ADVERTISEMENT

Flynn Plead The Fifth To The Question "Do You Believe The Violence On Jan 6 Was Justified"

No jackass its against the law in DC...

Then your other idiot trumpanzee started talking about the Secret Service so I explained to him the Secret Service all over the place on Jan 6 in addition to local laws about being armed in DC

Understand now?
And why would someone committing TREASON give a flying f*ck about open carry laws?
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly
He isn't the only one...

G.O.P. Declares Jan. 6 Attack ‘Legitimate Political Discourse’​

The Republican National Committee voted to censure Representatives Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger for participating in the inquiry into the deadly riot at the Capitol.



What the Republican party's support of the 'Big Lie' means for politics04:55​

Play
April 26, 2022

The Republican Party continues to support the Big Lie — the baseless claim that former President Donald Trump won re-election in 2020. Loyalty to this idea and the former president has taken the place of a unifying party platform.

Host Celeste Headlee talks about what this means for the party and politics with Julian Zelizer, professor of history and public affairs at Princeton University.

This segment aired on April 26, 2022.


src=9338932;type=invmedia;cat=wbur-00;dc_lat=;dc_rdid=;tag_for_child_directed_treatment=;tfua=;npa=;ord=[SessionID]
this is your evidence, a show trial by two avowed never trump folks? That's not biased or anything. No wonder Jim Jordan told them to pound sand.
 
I don't blame him. I wouldn't answer any of their questions. This commitee is a total shame.

Yes because as every American citizen & patriot should not be able to answer that question if they don't like the investigators asking it

Don't worry...it won't be a Congressional soon.
It will be a criminal investigation by the DOJ
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BCSpell
Thank you for admitting that the Stop The Steal insurrectionists were committing treason and breaking the law

That wasn't so painful was it?
No dumbass, you are the one that stated people didn't come to the Capital armed because it's against the law.
A coup is a violent overthrow of government.
It's also treason.
If I'm committing the highest federal crime in the nation, I'm pretty sure I don't care about the open carry laws of the district of Columbia.

Therefore, what happened on Jan 6th could be charitably called a riot. Real insurrectionists don't follow the velvet ropes, wait for law enforcement to open doors for them, and they come heavy.

This post was brought to you by logic, and the letters F and U.
 
Is that why states are decertifying?

LOL...please explain the process for "decertifying" a past election you fool.


https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/rep...certification-2020-election/story?id=83794526
Some Republicans continue to push for 'decertification' of 2020 election
Experts say the call is legally and constitutionally dubious.

April 02, 2022, 8:27 AM

While many mainstream Republicans look toward making waves in the midterm elections, some are still clinging to the past.

After GOP Rep. Mo Brooks' recently confessed that former President Donald Trump repeatedly urged Brooks to "rescind" the results of the 2020 presidential campaign, some Republicans are exploring -- even publicly vowing – to "decertify" President Joe Biden's victory, a move with no legal or constitutional basis.

In late March, Brooks told ABC News that Trump requested several times he "remove" Biden from office, under the fraudulent assertion that the 2020 election was somehow tampered with and illegally skewed in Biden's favor. Brooks, in his own telling of the interaction, said he refused Trump's requests, writing the move off as impossible.

"We didn't get into the details [of how it would happen] because it's legally impossible. And I explained that fairly promptly," Brooks told ABC News in a phone interview.
 
Has nothing to do with this thread, just thought you’d like to see another sure fire “Trump’s going to Jail” wish go down the toilet.


He's no longer in contempt because he turned over the documents... and he still has to pay the fine that was imposed

but we all know how much he welches on his bills

The smell of desperation in the air from the trumpanzees
 
@RayGravesGhost

I keep forgetting to ask you, since you are so dialed into the events of J6, a few questions I can’t find answers to.

1) 2 days before the horribly violent insurrection Trump offered (5 eyewitnesses tell us) up to 20k National Guard Troops to Pelosi, Bowser and the Majority leader of the Senate. At that time the Secret Service and FBI are said to have “known the threat”. Why did they turn down that safety net and not protect the gov’t from an overthrow?

So that somehow absolves trump from what occurred that day?

Sorry to burst your bubble...

https://www.politifact.com/factchec...dence-pelosi-rejected-trumps-authorization-2/
  • There is no record of former President Donald Trump officially authorizing 20,000 National Guard troops for the U.S. Capitol ahead of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack.
  • There is no evidence that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi denied such an authorization, and experts said she doesn’t have the authority to do so in the first place.
  • A Vanity Fair report said Trump made a passing remark to his acting defense secretary about potentially needing 10,000 National Guard troops, not 20,000. But there’s no evidence the comment was treated as a formal authorization.


2) The main rotunda doors are several thousand lbs each, and they are locked with a magnetic lock that requires a code. Surely the J6 committee has identified who opened those doors and why?

Thanks, just trying to connect the dots here.
 
No dumbass, you are the one that stated people didn't come to the Capital armed because it's against the law.
A coup is a violent overthrow of government.
It's also treason.
If I'm committing the highest federal crime in the nation, I'm pretty sure I don't care about the open carry laws of the district of Columbia.

Egypt had a coup...it wasn't a violent overthrow by the opposition

The great majority of the violence was the government putting down the nonviolent protest opposition


Therefore, what happened on Jan 6th could be charitably called a riot. Real insurrectionists don't follow the velvet ropes, wait for law enforcement to open doors for them, and they come heavy.

This post was brought to you by logic, and the letters F and U.

Therefore? LOL
evil wayz the resident authority on coup requirements

Are you self-radicalizing in front of us?






evilwayz is actually more appropriately called ignorant wayz
 
Last edited:
this is your evidence, a show trial by two avowed never trump folks? That's not biased or anything. No wonder Jim Jordan told them to pound sand.

What?

This has nothing to do with the Jan 6 investigation

Try reading the attachments...its about the GOP under Rhonda Rommney McDaniel

Your name should be "ignorant wayz"
 
Vanity Fair????!?

You do know that the "story" of trump authorizing anything comes from the stooge he installed in the defense department right?

Kash Patel is the source of your fantasy belief...

He's part of the coup attempt...of course he would lie to save his ass

Show us anything of the "authorization" from trump being acted on by his administration

And please tell us why trump did NOTHING on Jan 6 for hours while your at it
 
So that somehow absolves trump from what occurred that day?

Sorry to burst your bubble...

https://www.politifact.com/factchec...dence-pelosi-rejected-trumps-authorization-2/
  • There is no record of former President Donald Trump officially authorizing 20,000 National Guard troops for the U.S. Capitol ahead of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack.
  • There is no evidence that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi denied such an authorization, and experts said she doesn’t have the authority to do so in the first place.
  • A Vanity Fair report said Trump made a passing remark to his acting defense secretary about potentially needing 10,000 National Guard troops, not 20,000. But there’s no evidence the comment was treated as a formal authorization.
Thanks for the concern buddy, but you could never burst my bubble.

1) Politifact is not a real fact checker, they are shills for leftists. Find another source.
2) No "record" of it? Really? 5 eyewitnesses on record have stated this, unfortunately Liz won't let them speak.
3) You caught the vapors over the Beast testimony which was hearsay, so we know "records" don't matter to you.
4) Vanity Fair - another truly investigative unbiased news org. Well done.
 
Egypt had a coup...it wasn't a violent overthrow by the opposition

The great majority of the violence was the government putting down the nonviolent protest opposition

Then it wasn't a coup.
Therefore? LOL
evil wayz the resident authority on coup requirements

Are you self-radicalizing in front of us?






evilwayz is actually more appropriately called ignorant wayz
I've seen a coup, in person. Have you?

I'm not self radicalizing, I've always been anti- government.
 
You do know that the "story" of trump authorizing anything comes from the stooge he installed in the defense department right?

Kash Patel is the source of your fantasy belief...

He's part of the coup attempt...of course he would lie to save his ass

Show us anything of the "authorization" from trump being acted on by his administration

And please tell us why trump did NOTHING on Jan 6 for hours while your at it
Wait, so Kash is completely untrustworthy but Liz and the J6 panel let a young woman testify she wrote a letter to Trump that another witness had previously testified under oath was his?

They knew beyond a shadow of a doubt she was lying and didn't say a word.

I'm sorry, you don't hold the high ground on who can and cannot be trusted in this matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly
So your great "win" is that trump was forced to comply with the documents request by the court AND paid the fine...

Got it. LMAO
You implied that 1) he hand't paid the fine, which is false and 2) he wasn't going to pay his bill, which is also false.

I don;t give a crap one way or the other, not complying with subpoenas is stupid.
 
He's no longer in contempt because he turned over the documents... and he still has to pay the fine that was imposed

but we all know how much he welches on his bills

The smell of desperation in the air from the trumpanzees
Actually, it's not. The snowball is rolling downhill.

The pain train is coming and you know it. A massive shift is coming, and I'm 100% sure you'll just disappear when it does.
 
What?

This has nothing to do with the Jan 6 investigation

Try reading the attachments...its about the GOP under Rhonda Rommney McDaniel

Your name should be "ignorant wayz"
I don't bother reading thru the drivel you post.

And if this isn't about Jan 6th, why are you talking about it?

To quote your dumbass "Stay on topic."
 
You do know that the "story" of trump authorizing anything comes from the stooge he installed in the defense department right?

Kash Patel is the source of your fantasy belief...

He's part of the coup attempt...of course he would lie to save his ass

Show us anything of the "authorization" from trump being acted on by his administration

And please tell us why trump did NOTHING on Jan 6 for hours while your at it
So everyone that was involved in the "coup attempt" is automatically guilty, but everyone involved in the steal is innocent til proven guilty?

Right.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: fatman76
LOL...please explain the process for "decertifying" a past election you fool.


https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/rep...certification-2020-election/story?id=83794526
Some Republicans continue to push for 'decertification' of 2020 election
Experts say the call is legally and constitutionally dubious.

April 02, 2022, 8:27 AM

While many mainstream Republicans look toward making waves in the midterm elections, some are still clinging to the past.

After GOP Rep. Mo Brooks' recently confessed that former President Donald Trump repeatedly urged Brooks to "rescind" the results of the 2020 presidential campaign, some Republicans are exploring -- even publicly vowing – to "decertify" President Joe Biden's victory, a move with no legal or constitutional basis.

In late March, Brooks told ABC News that Trump requested several times he "remove" Biden from office, under the fraudulent assertion that the 2020 election was somehow tampered with and illegally skewed in Biden's favor. Brooks, in his own telling of the interaction, said he refused Trump's requests, writing the move off as impossible.

"We didn't get into the details [of how it would happen] because it's legally impossible. And I explained that fairly promptly," Brooks told ABC News in a phone interview.
The election is over, all it is now is a signal that these states (most of which sent contested electors to Pence) are realizing there was more, and significant, fraud and irregularities. They are doing this for future elections, not 2020.
 
You implied that 1) he hand't paid the fine, which is false and 2) he wasn't going to pay his bill, which is also false.

I don;t give a crap one way or the other, not complying with subpoenas is stupid.

He paid because the bill continuously growing and the NY AG had legally won the request for the disclosure

It was a never ending growing sinkhole for donald...

So donald's win was losing the appeal & paying the fine...Got it.

LOL
 
He paid because the bill continuously growing and the NY AG had legally won the request for the disclosure

It was a never ending growing sinkhole for donald...

So donald's win was losing the appeal & paying the fine...Got it.

LOL
Fetch me the post where I said he won a damn thing. I'll wait.

He paid his fine, PRIOR to the contempt being dropped.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
So everyone that was involved in the "coup attempt" is automatically guilty, but everyone involved in the steal is innocent til proven guilty?

Right.

What steal? Where's the evidence of a steal?

trumpanzees have been ducking this basic question since the November election

And if you have any why haven't you shown up in court with it?
 
What steal? Where's the evidence of a steal?

trumpanzees have been ducking this basic question since the November election

And if you have any why haven't you shown up in court with it?
Disgusting behavior cheering on a communist type trial, but hey, you’re a woke lib so I guess that’s to be expected. The behavior of this committee is disgusting, shameful, and should be admonished by EVERY American who believes in justice.

If a former president can be tried without a defense, and by a one sided committee….so can @RayGravesGhost, but I bet this missed you.

tiny-small.gif
 
Disgusting behavior cheering on a communist type trial, but hey, you’re a woke lib so I guess that’s to be expected. The behavior of this committee is disgusting, shameful, and should be admonished by EVERY American who believes in justice.

This was the same reaction of republicans when the Nixon Watergate investigation started

If a former president can be tried without a defense, and by a one sided committee….so can @RayGravesGhost, but I bet this missed you.

Newsflash for the guy preoccupied with penises jfegaly...

donald trump is not being tried [yet]

He is being investigated...and yes every American citizen can be investigated
 
This was the same reaction of republicans when the Nixon Watergate investigation started



Newsflash for the guy preoccupied with penises jfegaly...

donald trump is not being tried [yet]

He is being investigated...and yes every American citizen can be investigated
Oh wait, I thought folks were testifying under oath? Be better.

These are hearings. Just admit you like gestapo tactics. It’s part of lib DNA.
 
Oh wait, I thought folks were testifying under oath? Be better.

Testifying under oath isn't being "tried"...it just means you have to tell the truth

Something trumpanzees regularly have difficulty with


These are hearings. Just admit you like gestapo tactics. It’s part of lib DNA.

jfegaly love hearings when they're about the Clintons or Obama

Calls for them when they are about the current president's son


But they're "gestapo tactics" when they're employed against donald trump



the trumpanzee mind is, by nature, bipolar and irrational

That's why they fling poo in the wild
 
You do know that the "story" of trump authorizing anything comes from the stooge he installed in the defense department right?

Kash Patel is the source of your fantasy belief...

He's part of the coup attempt...of course he would lie to save his ass

Show us anything of the "authorization" from trump being acted on by his administration

And please tell us why trump did NOTHING on Jan 6 for hours while your at it
187 minutes. Do you even J6, bro? 😆

You're off by half, which is honestly really accurate for you.

 
No jackass its against the law in DC...

Then your other idiot trumpanzee started talking about the Secret Service so I explained to him the Secret Service all over the place on Jan 6 in addition to local laws about being armed in DC

Understand now?
Not even a little bit...I have a functioning mind...unlike someone else on this post lil dickey!
 
LOL...please explain the process for "decertifying" a past election you fool.


https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/rep...certification-2020-election/story?id=83794526
Some Republicans continue to push for 'decertification' of 2020 election
Experts say the call is legally and constitutionally dubious.

April 02, 2022, 8:27 AM

While many mainstream Republicans look toward making waves in the midterm elections, some are still clinging to the past.

After GOP Rep. Mo Brooks' recently confessed that former President Donald Trump repeatedly urged Brooks to "rescind" the results of the 2020 presidential campaign, some Republicans are exploring -- even publicly vowing – to "decertify" President Joe Biden's victory, a move with no legal or constitutional basis.

In late March, Brooks told ABC News that Trump requested several times he "remove" Biden from office, under the fraudulent assertion that the 2020 election was somehow tampered with and illegally skewed in Biden's favor. Brooks, in his own telling of the interaction, said he refused Trump's requests, writing the move off as impossible.

"We didn't get into the details [of how it would happen] because it's legally impossible. And I explained that fairly promptly," Brooks told ABC News in a phone interview.
Watch your tonge little dickey...your little dicky mouth is overlaoding your little dickey azz! LOLOLOL
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT