What rhetoric? I keep hearing stuff like this but the only evidence is doctored/misquoted/no context soundbites.Aside from trumps rhetoric, he was actually pretty decent to black people. I do understand that the rhetoric is a big deal.
What rhetoric? I keep hearing stuff like this but the only evidence is doctored/misquoted/no context soundbites.Aside from trumps rhetoric, he was actually pretty decent to black people. I do understand that the rhetoric is a big deal.
Make America great again, it is what it is Whether you see it or not. America wasn't great for a lot of people 60 years ago. His comments on immigration, not sensitive and certainly not befitting of the president of the United States. He was right, we certainly need to do something about the border, but ginning up the emotions he did was a bit too self serving for my taste. Calling Haiti a shithole country, while true, nkt particularly tasteful and certainly not a good look for the potus. Wanting more immigrants from Norway, again, not untrue on its face not very tactful.What rhetoric? I keep hearing stuff like this but the only evidence is doctored/misquoted/no context soundbites.
Inflation?
For you Deniers. I know you will ignore.Inflation?
Oh. You want your uncomfortable truths packaged up nicely? That’s worked so well in the past. Maybe guys like Romney and McCain should have ... wait.. nevermind.Make America great again, it is what it is Whether you see it or not. America wasn't great for a lot of people 60 years ago. His comments on immigration, not sensitive and certainly not befitting of the president of the United States. He was right, we certainly need to do something about the border, but ginning up the emotions he did was a bit too self serving for my taste. Calling Haiti a shithole country, while true, nkt particularly tasteful and certainly not a good look for the potus. Wanting more immigrants from Norway, again, not untrue on its face not very tactful.
And simpletons think you can boil the economy down to one or two buzz words. The economy is complex.Humans tend to overthink when problem solving.
What uncomfortable truth?Oh. You want your uncomfortable truths packaged up nicely? That’s worked so well in the past. Maybe guys like Romney and McCain should have ... wait.. nevermind.
Make America great again, it is what it is Whether you see it or not. America wasn't great for a lot of people 60 years ago. His comments on immigration, not sensitive and certainly not befitting of the president of the United States. He was right, we certainly need to do something about the border, but ginning up the emotions he did was a bit too self serving for my taste. Calling Haiti a shithole country, while true, nkt particularly tasteful and certainly not a good look for the potus. Wanting more immigrants from Norway, again, not untrue on its face not very tactful.
We unfortunately have a history where blacks were denied basic civil rights, saying you want to make american great again(I kind of think it's great) harkens back to an era where certain people were not treated properly. Trumps not stupid he knew what he was doing. Now could he have gotten elected taking a different path? No idea, beating the Dems snd pubs at their game has never been done before so it's not likely. i would have liked seeing him soften some of his rhetoric once elected, I think that would have been smarter and certainly nicer.Hmmm...I sort of appreciated some of that honesty.
Agree calling Haiti a shithole lacked tact...though it's absolutely a shithole.
I wish someone would have edited his tweets, every time, before he hit send but I'm so over the PC crap. Feelings are not more important than reality or fact. But if there's nothing to gain from telling a hard truth, why are you spending political capital to tell it?
But if my plan to Make America Great Again includes real plans to help brown people who are legal residents of the US, it's not an insensitive catchphrase.
For you Deniers. I know you will ignore.
AIR Worldwide : Climate Change Could Cut Corn Belt Crop Yields by Up To 40 Percent by Increasing Unfavorable and Extreme Weather by Mid-Century, According to a New Report
10:08 AM: Climate Change Could Cut Corn Belt Crop Yields by Up To 40 Percent by Increasing Unfavorable and Extreme Weather by Mid-Century, Accor...markets.businessinsider.com
We unfortunately have a history where blacks were denied basic civil rights, saying you want to make american great again(I kind of think it's great) harkens back to an era where certain people were not treated properly. Trumps not stupid he knew what he was doing. Now could he have gotten elected taking a different path? No idea, beating the Dems snd pubs at their game has never been done before so it's not likely. i would have liked seeing him soften some of his rhetoric once elected, I think that would have been smarter and certainly nicer.
I don't think anyone took it that way, but to say you want to make America great again, well great for who, that's the point. That's why the left went apoplectic and blacks despised trump. He was using the phrase for political gain but there was a coat, he should have softened a bit, trump was dancing with the devil, its a tricky dance.I literally NEVER took MAGA as a desire to turn the clock back on civil rights. I don't see how any reasonable person could.
It's a stretch...but if he could have put that to bed by specifically saying "no, I do not wish to undo civil rights as part of MAGA," then fine. But imo that's incredibly obvious.
I don't think anyone took it that way, but to say you want to make America great again, well great for who, that's the point.
So this is something I view differently than most. If you're driving a car going 60 instead of the 55 it used to go, in a vacuum that's a good improvement(certainly not sky rocket I would like for you to define that) but if all the other cars on the road are now doing 85 instead of 65, youre further behind, we live in a competitive world, people car what others are doimg, right or wrong we all suffer a bit from this. Bubbles, easy money liberal foley policies help those with assets infinitely more than it does for those that don't, in fact it serves to make those that don't into a permanent peasant class, the assets are now unattainable, this is a larger conversation on how it relates to what I think is the ultimate goal of all the elite class in the country, socialism.The standard of living for the people who may have had concern over the phrase skyrocketed.
That should have quelled some of their concern at some point. But that's not how dog whistles work.
Well he says these things that are really true but we don’t like to hear them so the rhetoric is bad... I don’t know if that’s daddy or mommy issues. Not my concern, some people just have a soft disposition.Dems began attacking Pres Trump as a racist as soon as he pointed out that blacks keep voting for dems in big cities, but those big cities stay shitholes under dems and they stay poor.
'What have you got to lose?' by voting for someone different.
And he is precisely correct. Cities like NYC, Chicago, LA, Atlanta, Detroit have been run by dems for decades. And blacks have gotten poorer and poorer in those cities.
This is what the dems always do. When you bring up truths they don't want to hear, or dont want voters to hear, they start in with the distractions. They are the party of the KKK, of segregation, of slavery, of trying to block the Civil Rights Act, of supporting a known eugenicist in her attempt to eradicate the black race.
Yet they spin the right are the racists.
Hiden says 'If you don't vote for me, you aint black, man!' and faux independent here thinks that's cool. But Pres Trump pointing out that dem-run cities haven't done shit for their black voters....welll he thinks that's racist rhetoric.
So this is something I view differently than most. If you're driving a car going 60 instead of the 55 it used to go, in a vacuum that's a good improvement(certainly not sky rocket I would like for you to define that) but if all the other cars on the road are now doing 85 instead of 65, youre further behind, we live in a competitive world, people car what others are doimg, right or wrong we all suffer a bit from this. Bubbles, easy money liberal foley policies help those with assets infinitely more than it does for those that don't, in fact it serves to make those that don't into a permanent peasant class, the assets are now unattainable, this is a larger conversation on how it relates to what I think is the ultimate goal of all the elite class in the country, socialism.
Jen Psaki admits Biden taking impromptu reporter questions is ‘not something we recommend’
White House press secretary Jen Psaki admitted in a CNN podcast published Thursday that President Joe Biden taking impromptu questions from reporters "is not something we recommend."www.foxnews.com
'What have you got to lose?' by voting for someone different.
Yes, but we live in a relative world, a million bucks is great unless everyone else has 10 million,Fair enough, sky rocket was hyperbole. But it's fair to say things were going well for minorities and in many ways better than ever.
You have to start somewhere. The car won't go 85 until it goes 60 first.
No doubt some of the claims may be exaggerated. Its just a prediction so it’s obviously dependent upon many variables.I went down the rabbit hole. I put very little credence in fear mongerers from air-worldwide.com
America has always been great. Not perfect, but great.Hmmm...I sort of appreciated some of that honesty.
Agree calling Haiti a shithole lacked tact...though it's absolutely a shithole.
