Why aren't we discussing the fact that the latest Trump indictment...

[DCandtheUTBand]

Fulton County Grand Jury Was Unhinged, Reveals Election Lawyer

'I knew coming out of there that the whole thing was a loose cannon,' election-law expert Cleta Mitchell told The Federalist.

thefederalist.com

‘I knew coming out of there that the whole thing was a loose cannon,’ election-law expert Cleta Mitchell told The Federalist.

Grand Jury wanted to indict lawyers for giving ........ LEGAL advice. SMH

 

[RussellCasse]

Fulton County Grand Jury Was Unhinged, Reveals Election Lawyer

'I knew coming out of there that the whole thing was a loose cannon,' election-law expert Cleta Mitchell told The Federalist.

thefederalist.com

‘I knew coming out of there that the whole thing was a loose cannon,’ election-law expert Cleta Mitchell told The Federalist.

Grand Jury wanted to indict lawyers for giving ........ LEGAL advice. SMH

That’s part of the plan. Make it so that no lawyer ever wants to defend Trump, or brings election litigation ever again.

We will never have actual elections ever again if they succeed.

 

[fatman76]

@GatorTheo - Megyn asks a good question, why is Trump putting himself through all of this? Why not just be a billionaire with a model wife and a beautiful family?

Seriously try to ask yourself if you were Trump what would you do.

 

[gatordad3]

View embedded media

@GatorTheo - Megyn asks a good question, why is Trump putting himself through all of this? Why not just be a billionaire with a model wife and a beautiful family?

Seriously try to ask yourself if you were Trump what would you do.

His vision for America is no different today than it was well over 40 years ago. He's repeated it over and over since the 80's.

 

[GatorTheo]

View embedded media

@GatorTheo - Megyn asks a good question, why is Trump putting himself through all of this? Why not just be a billionaire with a model wife and a beautiful family?

Seriously try to ask yourself if you were Trump what would you do.

Trump's ego won't allow him to go out a loser.

Why would any normal person want to run for president? The campaign would be a shitstorm and the job would be worse.

 

[nail1988]

What?

@kalimgoodman

 

[BCSpell]

What?

@kalimgoodman

View embedded media

It all hinges on RICO. I have not read the indictment, but seen wherein someone said that if you look at each of the charges individually, no law has been broken.

 

[fatman76]

Trump's ego won't allow him to go out a loser.

Why would any normal person want to run for president? The campaign would be a shitstorm and the job would be worse.

He's risking 700 years in jail because of his ego? No one, not even Trump, has an ego that big.

If he dropped out now I can guarantee you all 4 indictments would be dropped. That's why they waited years to charge him. What's changed since J6 besides Trump running and leading in the polls?

Is it even possible your lib brain can consider that he wants the best for this country, and wants to break apart the uniparty (aka the swamp)?

He has cost himself riches, the twilight years of his life and potentially his freedom...just because he can't stand losing? That's ridiculous.

 

[GatorTheo]

He's risking 700 years in jail because of his ego? No one, not even Trump, has an ego that big.

If he dropped out now I can guarantee you all 4 indictments would be dropped. That's why they waited years to charge him. What's changed since J6 besides Trump running and leading in the polls?

Is it even possible your lib brain can consider that he wants the best for this country, and wants to break apart the uniparty (aka the swamp)?

He has cost himself riches, the twilight years of his life and potentially his freedom...just because he can't stand losing? That's ridiculous.

My 'lib' brain. 😂

Good call. I don't worship Trump so I must be a lib.

 

[fatman76]

What?

@kalimgoodman

View embedded media

That tweet is misleading. He means that she's mad she lost this decision, not that she isn't serious about the charges (even though she probably isn't).

However, this is terrible for the prosecution. A communist show trial needs to be quick, dirty and public - it's not about the truth or the law. Giving the defense more time to review the millions of pages of discovery is going to make the prosecution's job MUCH harder.

It also helps Trump's legal team balance the caseload from all 4.

 

[fatman76]

My 'lib' brain. 😂

Good call. I don't worship Trump so I must be a lib.

Gutting the Constitution is a liberal mindset. You are not a conservative.

@RussellCasse has nailed your political ideology, he knows you better than I do.

 

[GatorTheo]

Gutting the Constitution is a liberal mindset. You are not a conservative.

@RussellCasse has nailed your political ideology, he knows you better than I do.

I want to gut the constitution? I did not know that. Are you sure you're not just making it up because we disagree on the second amendment?

 

[fatman76]

I want to gut the constitution? I did not know that. Are you sure you're not just making it up because we disagree on the second amendment?

It's literally the second most important thing they wanted to add to the Constitution to clarify the rights of the people.

Yes, I'd say you're not a conservative if you think the meaning/intent of the second amendment is to allow the citizenry to have two - and only two - bolt action .22 cal rifles. That's radical liberal ideology (as well as completely ignorant about the founding of the country).

And we don't "disagree". The 2A and the reason it was added where it was added is abundantly clear. You're flat out wrong.

 

[GatorTheo]

It's literally the second most important thing they wanted to add to the Constitution to clarify the rights of the people.

Yes, I'd say you're not a conservative if you think the meaning/intent of the second amendment is to allow the citizenry to have two - and only two - bolt action .22 cal rifles. That's radical liberal ideology (as well as completely ignorant about the founding of the country).

And we don't "disagree". The 2A and the reason it was added where it was added is abundantly clear. You're flat out wrong.

You're misreading what I'm saying.

I'm not saying the constitution limits anyone to two killing machines.

I'm saying they could take the 2nd literally and limit you to two.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

You're misreading what I'm saying.

I'm not saying the constitution limits anyone to two killing machines.

I'm saying they could take the 2nd literally and limit you to two.

That wouldn't be taking the Constitution literally.

 

[BamaFan1137]

My 'lib' brain. 😂

Good call. I don't worship Trump so I must be a lib.

You are obtuse. You should work on that.

 

[BamaFan1137]

You're misreading what I'm saying.

I'm not saying the constitution limits anyone to two killing machines.

I'm saying they could take the 2nd literally and limit you to two.

Could they limit the 1st similarly?

This argument is so stupid and you know it and that's why you've ignored this since @RussleCasse pointed it out for you.

Are you just trolling or do you crap?

 

[GatorTheo]

Could they limit the 1st similarly?

This argument is so stupid and you know it and that's why you've ignored this since @RussleCasse pointed it out for you.

Are you just trolling or do you crap?

As I mentioned in another post, the first is written differently.

The first says (something like) they will establish NO LAW with regards to freedom of speech so the answer to your question is........no, they can't limit it based on what the amendment says.

The second doesn't say there will be no law......only that you have the right to bear arms.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Could they limit the 1st similarly?

This argument is so stupid and you know it and that's why you've ignored this since @RussleCasse pointed it out for you.

Are you just trolling or do you crap?

Remember he started his trolling by saying he takes what the Constitution says LITERALLY about the 2nd Amendment.

Then proceeded to do the exact opposite of that.

He's trolling. It's an amazing life.

 

[BamaFan1137]

Are you just trolling or do you crap?

Just read my post. 😂🤣😂

That was supposed to read, "...or do you believe this crap."

LOL

 

[BamaFan1137]

As I mentioned in another post, the first is written differently.

The first says (something like) they will establish NO LAW with regards to freedom of speech so the answer to your question is........no, they can't limit it based on what the amendment says.

The second doesn't say there will be no law......only that you have the right to bear arms.

False...

Shall make no law

Shall not be infringed

The only difference is that you're ok with giving up one guaranteed right but not the other. The logic fail is entirely your own.

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

View embedded media

@GatorTheo - Megyn asks a good question, why is Trump putting himself through all of this? Why not just be a billionaire with a model wife and a beautiful family?

Seriously try to ask yourself if you were Trump what would you do.

Anyone with TDS needs to watch this video because it totally explains Trump. I am going to tag a few: @goldmom @Illegal-shift @sadgator @LizardGrad89

Notice how Trump responded when Megyn asked him if it's worth it doing all he's doing, all the problems he is creating for himself, 100s of years of potential jail time.

He did not hestitate, he said YES immediately, and then he TALKED ABOUT THE COUNTRY.

That proves he is doing this FOR AMERICA.

If he was doing it for himself, he would have paused, said he didn't know sometimes, and he would have recapped all the struggles he has been thru. He would have painted himself as the victim. If he was doing all this for himself.

Instead, he totally ignored all the ILLEGAL targeting to himself and his family. Even though Megyn set him up perfectly to victimize himself.

He said nothing about himself, he made it all about America.

We have the President that all of us always claimed we wanted. But now that he's here, some of you are letting the media tell you he's a monster that's only hurting you.

Think about that.

 

[Capt Ron 1]

Gutting the Constitution is a liberal mindset. You are not a conservative.

@RussellCasse has nailed your political ideology, he knows you better than I do.

No, he is not...never has been . He is a TROLL. Leave him be to troll himself

 

[GhostOfMatchesMalone]

Gutting the Constitution is a liberal mindset. You are not a conservative.

@RussellCasse has nailed your political ideology, he knows you better than I do.

But but but....he said he's NOT a lib.

Course so did @goldmom and @BSC911 and @kalimgoodman