OK, I'll play.
1) "Don't have video of the same person visiting multiple drop boxes"
- They cited several times issues with cameras. They weren't on, the data was deleted, they weren't aimed at the drop boxes, the quality was too poor. They actually had it but Englebright mentioned that they couldn't show it because it would have been fodder for "fact checkers". The bottom line is they tracked stop points emanating from Dem non-profits and hitting multiple drop boxes and back again. You make it sound like they just "drove by" - that's not how geolocation works. They know when and where you stop and for how long.
2) "I read their explanation before. It seems contradictory for them to claim they have a video of the same person adding ballots at multiple drop boxes, but then also claim that the video quality is so bad they couldn’t release it. If the video quality is “extremely poor,” how could they know who is in the video?"
- Because they dovetailed it with the geotracking data. Surely you aren't this dense? Guy with red shirt and orange car is seen at multiple stops. 7/10 stops are so bad you can hardly make anything out, but the geolocation data aligns perfectly with what video we can see. That doesn't make for good TV....you'd just say "I could only see 70% of those drops, this proves the geolocation data mining was fake (but lock up every J6'er who was within 2 miles of the Capitol)."
That's all I can find, you need the video to be convinced even though they have more reliable tracking data.
Again, you've debunked nothing. You're clinging to a technicality. Surely you don't really believe there was no illegal pay-to-play harvesting if you truly watched the documentary?