ADVERTISEMENT

47 years left of oil at current consumption rate

The writing is on the wall. Global oil supply can't meet global oil demand forever, necessitating new energy sources and usage practices. Even if technology allowed us to harvest every last drop of oil in the planet, increasing scarcity and rising prices will necessitate widespread change long before we actually run out of oil.

Enter Hydrogen
 
  • Haha
Reactions: nail1988
The writing is on the wall. Global oil supply can't meet global oil demand forever, necessitating new energy sources and usage practices. Even if technology allowed us to harvest every last drop of oil in the planet, increasing scarcity and rising prices will necessitate widespread change long before we actually run out of oil.

Enter Hydrogen
Oh FFS. In 1975 we were told we would run out of oil by 2015. 🤣


Oh and................trust the science! 🤣


Earth Is An Oil-Producing Machine — We're Not Running Out​

 
We need to do it all: Oil, Gas, Nuclear, Wind, Solar, Hydrogen, ...

Global Warming is a total scam. However, we still need to find new technologies and evolve our energy options.
There is no argument that man shouldn't refine new energy sources but the narrative that "the sky is falling" is complete bullshit. No need to panic and push austerity on us before technology perfects less expensive and superior alternatives. What the efftards are asking us to do is shoot all of the horses prior to invention of the internal combustion engine. :mad:
 
I can't find it. I just read US natural gas reserves are only 550 years. Petroleum 500 years. Coal 600 years.
I recently read an article that some Russian and Ukrainian scientists believe that petroleum is not really fossil fuels, but that the earth releases gases that will perpetually replenish themselves. From memory this was hypothesized a decade ago. It's no more unreasonable than the climate change warmist hand wringing theories.
 
I recently read an article that some Russian and Ukrainian scientists believe that petroleum is not really fossil fuels, but that the earth releases gases that will perpetually replenish themselves. From memory this was hypothesized a decade ago. It's no more unreasonable than the climate change warmist hand wringing theories.
So what you’re saying is the Earth is really Philip Seymour Hoffman …..

along-came-polly-dude.gif
 
So, what your telling us, BIDEN and Company is setting the US to be able to control the world later, by not using our oil now.
 
Same people who are pushing climate change also believe Biden received 81 M "legal votes from eligible voters". And those same people pushed the Russian hoax, covered for the Clintons and supported sending blankets and bandaids to Ukraine when they needed weapons and ammunition. So count me as a skeptic. Progressives are like termites....you don't see the damage at first...then the structure is on the verge of collapse.
 
Then what are warmists worried about?

The issue will resolve itself and we’ll go to zero carbon emissions inside 50 years. No one is modeling that.
 
How long until cold fusion is possible or is that just a fairy tale most likely in the next 20 years.
 
I recently read an article that some Russian and Ukrainian scientists believe that petroleum is not really fossil fuels, but that the earth releases gases that will perpetually replenish themselves. From memory this was hypothesized a decade ago. It's no more unreasonable than the climate change warmist hand wringing theories.
It was years and years ago many scientists began to believe fossil fuels to be dubious. There simply could never have been enough of those beasts to make the oceans of petroleum we know of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NavigatorII
It was years and years ago many scientists began to believe fossil fuels to be dubious. There simply could never have been enough of those beasts to make the oceans of petroleum we know of.

The biomass of plants and single-cell organisms, like bacteria, is many orders of magnitude greater than that of animals. Over billions of years, it adds up.
 
We need to worry about 47 days and 47 months. 47 years is time to do something well not quickly.
 
Not if consumption rate continues to climb. Supply and demand says petrol will cost a fortune in 20 years
One more reason I am glad to be 63 years old and not 30 all over again. By the time I'm 85 we will be run by socialists, gas will be rationed and the elite left will be running the show. They will be the equivalent of the Cuban government by that time. Imagine Pelosi's daughter and Biden's grandson running the show. Their puppet strings being pulled by Soros' grandsons. UGH!!!!
 
Like learning Chinese, at the rate we are going.
Mandarin is the most spoken language. English is the most spoken second language and third most spoken behind Spanish. The US is the only country in the Americas without an official language. Belize and Canada are the only countries in the Americas who claim English as official. Portuguese is the official language of Brazil. Canada is the only country with 2 official languages. English and French.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
Oh FFS. In 1975 we were told we would run out of oil by 2015. 🤣


Oh and................trust the science! 🤣


Earth Is An Oil-Producing Machine — We're Not Running Out​

Libs gonna lib. Remember...they are LIARS. Only look to the "anti gay bill". It speaks so loudly to EXACTLY who every lefty is. L I A R S. Has there even been ONE snowflake come on here and call out the people who are delibertly lying about this..including Brandon and his gang of liars?
 
There is no argument that man shouldn't refine new energy sources but the narrative that "the sky is falling" is complete bullshit. No need to panic and push austerity on us before technology perfects less expensive and superior alternatives. What the efftards are asking us to do is shoot all of the horses prior to invention of the internal combustion engine. :mad:
This is what people with a brain wish's that happens
 
  • Like
Reactions: NavigatorII
One more reason I am glad to be 63 years old and not 30 all over again. By the time I'm 85 we will be run by socialists, gas will be rationed and the elite left will be running the show. They will be the equivalent of the Cuban government by that time. Imagine Pelosi's daughter and Biden's grandson running the show. Their puppet strings being pulled by Soros' grandsons. UGH!!!!
Ditto...unless some people on the right grow a pair very soon
 
The writing is on the wall. Global oil supply can't meet global oil demand forever, necessitating new energy sources and usage practices. Even if technology allowed us to harvest every last drop of oil in the planet, increasing scarcity and rising prices will necessitate widespread change long before we actually run out of oil.
Enter Hydrogen

Sorry guys, but all of this talk about hydrogen has made a joke
I heard 50+ years ago spring to mind, so I've decided to share it.

Two gay guys enter a redneck bar.
The first one, Brucey order a gin.

The big burly Bartender, being a bit of a jerk says;
What kind of gin? We have 3 kinds;
nitro-gen, oxy-gen, and hydro-gen.

The 2nd guy tells the first guy, I got this.
He says look, we'll just have a turd instead.

The somewhat amused Bartender says, what's a turd?
2nd guy says well, there's three kinds of turds.
There's mustard, custard, and you, you big shit!

(Run Brucey Run)
 
Last edited:
Hydrogen fuel cells can channel high volumes of power without taking up much space, making them an ideal solution for heavy, long-haul transport modes, in GM's view. In the locomotive sector, for example, the company is developing fuel cell freight locomotives with partner Wabtec that are "very, very high power" — as much as 3-4 megawatts. "They need a really compact propulsion system and that's what fuel cells and hydrogen can provide," explains Mercurio.

Batteries, by contrast, cannot provide the quantity of energy to make cross-country trips that locomotives make. For similar reasons, GM also sees a big role for hydrogen in road freight. "You think about cross-country trucking, where your truck makes money based on how much cargo weight it can haul," he says. "Batteries are at a real disadvantage there, and fuel cells have a clear advantage with the lower weight of the fuel."

Versatile Charging

Fuel cells can support battery vehicles in some ways. GM is developing electric vehicle charging units built with fuel cell technology under its Empower program. The units promise rapid charging times. They would be also portable and swiftly deployable, making them suitable for operations that don't stay still. "As we talk to charge station operators, it takes a long time to install a grid-tied system," says Al Martin, an integration engineer for fuel cell applications with GM. "We are hearing numbers such as 12, 18, 24 months to install a DC fast-charge station. So we see a clear advantage with fuel cells where we can drop and go instantly, by comparison."

Developing the substation, transformers and related infrastructure to build new grid-based charging involves a lot of work and "those are not recoverable expenses," Martin adds. Mobile power generators (MPG), however, are a different story. "You can deploy it somewhere and redeploy it somewhere else if the needs shift," he says.

GM's MPG technology comes in various sizes that appeal to different customers, including branches of the US armed forces. Construction sites are another optimal customer in light of increasing efforts to electrify equipment like bulldozers and excavators. "They need the charging to come to the equipment, rather than the equipment going somewhere to be charged," Mercurio explains. Recreation is another useful application, for example at ski resorts or lakes where EVs are used but not year-round.

Hydrogen Generators

GM's fuel cell ambitions don't stop at transport. The company is developing fuel-cell generators for large-scale data centers, in case the power goes out. Companies like Microsoft and Google are finding it more and more difficult to receive permits to install diesel generators. "They can go much faster by installing fuel cells and hydrogen," Mercurio says.

Military customers are similarly interested in the fuel cell generators, GM says. That's because they offer a low heat signature, low emissions and a lack of exhaust smell. Diesel generators, by contrast, have created risks. Military personnel are required to wear personal protective equipment when working around diesel units — including equipment around the ears. "Not only, as a soldier, are you working around something that is noisy and smelly and giving away your location, but now you have no situational awareness," Martin says. And fuel cell generators offer a bonus. "Fuel cells, as a technology, emit water as a byproduct, which is attractive to the military as they are looking at the logistics of moving water around here and there."
 
It was years and years ago many scientists began to believe fossil fuels to be dubious. There simply could never have been enough of those beasts to make the oceans of petroleum we know of.

My understanding is that the fossils don't refer to dinosaurs per se...rather it comes primarily from plankton.
 
EvilKing, I hope you have a house right next door to a hydrogen plant, but I can assure you that I damn well won't...


Fuel Cells are pressurized to 5-10K PSI to achieve greater driving range in hydrogen-fueled vehicles.. But don't worry about that, because they never explode and are very safe, say those that are producing the hydrogen, and you can always trust those guys....

Oh BTW, they use natural gas and other petro products to make the hydrogen....




Producing Grey-Green-Blue Hydrogen

 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT