ADVERTISEMENT

Even more reasons the SCOTUS needs ethics reform.

But I said that you're correct and I am not defending her. They all need to stop it. You can't even admit that.
As @GhostOfMatchesMalone just said - stop what? Justice Thomas can go on vacation. Sotomayor can write books.

One of them heard cases involving a company that's paid them millions since 2009, and should have recused herself. How could she not be biased? If she ruled against her publisher and cost them financial harm do you think they'd still want to do business with her?

Now do Thomas, what opinions, cases or decisions were affected by his vacations?
 
As @GhostOfMatchesMalone just said - stop what? Justice Thomas can go on vacation. Sotomayor can write books.

One of them heard cases involving a company that's paid them millions since 2009, and should have recused herself. How could she not be biased? If she ruled against her publisher and cost them financial harm do you think they'd still want to do business with her?

Now do Thomas, what opinions, cases or decisions were affected by his vacations?
It's funny that ghost still try to message me. I bet he has me on follow. Weird dude.

Now back to you. Crow did have business before the court. I'm sure you knew that and Thomas didn't recuse himself.

Let's see your spin on this one...
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: fatman76
It's funny that ghost still try to message me. I bet he has me on follow. Weird dude.

No back to you. Crow did have business before the court. I'm sure you knew that and Thomas didn't recuse himself.

Let's see your spin on this one...
There's nothing to spin. You made a claim with zero proof of your claim.

Back up your claim with facts, then we can address. Till then. you are lying.

Welcome to the real world, kid.
 
Same reason you try to talk sense into MDF I guess.

Be more productive and less painful to hit myself in the nuts with a hammer.

Oh I meant no judgment...that was me looking over the wall seeing myself. 😂

I chased my tail with both of them, obviously.
 
You don't [care] that people who decide our laws, shouldn't look compromised? Why not?
Looks like you left out the word “care” so I fixed it for you…..

Yes I do care about judicial ethics….. just not as much as the many other problems affecting our nation. As far as I’m concerned this thread has run its course. See you in other threads.
 
So we learn that multiple liberal justices have shady income that could influence how they rule.

I’m sure @kalimgoodman is spitting mad about this.
I am. This is why I ignore these tags. I always said that all of these justices piss me off and we need reform. I said CT went too far and farther than everyone else. There are killers and serial killers. He's a serial killer. Only one side bother you, both bothers Kalim.

I only responded to point out why I left the board. It's a joke. All of you guys are way dishonest. Nothing changed over here, sadly.
 
I am. This is why I ignore these tags. I always said that all of these justices piss me off and we need reform. I said CT went too far and farther than everyone else. There are killers and serial killers. He's a serial killer. Only one side bother you, both bothers Kalim.

I only responded to point out why I left the board. It's a joke. All of you guys are way dishonest. Nothing changed over here, sadly.
But you didn’t ignore this tag.

It’s pretty clear why.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatordad3
I am. This is why I ignore these tags. I always said that all of these justices piss me off and we need reform. I said CT went too far and farther than everyone else. There are killers and serial killers. He's a serial killer. Only one side bother you, both bothers Kalim.

I only responded to point out why I left the board. It's a joke. All of you guys are way dishonest. Nothing changed over here, sadly.
😂 You "Independents" Now fill my prescriptions, chop chop.

giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: nail1988
You completely ignored my comments because you only tagged me for trolling. You thought that I would defend or something.

I want an ethical Supreme Court, like the old days. I'm over the trolling by you guys. Take care. Back to ignoring you guys.
Well if you want an ethical SCOTUS you have twice as much work to do with liberals than conservatives (assuming you really believe Thomas is compromised).

Good luck straightening out your side of the aisle.
 
The biggest laugh I got out of this entire thread was KalimGoodman telling everyone that he left because of the dishonesty of others when he is the most dishonest poster I have ever encountered on any message board, starting with his big lie of painting himself as some virtuous independent when his true liberal identity soon became evident. And many lies would follow.
His absence had no affect on his self awareness, which was and remains ZERO
 
  • Like
Reactions: LordofallSocks
It's funny that ghost still try to message me. I bet he has me on follow. Weird dude.

Now back to you. Crow did have business before the court. I'm sure you knew that and Thomas didn't recuse himself.

Let's see your spin on this one...
Funny the genderless fool runs from me at every turn, you’re lucky!!! But yes, the Supreme Court should be watched like a hawk for any potential leverage points being breached we want them like a virgin before her wedding night. Pure.
 
Clarence Thomas loves free gifts, despite hating "handouts". The irony...

uh-oh Kalim...I know how mad you get about this stuff...sorry to be the bearer of bad news again

 
No, calling out hypocrisy and double standards is not the same as trolling.

But your response is all I needed. Thank you.
So you don't understand. Wait, so you're trolling because I addressed this in post 49, in response to another question by you. Stop trolling, it's against the rules.
 
So you don't understand. Wait, so you're trolling because I addressed this in post 49, in response to another question by you. Stop trolling, it's against the rules.

As for trolling, project much?

Also, So is name calling, yet here you are.


💊
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT