I'm not getting into the news information argument.You’re posting a fact check by the AP who used an Obama appointee as the main fact checker.
Why were the envelopes (required by law to be maintained) never provided for these mail in ballots?
And the canvassing wasn’t mean to be a door to door intimidation campaign but a way to check some of the repeated addresses used to make sure they aren’t parking lots.
The information on EV32 and EV33 is beyond the scope of my knowledge but I’ll research it. But if you’re cool with a forensic audit does it matter to you that these specific mail in ballots weren’t folded and weren’t on the right paper? Two things can be true at once - the auditors could have used the wrong method for tracking what was sent but they could also still be fraudulent.
I’ll ask you one more time - you keep dodging. 2.1MM recorded votes in the county should be proven with 2.1MM ballots retained by the county for audit, correct? If that number varies are you still going to say the audit is BS?
You are providing a lot of stuff that was debunked or is not true. I think you need to check your avenue of information. That is not why they wanted to canvass here is the reason;
"Senate Republicans had planned to canvass homes and ask people about their voting patterns, but in May dropped the idea under pressure from the U.S. Department of Justice, which warned the effort could violate laws against voter intimidation. Fann said Thursday she would consult with lawyers before deciding whether to proceed."
They want to ask people whom they voted for, extremely private and illegal.