ADVERTISEMENT

More info on the Hiden Crime Family

  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
Impossible.

@kalimgoodman - told us Comer said he had nothing.
I read that, despite my determination not to read right-wing deep sites' opinions/commentary pieces. They are always filled with Republicans lies and talking points, which remained true but...

The article you linked said Biden's family, not Joe AND direct words from the article;

"The short answer is that it has yet to be proven to be true."

So, did you read what you sent? Your article mentions Comer allegations and states that it's not proven true. I thought America was innocent until proven guilty.

This is ANOTHER example of you wanting this to be true so bad, odd...
 
I read that, despite my determination not to read right-wing deep sites' opinions/commentary pieces. They are always filled with Republicans lies and talking points, which remained true but...

The article you linked said Biden's family, not Joe AND direct words from the article;

"The short answer is that it has yet to be proven to be true."

So, did you read what you sent? Your article mentions Comer allegations and states that it's not proven true. I thought America was innocent until proven guilty.

This is ANOTHER example of you wanting this to be true so bad, odd...
Why so defensive?

I just repeated what you said, Comer claimed to have nothing, but it certainly seems like he's claiming to have a whole lot of things. You spin and lie, and I'm calling you out for it.

1) It's not 'my article', I was replying to someone.
2) I love how you cherry pick one statement that supports your incredible desire to give Joe the benefit of the doubt here, as well as the fact that this investigation is ongoing like that's some sort of proof there's nothing here...
3) and it is the entire Biden family...you do recall the records we have so far implicate 9 Biden family members in accepting foreign payments?

Here's the part of the statement that you left out...pretty intellectually dishonest to ignore anything that contradicts your position IMO. Why would the FBI be stonewalling here? Is that OK with you that they are? Shouldn't you be mad that a 3-letter agency is making one of the biggest potential bribery scandals in our history harder to investigate? Nope, you just cherry pick the first part and lie about what the article is saying.

"The short answer is that it has yet to be proven to be true. Comer, Sen. Chuck Grassley and company are working on it. But it’s not as easy as it should be. The FBI, to understate the matter, is not being forthright."


None of it matters to you because I suspect you really don't care if Biden has taken $30MM from foreign govt's in exchange for policy decisions. You're a liberal and liberals will do anything to defend their politics.
 
Many of us have said repeatedly that if Trump does something wrong justice should be served.

I said last night in another thread if Ivanka's diary said DJT molested her as a child I'd run from the guy.

If you want to act like we're all giving him a pass on the documents charges, you're not listening to why we think this whole thing has nothing to do with justice and everything to do with election interference.
 
Why so defensive?

I just repeated what you said, Comer claimed to have nothing, but it certainly seems like he's claiming to have a whole lot of things. You spin and lie, and I'm calling you out for it.

1) It's not 'my article', I was replying to someone.
2) I love how you cherry pick one statement that supports your incredible desire to give Joe the benefit of the doubt here, as well as the fact that this investigation is ongoing like that's some sort of proof there's nothing here...
3) and it is the entire Biden family...you do recall the records we have so far implicate 9 Biden family members in accepting foreign payments?

Here's the part of the statement that you left out...pretty intellectually dishonest to ignore anything that contradicts your position IMO. Why would the FBI be stonewalling here? Is that OK with you that they are? Shouldn't you be mad that a 3-letter agency is making one of the biggest potential bribery scandals in our history harder to investigate? Nope, you just cherry pick the first part and lie about what the article is saying.

"The short answer is that it has yet to be proven to be true. Comer, Sen. Chuck Grassley and company are working on it. But it’s not as easy as it should be. The FBI, to understate the matter, is not being forthright."

None of it matters to you because I suspect you really don't care if Biden has taken $30MM from foreign govt's in exchange for policy decisions. You're a liberal and liberals will do anything to defend their politics.
No, they are saying the FBI may have more information that's not being giving, once again without PROOF.

I really don't get why you are disappointed in the fact that I won't believe any of this until it is proven. The article even said that much.

When this "bribe" happened, Biden was VP and he wasn't making policy decisions, he was enforcing Obama policy decisions. That's the other thing doesn't make sense to me.

It's more about thinking logical, not liberal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RayGravesGhost
Many of us have said repeatedly that if Trump does something wrong justice should be served.

I said last night in another thread if Ivanka's diary said DJT molested her as a child I'd run from the guy.

If you want to act like we're all giving him a pass on the documents charges, you're not listening to why we think this whole thing has nothing to do with justice and everything to do with election interference.
You are literally saying that he shouldn't even be charged because it would look political and because Hillary wasn't charge. So stop being dishonest.

