ADVERTISEMENT

Walls are closing in on DJT.... *All of Trump Charged threads have been merged - post here*

On the 87th attempt, have the dems FINALLY got Trump?


  • Total voters
    48
How crushed would MSM be if the case got dropped? :D

If the DA dropped it without letting the jury decide or the DA dropped it after the jury decided to indict Trump I think the MSM would be going crazy. If the grand jury refuses to indict the uproar wouldn't be quite as big.
 
We have the bank records. I'm not speculating about anything.

And it's not "throwing mud" to ask a simple question...it's a fact that a Biden-owned LLC distributed a $3MM payment from China to three Biden family members shortly after he left office.

What good or service did Biden provide China to earn that payment? I'm not aware of any consulting work he did while VP (and that seems like a conflict of interest), I'm not aware of any manufacturing plants that Biden owns...and China just doesn't hand ex-VP's millions for no reason. What could it possibly be?

https://katv.com/news/nation-world/...ouse-oversight-committee-treasury-james-comer
Man where do you get this garbage from News Max?? Lol probably, it’s all fodder until you see this on major news channels etc. you guys need a reality check, only cat I see in the headlines is….Trump
 
  • Like
Reactions: emekz1
He’s literally telling you what you’re going to do before you do it.

It’s in writing unless you start deleting posts.

You’re on to the next one, don’t you still think Trump is getting arrested today? You do remember that today is the day, or did you move on that quick?
@gatorspeed deserves every second of this. At least Ray ray was smart enough to bail.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
How crushed would MSM be if the case got dropped? :D
This whole story has to be making a huge impression on moderates. We were told by certain posters here that they don't care for such shenanigans.

Funny how that's suddenly not a worry. @grandhavendiddy got an update for us on how college-educated white women in the suburbs of Denver are handling this?
 


Hey @gatorspeed, how does Trump's ass taste?
I don’t know you tell me? You’ve been kissing his for years, this some more of your crap you find on the internet, just a flat out lier is what you are, I’ve got you pegged boy, you’ve met your match just keep running your mouth and I’ll keep popping it to you, I’m just getting started sunny buck 👍👍
 
Man I hear so much speculation on Biden this and Biden that lol you Trump lovers need to understand that until Joe and Hunter are on center stage and “Truly” under investigation quit throwing mud at the wall to see if it sticks it’s rediculous


Seriously

Or you can just punt on reality and go with the conservative trumper response...

"Is Biden in jail yet?" 🤣
 
  • Haha
Reactions: gatorspeed
Tucker's opening last night was on point. We are about to lose our country:



@GatorTheo everyone eventually has to get off the porch. You can either do it voluntarily to fight back, or you can be forcibly removed and sent to the gulag. But either way, your ass and that rocker will be separated at some point.

Serious question for the board: At what point do you think the left stops? At what point does the left wake up one day and say "Ok guys, that's enough shitting on the US Constitution and using the court system to jail our opponents. We are becoming like Venezuela now. We're made our point, let's go back to respecting the law and drop all the Third World corruption stuff."

When do you guys think that happens? Because many of us seem to think we can stay rocking on the porch, and this will all blow over.

Watch Tucker's opening. This IS our second Civil War. And if the rest of us don't want to fight it, the left is more than happy to win on a forfeit.


OK a show of hands,,,

How many people are tired of trump followers saying "We are about to lose our country:" when trump is accused of anything?
 
  • Like
Reactions: emekz1
Seriously

Or you can just punt on reality and go with the conservative trumper response...

"Is Biden in jail yet?" 🤣
Bro the only thing I can honestly say that I’ve seen on this board that I knew was real or the truth meaning posted by Ghost was about the revival, the rest is just internet garbage “Lies”
 
No.

If you're a rich Black / Latino / Other alumnus you seriously think they're going to bum rush your kid?

The answer is no. The Ivy League cares about one color, green.

Keeping the riffraff out doesn't apply to potential donors.

Most Ivy Leaguers are successful and donate to the school, endow chairs, sponsor scholarships etc.

And so where are wealthy black donors if green is all that matters?

Disparate impact/treatment is illegal under civil rights ^ US labor law

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_impact

Disparate impact in United States labor law refers to practices in employment, housing, and other areas that adversely affect one group of people of a protected characteristic more than another, even though rules applied by employers or landlords are formally neutral. Although the protected classes vary by statute, most federal civil rights laws consider race, color, religion, national origin, and sex to be protected characteristics, and some laws include disability status and other traits as well.

A violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act may be proven by showing that an employment practice or policy has a disproportionately adverse effect on members of the protected class as compared with non-members of the protected class.[1] Therefore, the disparate impact theory under Title VII prohibits employers "from using a facially neutral employment practice that has an unjustified adverse impact on members of a protected class. A facially neutral employment practice is one that does not appear to be discriminatory on its face; rather it is one that is discriminatory in its application or effect."[2] Where a disparate impact is shown, the plaintiff can prevail without the necessity of showing intentional discrimination unless the defendant employer demonstrates that the practice or policy in question has a demonstrable relationship to the requirements of the job in question.[3] This is the "business necessity" defense.[1]

In addition to Title VII, other federal laws also have disparate impact provisions, including the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967.[4] Some civil rights laws, such as Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, do not contain disparate impact provisions creating a private right of action,[5] although the federal government may still pursue disparate impact claims under these laws.[6] The U.S. Supreme Court has held that the Fair Housing Act of 1968 creates a cause of action for disparate impact.[7]

Disparate impact contrasts with disparate treatment. A disparate impact does not require a showing of intention, whereas a disparate treatment is an intentional decision to treat people differently based on their race or other protected characteristics.

It's not about race Ray. It's about money. Rich people operate under different rules.

Thank you for proving this is about disparate impact/treatment

The explicit admission policy does NOT have donations as a factor in entry but by your own admission its the most important factor when an applicant would be deemed unqualified but accepted for entry

Even if "buying your way in" was the explicit policy it would still be ILLEGAL & unconstitutional because the result (intended or not) leads to racial discrimination
 
  • Haha
Reactions: nail1988
Ray will blame racism for just about anything...which is a shame because he cheapens the claim for those circumstances where racism is actually to blame.
He doesn't care about racism, see the thread he started about Louisville's racism problem. As soon as he found out the dems were responsible for the racism, he said it didn't matter, Louisville had always been racist LOL
 
Tucker's opening last night was on point. We are about to lose our country:



@GatorTheo everyone eventually has to get off the porch. You can either do it voluntarily to fight back, or you can be forcibly removed and sent to the gulag. But either way, your ass and that rocker will be separated at some point.

Serious question for the board: At what point do you think the left stops? At what point does the left wake up one day and say "Ok guys, that's enough shitting on the US Constitution and using the court system to jail our opponents. We are becoming like Venezuela now. We're made our point, let's go back to respecting the law and drop all the Third World corruption stuff."

When do you guys think that happens? Because many of us seem to think we can stay rocking on the porch, and this will all blow over.

Watch Tucker's opening. This IS our second Civil War. And if the rest of us don't want to fight it, the left is more than happy to win on a forfeit.
I have thought for some time now that unless we revise and re-invent the DOJ and FBI we will never see equal justice for all in our country again.
 
And so where are wealthy black donors if green is all that matters?

Disparate impact/treatment is illegal under civil rights ^ US labor law

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_impact

Disparate impact in United States labor law refers to practices in employment, housing, and other areas that adversely affect one group of people of a protected characteristic more than another, even though rules applied by employers or landlords are formally neutral. Although the protected classes vary by statute, most federal civil rights laws consider race, color, religion, national origin, and sex to be protected characteristics, and some laws include disability status and other traits as well.

A violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act may be proven by showing that an employment practice or policy has a disproportionately adverse effect on members of the protected class as compared with non-members of the protected class.[1] Therefore, the disparate impact theory under Title VII prohibits employers "from using a facially neutral employment practice that has an unjustified adverse impact on members of a protected class. A facially neutral employment practice is one that does not appear to be discriminatory on its face; rather it is one that is discriminatory in its application or effect."[2] Where a disparate impact is shown, the plaintiff can prevail without the necessity of showing intentional discrimination unless the defendant employer demonstrates that the practice or policy in question has a demonstrable relationship to the requirements of the job in question.[3] This is the "business necessity" defense.[1]

In addition to Title VII, other federal laws also have disparate impact provisions, including the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967.[4] Some civil rights laws, such as Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, do not contain disparate impact provisions creating a private right of action,[5] although the federal government may still pursue disparate impact claims under these laws.[6] The U.S. Supreme Court has held that the Fair Housing Act of 1968 creates a cause of action for disparate impact.[7]

Disparate impact contrasts with disparate treatment. A disparate impact does not require a showing of intention, whereas a disparate treatment is an intentional decision to treat people differently based on their race or other protected characteristics.



Thank you for proving this is about disparate impact/treatment

The explicit admission policy does NOT have donations as a factor in entry but by your own admission its the most important factor when an applicant would be deemed unqualified but accepted for entry

Even if "buying your way in" was the explicit policy it would still be ILLEGAL & unconstitutional because the result (intended or not) leads to racial discrimination
FFS Ray. You seriously think it's in the rules? Are you retarded?

I wrote this big long thing and then my effing phone deleted it. So pull your head out of your ass.

Rich guy A wants his idiot son to get into Yale. So he calls his buddy in admissions, and the dean of academic affairs and his other buddy on the board of regents. Then he endows a chair in women's studies, donates 50 grand to the general scholarship fund and sponsors two foreign exchange students and his idiot son magically gets into Yale.

It's the rich people version of the hookup.

The civil rights act has been around since 1964.

Harvard was founded in 1636.

They've been at this shit since slavery. They have ot locked down.
 


If there is any truth to this story the grand jury will be voting on whether to indict right after the witness testifies tomorrow. The result of that would definitely leak out for sure.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: gatordad3


If there is any truth to this story the grand jury will be voting on whether to indict right after the witness testifies tomorrow. The result of that would definitely leak out for sure.
I seriously think they pushed it back a day just so they can say Trump was wrong when he claimed it was today. @GatorTheo will remember the whole episode as 'that time Trump lied about being arrested on a Tuesday' LOL
 
FFS Ray. You seriously think it's in the rules? Are you retarded?

Obviously you don't know how to read ...it doesn't matter if its in the rules you idiot
I would call you a retard but that would be a unfair characterization of retardfs

You more mentally challenged than them

I wrote this big long thing and then my effing phone deleted it. So pull your head out of your ass.

You can't operate your phone and I have to pull my head out of my ass? LOL

Are you going to blame your stupidity on being drunk again?

Rich guy A wants his idiot son to get into Yale. So he calls his buddy in admissions, and the dean of academic affairs and his other buddy on the board of regents. Then he endows a chair in women's studies, donates 50 grand to the general scholarship fund and sponsors two foreign exchange students and his idiot son magically gets into Yale.

Yes that's one way how white affirmative action works ....its still white affirmative action

Doesn't really matter if you do something kinda woke to coverup getting a candidate entry when otherwise he would have been rejected on the merits

It's the rich people version of the hookup.

The "hookup" is white affirmative action. Thank you for admitting to that fact

The civil rights act has been around since 1964.

Harvard was founded in 1636.

They've been at this shit since slavery. They have ot locked down.

And it was white affirmative action back then as it is now...


Put down the whiskey, stop posting, and go sleep it off...

That is if you can sleep off defending racial discriminatory practices
 
  • Haha
Reactions: nail1988
I have thought for some time now that unless we revise and re-invent the DOJ and FBI we will never see equal justice for all in our country again.


I'm just wondering when conservatives came to this realization and why
Was the FBI & DOJ treating MLK equally as other political leaders?

When was there "equal justice" for all in our country? Please be date specific

I find it highly suspicious when conservatives came to this epiphany about equality
 
  • Like
Reactions: emekz1
Obviously you don't know how to read ...it doesn't matter if its in the rules you idiot
I would call you a retard but that would be a unfair characterization of retardfs

You more mentally challenged than them



You can't operate your phone and I have to pull my head out of my ass? LOL

Are you going to blame your stupidity on being drunk again?
No, I'm blaming your lack of understanding. I know what the law says. Hell, THEY KNOW WHAT THE LAW SAYS. They don't care because they got the kind of money that gets shit done regardless of who you are.


Yes that's one way how white affirmative action works ....its still white affirmative action
No it's not. It now included rich people of all colors.

You can quote the law all you want. We both know what they do is illegal.

And I said that right up front. They play by their own rules.


Doesn't really matter if you do something kinda woke to coverup getting a candidate entry when otherwise he would have been rejected on the merits

Bribery is woke now?
The "hookup" is white affirmative action. Thank you for admitting to that fact

So rich Black Latino and other poc don't engage in this? You have lost your damn mind.
And it was white affirmative action back then as it is now...
How do you get anything done when you are this consumed by race? Your boss know how much time you spend on the internet?


Put down the whiskey, stop posting, and go sleep it off...

Piss on you. I just started.
That is if you can sleep off defending racial discriminatory practices
It will continue whether I'm awake or not. And I once fell asleep during an artillery barrage.
 
How crushed would MSM be if the case got dropped? :D
Not just them...the little libby sissy snowflakes. Remember when Trump won the election, and the day after they were all staring up at the sky screaming?? THIS WILL HAPPEN AGAIN..TWICE. First when this does not work. Second time when Trump is elected as THEIR President AGAIN!!
 
I don’t know you tell me? You’ve been kissing his for years, this some more of your crap you find on the internet, just a flat out lier is what you are, I’ve got you pegged boy, you’ve met your match just keep running your mouth and I’ll keep popping it to you, I’m just getting started sunny buck 👍👍
?????????
 
What I have found out in life...people calling others racist are THE BIGGEST racists on the planet...and too stupid to know it. Does this apply here?
This theorem is 100% proven w demonstrable actions of Leftists! EVER time!
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
What I have found out in life...people calling others racist are THE BIGGEST racists on the planet...and too stupid to know it. Does this apply here?
Racist Biden defames a race with his idiotic selection of press secretary. Wanna bet Biden hasn't a clue? Tell me there's not a female black Democrat with a brain. Condaleezza Rice has an IQ in the genius range.
 
Racist Biden defames a race with his idiotic selection of press secretary. Wanna bet Biden hasn't a clue? Tell me there's not a female black Democrat with a brain. Condaleezza Rice has an IQ in the genius range.
C.Rice = Evil Genius

I prefer a smart person with high moral character, over any evil genius....
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT