Not according to you and your mental state. You haven't attacked Joe at all but constantly rail on PDT, so he forever sits in the oval office in your mind.
Flynn Plead The Fifth To The Question "Do You Believe The Violence On Jan 6 Was Justified"
- Thread starter RayGravesGhost
- Start date
Still waiting on trump being "reinstated" or have you finally given up on that? LOL
The Pro-Afrikaner National Party was absolutely a socialist regime. They nationalized industry and individual freedom was clearly not a priority for them.
They were anti-communist but they sure as hell were NOT Republicans.
There were a conservative party.
Are you claiming them to be a bunch of progressives? LOL
Do you actually believe Adam Schiff? Bless your heart.
Yeah, and they empowered a Murderer and a Rapist in Nelson Mandela. Similar to the martyrdom of George Floyd.
They are white Christian nationalists who would be right at home with the NSDAP. Who were socialists.
Certainly over what currently sits in the Oval Office, and you actually voted for a man with dementia. Talk about being poorly educated. lol
You can't answer a question without deflecting. You are mentally ill, Sir. Get help.
I am claiming that people like American Conservative Republicans are very much against socialism and nationalizing industry.
People like you claim nazis and fascists from the 1930's were like Republicans too. That's also stupid AF.
The man you voted for fought for segregation. Apartheid is segregation on steroids. Apparently you're pro-Apartheid. For shame bsc.
So you make a claim from some unnamed person that Biden has dementia
And you have a problem with a trump advisor telling you trump has dementia?
trumpanzees is sum of the craziest
Trump passed a cognitive test, but Biden won’t take one, and if he did he sure as hell wouldn’t pass it.
So you admit you knew he had dementia and still voted for him. That is all I need to know.
So what?
You think "conservatism" globally is defined by American conservative republicans?
You know they're very people you call RINOs every chance you get right?
No you're stupid AF.
Conservatism & nationalism are NOT exclusive of fascism
You can be conservative, nationalistic AND fascist
Hitler, Mussolini, etc.
Apartheid was segregation on steriods? How so?
Last edited:
Another item. I have had relatives that suffered from dementia and I see the same symptoms with Joe. You don't have to be a neurologist to recognize cognitive decline just as you don't have to be a biologist to know what a woman is. You lefties are really devoid of common sense.
Well that solves that... because curmudgeon's family has dementia then there's nothing to discuss
Millions of families have had family members suffer from it. Don't be naive.
But no...you claimed that because you have dementia in you're family you can diagnose it without anything else
OK...Got it
I never said that. I said I have seen the same symptoms in Joe as my grandmother. If he is of sound mind why won't he be tested?
Fascism as created by the Italians is a left wing ideology.
Are you f*cking serious.
Apartheid transl. "separateness", lit. "aparthood") was a system of institutionalised racial oppression that existed in South Africa and South West Africa (now Namibia) from 1948 until the early 1990s. This system denied non-white South Africans basic human rights, such as the right to vote. Apartheid was characterized by an authoritarian political culture based on baasskap (boss-hood or boss-ship), which ensured that South Africa was dominated politically, socially, and economically by the nation's minority white population. According to this system of social stratification, white citizens had the highest status, followed by Indians and Coloureds, then black Africans. The economic legacy and social effects of apartheid continue to the present day.
If you can't comprehend and sort out that Brandon is demented AF from his daily activities, you need to see an optometrist. That or you live in a cave without a television.
Replace the word "Brandon" with trump and you're on to something everybody else already knows...
Apartheid goes back much further than 1948 but OK...
That means it existed 50 years roughly
Segregation in the US existed from the end of the Reconstruction era to 1965
Roughly twice as long
Which one was on steroids again?
This was true in the US also
In the US, segregation ensured that non-whites were dominated politically, socially, and economically by whites
In the US the social stratification was more simplified...white and everybody else
Where's the evidence that Apartheid was segregation on steroids?
Oh I dunno maybe I just posted it. They took segregation and made it worse.
And there was no Apartheid before this Apartheid is an Afrikaner word.
I'm at a BBQ, I'm going to let someone else deal with your bullshit now.
Worse in what way specifically?
Everything you've listed so far was true in Segregation in the US
I actually respect you're knowledge to be better than this.
You really don't believe Apartheid didn't exist before 1948?
Just like a rose..
A system of racial segregation that favors whites by any other name is still a system of racial discrimination that favors white...no?
Isn't that also a social system of "white supremacy"?
A system of racial preference not based on merit or opportunity but skin color?
Precursors
The United Kingdom's Slavery Abolition Act 1833 (3 & 4 Will. IV c. 73) abolished slavery throughout the British Empire and overrode the Cape Articles of Capitulation. To comply with the act the South African legislation was expanded to include Ordinance 1 in 1835, which effectively changed the status of slaves to indentured labourers. This was followed by Ordinance 3 in 1848, which introduced an indenture system for Xhosa that was little different from slavery. The various South African colonies passed legislation throughout the rest of the nineteenth century to limit the freedom of unskilled workers, to increase the restrictions on indentured workers and to regulate the relations between the races.
In the Cape Colony, which previously had a liberal and multi-racial constitution and a system of franchise open to men of all races, the Franchise and Ballot Act of 1892 raised the property franchise qualification and added an educational element, disenfranchising a disproportionate number of the Cape's non-white voters,[24] and the Glen Grey Act of 1894 instigated by the government of Prime Minister Cecil John Rhodes limited the amount of land Africans could hold. Similarly, in Natal, the Natal Legislative Assembly Bill of 1894 deprived Indians of the right to vote.[25]
In 1896 the South African Republic brought in two pass laws requiring Africans to carry a badge. Only those employed by a master were permitted to remain on the Rand and those entering a "labour district" needed a special pass.[26]
In 1905 the General Pass Regulations Act denied blacks the vote and limited them to fixed areas,[27] and in 1906 the Asiatic Registration Act of the Transvaal Colony required all Indians to register and carry passes.[28] The latter was repealed by the British government but re-enacted again in 1908.
In 1910, the Union of South Africa was created as a self-governing dominion, which continued the legislative program: the South Africa Act (1910) enfranchised white people, giving them complete political control over all other racial groups while removing the right of black people to sit in parliament,[29] the Native Land Act (1913) prevented blacks, except those in the Cape, from buying land outside "reserves",[29] the Natives in Urban Areas Bill (1918) was designed to force black people into "locations",[30] the Urban Areas Act (1923) introduced residential segregation and provided cheap labour for industry led by white people, the Colour Bar Act (1926) prevented black mine workers from practicing skilled trades, the Native Administration Act (1927) made the British Crown, rather than paramount chiefs, the supreme head over all African affairs,[31][better source needed] the Native Land and Trust Act (1936) complemented the 1913 Native Land Act and, in the same year, the Representation of Natives Act removed previous black voters from the Cape voters' roll and allowed them to elect three whites to Parliament.[32][better source needed] One of the first pieces of segregating legislation enacted by Jan Smuts' United Party government was the Asiatic Land Tenure Bill (1946), which banned land sales to Indians and Indian descendent South Africans.[33]
The United Party government began to move away from the rigid enforcement of segregationist laws during World War II.[34] Amid fears integration would eventually lead to racial assimilation, the National Party established the Sauer Commission to investigate the effects of the United Party's policies. The commission concluded that integration would bring about a "loss of personality" for all racial groups.
Is that a real question?
You are just too stupid to argue with.
The biggest difference I see between this sock and the BSC one, you seem to be even dumber on this handle.
How is that possible?
So desperate. Would it kill you to say, "I was wrong?"
I'd have more respect for you if you were capable...which you clearly are not.
Argue with dumber people. Someone in your own weight class.
