Typical liberal tactic - when you can no longer argue the issue on the facts you attack the source and defer to “experts”.
Your lack of intellectual curiosity is on brand with your politics.
Again, nice pivot.
Walls are closing in on DJT.... *All of Trump Charged threads have been merged - post here*
- Thread starter Illegal-shift
- Start date
Your lack of intellectual curiosity is on brand with your politics.
Again, nice pivot.
I can’t recall ever arguing with Lord. But it’s funny things something I “alway do” and he came up with three people and no specific examples.
BSC was a lying clown and 1776 was just parroting MSM/Fauci talking points. When the truth started to come out he slid under a rock.
But I guess I should shut up when someone makes a claim about their profession on a free message board. You won’t hear me say a WORD about Tylenol moving forward, I can promise you that.
Again and again Kalim proves himself to be Left of CNN.
Why is it that the Lawfare witnesses keep backfiring on the prosecution? Hicks, Cohen, probably Daniels herself if the truth were known. Avenatti has even crapped on them from jail. 😂
Experts like Chris Cuomo, once a jab Nazi, is now taking Ivermectin to survive? 😂
So you won't answer because you're the know it all type and won't/can't admit it. Gotcha.
But but but "EXPERTS" I wonder how many have heart problems from 1776'ers jabs?
😂
There wasn’t a question in your post.
It’s difficult having a discussion with someone who literally doesn’t/don’t 😏 comprehend English.
There is no more wondering why the left is easily manipulated.
It’s really amazing to watch his attempts to change the subject when he doesn’t like where the conversation is going.
Bingo. There are some that do it well, and you don’t quite catch it. He isn’t “some”, and actually is awful at it.
Interesting. I'm over it. When my question(s) gets ignored or not answered, I just return the favor. So don't expect me to answer you, going forward.
Does anyone know when this NDA payment was made??
And technically, a lawfirm, advancing $ for a NDA payment, then charging their client, is a legal payment/legal use of the funds, so Trump's accountant's would naturally put it down as legal fees.
2016. Repayment to Cohen was made the following year.
Trump was so out of the loop on the payment that Cohen had to take out a second mortgage to get the liquidity to make the payment.
And you're correct - this was properly classified as a legal fee.
The whole thing is laughable. Trump made a "hush money" payment to a porn star he never slept with to interfere in an election, despite the fact he never knew she was extorting him or that the payment was even made.
But Hillary can take $10MM in campaign funds to create a fake dossier to accuse the sitting President of collusion with a foreign adversary and that's totally above board.
This country is a banana republic.
Seems like he is trying very hard these days on his grammar. I have noticed a change in his posting style. Interesting. 🤔
Doesn’t @me!!!!
💊
Weird…Kalim is to the left of this cat.
I hear that TDS is strong with many Pharmacists across the country as well.
I hear that TDS is strong with many Pharmacists across the country as well.
When the commies are calling out fascism and you still can't admit it...
Her story has changed several times...odd that you'd have such vivid memories that completely don't line up.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Bill Maher drops Stormy Daniels bombshell as he airs 2018 interview
The HBO host unearthed footage of his 2018 interview with the porn star in which she laughed off suggestions she was coerced into having sex during the alleged hook-up 12 years earlier.
Exactly. The payment to Cohen, the accounting "blunder" (not really a blunder) that is being called into question as election interference, happened, AFTER Trump had already won the election. SO, how do you try and hide something that might cause you to LOSE an election, AFTER the election?
The whole thing is bullshit. The accountant has to make a judgement call as to how to classify an expense. What it's called is irrelevant and completely subjective. The retards prosecuting this case seem to think proper classification is campaign contribution. As you say, post election how the hell could that even be considered one? They remind me of someone else.
Paralegal Testimony: Alvin Bragg's Office Tampered With Evidence
Alvin Bragg's paralegal testified the office deleted from their evidence three pages of phone records without notifying Trump's legal team.
thefederalist.com
Can't wait for Kalim to read all 800 pages and tell us how damning Cohen's testimony is.
"What financing?" - Trump had no idea what the hell Cohen was talking about.
"What financing?" - Trump had no idea what the hell Cohen was talking about.
Cohen is an idiot. Cohen got busted on things completely unrelated to Trump. He went to jail. Now these idiot prosecutors are trying to use a discredited informant against Trump? Talk about some weak sauce and desperation. Unfortunately NYC has notoriously retarded constituents in their jury pools. The grounds for appeal are as wide as Moby Dick's mouth, or Stormy's..........not sure which is bigger. 😂
This all has ZERO to do with "getting Trump" They KNOW they do not have a case. They also know they have noting to talk about on the campaign trail...because everything is worse today than before the pedo stole the election. They are trying to keep TRUMP from campaigning, and at the same time trying to attack his character. It is FAILING miserably...and the polls show it. Remember...democrats are America's #1 enemy. I mean EVERY DAMN one of them. Why? Because not you...not me..not ANYONE has heard a democrat call this BS out. they did not call out the russia hoax. They do not call out FJB showering with his daughter. THEY DO NOT CARE about things like that as long as they can kill babies and get gubment freebies. Its just who they are....and they HATE America....HATE Capitalism.
Well it's not working. Every day the battleground states keep growing in Trump support vs the Potato. The harder they try, the bigger hole they dig for Biden.
Pretty sure CNN called them out in post 3181.
Say what now?
How many times have I had to explain the difference between a criminal and civil case to you only for you to tell me that you disagree???
Suddenly I'm an expert?
Bruh.
I never disagreed with you on that. We just disagreed on whether it's fair to call your king an adjudicated rapist based on a civil case.
You guys lie about me a lot.
Actually, you lie about yourself a lot.
You really can't control yourself.
You must have me on follow.
Glad you're a fan. I need to create an onlyfans message board version. 😂
