ADVERTISEMENT

Walls are closing in on DJT.... *All of Trump Charged threads have been merged - post here*

On the 87th attempt, have the dems FINALLY got Trump?


  • Total voters
    48
I'm not the one toting water for the dems. I'm not the one that needs to explain my foolishness.
No, but I still suspect you’re a plant paid by them to keep the Trumpys in line and away from any calendar that doesn’t say 2020. Plus you just don’t come across as super brilliant- but that may be intentional too. You can’t seem to be smarter than the folks you’re trying to control.
 
What does that have to do with anything?

I'm talking about our text to vote for Hillary early friend.
I'm addressing the meme you quoted. I don't even see what you are talking about. I read about it somewhere, but if people are that stupid they shouldn't be voting anyway. Those are RayRay's peeps. 😂
 
Last edited:
In some cases the political leader was acquitted...in other cases they were found guilty


7gs0j5.jpg
 
I do not "believe" it...I % know it because I pay attention to what is happening in the world. I see two different justice systems, I see the FBI getting involved to bring a political opponent down..many times while NOT doing the same with Hillary. I see intelligence "experts" lie about Hunter's laptop. I see a former POTUS get charged for what EVERYONE says is political garbage, while the current president gets payoffs from China, Russia, Ukraine, etc. I can go on and on. I attribute this to that cabal...what is your explanation for this, and the rest I left out?

Case closed. You’re officially a Trumpy Tool.
Personal question: are your knuckles perpetually raw? You know, from all that dragging on the ground?
 
I'm addressing the meme you quoted. I don't even see what you are talking about. I read about it somewhere, but if people are that stupid they shouldn't be voting anyway. Those a RayRay's peeps. 😂


Why do trumpers ALWAYS fall back on their ignorance as an excuse for being anti-American?

navi is perfectly comfortable violating the US Constitution because it will help his side "win"

And these are the numbskulls who have been crying about "election integrity"... hilarious 🤣
 
Some still don’t get it I guess. It’s OKAY that it backfired because the mission may have thus been accomplished: giving Trump the nomination because that’s who the Dems want the Delaware Dimwit to run against.
They do? If that is the case, why are they so hell bent to keep Trump from running? They are at a lunatic pitch, "just charge him with something". That goes for the lamestream media as well. Not sure who is leading the charge, the MSM or their sheep?
 
In some cases the political leader was acquitted...in other cases they were found guilty





https://www.yahoo.com/news/7-other-democracies-indicted-leaders-185236630.html
Here Are 7 Other Democracies That Have Indicted Their Leaders
Tara Law
Fri, March 31, 2023 at 2:52 PM EDT·3 min read

197597b42b230eb4dae8410df67ad243


As news spread that former President Donald Trump had been indicted by a Manhattan grand jury, making him the first former U.S. President to be charged with a crime, his spokesperson, Liz Harrington likened the situation to a “banana republic.” His son, Donald Trump Jr., declared the case “Communist-level sh*t. This is stuff that would make Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot blush.” The former President is expected to be arraigned on Tuesday.

But a government that is accountable to the rule of law, and not subject to the whims of a king or a dictator, is considered one of the key tenets of democracy—and, many experts say, it is essential for leaders to be held accountable like anyone else. In fact, many countries that are considered free and highly functional democracies have prosecuted their leaders.


“Indicting Trump thus is essential to send a message to all: No one, not even a former president, is above the law,” said Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of University of California Berkeley School of Law, in an interview with Berkeley News.


France - 2014
South Korea - 2017
Israel - 2019
Italy - 2012
Taiwan - 2010
Germany - 2014
Portugal - 2021

we are a republic, not a democracy, and our constitution and rule of law are what separate us from those other countries. We don’t twist the law go after one of our political enemies until last week.
 
Some still don’t get it I guess. It’s OKAY that it backfired because the mission may have thus been accomplished: giving Trump the nomination because that’s who the Dems want the Delaware Dimwit to run against.
This might be the most ridiculous thing you have ever posted.

So you are mad that we haven't moved on from Trump....cause you think the dems want to face Trump cause they know they can beat him.

AND.....you think Trump running means DeSantis will surely lose.

BUT.....you think DeSantis COULD beat Hiden. But he can't beat Trump. Which is why we need to just move on and clear the path for DeSantis vs Hiden. So you think the country is best served by shitcanning the republican who is in front by 30 points, so we can let the 2nd place pub go against Hiden.

We have the dumbest trolls on the internet.
 
Could those people actually be the trump supporters or did you have someone else in mind?
Stupidity is an inclusive condition.
Trumpers are not necessarily stupid.
But Libbies are willfully dumb.
Both have selective hearing and are gullible but both are stubborn and afraid they’ll look foolish if they admit they were repeatedly “primrosed”.
 
They do? If that is the case, why are they so hell bent to keep Trump from running?

Because he's a douchebag?

Nothing in the NY case will prevent trump from running
Is that why his followers are freaking out?

Now Jack Smith's case is where trump can be barred from public office for being a treasonus douchebag 🤣


They are at a lunatic pitch, "just charge him with something". That goes for the lamestream media as well. Not sure who is leading the charge, the MSM or their sheep?

No....this is a lunatic pitch

https://www.vice.com/en/article/5d9p9q/trump-indictment-civil-war-the-donald
The Far Right Is Calling For Bloody ‘Civil War’ After Trump’s Indictment
“None of this will stop unless there is blood in the streets,” one Trump supporter wrote on a message board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldmom
This might be the most ridiculous thing you have ever posted.

So you are mad that we haven't moved on from Trump....cause you think the dems want to face Trump cause they know they can beat him.

AND.....you think Trump running means DeSantis will surely lose.

BUT.....you think DeSantis COULD beat Hiden. But he can't beat Trump. Which is why we need to just move on and clear the path for DeSantis vs Hiden. So you think the country is best served by shitcanning the republican who is in front by 30 points, so we can let the 2nd place pub go against Hiden.

We have the dumbest trolls on the internet.

LOL. That’s straight out of DNC talking points.
And we do have dumb people on the internet GOMM. Lucky for you, right? That’s what they call job security.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RayGravesGhost
So you’re just going skip past the Satantic-pedo-cannibal conspiracies and make a false equivalence to the crap Trump pulled from November 2020 to January 2021.
BTW since you asked, this is all I will say on the topic. If you want, you or anyone here can do their own research on the topic. Which I have.

Based on what I learned, I have no desire to keep researching, nor discuss the topic here.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: NavigatorII
Some still don’t get it I guess. It’s OKAY that it backfired because the mission may have thus been accomplished: giving Trump the nomination because that’s who the Dems want the Delaware Dimwit to run against.
And we know that old man from Delaware will break his foot off in Fatboy tail again easily
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RayGravesGhost
Stupidity is an inclusive condition.
Trumpers are not necessarily stupid.
But Libbies are willfully dumb.
Both have selective hearing and are gullible but both are stubborn and afraid they’ll look foolish if they admit they were repeatedly “primrosed”.

trump followers aren't "willfully dumb" ?

Take a look at the responses here that can't acknowledge the truth about trump?
Is that willful ignorance or stupidity?

You and I don't agree on much...and that's fine, we don't have to...

But I would say at least in this instance the trump loyalists have gone too far for other conservatives like you because it is direct opposition to democracy

These people aren't republicans or conservatives...

They're just extremists who hijacked the party
 
Of course. She hates Trump and just wants him gone gone GONE.

Country be damned. Dems agree with her stance completely, as they do 90% of the time here. Check her Likes.
Hey boo boo, you’re wrong, 57 percent of “Americans” do not want that loser in office, trump really doesn’t care, but he really enjoys Is fundraising and donations! It’s free Money
 
  • Like
Reactions: RayGravesGhost
we are a republic, not a democracy, and our constitution and rule of law are what separate us from those other countries.

Yes...which is why Nixon was forced to resign (along with Spiro Agnew)

Ooops that's actually a case where we didn't prosecute the criminals
Lucky for them were a republic not a democracy huh?

We don’t twist the law go after one of our political enemies until last week.

Last week? Really?
Nixon & Agnew wasn't enough?

How about Rick Perry...he ran for POTUS in 2016 while under indictment

And as Evilwayz said...LaRouche ran from prison for Congress & POTUS ias far back as the 80s & 90s

"...until last week." 🤣
 
Last edited:
trump followers aren't "willfully dumb" ?

Take a look at the responses here that can't acknowledge the truth about trump?
Is that willful ignorance or stupidity?

You and I don't agree on much...and that's fine, we don't have to...

But I would say at least in this instance the trump loyalists have gone too far for other conservatives like you because it is direct opposition to democracy

These people aren't republicans or conservatives...

They're just extremists who hijacked the party
Trump needs to take a seat and just play golf, now Asa Hutchinson jumped on the ticket he’s one dude I would definitely support, no drama, and not a cry baby me me me type
 
He cheats at that too,... 🤣
Ray everytime I hear him whining that he got cheated reminds me of a couple rich kids I played high school football with, if we lost a game it never failed they’d start up “ we got cheated “ I just shook my head and walked out the locker room, Trump just can’t handle getting whipped. Why? Bcos he’s had everything handed to him
 
  • Like
Reactions: RayGravesGhost
I'm addressing the meme you quoted. I don't even see what you are talking about. I read about it somewhere, but if people are that stupid they shouldn't be voting anyway. Those are RayRay's peeps. 😂
Being stupid is not against the law. And clearly I have no issue with trolling stupid people.

I do have a problem with 5k people not voting because they thought they already did, regardless of where they got the information.

I dont care if it was just a prank that was slightly more successful than intended.

He doesn't deserve to spend time in prison over it but they should fine the shit out of him for being grossly irresponsible.
 
Being stupid is not against the law. And clearly I have no issue with trolling stupid people.

I do have a problem with 5k people not voting because they thought they already did, regardless of where they got the information.

I dont care if it was just a prank that was slightly more successful than intended.

He doesn't deserve to spend time in prison over it but they should fine the shit out of him for being grossly irresponsible.
I paid little attention to the second part of that meme, that's why you confused me. The Hillary thing though is REAL and it's criminal AF. But regarding the latter, it's like putting out a tweet that voting will be Nov 4th instead of Nov 3rd. People do that kind of trolling all the time, "no reasonable prosecutor" could bring a case, nobody could be that stupid............ :rolleyes: 😂 Oh wait!! We have someone like that here!

104985733-GettyImages-693965986.jpg
 
Being stupid is not against the law. And clearly I have no issue with trolling stupid people.

I do have a problem with 5k people not voting because they thought they already did, regardless of where they got the information.

I dont care if it was just a prank that was slightly more successful than intended.

He doesn't deserve to spend time in prison over it but they should fine the shit out of him for being grossly irresponsible.

It wasn't a "prank"...its just another case of a long history of conservatives violating election integrity in a number of states


https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/dnc-v-rnc-consent-decree
DNC v. RNC Consent Decree

In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree with their Democratic party counterparts.

PUBLISHED: November 5, 2016

Related Court Documents​

2016
Order Denying Request to Extend Decree (November 5, 2016)
RNC’s Memorandum in Opposition to Order to Show Cause (October 31, 2016)
DNC’s Memorandum in Support of Order to Show Cause (October 26, 2016)

2012
Third Circuit Opinion (March 8, 2012)

2009
Debevoise Order (December 1, 2009)
Debevoise Opinion (December 1, 2009)
RNC Post-Hearing Brief (June 26, 2009)
DNC Post-Hearing Brief (June 26, 2009)
RNC Reply Brief (February 19, 2009)
DNC Brief Opposing Motion to Vacate (January 19, 2009)
RNC Brief in Support of Motion (November 3, 2008)

2008 (several states)
DNC Brief (November 3, 2008)
DNC Brief Atty. Certification of Exhibits (November 3, 2008)
OFA Intervention Memo (November 3, 2008)
Minute Entry (November 3, 2008)

2004 (Ohio)
Malone Dismissal (February 3, 2005)
Malone en banc Decision (November 9, 2004)
Malone Appellate Decision (November 1, 2004)
Malone Order (November 1, 2004)
Malone Intervenor PI brief (November 1, 2004)
Malone Intervenor Complaint (October 31, 2004)
Malone Memo in Support of Intervention (October 28, 2004)
Malone Motion to Intervene (October 28, 2004)

2004 (South Dakota)
Daschle Temporary Restraining Order (November 2, 2004)
Daschle SD Complaint (November 1, 2004)

2002 (New Jersey)
Order (October 31, 2002)

1990 (North Carolina)
Order (November 5, 1990)

1987 (several states)
Consent Decree (July 27, 1987)

Original 1981 case (New Jersey)
Consent Decree (November 1, 1982)
Complaint (February 11, 1982)



https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow...t-security-consent-decree-matters-msna1055841
Why the end of the RNC's 'ballot security' consent decree matters

Let's start with the background we discussed a while back. In 1981, there was a very competitive gubernatorial race in New Jersey, which the Republican National Committee was eager to win. The party was so eager to prevail that the RNC launched a program called the "Ballot Security Task Force," which involved having Republican operatives and off-duty law enforcement personnel hanging around dozens of minority-voting precincts, looking for evidence of election irregularities, and intimidating local voters.

The campaign was not subtle: Republicans put up warning signs, telling locals that their precincts were being monitored, and creating quasi-official arm bands for the party's monitors to wear while physically patrolling polling places in areas made up mostly of minority voters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatorspeed
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT