Their 2 lawyers from the same conservative law firm and one is a member of the Federalist Society
The 3 charges are exactly clear...none have anything to do with classification
So whatever Jonathon Turley is talking about is bullcrap
LE can seize anything that may criminal found during a search if its out in the open
FBI/DOJ went there looking for highly classified documents...found them...and a whole lot more
The 1st explanation is the only one the DOJ has put forward and the video says its plausible.
Nothing "morphed" into another explanation
The 2nd claimed DOJ explanation is presented by Michael Mukasey about Jan 6??? Really? Couldn't find someone actually in the DOJ to attribute this lie to so they whipped out a guy who hasn't been part of the DOJ for15 years?
And he's a Reagan judicial appointee & George Bush's AG replacement for Gonzalez?
You've got to F'ing be kidding me...🤣
The conclusion and the title of the article are that "voters should decide"
Which is the lamest desperate attempt at trying to save trump's political life because the GOP has nothing but trump & his trumpanzee base to rely on
The WSJ should be ashamed for putting out trash like that
The legal basis was probable cause for 3 crimes...no classification level needed
Basically he stole government property, hid that fact, and then didn't return all of the stolen property after being given multiple opportunities to do so