I really think at his core, Trump is an idealistic democrat. He believed Fauci and the 'medical community' wanted to help Americans, at the end of the day. He's much like @Uniformed_ReRe in that regard.
One of Trump’s biggest flaws is his selection of people around him.
I don’t disagree with any of this but if this has taught society anything, don’t rush.
It’s taught me never to trust big pharma or elected health officials with their hand in the cookie jar again.
Good to confirm, but did anyone really ever think it was only Twitter?Now There's PROOF: The White House Was Behind Facebook's COVID-19 Censorship
During the discovery phase of the Missouri v. Biden lawsuit, alleging social media censorship efforts by the Biden White House, Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry unearthed documents proving that the government was directly involved in shutting down discussions related to the Covid pandemic—the most damning proof we’ve seen yet of First Amendment violations.
I know Pfizer has shielding from lawsuits over these shots, but I can't see how that protection can be extended to cover them if they knew it was dangerous.Pfizer knew.
Pfizer Scientist: ‘Your Antibodies are Probably Better than the Vaccination’ | Project Veritas
Investigating and exposing corruption in both public and private institutions.www.projectveritas.com
sCiEncE - follow it!
I mean they are still alive, so...sCiEncE - follow it!
People who skipped their COVID vaccine are at higher risk of traffic accidents, according to a new study
The findings could justify changes to driver insurance policies, the authors say.fortune.com
Armed Forces + NCAA FB = for sure vaccinated
www.theepochtimes.com
Full disclosure I'm being a bit hyperbolic - this new tech he's discussing is for congestive heart failure, not myocarditis.
www.revolver.news
www.thegatewaypundit.com
trib.al
trib.al
trib.al
I think we're still trying to figure all of that out. There's not nearly as much funding for a study that could show the risks outweigh the benefit, but there are data signals that suggest:
alexberenson.substack.com
alexberenson.substack.com
www.uscjournal.com
www.rwmalonemd.com
My point here is that this was FORCED upon us, and they lied to us about its success, effects. And since it is killing people who may have survived covid....I would never take a shot of this. And YES, boosters just add to your troubles. So our Government lied to us from "15 days to flatten the curve" to "masks do not help" to "you HAVE to wear masks" "schools must be closed" "it came from bats" (although it was first found right outside the door of a bio lab in China) They lied about "gain of research" (Fauci lied more than all put together)
I think we're still trying to figure all of that out. There's not nearly as much funding for a study that could show the risks outweigh the benefit, but there are data signals that suggest:
1) Covid vaccines clearly result in a surge of antibody activity by "fooling" the immune system into creating spike proteins that look like the virus, which in turn causes the same immune system to create antibodies. This seems to convey some protection from/prevention of the cytokine storm (hyper inflammatory response that puts many into the hospital) by giving your immune system a head start in killing the virus.
- The only issue is, the spike of the virus mutates quickly, and the antibodies created from a real infection carry broader protection against different variants. Some estimates put current vaccine efficacy at 30% due to this.
2) It seems that the protection from the vaccines is about a 90 day window. After that, it's possible that the immune response is actually degraded...when you hear reports of a majority of the people dying/in the hospital are vaxxed it's probably because they are too far from their last vaccine.
Something wicked this way comes (and by something, I mean mRNA immune system dysregulation)
Why the paper reporting an explosion in IgG4 antibodies after the mRNA boosters is so unsettling - in a hopefully easy to understand Q+AURGENT: Two new studies show mRNA-jabbed people have a much higher risk of getting Covid than unvaccinated people
Vaccine-driven original antigenic sin: it's real and it's getting worse.
3) Booster create antibodies...but they have the same flaws as the original shots. Short lived protection, followed by a period of likely increased risk of infection.
4) Lastly, the vaccines can cause serious side effects, even the manufacturer's admit this. They are indemnified from liability first by the EUA, but when that expired the approval for use in children provided them ongoing protection (we have a law that if a vax is approved for use in kids under 5 the manufacturer is indemnified from all injury liability - I think it stemmed from the Polio vaccine). 1,433 of the 1.1MM deaths from Covid were kids age 0-17...that's 0.13%. Not 13%, 0.1%. This statistic also doesn't track comorbidities - meaning those 1433 lives lost were probably already very sick.
To me the summary is this: you have two choices. You can get on the booster train, but if not getting Covid is the goal you need to stay on it. Benefits - you're probably 30% better off than someone who's never had Covid or a vax. Risks - vaccine injury (heart issues, stroke, nerve issues like Guillain Barre, etc...there's also some concern about your bodies' ability to fight off certain other diseases, like Cancer, long term).
Choice 2 is to get off the train. Focus on comorbidities (excess weight, cardiovascular health, smoking, etc). If you get sick take vitamins and IVM/HCQ if you're so inclined. Let your immune system fight the fight with the hope the antibodies you create are better. There are some packaged protocols, this is a popular one https://zstacklife.com/?ref=aet6ilomcs
Risks? Some Covid cases are fatal or seriously debilitating.
But after a period of time (a year?) most likely the vax isn't going to do anything for you. I highly recommend following Berenson's substack linked above, and dig through it to do your own research. Other voices that aren't following the CDC guidelines but have credibility:
Peter A McCullough, Cardiologist | USC Journal
Find out more about Dr Peter A McCullough, Cardiologist from the William Beaumont Hospital, MI, US. Read articles from Dr Peter A McCullough.Robert W Malone MD
Good luck with whatever you decide. The answer isn't a one-size fits all approach.