I wish someone would have edited his tweets, every time, before he hit send but I'm so over the PC crap. Feelings are not more important than reality or fact. But if there's nothing to gain from telling a hard truth, why are you spending political capital to tell it?
But if my plan to Make America Great Again includes real plans to help brown people who are legal residents of the US, it's not an insensitive catchphrase.
See, that’s the problems with Deniers. They take one prediction that turns out to be exaggerated and use it to ignore all of the forecasts. It’s ignorant.Ignore yet another predicted possibility? We would never.
One way to make people listen if you want to warn them of impending doom...stop shoveling so much ridiculous bullshit and they might take you seriously if and when you warn them about actual impending doom.
Is the corn belt F'd by mid-century, as this article claims is possibile? I don't know...but based on recent retarded predictions, I do have my doubts. Can you really blame me?
IMO, blame the boys who keep crying wolf.
America has always been great. Not perfect, but great.
See, that’s the problems with Deniers. They take one prediction that turns out to be exaggerated and use it to ignore all of the forecasts. It’s ignorant.
Focus on the bigger picture, which claimed that increased carbon in the atmosphere would lead to warming temperatures, melting glaciers, rising sea levels, more drougets, more severe weather events, etc. All those have turned out to be true. As I said before, most of the world accepts this reality so I have no desire to debate it any more. The main part of my post was merely to discuss corn prices.
All those have turned out to be true.
Which cult is stronger, the climatologists or the trumpets?Now you see how easy it is to fool the sheep.
You can take anything in the world, add in a claim that it will eventually lead to increased or decreased temperatures, and be 'right'. Because the climate is in a constant state of change. The sheep have never figured this out.
"More carbon in the atmosphere leads to increased temperatures! That's climate change!"
See how easy it is to fool the sheep?
Nick Saban won an increased number of National Championships the last 10 years. We have just as much evidence that the increased number of titles resulted in climate change as we do that increased amount of CO2 in the atmosphere caused it.
But as Sunny keeps telling us, climate change is a religion to the warmists.
When have I ever said the science is settled? It's not. By definition, it never is.Have they?
No, not really. Pigeon hole me as a denier if it makes you feel better.
And just freaking stop with the science is settled attitude. It isn't. We have a working hypothesis and that's fine.
Well some science is settled, most isn't, there in lies the problem. I am with @BamaFan1137 on this, absolutely enormous algorithm the climate is, let's discuss possible measures we can take and who is going to pay the price. I lived in Cali for 24 years, my energy bills sucked whenever I was not living in sf or the beaches. That's not the answer.When have I ever said the science is settled? It's not. By definition, it never is.
For centuries, we thought the concept of time was settled.Well some science is settled, most isn't, there in lies the problem. I am with @BamaFan1137 on this, absolutely enormous algorithm the climate is, let's discuss possible measures we can take and who is going to pay the price. I lived in Cali for 24 years, my energy bills sucked whenever I was not living in sf or the beaches. That's not the answer.
Yes, I know. But some science is settle, most isn't, that's the rub. Got to be honest in ones representation of "facts" when the agenda is clearly there to manipulate.For centuries, we thought the concept of time was settled.
The progressives for sure, but I don't care what this woman thinks.Did someone mention cults? According to Rose McGowan, it looks like your democratic party is the worst of the worst.
Being a survivor of a cult, she would know.
Why would you give a shit what anyone thinks?The progressives for sure, but I don't care what this woman thinks.
Well, I care if I respect the persons intellect. I don't meet many people that get it, unfortunatelyWhy would you give a shit what anyone thinks?
Did you read my response? Lol, good lord.So you blindly reject any criticism of your party?
Sounds like you're in a cult.
I’ll never understand that but right on manWell, I care if I respect the persons intellect. I don't meet many people that get it, unfortunately
You will never get what? how much do you get from idiots that say the same things over and overI’ll never understand that but right on man
I don’t understand why you would care what others think regardless if you agree or disagree with what they say, especially online.You will never get what? how much do you get from idiots that say the same things over and over