Election Fraud - Dominoes getting ready to fall

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy

I didn't ask for a wikipedia link to what the hoax/lie is.

You said Southern Republicans left the party en masse in protest over their party passing the Civil Rights Act (Your racist party was completely against it. We passed it in spite of you).

I asked you for the list of Southern Republican party members in the Senate and House that left the party en masse following the passing of the Act. IOW, I'm asking you to back up your claim with facts.

You can't provide the list. Because there isn't one.

You lied.

 

[jfegaly]

Lots of revisionist history up in here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy

Falling for dim narratives again

The myth of Nixon’s ‘Southern Strategy’

The conservative appeal to patriotism, anti-communism, free markets, pro-life and Christianity had more to do with the South becoming Republican than anything related to race.

thehill.com

 

[BillCutting4585]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy

Wikipedia, really? Please tell me you’re messing with us 😂😂😂😂😂

 

[jfegaly]

The Myth of the ‘Southern Strategy’

Have you ever wondered why it is that Democrats like to call all things Republican ‘racist,’ even though the Democrat Party was the party of slavery and Jim Crow? Have you ever wondered…

thedailylibertarian.com

 

[Uniformed_ReRe]

You guys aren’t fooling anyone but yourselves.

 

[jfegaly]

Uninformed rere strikes again.

He is so woke

 

[BillCutting4585]

You guys aren’t fooling anyone but yourselves.

Sorry bud, the egg is on your face with this one. Whoever put that lie of the southern switch in your brain deserves a Medal of Honor in disinformation.

Just do what @GhostOfMatchesMalone said, go back to the drawing board, get us names of the democrats that went blue to red to support this theory and then we can all discuss your findings.

In the meantime, the next time someone says something to you that you believe is true, shoot me a quick PM and we’ll discuss it. I’ll research it for the truth and then you can present it to the class to avoid embarrassment.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

You guys aren’t fooling anyone but yourselves.

Still waiting on that list. Where is it?

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Sorry bud, the egg is on your face with this one. Whoever put that lie of the southern switch in your brain deserves a Medal of Honor in disinformation.

Just do what @GhostOfMatchesMalone said, go back to the drawing board, get us names of the democrats that went blue to red to support this theory and then we can all discuss your findings.

In the meantime, the next time someone says something to you that you believe is true, shoot me a quick PM and we’ll discuss it. I’ll research it for the truth and then you can present it to the class to avoid embarrassment.

This is how the sheep stay hoodwinked.

Look at what just happened here. Uninformed repeated a lie that he's never investigated. The whole premise of the lie is rooted in the 'en masse' defection of Republicans to the Democratic party in protest over the Civil Rights Act passing.

So those of us who HAVE investigated this lie, asked the intelligent question: "Where's the list of these Republicans that left the party en masse?"

Because we know there isn't one.

Now if @Uniformed_ReRe was an honest and intelligent person, he would do his own investigating. And when he found that the list doesn't exist, he would do the honest thing and admit to himself that the 'Southern Switch' lie is just that.

But he can't do that. Because to libs, believing in lies is better than accepting the truth.

 

[Uniformed_ReRe]

Whites in the Deep South consistently voted for Democratic presidential candidates for a century. After the Civil Rights Acts and desegregation, they started voting for Republicans.

And Ghost, you’re not fooling anyone by trying narrow this to state legislators. You know full well that I’m referring to the voters.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Whites in the Deep South consistently voted for Democratic presidential candidates for a century. After the Civil Rights Acts and desegregation, they started voting for Republicans.

IOW, whites in the Deep South started voting with the party that fought to pass the Civil Rights Act (Republicans), and not the party that fought against it(Democrats)?

Sounds like whites in the Deep South didn't want to be associated with racists.

 

[BillCutting4585]

Whites in the Deep South consistently voted for Democratic presidential candidates for a century. After the Civil Rights Acts and desegregation, they started voting for Republicans.

And Ghost, you’re not fooling anyone by trying narrow this to state legislators. You know full well that I’m referring to the voters.

Then list the members of the House and Senate who switched parties in 1964

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

And Ghost, you’re not fooling anyone by trying narrow this to state legislators. You know full well that I’m referring to the voters.

Never mentioned state legislators, as you know.

You said Republicans left the party en masse in protest of their party passing the Civil Rights Act.

You lied. There is no list of Senators and Representatives that left the party after they passed the Act.

So again, if you were HONEST, you would now admit to yourself that the 'Southern Switch' is also a lie.

But of course you won't. Cause you would rather believe in a lie you want to hear, than the uncomfortable truth about your party coddling racists.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Then list the members of the House and Senate who switched parties in 1964

Notice @Uniformed_ReRe was gone for a half hour. That means he went to check out to see if there was a list.

He found out there wasn't one. Instead of being honest and coming back and admitting he was wrong, he's now trying to shift the goalposts.

This is what dishonesty looks like. Oh well, now he knows the truth about his racist party.

 

[BillCutting4585]

Notice @Uniformed_ReRe was gone for a half hour. That means he went to check out to see if there was a list.

He found out there wasn't one. Instead of being honest and coming back and admitting he was wrong, he's now trying to shift the goalposts.

This is what dishonesty looks like. Oh well, now he knows the truth about his racist party.

If he looks really hard, he’ll find 3 that went from dem to republican.

All this was was another propaganda tactic of the dem party to deflect their own party racism.

Where do you think the Dems learned propaganda from?

Welcome to Nazi Germany

 

[jfegaly]

If he looks really hard, he’ll find 3 that went from dem to republican.

All this was was another propaganda tactic of the dem party to deflect their own party racism.

Where do you think the Dems learned propaganda from?

Welcome to Nazi Germany

Bingo! Dims been trying to cover up their racist roots for years

 

[fsumc]

I’m sure you already know this, but the modern GOP was formed when southern white racists defected en masse to the Republican Party in response to the the Civil Rights Acts and desegregation. The progressives and liberals remained Democrats.

My goodness! This lie still going?! LOL

 

[BillCutting4585]

My goodness! This lie still going?! LOL

It’s sad, isn’t it?

 

[fsumc]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy

“Several aspects of this view have been debated by some historians and political scientists.”

Why do you Democrats love to post articles you didn’t read?
Just to get this straight. The party of the KKK, pro-slavery, segregationists, suddenly became the party of the Civil Rights Act? The same act that LBJ promised would get “those n*** voting democrat for the next 200 years” because the Democrats pumped in as much welfare money as possible to incentivize breaking up families and getting more blacks hooked on the government dole. 1965 happened and suddenly Democrat stripes changed colors, one Democrat became a Republican immediately following the Civil Rights Act and then it took 30+ years for Republicans to carry a majority in the south?

This dumbass argument of the big switch is just painfully retarded. It’s embarrassing people still push it out in public. But if you need to lie to yourself to feel better about throwing in with the party that’s been obsessed with and manipulating people based on their race keep telling yourself whatever you need to sleep better at night. But you probably want to stop embarrassing yourself in public.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

This dumbass argument of the big switch is just painfully retarded. It’s embarrassing people still push it out in public. But if you need to lie to yourself to feel better about throwing in with the party that’s been obsessed with and manipulating people based on their race keep telling yourself whatever you need to sleep better at night. But you probably want to stop embarrassing yourself in public.

@Uniformed_ReRe and the rest of the dems don't want to hear this, but the dems started losing the Deep South when they became the party of abortion, gay marriage, and started distancing itself from the teachings of the Bible.

That plays well in the Pacific Northwest and the Northeast, but Deep South is rooted in God, Family, and Freedom.

I don't think the modern democratic party really cares about any of those things.

 

[BamaFan1137]

Dammit...the video cut off. Did he catch it?

 

[BamaFan1137]

Whites in the Deep South consistently voted for Democratic presidential candidates for a century. After the Civil Rights Acts and desegregation, they started voting for Republicans.

And Ghost, you’re not fooling anyone by trying narrow this to state legislators. You know full well that I’m referring to the voters.

You should look a little deeper. Read stuff that you typically wouldn't...and that maybe you don't particularly care for.

Confirmation bias will help you double down, if that's what you are looking for, but if it's truth you're looking for, you can find it.

The southern switch is a necessary lie told by those who need it to be believed. If you will look at the origins of the lie, it all makes sense. You had two parties that wanted two very different things.

Also, remember who was POTUS and remember some of his very public comments on his plan to change the way some Americans voted.

Republicans have ALWAYS been about opportunity while Democrats have always been about keeping certain people in their place. It's still true today...though I recognize that many well-meaning Democrats do not recognize it for what it is.

 

[DCandtheUTBand]

Wow the claim was actually that southern dems switched to pubs. Guy got it completely backwards. Thurmond was the only national pol to do it. Thing is that once conservative dems lost the segregation fight they had nothing else to keep them in the dem party. Rank and file began switching. Yet national dems like Fulbright and and Byrd stayed dems. While segregation was lost on a legal level they implemented it with public housing and the welfare state while getting minorities to vote for their oppressors to keep the handouts coming.

Goldwater opposed the CRA rightly on constitutional grounds.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

You guys aren’t fooling anyone but yourselves.

Speaking of fooling yourself, got an update on how the court cases are going?

 

[fsumc]

Wow the claim was actually that southern dems switched to pubs. Guy got it completely backwards. Thurmond was the only national pol to do it. Thing is that once conservative dems lost the segregation fight they had nothing else to keep them in the dem party. Rank and file began switching. Yet national dems like Fulbright and and Byrd stayed dems. While segregation was lost on a legal level they implemented it with public housing and the welfare state while getting minorities to vote for their oppressors to keep the handouts coming.

Goldwater opposed the CRA rightly on constitutional grounds.

Anyone care to look at when the southern border started opening up once Democrats had to pay blacks an equal wage?

 

[jfegaly]

@Uniformed_ReRe

 

[instaGATOR]

Whites in the Deep South DIM-MOE-RATS consistently voted for Democratic presidential candidates for a century. After the Civil Rights Acts and desegregation, they started voting for Republicans.

And Ghost, you’re not fooling anyone by trying narrow this to state legislators. You know full well that I’m referring to the voters.

Fixed that for ya...

With a little research, the actual voting record for both Houses of Congress shows that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed the Senate on a 73-to-27 vote.

The Democratic majority in the Senate split their vote 46 (69%) for & 21 (31%) against.

The Republicans, split their vote 27 for (82%) and 6 (18%) against.

Thus, the no vote consisted of 78% Democrats. Further, the infamous 74-day filibuster was led by the Southern Democrats, who overwhelmingly voted against the act.

The House voted 290 to 130 in favor.

Democrats split their vote 152 for (61%) to 96 (39%) against.

Republicans split theirs 138 for (80%) to 34 (20%) against.

The no vote consisted of 74% Democrats.

Clearly, the 1964 Civil Rights Act could not have been passed without the leadership of Republicans.
The party of Abraham Lincoln and the Abolitionists.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Thus, the no vote consisted of 78% Democrats. Further, the infamous 74-day filibuster was led by the Southern Democrats, who overwhelmingly voted against the act.

The House voted 290 to 130 in favor.

Democrats split their vote 152 for (61%) to 96 (39%) against.

Republicans split theirs 138 for (80%) to 34 (20%) against.

The no vote consisted of 74% Democrats.

@Uniformed_ReRe why did the democrats oppose the Civil Rights Act?

 

[BillCutting4585]

@Uniformed_ReRe why did the democrats oppose the Civil Rights Act?

Will @Uniformed_ReRe ever provide the list of politicians who were part of the southern switch?

 

[fsumc]

Will @Uniformed_ReRe ever provide the list of politicians who were part of the southern switch?

And this is why this bullshit lie has transitioned over the years from a automatic switch to “oh, well there was a switch but it took a few years..” They keep trying to jump through hoops to pretend Democrats are the party of Civil Rights party but it’s garbage and honest people that know history know it’s garbage. I don’t know why I was shocked when I saw posted by a Democrat here; I mean we still have some pushing the Russian collusion stuff and Trump called white supremacists good people. Dishonesty and naïveté are the foundations of the principles.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Will @Uniformed_ReRe ever provide the list of politicians who were part of the southern switch?

Dems can repeat the talking points, but they can't defend them. The @bradleygator Rule.

 

[BillCutting4585]

And this is why this bullshit lie has transitioned over the years from a automatic switch to “oh, well there was a switch but it took a few years..” They keep trying to jump through hoops to pretend Democrats are the party of Civil Rights party but it’s garbage and honest people that know history know it’s garbage. I don’t know why I was shocked when I saw posted by a Democrat here; I mean we still have some pushing the Russian collusion stuff and Trump called white supremacists good people. Dishonesty and naïveté are the foundations of the principles.

It’s a tragic comedy. The fact that people believe this happened is funny but yet sad that they believe it. However, these people also believe Trump colluded with Russia, the virus came from a bat, politicians are good people and the government will protect us.

 

[BillCutting4585]

Dems can repeat the talking points, but they can't defend them. The @bradleygator Rule.

The mockingbird is strong with a few on here

 

[instaGATOR]

The uninformed ReRe is absent. He's out in the dark trapping a new supply of crickets....

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

I just saw a video interview with Ken Bennett, former AZ SOS and Senate President. He said they have the "packet captures" from the Dominion machines and over 100 terrabytes of information from Maricopa county.

"Packeet capture is a networking term for intercepting a data packet that is crossing a specific point in a data network."

Reminder: Dominion has contended that their machines don't connect to the internet.

 

[instaGATOR]

Bombshell: Arizona Election Results Audit Finds ‘Significant Discrepancies,’ Ballots Off By Up To 17.5%,​

Joe Biden ‘Likely Did Not Win’​

"It’s absolutely mind boggling, anything above a tiny fraction of a percentage is unacceptable, by the way, unacceptable according to the Federal Elections Commission.”
=====

Epshteyn then went on to explain that several databases that were subpoenaed for the purpose of the audit have been removed, which includes files containing election results and how they were tallied up.

“There’s evidence these databases were removed as recently as March, right before handed over, and while being subject to a subpoena.
That’s criminal activity,” he said.

Bombshell: Arizona Election Results Audit Finds ‘Significant Discrepancies,’ Ballots Off By Up To 17.5%, Joe Biden ‘Likely Did Not Win’ | Tea Party

www.teaparty.org

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Bombshell: Arizona Election Results Audit Finds ‘Significant Discrepancies,’ Ballots Off By Up To 17.5%,​

Joe Biden ‘Likely Did Not Win’​

"It’s absolutely mind boggling, anything above a tiny fraction of a percentage is unacceptable, by the way, unacceptable according to the Federal Elections Commission.”
=====

Epshteyn then went on to explain that several databases that were subpoenaed for the purpose of the audit have been removed, which includes files containing election results and how they were tallied up.

“There’s evidence these databases were removed as recently as March, right before handed over, and while being subject to a subpoena.
That’s criminal activity,” he said.

Bombshell: Arizona Election Results Audit Finds ‘Significant Discrepancies,’ Ballots Off By Up To 17.5%, Joe Biden ‘Likely Did Not Win’ | Tea Party

www.teaparty.org

If true, that likely means Arizona will have to be decertified. @sadgator is this what you wanted us to keep watching for?

 

[Uniformed_ReRe]

And this is why this bullshit lie has transitioned over the years from a automatic switch to “oh, well there was a switch but it took a few years..” They keep trying to jump through hoops to pretend Democrats are the party of Civil Rights party but it’s garbage and honest people that know history know it’s garbage. I don’t know why I was shocked when I saw posted by a Democrat here; I mean we still have some pushing the Russian collusion stuff and Trump called white supremacists good people. Dishonesty and naïveté are the foundations of the principles.

You guys think you are slick by framing the issue to be about politicians switching parties. Is this the pivoting tactic they taught you at some 1980-1990s Young Republicans Conventions?

This is about the voters in the Deep South voting for Democrats for a century and then voting for Republicans after Civil Rights Acts.

 

[fsumc]

You guys think you are slick by framing the issue to be about politicians switching parties. Is this the pivoting tactic they taught you at some 1980-1990s Young Republicans Conventions?

This is about the voters in the Deep South voting for Democrats for a century and then voting for Republicans after Civil Rights Acts.

There’s no slickness to it. Your party has been proclaiming a big switch for as long as I can remember. And Republicans didn’t become a majority in the south until 30 years after the Civil Rights Act was signed so your argument still falls short of evidence. The less racist the south became the less they voted for Democrats. The slickness is you Democrats trying to pretend you’re the party of equal opportunities and trying to rewrite history.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

You guys think you are slick by framing the issue to be about politicians switching parties. Is this the pivoting tactic they taught you at some 1980-1990s Young Republicans Conventions?

This is about the voters in the Deep South voting for Democrats for a century and then voting for Republicans after Civil Rights Acts.

This might be the most offensive attempt at gaslighting I've ever seen here.

@Uniformed_ReRe takes his party's racism, ignores it, and tries to spin that voters in the South are the real racists......cause they wouldn't support his party being racists.

Wow. Hey uninformed, why do YOU support your party's racism? That's what this is REALLY about.