Biden Crime wave
- Thread starter nail1988
- Start date
Tolerating crap like this in fear of "escalation" only serves to embolden criminal behavior thus escalating violence on the innocent by predatory elements of those communities.
It's the definition of not being able to see the forest through the trees.
Democrat Zombies
my chief of police buddy says the ones that look like Zombies are taking Tranq it’s a horse drug and it eats the skin off their face.
my chief of police buddy says the ones that look like Zombies are taking Tranq it’s a horse drug and it eats the skin off their face.
TBH I'm glad that anyone is willing to do that job in NYC. No way in hell that I would. Bad guys and "good" guys are both out to get you. It's organized and purposeful chaos.
So are we done with the narrative about cops gunning down innocent AA's?
No one in this video seems worried about that at all.
Sometimes I wonder about the worst mistake America has ever made.
I can't decide between bringing in slaves or letting women vote.
I can't decide between bringing in slaves or letting women vote.
Correct...but imo LE posture, and specifically our response to "broken window-esque" behavior from the lawless elements in our culture, is far more important than the conditions of actual structures.
When we (and I mean specifically LE) feed into the narrative and portray criminal behavior as acceptable, the criminals will step it up a notch and push the boundaries.
By not knocking a few skulls together and taking several people to jail in the scenario listed above, that community got more dangerous. And that sort of thing is endemic in Chicago, NYC, LA, ect.
This was in Brazil, but it’s still the worst thing I’ve ever seen.
Snap!!! Looked like Half Nickel going down mach schnell! 😂
Do they have the problem where a small demographic commits a large percentage of the violent crime?
I don't understand the question.
The demographics in Brazil are very different than here, Whites are 47% and Blacks are 43%. So it's not going to be an apples to apples comparison when you look at crimes committed by race.
I'd assume a majority of the homicides are gang and drug related, but I'm not an expert on Brazilian crime statistics.
So 2 armed men killed two unarmed men?
@GatorTheo if the other 2 men had guns, would that increase their chances of being alive today?
Would it have decreased the chances that anyone got shot?
Think logically, without an emotional fear of guns, and you know what the answer is.
So, you need more guns to defend yourself from all the people who have guns? You'd love some of the third world countries.
No silly.
You just need to call the magic violence fairy to magically whisk all the guns away.
Then EVERYONE will be safe!
I think all you have to do is piss yourself, go fetal, suck your thumb and rock yourself slowly and he'll show up. Or have you already tried that?
So it seems Theo isn't really fazed by this exchange of gunfire (Note his response to the earlier example involving a DGU, he basically impled that guy was a criminal for defending himself with a gun), but IS worried about the potential of introducing 2 more guns into the scenario, even if it would likely lead to fewer or no gun deaths.
IOW, it seems that Theo just wants fewer guns. Even if fewer guns leads to more gun deaths.
When your politics are based primarily on emotion, logic becomes very clouded.
I get it, I think guns are scary too. I treat them with a ton of respect. The first time I took my boys to the range we spent nearly 45 minutes on gun safety. Several times we had "learning" moments about treating every gun like it's loaded and ready to fire, proper use of the safety, how to check and disarm a weapon, when and where to point the muzzle when carrying the gun, etc.
They were bored but it's way more important than learning how to aim and shoot. I want my kids to be the voice of reason if they are at a friend's house and a gun comes out (which the first lesson there is, if they don't let you take charge GTFO of there).
You need MUCH more than a gun to be a man...you finally got something correct
This makes a person a MALE..not a man. Someone with male equipment that refuses to protect their family from violence because they are afraid of guns are NOT "men"...they are MALES.
The exercise wasn't about being manly. The goal was to survive.
But you have to admit, a LOT of your fellow gun lovers do believe a gun makes them more manly.
I think I've finally figured Theo out: He places a priority on fewer guns over fewer deaths.
The rest of us want fewer deaths. We don't care if we need more guns to accomplish that.
So let's tackle this, shall we?
Can a gun make one more manly? I'll say yes...and here's how.
If my home is invaded by, let's say, 6 men who intend to steal from me and commit acts of violence on my family...or let's just say 1 man, who is armed, comes to my house to do the same. Is it more manly to...
A. Be the man of the house, be prepared for whatever may come, and defend your family and your home from those that wish to do harm? Even if that means killing the intruder or intruders?
...or
B. Not be prepared, not protect your home or family and instead rely on begging or pleading these men to only steal certain things or only commit certain acts of violence on certain family members?
A. does sound more manly to me. So yes...I guess guns can make you more manly? Go figure, who knew?
Cause y'all exhibit your beliefs on it all the time. I mean it's funny.......just like guys thinking pickups make them macho. 😂
I have a pickup truck, gun and I’m macho 😎😎
