ADVERTISEMENT

Why aren't we discussing the fact that the latest Trump indictment...

@GhostOfMatchesMalone

We know the Fulton case is a golden opportunity for Trump to show election interference/mal-misfeasance.

If you want to take it further, some underground conspiracies posit that the military was tracking the fraud in real time and would be the witness presenting these findings.

If that's true, and I'm not saying it is, does it seem like Republicans are trying REAL hard to prevent the case from going forward? Why would they be so worried? The case is laughable on its face.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

House GOP investigating whether Fulton County district attorney coordinated with DOJ in Trump indictment - Washington Examiner

The House Judiciary Committee is launching an investigation into Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, demanding the prosecutor turn over key information detailing the criminal indictment of former President Donald Trump over his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. In a letter sent by...
www.washingtonexaminer.com www.washingtonexaminer.com
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: nothergator, BCSpell, RussellCasse and 2 others
fatman76 said:
@GhostOfMatchesMalone

We know the Fulton case is a golden opportunity for Trump to show election interference/mal-misfeasance.

If you want to take it further, some underground conspiracies posit that the military was tracking the fraud in real time and would be the witness presenting these findings.

If that's true, and I'm not saying it is, does it seem like Republicans are trying REAL hard to prevent the case from going forward? Why would they be so worried? The case is laughable on its face.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

House GOP investigating whether Fulton County district attorney coordinated with DOJ in Trump indictment - Washington Examiner

The House Judiciary Committee is launching an investigation into Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, demanding the prosecutor turn over key information detailing the criminal indictment of former President Donald Trump over his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. In a letter sent by...
www.washingtonexaminer.com www.washingtonexaminer.com
Click to expand...
Hmmmmm.....

First, I do believe the military has all the evidence of fraud and has since the election. I think they pretty much knew exactly how the fraud would be committed and had plans in place to collect the evidence as it came in. I don't know if military would be witnesses or simply hand it off to Trump. I guess the military presenting it would make it more credible?

My initial thought when this indictment was announced as that the timing of the case would indicate who was likely in control here. If the case was pushed back later, maybe with a date set for AFTER the 2024 election, that would suggest to me that the deep state was pulling the strings.

But if the court date was set for early 2024, with plenty of time for the findings from the case to seep into the public discussion, that would suggest to me that Trump is still in charge.

Well apparently Fani is trying to get the case for ALL defendants started in OCTOBER.

To be fair, Trump is not signing off on that trial date, one of the guys in GA who is part of the indictment is asking for it as his right to a speedy trial. I read something that said if the defendant requests a speedy trial in GA and it's not granted within 4 months, the case can potentially be tossed. So that might be his play here.

As for the pubs targeting Fani Willis, not sure it would stop the case, at least not yet. I suspect anything they attempt will drag along, she will drag it out, so it could be months before anything real happens. Willis is acting like Trump's case will start this year.

A lot of balls in the air...I definitely need to do some more research before I get a handle on what I think is happening here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
GhostOfMatchesMalone said:
Hmmmmm.....

First, I do believe the military has all the evidence of fraud and has since the election. I think they pretty much knew exactly how the fraud would be committed and had plans in place to collect the evidence as it came in. I don't know if military would be witnesses or simply hand it off to Trump. I guess the military presenting it would make it more credible?

My initial thought when this indictment was announced as that the timing of the case would indicate who was likely in control here. If the case was pushed back later, maybe with a date set for AFTER the 2024 election, that would suggest to me that the deep state was pulling the strings.

But if the court date was set for early 2024, with plenty of time for the findings from the case to seep into the public discussion, that would suggest to me that Trump is still in charge.

Well apparently Fani is trying to get the case for ALL defendants started in OCTOBER.

To be fair, Trump is not signing off on that trial date, one of the guys in GA who is part of the indictment is asking for it as his right to a speedy trial. I read something that said if the defendant requests a speedy trial in GA and it's not granted within 4 months, the case can potentially be tossed. So that might be his play here.

As for the pubs targeting Fani Willis, not sure it would stop the case, at least not yet. I suspect anything they attempt will drag along, she will drag it out, so it could be months before anything real happens. Willis is acting like Trump's case will start this year.

A lot of balls in the air...I definitely need to do some more research before I get a handle on what I think is happening here.
Click to expand...
www.georgiarecord.com

Raffensperger Trying To Squash Halderman Report With Election Departments And Boards, Is The Facade Coming Down?

Yesterday, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger sent out a letter to Election Departments in an apparent attempt to explain away the damning Halderman report which was released last week.
www.georgiarecord.com www.georgiarecord.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: BCSpell, nail1988 and blubo
nail1988 said:
@kalimgoodman are you ok with this?

View embedded media
Click to expand...
@kalimgoodman


THIS IS A MASSIVE STORY! That's why it will be ignored by the Democrat Party media. That said, Bratt not only met with Biden's staff at the White House while investigating Donald Trump and weeks before Trump was charged, Bratt is the senior DOJ official who insisted on securing a warrant and sending an FBI SWAT team to Mar-a-Lago; and, Bratt stands accused by Stanley Woodward, who represents Walt Nauta in the documents case, of extorting him (Bratt allegedly told Woodward that the judgeship he is seeking has a better chance if his client turns on Trump). Judge Cannon should order, from the bench, that all records related to Bratt's meetings and discussions at the White House be preserved and provided to the court; and, she should ask the DC judge who has been dragging his feet in his secret review of the allegation against Bratt by Woodward transfer that matter and all the information related to it to her as it clearly bears on the document case that is now before her and in her jurisdiction. Yet again, I am forced to ask, where the hell are Trump's lawyers? They should file a motion immediately seeking a court order for the information (mentioned above) and make a big stink about this outrageous news. Let me add another important point. THIS CLEARLY adds to the overwhelming case for a special counsel, as this not only creates the impression of a conflict of interest but a conflict of interest in fact. The Biden administration cannot be relied on to truthfully explain itself. The standard for appointing a special counsel -- a qualified lawyer from outside the government -- has been met, again! I'm authorizing the backbenchers on radio and TV to repeat my points, without attribution, of course.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: BCSpell and Dr. Curmudgeon
nail1988 said:
I don’t think my buddy @kalimgoodman appreciates how big of a story and scandal this is. This is what happens in 3rd world countries and led by your president

View embedded media
Click to expand...
Only thing I disagree with is this….

She says “if there isn’t one appointed, welcome to the banana republic”

We have been well past that point for years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCSpell, gatordad3, Dr. Curmudgeon and 1 other person

Trump lawyers are behind the 8 ball again​

The Trump prosecutors have a grand jury problem. Where are the defense attorneys?​

Where the heck are the defense lawyers for former President Trump and his co-defendants? Why are they so passive?​


 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: gatordad3, blubo, BCSpell and 1 other person
nail1988 said:
@kalimgoodman


THIS IS A MASSIVE STORY! That's why it will be ignored by the Democrat Party media. That said, Bratt not only met with Biden's staff at the White House while investigating Donald Trump and weeks before Trump was charged, Bratt is the senior DOJ official who insisted on securing a warrant and sending an FBI SWAT team to Mar-a-Lago; and, Bratt stands accused by Stanley Woodward, who represents Walt Nauta in the documents case, of extorting him (Bratt allegedly told Woodward that the judgeship he is seeking has a better chance if his client turns on Trump). Judge Cannon should order, from the bench, that all records related to Bratt's meetings and discussions at the White House be preserved and provided to the court; and, she should ask the DC judge who has been dragging his feet in his secret review of the allegation against Bratt by Woodward transfer that matter and all the information related to it to her as it clearly bears on the document case that is now before her and in her jurisdiction. Yet again, I am forced to ask, where the hell are Trump's lawyers? They should file a motion immediately seeking a court order for the information (mentioned above) and make a big stink about this outrageous news. Let me add another important point. THIS CLEARLY adds to the overwhelming case for a special counsel, as this not only creates the impression of a conflict of interest but a conflict of interest in fact. The Biden administration cannot be relied on to truthfully explain itself. The standard for appointing a special counsel -- a qualified lawyer from outside the government -- has been met, again! I'm authorizing the backbenchers on radio and TV to repeat my points, without attribution, of course.
View embedded media
Click to expand...
This actually implicates the whole Hussein administration
 
  • Wow
Reactions: BCSpell
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

gator1776

Autopsy of an Election: What We Have Learned and What We Observed

Replies
67
Views
2K
The Parking Lot
gatordad3
gatordad3
JasonHigdon

Football The Day After Ole Miss Visited The Swamp (My Take: RB Position)

Replies
42
Views
4K
The Swamp
webtu
webtu
JasonHigdon

Football My Fear Moving Forward for the Team (11/3)

Replies
87
Views
5K
The Swamp
Skerplunky
Skerplunky
Jag31

Football The issue at the top

Replies
64
Views
4K
The Swamp
VOTC
VOTC
BillytheC

Judge questions why Trump was the only one charged with mishandling top secret docs

Replies
7
Views
336
The Parking Lot
NavigatorII
NavigatorII
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back