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/04/04/jan-6-panel-trump-criminal-referral-00022470
Jan. 6 panel wonders: Is Trump criminal referral necessary?
With a cascade of evidence, judge rulings and an active Justice Department, lawmakers are skeptical that they need to make a criminal referral on the former president.
Should the Jan. 6 committee ask the Justice Department to pursue a criminal case against Donald Trump? It’s a question with political heft but no practical effect — and some panel members are increasingly skeptical.
After all, as multiple lawmakers on the select committee noted in recent interviews, the Justice Department is aware of the volume of evidence pointing to violations of the law by Trump. That evidence got underscored emphatically last week, when a federal judge ruled the former president “more likely than not” committed felonies to try to overturn the 2020 election.
The select committee could send a “criminal referral” to Attorney General Merrick Garland outlining its recommendations, lawmakers note, but it would have no substantive value.
“A referral doesn’t mean anything,” said Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), a member of the select committee. “It has no legal weight whatsoever, and I’m pretty sure the Department of Justice has read [last week’s] opinion, so they don’t need us to tell them that it exists.”
Lawmakers and congressional committees have long issued criminal referrals that the Justice Department rarely acts on. A referral against a former president would be unprecedented, bound to set Washington ablaze with speculation and force tough questions for the Biden administration. Jan. 6 committee Chair Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) has floated such a move, but he reiterated this week that investigators haven’t made a decision yet.
- the DOJ getting materials is NOT unconstitutional
From the above referenced article
"Lawmakers and congressional committees have long issued criminal referrals that the Justice Department rarely acts on."
- and its not a separation of powers issue
Congress can issue subpoenas on the executive branch that the DOJ enforces...
So how the hell is offering a criminal referral a separation of powers issue?
Calling you stupid is a disservice to stupid people around the world
And by the way, we have heard for 5+ years now that the "walls are closing in on Trump", heck, another poster even started a thread about it. BUT, it hasn't happened.
You do remember he wasn't eligible to be convicted of anything until he left office right?
Well in less than 2 years he's facing multiple indictments
Do you always set such a high bar for the people you want to lead our country?
Now you're down to "Well, he isn't a CONVICTED criminal..." [yet]
Why don't you go and actually do a little research. Dems have contested EVER single election they lost. Some have filed suit and called for new electorals and for not certifiying the election. They claim election fraud ALL the time. So, what Trump said/did was nothing new to the Dems.
The stupid one is struggling with his spelling in this part of his post... LOL
For the casual observer of this thread...the majority if not all of the above paragraph is a lie
FINALLY, anyone with only half a brain, KNOWS there was electron fraud in 2020.
Again we asked for your evidence....and you presented NONE
Come on don't disappoint us...
Tell us again about the voting machines, the mystery ballots, and all of the other conspiracies trump's Atty General refers to as bullshit