If this incident would have occurred with a 10 year old girl, there would still be Noles on here arguing that she started it.
10 yr old in a bar, interesting.
If this incident would have occurred with a 10 year old girl, there would still be Noles on here arguing that she started it.
The issue is whether there SHOULD be or not. But apparently more than a few individuals are willing to excuse the actions of an adult based on what's between their legs, and they think people who disagree are the crazy ones. LOL.
If this incident would have occurred with a 10 year old girl, there would still be Noles on here arguing that she started it.
He still doesn't understand that the WHY doesn't matter, which is the funny part. He's already agreed that there is a double standard, which was the entire freaking point of the posts I've made, the why doesn't matter. The issue is whether there SHOULD be or not. But apparently more than a few individuals are willing to excuse the actions of an adult based on what's between their legs, and they think people who disagree are the crazy ones. LOL.
Yes, because that's the point being made.
You support a double standard. We get it.
He still doesn't understand that the WHY doesn't matter, which is the funny part. He's already agreed that there is a double standard, which was the entire freaking point of the posts I've made, the why doesn't matter. The issue is whether there SHOULD be or not. But apparently more than a few individuals are willing to excuse the actions of an adult based on what's between their legs, and they think people who disagree are the crazy ones. LOL.
I just don't believe she broke the law.
But she would have broke the law had he not punched her (or was that another poster who believes that...BayAreaGator maybe?)?
Oh dear. They were jockeying for position at a bar.He grabbed her right after she shoved him aside and slammed arm into his chest followed by a right hand pulled back ready to strike.
But she would have broke the law had he not punched her (or was that another poster who believes that...BayAreaGator maybe?)?
HYPO (because Alaska loves em):
If Johnson punched her a 2nd time, breaking her jaw, requiring surgery and hospitalizing her for days...
Are you going to call for an Officer to go into that hospital, arrest her for Battery and then call on the SAO to prosecute her for the Battery?
Get ready to defend another one nolies
Go Canes!
Dalvin Cook. Your now on the clock.
http://www.tallahassee.com/story/sp...b-dalvin-cook-investigation-battery/29971363/
Get ready to defend another one nolies
Go Canes!
No because at that point it's excessive
And Wyatt help us
You realize what you did there, right? You have now flip flopped.
Now, you agree with me....that circumstances (i.e. the level of punishment/injury a female endures should play a role in whether she is charged with Battery) do matter....a Female who commits a Battery but after doing so, gets punched in the face by a man, should not be charged with Battery if the man injures her to an extent you feel is "excessive."
The only thing you and I disagree on is the point at which her injuries are excessive enough that she should not be charged with Battery.
I think Johnson's punch to her face causing "bruising, swelling and a cut" is enough not to charge her.
You think he needed to swing twice, breaking her jaw, requiring surgery, and hospitalization for days.
Not necessarily. I think intent should matter too. I don't remember on what page I mentioned it, but in the heat of a moment if someone takes a swing at your head your immediate reaction is to protect yourself and fire back. In the scenario you outlined, I think his intent then would have been to injure rather than just being reactionary, so it's different for that reason.
And Wyatt help us if the girl might have been jockeying with Cook for a position at a bar, and swung at him after he grabbed her arms. SK and Igloo will be all over it.
Not necessarily. I think intent should matter too. I don't remember on what page I mentioned it, but in the heat of a moment if someone takes a swing at your head your immediate reaction is to protect yourself and fire back. In the scenario you outlined, I think his intent then would have been to injure rather than just being reactionary, so it's different for that reason.
Not sure what this even means, but I don't understand most of your blather.
I understand. Doing so would require at least some rudimentary level of reading comprehension.
How does and why should his "intent" affect whether she is charged? Those two things are about as irrelevant to each other as can be. You're going off in a direction I can barely follow.
You're trying too hard now. I think you're just digging in.
Oh Dear. You still think that FSU played a tougher schedule in the 90s in the ACC, than if they would have were they in the SEC, right?Or an ability on your part to make a cogent argument.
Oh Dear. You still think that FSU played a tougher schedule in the 90s in the ACC, than if they would have were they in the SEC, right?
If so, I can well understand your challenges trying to master effective reading comprehension.
I'll try to be nice, but you genuinely aren't a very intelligent person are you? Your characterizations of other peoples ideas are so twisted it's bizarre. It's like you're living on a different planet.
I'll try to be nice, but you genuinely aren't a very intelligent person are you? Your characterizations of other peoples ideas are so twisted it's bizarre. It's like you're living on a different planet.
So you don't understand a very straight forward statement and MJ is the one that is not very intelligent. LOL
Butt hurt Noles are butt hurt.I'll try to be nice, but you genuinely aren't a very intelligent person are you? Your characterizations of other peoples ideas are so twisted it's bizarre. It's like you're living on a different planet.
To be honest, it wouldn't hurt my feelings if she was charged with something. The more I watch the video, the more annoying she gets.