Mueller didn't clear Trump he was going to recommend impeachment on bogus crap (that 100 pages + of nonsense he put together) claiming obstruction of justice for mean tweets etc. The swamp creature Barr put a stop to the actual official impeachment recommendation probably to try and bolster himself with Reps while he later covered for the crooks. If Rosenstein was still making the final call then we would have had another joke impeachment attempt almost guaranteed.
Durham's CRIMINAL investigation zeroing in on the Clinton Campaign
- Thread starter GhostOfMatchesMalone
- Start date
Mueller didn't clear Trump he was going to recommend impeachment on bogus crap (that 100 pages + of nonsense he put together) claiming obstruction of justice for mean tweets etc. The swamp creature Barr put a stop to the actual official impeachment recommendation probably to try and bolster himself with Reps while he later covered for the crooks. If Rosenstein was still making the final call then we would have had another joke impeachment attempt almost guaranteed.
Listening to a Kash Patel interview now about Durham. He believes that Durham will get a conviction against Danchenko when his trial starts later this month. He believes Durham's strategy for this trial is to publicly expose how the FBI is misuing the CHS (Confidential Human Source) program. He says the FBI has been using CHSs to cover up its own corruption. He speculates that Ray Epps is a CHS. He references that Epps spent one day on the FBI Most Wanted list, and then next day he was off it. He says that only happens if the FBI made a grave error OR if they were using him as a CHS.
He added that it's 'unrealistic' to expect hilldabeast and Comey to get arrested by Durham, but he added that the people under them 'will be crushed'.
He added that it's 'unrealistic' to expect hilldabeast and Comey to get arrested by Durham, but he added that the people under them 'will be crushed'.
Danchenko trial just started, apparently Durham is handling arguments for the prosecution himself in the courtroom.
No phones allowed in the courthouse so it could be tonight before we get decent updates.
No phones allowed in the courthouse so it could be tonight before we get decent updates.
Ladies and gentlemen, barrack obama's FBI offered a person one million dollars to supply them with dirt on a political opponent.
Imagine Trump instructing the FBI to do this toward Hiden and how would the dems and media have reacted?
Probably fring squad.
I mean, the DEMS impeached him for asking Ukraine to look into potential corruption involving Ukraine and the Bidens.
I want justice SO MUCH for this. It is the most unAmerican thing I have ever witnessed in my life. Makes watergate look like playing with a coloring book. Yet I just have ZERO faith that these criminals will always protect their own. People need the firing squad over this. It was pure TREASON
And this is what they did once Trump was elected President. Dont forget the spying Obama had his team do before Trump ever became President. Obuma is a true POS who shows he's scared to death of Trump. He knows Trump can expose and destroy Obuma for all his corruption.
SPOT ON...I would be the most surprised person ever if any of this came back on Hussein or the POS Comey
In other breaking news…….. attorney Tommy Jefferson will soon release results on who chopped down the cherry tree; FBI to raid Mar-a Lago looking for 250 year old cherries.
Rumor has it that Nancy Pelosi may have the only cherry that old.
Rumor has it that Nancy Pelosi may have the only cherry that old.
None of the folks you mentioned will ever admit to being tricked. Now that's a nice word for brainwashed.
It's like climbing a ladder. You have to go up one rung at a time.
For instance, in order to arrest Comey, you have to first someone directly under him who Comey instructed to do something illegal. In order to get that person, you would likely need to start with someone under them who worked under that person.
So you're likely looking at first targeting a low level agent or consultant or CHS, then someone like Peter Strozk, then Comey.
Durham is after first level now.
Same thing with hildabeast. If you want to arrest her, first you have to get someone like Robbie Mook or Podesta who were given orders by hildabeast. To arrest them, you have to go after someone they worked with. Durham has already been doing that with the Sussmann trial.
Right now Durham is still at the first level players, but he's starting to move to the second level. If he can move to focus strictly on people like Strozk, Mook and Podesta, then you can start to wonder if people like hildabeast and Comey may be arrested at some point. Even if Durham isn't the one that does it. I've always thought that Durham's investigation will conclude that a new investigation is needed but the focus needs to be on the top leadership of the FBI, the CIA, the DNI.
IOW the people right under obama and hildabeast.
I'm thinking people like Comey, brennan and Jim Clapper. People who we KNOW obama closely corrdinated with at all times.
I think that's the 30,000 foot view of the larger strategy here: Prove that the FBI was corrupt. That the CIA was corrupt.
Then prove that LEADERSHIP of those organizations were directing the corruption.
Then go after LEADERSHIP. Leadership will then say 'hey we were just following orders'. IIRC, either Comey or Clapper (maybe both) have already testified before congress that they just followed orders.
That means they are saying they just did what the president told them to do.
I get what you’re saying but when you say the top leadership of the CIA, FBI, DOJ everyone knows that ultimately leads to Obuma and Hildabeast. Nothing was done by those organizations without the blessing, and orders, of those 2 POS.
I think you will finally see the writing on the wall sometime in January when most likely Durham is departing. He doesn't even have the grand jury going anymore.
Of course. That's why I said Durham is working in stages.
1 - Bottom of the FBI.
2 - Middle of the FBI
3 - Top of the FBI
4 - obama
Right now Durham is working on people in the bottom and middle of the FBI mostly. Same framework plays out with hillary's campaign.
He can't just arrest obama or hildabeast. Gotta work in stages and that's why it takes time.
Heard a chat among some people who attended the trial yesterday. All agreed that Durham was brilliant. One guy said "What I saw in that courtroom was art from Durham". And this was from the same group that was critical of Durham's team during the Sussmann trial, and who gatorfever gleefully referenced when they were critical.
Here's an example: Danchenko was investigated in 2009 (I assume by the FBI) for being a RUSSIAN AGENT. Durham wanted to mention this during the trial. but the judge wouldn't allow it. He said it would defame Danchenko without being relevant to the charges in this case.
So yesterday they had a guy named Helson on the stand (Believe he was called by Durham). Helson's role was basically to shepard Danchenko through the CHS (Confidential Human Source) program. One of the hosts of the chat explained that Helson was basically joined at the hip with Danchenko for the last decade plus. So he was entirely vested in Danchenko being a model member of the CHS program. The hosts speculated that Helson wasn't lying when he said he thought Danchenko was a great guy, he really believed it. But his career for the last decade plus was tied to Danchenko being a good guy.
So defense was questioning Helson. Helson was painting a picture of what an amazing person and CHS Danchenko was. Durham never objects. Helson continues, all glowing remarks about Danchenko, Durham says nothing.
So Durham starts questioning him on cross, he says him if Helson ever found anything derrogatory about Danchenko when examining him and his life? Helson says of course not! Durham then says so how did you miss him being investigated in 2009 as being a Russian agent?????
IMMEDIATELY both sides go to sidebar. They stay for 10 mins, then Durham returns and asks the same question LOL He tricked the defense into opening the door for him to bring up the investigation.
When Durham was done questioning Helson for the day, Danchenko's wife burst into tears and ran from the courtroom.
Durham will continue questioning Helson when court resumes today.
Here's an example: Danchenko was investigated in 2009 (I assume by the FBI) for being a RUSSIAN AGENT. Durham wanted to mention this during the trial. but the judge wouldn't allow it. He said it would defame Danchenko without being relevant to the charges in this case.
So yesterday they had a guy named Helson on the stand (Believe he was called by Durham). Helson's role was basically to shepard Danchenko through the CHS (Confidential Human Source) program. One of the hosts of the chat explained that Helson was basically joined at the hip with Danchenko for the last decade plus. So he was entirely vested in Danchenko being a model member of the CHS program. The hosts speculated that Helson wasn't lying when he said he thought Danchenko was a great guy, he really believed it. But his career for the last decade plus was tied to Danchenko being a good guy.
So defense was questioning Helson. Helson was painting a picture of what an amazing person and CHS Danchenko was. Durham never objects. Helson continues, all glowing remarks about Danchenko, Durham says nothing.
So Durham starts questioning him on cross, he says him if Helson ever found anything derrogatory about Danchenko when examining him and his life? Helson says of course not! Durham then says so how did you miss him being investigated in 2009 as being a Russian agent?????
IMMEDIATELY both sides go to sidebar. They stay for 10 mins, then Durham returns and asks the same question LOL He tricked the defense into opening the door for him to bring up the investigation.
When Durham was done questioning Helson for the day, Danchenko's wife burst into tears and ran from the courtroom.
Durham will continue questioning Helson when court resumes today.
When it comes to Durham Ghost will have to look up the word delusion soon which should have the name Brian Cates beside it. The same guy that has literally been wrong about everything but continues his grifting with the right. Next Cates will probably tell people he was right all along about Rosenstein being an undercover white hat despite being an actual ring leader and he will have a joint press conference with Durham. Crazy people still fall for these grifters after 5 years of being lied to and "5D chess' where every bad thing is actually good you know.
Pretty obvious this is where Durham is going: getting key FBI players on the stand and under oath about what they did and hid. During the chat last night one of the guys in the courtroom yesterday said Durham was really reserved UNTIL any witness mentioned Crossfire Hurricane, then he immediately perked up and drilled into what the witness had just said.
The judge also tossed one of the 5 charges against Danchenko:
This charge apparently doesn't relate to the other 4.
Sorry but don't see it or they would have been witnesses not defendents but I will self ban for 30 days if wrong but I think the chances of that are less than 1%.
So today Durham went after Mueller.
Mueller testified before congress that the Steele dossier was outside the scope of his investigation.
Apparently, Durham had an FBI agent testify today that Mueller had AN ENTIRE TEAM working on the Steele dossier.
They also testified that Charles Dolan was a source of the Steele dossier. The witness (Amy Anderson I believe) and her supervisor both went to Mueller and demanded they be allowed to investigate Dolan. Mueller refused and tried to bury it.
And more info on the first charge being dropped. Apparently the judge had warned Durham's team at some point earlier that if they didn't improve on their efforts, the charge would be dropped. Well Durham closed his case today and as soon as he did, the judge announced he was dropping the charge.
The defense rested as well. Closing arguments on Monday.
It's pretty obvious Durham used this case to open new doors and get new information out there even moreso than going after Danchenko. The revelations that the FBI wanted to investigate Charles Dolan and Mueller blocked it is a big deal, and that info came from FBI agents that Durham hand-picked to get on the stand and make that info public.
At minimum, Durham laid the groundwork for needing to investigate Charles Dolan. He could be building up to investigate Mueller as well. Based on testimony today, Mueller committed perjury when he testified that he wasn't and couldn't investigate the Steele dossier, when he actually had a team on it.
The issue is, if Durham doesn't get a conviction in this case, it will be a LOT easier for Merrick (what a manly name!) to stop his investigation saying he's getting no where. And if Durham then tries to go after a bigger fish, that could even make it easier for Merrick to pull the plug, saying 'Ok you couldnt get the little fish, I'm not letting you go after bigger fish'.
It will be interesting to see the verdict and what happens next.
Mueller testified before congress that the Steele dossier was outside the scope of his investigation.
Apparently, Durham had an FBI agent testify today that Mueller had AN ENTIRE TEAM working on the Steele dossier.
They also testified that Charles Dolan was a source of the Steele dossier. The witness (Amy Anderson I believe) and her supervisor both went to Mueller and demanded they be allowed to investigate Dolan. Mueller refused and tried to bury it.
And more info on the first charge being dropped. Apparently the judge had warned Durham's team at some point earlier that if they didn't improve on their efforts, the charge would be dropped. Well Durham closed his case today and as soon as he did, the judge announced he was dropping the charge.
The defense rested as well. Closing arguments on Monday.
It's pretty obvious Durham used this case to open new doors and get new information out there even moreso than going after Danchenko. The revelations that the FBI wanted to investigate Charles Dolan and Mueller blocked it is a big deal, and that info came from FBI agents that Durham hand-picked to get on the stand and make that info public.
At minimum, Durham laid the groundwork for needing to investigate Charles Dolan. He could be building up to investigate Mueller as well. Based on testimony today, Mueller committed perjury when he testified that he wasn't and couldn't investigate the Steele dossier, when he actually had a team on it.
The issue is, if Durham doesn't get a conviction in this case, it will be a LOT easier for Merrick (what a manly name!) to stop his investigation saying he's getting no where. And if Durham then tries to go after a bigger fish, that could even make it easier for Merrick to pull the plug, saying 'Ok you couldnt get the little fish, I'm not letting you go after bigger fish'.
It will be interesting to see the verdict and what happens next.
The only door Durham is opening is the exit door to leaving his job as special counsel having completed his job of protecting the biggest crooks from criminal charges. He can talk and write any report he wants but not charging these FBI crooks was a disgrace. The Dems if the rolls were reversed would have had them charged in less than a year. Durham has been around over 3 years working for Barr and now is going to be shutting down with these 2 joke trials where the head crooks are witnesses instead of defendents. Oh I forget he did get one guy no jail time but 400 community hours.
I think you are on to something here. Durham is not trying to get guilty convictions on these first few trials...he is EXPOSING the corruptness of the FBI...and hopefully the CIA, NSA and Comey, Brennan and Clapper
First few trials?
The investigation is OVER after this trial...
We know you don't read the news but you should...
The grand jury has expired
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/14/us/politics/durham-inquiry-trump-russia.html
Durham Inquiry Appears to Wind Down as Grand Jury Expires
The special counsel appointed by the Trump administration to examine the Russia investigation seems to be wrapping up its work with no further charges in store.
Sept. 14, 2022
Justice Department in 2019 to examine the origins of the investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign’s ties to Russia, President Donald J. Trump and his supporters expressed a belief that the inquiry would prove that a “deep state” conspiracy including top Obama-era officials had worked to sabotage him.
Now Mr. Durham appears to be winding down his three-year inquiry without anything close to the results Mr. Trump was seeking. The grand jury that Mr. Durham has recently used to hear evidence has expired, and while he could convene another, there are currently no plans to do so, three people familiar with the matter said.
Mr. Durham and his team are working to complete a final report by the end of the year, they said, and one of the lead prosecutors on his team is leaving for a job with a prominent law firm.
Over the course of his inquiry, Mr. Durham has developed cases against two people accused of lying to the F.B.I. in relation to outside efforts to investigate purported Trump-Russia ties, but he has not charged any conspiracy or put any high-level officials on trial. The recent developments suggest that the chances of any more indictments are remote.
The investigation is OVER after this trial...
We know you don't read the news but you should...
The grand jury has expired
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/14/us/politics/durham-inquiry-trump-russia.html
Durham Inquiry Appears to Wind Down as Grand Jury Expires
The special counsel appointed by the Trump administration to examine the Russia investigation seems to be wrapping up its work with no further charges in store.
Sept. 14, 2022
Justice Department in 2019 to examine the origins of the investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign’s ties to Russia, President Donald J. Trump and his supporters expressed a belief that the inquiry would prove that a “deep state” conspiracy including top Obama-era officials had worked to sabotage him.
Now Mr. Durham appears to be winding down his three-year inquiry without anything close to the results Mr. Trump was seeking. The grand jury that Mr. Durham has recently used to hear evidence has expired, and while he could convene another, there are currently no plans to do so, three people familiar with the matter said.
Mr. Durham and his team are working to complete a final report by the end of the year, they said, and one of the lead prosecutors on his team is leaving for a job with a prominent law firm.
Over the course of his inquiry, Mr. Durham has developed cases against two people accused of lying to the F.B.I. in relation to outside efforts to investigate purported Trump-Russia ties, but he has not charged any conspiracy or put any high-level officials on trial. The recent developments suggest that the chances of any more indictments are remote.
Sorry MSNBC does not inform you of what is happening in the world son....there is AWSEOME testimony coming put, that unless you are watching FNC, is not being reported. I am ALWAYS happy to educate the VERY slow. you are welcome, son
Awesome testimony has resulted in 1 of the charges being dropped? 🤣
The first trial ended in an acquittal..."AWESOME TESTIMONY!!!" 👏
The first trial ended in an acquittal..."AWESOME TESTIMONY!!!" 👏
Wait, is @RayGravesGhost still getting hoodwinked by the MSM when it comes to Durham? Too funny!
@RayGravesGhost let me help you from making a fool out of yourself: Never listen to ANYTHING the mainstream media tells you about the Durham investigation.
A couple of reasons why:
1 - MSM has no idea what Durham is doing because DURHAM DOES NOT LEAK. This is why I always laugh at articles from MSM about 'Durham is winding down' that you and fever seem to always fall for. MSM has been claiming Durham has been done for the last 3 years. They are clueless and anytime you see an article that makes a claim about the Durham CRIMINAL investigation and adds 'sources close to Durham confirm' or such, that's your cue they are making it up.
2 - Even when the MSM reports something factual about the Durham investigation, they misrepresent what it means and omit key facts. Case in point, look at the BOMBSHELL revelations we have had in the Danchenko trial: Steele was offered ONE MILLION TAXPAYER DOLLARS to corobborate the dossier (and he couldn't do it). Charles Dolan, a longtime DEMOCRATIC OPERATIVE was a source of the dossier. And just yesterday, we learned that Robert Mueller apparently committed PERJURY when he testified before Congress that his investigation didn't allow him to investigate the Steele Dossier when in fact HE HAD A TEAM INVESTIGATING IT! On top of everything else, we learned that Danchenko was under investigation in 2009 for being a RUSSIAN AGENT, and an internal FBI review later concluded that he was likely RUSSIAN INTELLGENCE!
But MSM isn't reporting ANY of that. Instead, the ONLY thing MSM is reporting is that the judge dropped the first of FIVE counts in the indictment against Danchenko. The MSM is spinning this was a CRUSHING blow to Durham and totally ENDS the trial.
Reality: The judge notified Durham at the start of the trial that Durham would need to make the case for keeping the first charge in quickly or the judge would toss it. So Durham knew this was coming, and did nothing to stop it. When the prosecution rested Friday afternoon, the judge had no choice but to drop the charge, and Durham did nothing.
@RayGravesGhost you need to put down the propaganda, that's why you keep getting hoodwinked.
malone must have lost his "winter is coming" images as this "investigation" has petered out to a big nothing burger 🤣
malone get your wallet out (again) trump is sure to fund raise off the conclusion of the special counsel
And you should be right there to get used in another trump scam like the loyal sheep you are
trump is your shepard and he will gladly lead you to slaughter (for a price
)
malone get your wallet out (again) trump is sure to fund raise off the conclusion of the special counsel
And you should be right there to get used in another trump scam like the loyal sheep you are
trump is your shepard and he will gladly lead you to slaughter (for a price
)
I do think that's the play. Remember his directive from Sessions and later Barr was to investigate how the FBI may have interfered in the 2016 election in regards to targeting Trump. I think in the course of that investigation, he's found massive and systemic corruption in the bureau. So I think at some point this is leading up to Durham either needs to start a new investigation focused on the FBI itself, or someone else needs to lead up that investigation.
If he doesn't get a guilty verdict against Danchenko, and many are saying he will not, then it will be VERY interesting to see what happens next. Merrick (what a manly name!) could easily pull the plug on the investigation and tell Durham to submit his conclusions and go away.
On the other hand if that happens, it will be very hard for Merrick to explain how he is willing to completely overlook all the evidence and information of corruption and misdeeds in the FBI, the Clinton campaign, etc.
Merrick may decide to do nothing and let Durham continue, hoping that liberal judges and juries can continue to run cover for any future trials Durham holds.
Merrick will have problems to deal with either way. Will be interesting to see what he does. Even if he totally kills Durham's investigation, Trump can always restart it in 2024 with Durham or someone else at the helm.
Durham has retired...Once his special counsel job is completed he's done
There is nothing that comes "after"
He will write the report and head for Miami Beach 🤣
There is nothing that comes "after"
He will write the report and head for Miami Beach 🤣
Thank you for helping me TRY to educate the lil dickey boy.
People that usually have good sources say the grand jury is over and Durham will be closing up shop in the next few months. Not sure if he writes some report or not and that doesn't matter anyway because he didn't charge those crooks criminally.
@GhostOfMatchesMalone i love the updates, keep them coming
Now, let’s be honest folks, we have a two tier Justice system, I do agree we won’t see any arrests on anything to do with corruption, treason or spying on Trump or his campaign.
Until the people are willing to take their country back, nothing changes.
Now, let’s be honest folks, we have a two tier Justice system, I do agree we won’t see any arrests on anything to do with corruption, treason or spying on Trump or his campaign.
Until the people are willing to take their country back, nothing changes.
He knows better. The lefties are scared to death of Durham and want him to go away.
Here's how you can tell: All of Durham's critics say the same thing: "Durham is going no where! This is such an embarrassment for him and for Trump! He's done he's gonna wrap up soon!"
Wut??? Why are lefties so desperate to spin that Durham is going to stop? If they really thought he was embarrassing himself and Trump AND that he was NOT uncovering FBI and hildabeast corruption.....why would they want that to end???
Contrast that with how Trump supporters here are reacting to the Jan 6th committee hearings: We also say these hearings are going nowhere and are an embarrassment to the left and everyone involved.
But NO ONE here is saying they want them to end! Hell I hope they keep going! All they are doing is proving to everyone that Trump did NOTHING wrong on Jan 6th, and that this is all a POLITICAL WITCHHUNT. Which our President Trump has said all along.
That's why you haven't seen a single Trump supporter here saying anything about end these hearings. We LOVE them! Keep them going, when your enemy is making mistakes, don't interrupt them!
Yet when it comes to Durham, the lefties are desperate to claim he's done.
They are scared. We are laughing.
More to come. Keep watching...
I think I'm beginning to figure out Durham's strategy here.
He knows he can't get a fair trial or jury for any case he brings. So bring cases against the low totem pole guys, but use the cases not to get convictions, but rather introduce evidence of the corruption of the big fish.
IOW, Durham is ok letting the low totem guys get off, if in the process he is able to introduce evidence that helps build his case against people like Comey, Mueller, brennan, etc. Maybe we shouldnt have thought of it as the Sussmann case, maybe that was the first round of evidence in the Comey trial. Maybe the Danchenko trial is the same thing.
And each time he introduces a new piece of damning evidence, it makes it that much harder for Merrick (what a manly name!) to just tell him to close up the investigation and then drop it.
Again, this is leading to a very interesting game of chicken between Durham and Merrick. I wonder if Durham is hoping that Merrick will go on intentionally ignoring Durham, assuming the media will ignore as well. Which plays into Durham's hands, let him keep chipping away with evidence until he finally delivers the 'smoking gun' in court that cannot be ignored.
A prosecutor is supposed to bring the case when the evidence is there. These 2 trials are just weak cases because the witnesses are the biggest crooks in the courtroom.
Durham could have used a report to bring out what the crooks did and we already knew the basics anyway so it doesn't help with anything a few new details coming out of these joke trials of his. Durham was put in place by Barr to protect the biggest FBI crooks as Durham's joke investigation has shown everyone now.
Most of the media will just be laughing again if Danchenko only gets nailed for one charge or got off altogether.
Durham could have used a report to bring out what the crooks did and we already knew the basics anyway so it doesn't help with anything a few new details coming out of these joke trials of his. Durham was put in place by Barr to protect the biggest FBI crooks as Durham's joke investigation has shown everyone now.
Most of the media will just be laughing again if Danchenko only gets nailed for one charge or got off altogether.
Interesting........ The FBI just ratted out itself. If this goes nowhere, I've given up all hope.
In a shocking testimony yesterday, it was reported that the Deep State FBI offered a $1,000,000 bounty for proof of President Trump’s alleged Russian collusion.
Folks, we at the ACLJ are not letting the Deep State get away with lying and manipulating our justice system to attack a political candidate and spy on innocent Americans. We told you how the Durham probe has led to the arrest of a Russian analyst and alleged source for the discredited Steele Dossier for lying to the FBI.
During yesterday’s trial of Danchenko, FBI analyst Brian Auten told Special Counsel John Durham that the FBI essentially attempted to bribe Christopher Steele, the disgraced author of the Steele dossier – in order to continue its phony Trump-Russia collusion investigation.
• 2022-10-14 • American Center for Law and Justice
canadafreepress.com
In a shocking testimony yesterday, it was reported that the Deep State FBI offered a $1,000,000 bounty for proof of President Trump’s alleged Russian collusion.
Folks, we at the ACLJ are not letting the Deep State get away with lying and manipulating our justice system to attack a political candidate and spy on innocent Americans. We told you how the Durham probe has led to the arrest of a Russian analyst and alleged source for the discredited Steele Dossier for lying to the FBI.
During yesterday’s trial of Danchenko, FBI analyst Brian Auten told Special Counsel John Durham that the FBI essentially attempted to bribe Christopher Steele, the disgraced author of the Steele dossier – in order to continue its phony Trump-Russia collusion investigation.
• 2022-10-14 • American Center for Law and Justice
Durham JUST Got the FBI to Admit Something HUGE Under Oath
Durham JUST Got the FBI to Admit Something HUGE Under Oath, FBI analyst Brian Auten told Special Counsel John Durham that the FBI essentially attempted to bribe Christopher Steele
canadafreepress.com
We discussed this earlier in the thread and you Liked the post where I mentioned it LOL
In addition, note this exchange: "He explained that the investigation was run from FBI headquarters. Here’s is Auten’s description of the chain of reporting:
- Section Chief Moffa and Peter Strzok both reported to Deputy Assistant Director Bill Priestap.
- Priestap reported directly to Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.
- McCabe reported to FBI Director James Comey."
He also got the FBI analyst to testify that Comey was aware of ALL elements of Crossfire Hurricane from its very beginning. That's actually massive and has been totally overlooked by the media. That means any corruption that happened in the course of the investigation, Comey was aware of it, and either facilitated it, or at minimum did nothing to stop others from engaging in it.
And again, all this information was provided UNDER OATH by FBI AGENTS AND ANALYSTS. So it becomes evidence.
I'm starting to see why @RayGravesGhost wants Durham to close shop and drop this immediately.
Latest posts
-
Basketball LIVE GAME THREAD: FLORIDA VS MISSISSIPPI STATE - CHAT IS OPEN
- Latest: BleedOrangeandBlue24
-
-
-
