Interesting........ The FBI just ratted out itself. If this goes nowhere, I've given up all hope.
In a shocking testimony yesterday, it was reported that the Deep State FBI offered a $1,000,000 bounty for proof of President Trump’s alleged Russian collusion.
Folks, we at the ACLJ are not letting the Deep State get away with lying and manipulating our justice system to attack a political candidate and spy on innocent Americans. We told you how the Durham probe has led to the arrest of a Russian analyst and alleged source for the discredited Steele Dossier for lying to the FBI.
During yesterday’s trial of Danchenko, FBI analyst Brian Auten told Special Counsel John Durham that the FBI essentially attempted to bribe Christopher Steele, the disgraced author of the Steele dossier – in order to continue its phony Trump-Russia collusion investigation.
• 2022-10-14 • American Center for Law and Justice
Durham JUST Got the FBI to Admit Something HUGE Under Oath, FBI analyst Brian Auten told Special Counsel John Durham that the FBI essentially attempted to bribe Christopher Steele
canadafreepress.com
We discussed this earlier in the thread and you Liked the post where I mentioned it LOL
In addition, note this exchange: "He explained that the investigation was run from FBI headquarters. Here’s is Auten’s description of the chain of reporting:
- Section Chief Moffa and Peter Strzok both reported to Deputy Assistant Director Bill Priestap.
- Priestap reported directly to Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.
- McCabe reported to FBI Director James Comey."
He also got the FBI analyst to testify that Comey was aware of ALL elements of Crossfire Hurricane from its very beginning. That's actually massive and has been totally overlooked by the media. That means any corruption that happened in the course of the investigation, Comey was aware of it, and either facilitated it, or at minimum did nothing to stop others from engaging in it.
And again, all this information was provided UNDER OATH by FBI AGENTS AND ANALYSTS. So it becomes evidence.
I'm starting to see why
@RayGravesGhost wants Durham to close shop and drop this immediately.
🤣 I guess an article written by the son of one of trump's lawyers should be considered unbiased?
When you can stand to hear the actual reporting about the entirety of the FBI agent's testimony you'll see navi & ghost are easily manipulated...
...and as usual wrong
https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/12/politics/durham-fbi-russia-probe-witness
Durham rebukes his own witness and slams FBI’s Russia probe after trial setbacks
Marshall Cohen
Analysis by Marshall Cohen
Updated 5:40 PM EDT, Fri October 14, 2022
FBI official undercuts Durham’s case
The special counsel opened his case with
testimony from Brian Auten, a senior FBI intelligence analyst who oversaw part of the FBI’s early investigation into possible Trump-Russia collusion.
Over two days, Auten helped prosecutors by saying there was information that Danchenko didn’t share with the FBI about his dossier sourcing that would’ve aided the bureau’s investigation. This is a key element of Durham’s case: to secure a conviction, Durham must persuade the jury that Danchenko intentionally lied and that those false statements may have impacted the FBI’s work.
The witness also put a spotlight on some of Danchenko’s inconsistencies in his many FBI interviews, where he was peppered with questions about his ties to Christopher Steele, the dossier, and his own sub-sources.
But the situation shifted when the defense got to cross-examine Auten. Danchenko’s lawyers highlighted Auten’s previous testimony, given years ago to the Justice Department inspector general and to the Senate Judiciary Committee, which contradicted some of Durham’s claims.
Auten previously said Danchenko was “truthful” and “assisted” the Russia probe. He also said securing Danchenko as an FBI source was “one of the best things that came out of” the Russia probe. This undercuts the core of Durham’s indictment, which alleged that Danchenko serially lied to the FBI and impeded the investigators who were scrambling to verify the Steele dossier.
Danchenko’s defense attorney, Danny Onorato, asked Auten in court on Wednesday if that was still his belief today, and Auten answered in the affirmative, adding, “I stand by my testimony.”
The defense also elicited testimony indicating that Durham cherry-picked material from an FBI memo that Auten wrote, when there was exculpatory information on the very next page.
“And Mr. Durham didn’t take any steps to correct your wrong answer, did he?” Onorato asked.