It's not election interference. That's another Trump talking point. He is being investigate because he didn't turn over the documents. Not sure why you can't accept that he put himself in that situation. All he had to do was turn them over and fight in court to get certain documents back or not. You just don't ignore a subpoena unless it's congressional haha.

I am saying charge Biden if he did anything wrong. I've been saying that for over a year. I have no bones in my body to defend people who make stupid decisions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RayGravesGhost
No, they are saying the FBI may have more information that's not being giving, once again without PROOF.

I really don't get why you are disappointed in the fact that I won't believe any of this until it is proven. The article even said that much.

When this "bribe" happened, Biden was VP and he wasn't making policy decisions, he was enforcing Obama policy decisions. That's the other thing doesn't make sense to me.

It's more about thinking logical, not liberal.
You also claimed you had put me on Ignore. By posting in this thread, that proves you have not.

Then you claimed anyone that pointed out your lie....was the real liar.

Is it as exhausting being you as it is reading your troll attempts?
 
You are literally saying that he shouldn't even be charged because it would look political and because Hillary wasn't charge. So stop being dishonest.

It's not election interference. That's another Trump talking point. He is being investigate because he didn't turn over the documents. Not sure why you can't accept that he put himself in that situation. All he had to do was turn them over and fight in court to get certain documents back or not. You just don't ignore a subpoena unless it's congressional haha.

I am saying charge Biden if he did anything wrong. I've been saying that for over a year. I have no bones in my body to defend people who make stupid decisions.
Find a post where I claimed Trump shouldn’t be charged because it’ll “look political”. You just made that up.

He shouldn’t be charged because of the legal precedent and the law. The lefty judge in the Clinton Sock Drawer case gave us a clear read on the ERA…NARA has no right to demand records back because the President is the sole determinant of what are official Presidential records and what is personal. Whatever he leaves behind they can have, whatever he takes is his.

I have called out the asymmetrical justice here though - Biden, Pence and Hillary all mishandled or stole (yes, as a Senator Biden stole documents from a SCIF, as VP he took sensitive Ukraine documents that are still at the Penn Biden Center…1800 boxes which still haven’t been returned or examined).

So yes, he shouldn’t be charged because he didn’t commit a crime. He’s being charged because the FBI and DOJ are terrified of him and they want to affect the election.
 
Find a post where I claimed Trump shouldn’t be charged because it’ll “look political”. You just made that up.

He shouldn’t be charged because of the legal precedent and the law. The lefty judge in the Clinton Sock Drawer case gave us a clear read on the ERA…NARA has no right to demand records back because the President is the sole determinant of what are official Presidential records and what is personal. Whatever he leaves behind they can have, whatever he takes is his.

I have called out the asymmetrical justice here though - Biden, Pence and Hillary all mishandled or stole (yes, as a Senator Biden stole documents from a SCIF, as VP he took sensitive Ukraine documents that are still at the Penn Biden Center…1800 boxes which still haven’t been returned or examined).

So yes, he shouldn’t be charged because he didn’t commit a crime. He’s being charged because the FBI and DOJ are terrified of him and they want to affect the election.
Literally everything you stated was incorrect. How can we discuss when you're going by all false information?

That 1800 boxes comment tells me that you're gone. Like that was completely made up by the far right. You are still believing that Clinton sock stuff. That is something I strongly suggest that you research and not believe that right wing guy interruption of it.

The main issue with you is that you don't look for truth. You look for confirmation. Plenty of Republicans are saying how Trump messed up with these documents.

Look at Barr, he defend Trump against the NY charge but not the document case. Why don't you believe him?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: nail1988
Literally everything you stated was incorrect. How can we discuss when you're going by all false information?

That 1800 boxes comment tells me that you're gone. Like that was completely made up by the far right. You are still believing that Clinton sock stuff. That is something I strongly suggest that you research and not believe that right wing guy interruption of it.

The main issue with you is that you don't look for truth. You look for confirmation. Plenty of Republicans are saying how Trump messed up with these documents.

Look at Barr, he defend Trump against the NY charge but not the document case. Why don't you believe him?
How did the research go? I gave you a solid start. You listen to those calls? Hear the one where Biden panicked and asked Poroshenko to close Privatt bank before Trump took office? So weird.

Have you read the opinion from Jackson? She’s crystal clear. You don’t even have to be a lawyer to understand it. And there wasn’t even an appeal, which meant prosecution felt that had no case.

And Biden had documents in 5 locations. One was a garage. He’s had classified documents since 1974. Hillary paid someone to wipe a server and literally crushed blackberry’s with hammers to avoid a subpoena. Neither had any of the protections provided by the PRA, but both were establishment politicians.

And Barr isn’t a Republican. He’s going scorched earth on a guy he hates. The relationship between the two ended terribly, Barr quit before he was fired to save face. Barr is also an attention whore and will go on any cable news show that’ll have him. But keep using him as your prime example.

Admit it…Biden would plead guilty and you’d still say he didn’t do it. You’re so blinded by your religion, I mean your politics, that you will never believe any of the evidence in front of you.
 
Last edited:
Why would Hunter be setting up a
Bank account in Malta at a bank that got shut down for money laundering?

And why would he do it through a Burisma employee?

Weird. I guess Bank of America was full.

@kalimgoodman - please research and let me know where this outlet’s bias is leading us all astray

 
  • Like
Reactions: BCSpell
How did the research go? I gave you a solid start. You listen to those calls? Hear the one where Biden panicked and asked Poroshenko to close Privatt bank before Trump took office? So weird.

Have you read the opinion from Jackson? She’s crystal clear. You don’t even have to be a lawyer to understand it. And there wasn’t even an appeal, which meant prosecution felt that had no case.

And Biden had documents in 5 locations. One was a garage. He’s had classified documents since 1974. Hillary paid someone to wipe a server and literally crushed blackberry’s with hammers to avoid a subpoena. Neither had any of the protections provided by the PRA, but both were establishment politicians.

And Barr isn’t a Republican. He’s going scorched earth on a guy he hates. The relationship between the two ended terribly, Barr quit before he was fired to save face. Barr is also an attention whore and will go on any cable news show that’ll have him. But keep using him as your prime example.

Admit it…Biden would plead guilty and you’d still say he didn’t do it. You’re so blinded by your religion, I mean your politics, that you will never believe any of the evidence in front of you.
The sock case was NOT a government case. It was a case about a conservative group trying to force the government to classify Clinton tapes as government "documents".

NARA said that those tapes were personal, they agreed with Clinton and judge agree that the Judicial can't force NARA to classify something as personal or the governments.

This case is not like Trump and isn't in the same hemisphere. NARA is actually saying that those documents are the governments and not personal. Also, NARA wants those documents back, its not a liberal group trying to force NARA to take them from Trump.

😮‍💨😮‍💨😮‍💨
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RayGravesGhost
Why would Hunter be setting up a
Bank account in Malta at a bank that got shut down for money laundering?

And why would he do it through a Burisma employee?

Weird. I guess Bank of America was full.

@kalimgoodman - please research and let me know where this outlet’s bias is leading us all astray

Nobody is debating Hunter. Lets focus on Joe.
 
How did the research go? I gave you a solid start. You listen to those calls? Hear the one where Biden panicked and asked Poroshenko to close Privatt bank before Trump took office? So weird.

Have you read the opinion from Jackson? She’s crystal clear. You don’t even have to be a lawyer to understand it. And there wasn’t even an appeal, which meant prosecution felt that had no case.

And Biden had documents in 5 locations. One was a garage. He’s had classified documents since 1974. Hillary paid someone to wipe a server and literally crushed blackberry’s with hammers to avoid a subpoena. Neither had any of the protections provided by the PRA, but both were establishment politicians.

And Barr isn’t a Republican. He’s going scorched earth on a guy he hates. The relationship between the two ended terribly, Barr quit before he was fired to save face. Barr is also an attention whore and will go on any cable news show that’ll have him. But keep using him as your prime example.

Admit it…Biden would plead guilty and you’d still say he didn’t do it. You’re so blinded by your religion, I mean your politics, that you will never believe any of the evidence in front of you.
Can you be a Republican and disagree with Trump?

Also, when did Barr not become a Republican?
 
Can you be a Republican and disagree with Trump?

Also, when did Barr not become a Republican?
I guess you've missed the morning show/cable news tour?

He's full-on TDS at this point. He did nothing he said he was going to do as AG. He ignored clear election integrity issues and said everything was fine.

He's a deep state RINO, banking on the MAGA movement going away.
 
I guess you've missed the morning show/cable news tour?

He's full-on TDS at this point. He did nothing he said he was going to do as AG. He ignored clear election integrity issues and said everything was fine.

He's a deep state RINO, banking on the MAGA movement going away.
You didn't answer the questions. Just went on a rant about Barr. So ill ask again.

Can you be a Republican and disagree with Trump?

Also, when did Barr not become a Republican?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT