Tucker showing 6 Jan hoax
- Thread starter nail1988
- Start date
No, my actual 1st response was that he's a known liar. I haven't changed any stance. He's more likely than not is lying but until more evidence comes out, I can't say for a fact.
OMG..........lol
Damn how I wish yehaw comments would let you post jpg's.......currently only gifs. 😂
Show the damn videos. The left screams like hell to release body cam footage in a police shooting. Unless the videos are doctored or edited in some dishonest way, it doesn't make any difference what program they're on. Put 'em on CNN then.
Not only liars, but criminals as they didn't give this very large piece of evidence to Defense Counsel for ANY of the people they arrested on Jan 6.
Last edited:
CNN would have the same damned agenda J6 did. There's a reason why McCarthy let FOX have them first. The sheep are going to have to see it first th rough a REAL lens. But then there's still the low information voters that will wait patiently for their koolaid and be told what they see. 😂
The entirety of The Leftist Narrative (Communism) is built upon lies. CRT, Equity, Hunter’ Laptop was Russian, COVID, VAX Requirements, Masks, Afghanistan, 1619, Hillary’s eMails, Russian Collusion, Stacey The Hutt “won”, Voter Discrimination, …. All of it!
China Joe is an illegitimate, corrupt, senile ole’ coot! No way Biden/Harris got 14M more votes than Obama/Biden did in 2012. NONE!
China Joe is an illegitimate, corrupt, senile ole’ coot! No way Biden/Harris got 14M more votes than Obama/Biden did in 2012. NONE!
Well, if Tucker does lie SOMETIMES, what do you expect, he started off on CNN. Old habits are hard to beat sometimes. I would assume he stretches the truth a little here and there, but doesn't blatantly just make lies up, like most DEM politicians and DEM journalists.
I've been watching Tucker since he wore a bow tie. When did he ever work for CNN? 😂 CNN was the first cable news network, so it's possible. CNN USED to be a real news network. That ship sailed 35 years ago.
According to wiki, 2000-2005. Was a host of Crossfire for a little while.
Tucker worked for FOX during the Bush/Gore election. His adversary was the libtard Allen Combs. I didn't realize he went to CNN for a stint.
One of my better ones, I might add.Bump
Happy Insurrection Day
When the traitors to America were repelled. Democracy still reigns Trump is booted out in embarrassing fashion Biden is still your president Ghost is still a welcher.florida.forums.rivals.com
You're thinking of Hannity, it was Hannity and Combs. I believe Tucker was on MSNBC at one time.
One reason...they are the MOST dishonest POS's ever put on this planet. I KNEW it when they tried the RUSSIA RUSSIA BS. I KNEW the ONLY party EVER to aid America's enemies have been DEMOCRATS. They have a unique talent of hanging their dirty laundry on Republicans. They have every cheating and lying way figured out perfectly. SCUM BAGS to the very core
Although this is true...it is even worse than this. We have many that belong to the cabal that have R's beside their name...and these people are immune from anything ever happening to them. Many in the FBI, CIA NSA and other alphabet agencies
This guy is hard to figure out. Either he is a GREAT troll...or dumb.The video doesn't lie. Do some more of your patented "research".
My guess is their vote total was doubled by cheating. I would say 40-45 million REAL votes...no more
You are correct. But I remember Tucker roasting Al Gore in 1999. My then girlfriend used to watch together and howl at how stupid Combs was. 😂
Sure but I do understand the potential security concerns. You don't?
The only bigger scumbag than an attorney is a reporter.
They are MASTERS of showing footage in a manner that shows the story they want. They don't even manipulate or doctor it, they show things in an order that creates the narrative they want and either edit out the chunks that don't support it or dont show those clips at all.
I work for one of the news affiliates part time here in Jax.
Yes, but I am trying to balance security concerns with the necessity of showing what happened on an event so extraordinary to be called threat to our democracy and one of the greatest catastrophes in our nation's history, that maybe the security concerns take second place.
And since you mention security concerns, as I asked you already in this thread, why would the Jan 6th committee not call Pelosi to testify since she was in the chain of command for Capitol security.
There are no security concerns. The Capitol Police checked with Tucker and signed off on everything he aired last night.
I'd ask why you keep repeating this lie, but we both know why. Talking points over the truth.
Tucker ran everything by Capitol Police before he aired it. They found no security concerns. @kalimgoodman is lying.
BULL****. There are ZERO security concerns...just proving this WHOLE THING was BS...just like we TOLD you it was. Remember this..ONLY democrats aid our enemies. ONLY democrats do things AGAINST our Constitution. If you can remember those TWO things...you will be SO MUCH smarter.
No, you're first response was that he was a "known liar" and you "can't believe we trust him".
The context of where and when you said it makes it clear you think we shouldn't believe him on this issue.
Now you're backtracking on this, like you do almost every time you're cornered (your other tactic is to disappear for a little while).
There is a VERY simple answer to this, and one only has to read a few of my posts to figure it out. ALL LEFTIES ARE LIARS. SCUM.
I can't believe we trust a known liar.
We should put our faith in Schumer and Cheney's J6 committee, THOSE are true and honest patriots.
No I can't believe that you guys just trust him. He earned the right to be approached skepticism.
I never said I believe him. I always said in every post that he is a known liar. So you can say I'm backtracking but there is no evidence of that other you saying it. I know your tactic as well. You guys like to tell people what they are saying despite me clearly being that's false.
Glad that we see eye to eye on this. I don't have any issues with this being released in an honest way. I don't trust known liar Tucker to do that. I feel pretty confident that he's doing something shady.
Read the Jan 6th report, if you truly care about that. They talked/wrote about it. That info is out there on Pelosi. Hope this isn't a partisan question, in which you only want one answer or you don't care.
I don't trust @kalimgoodman. He began this thread by repeating a lib talking point about 'security concerns', that has been proven to be a lie. Tucker showed the capitol police what he would show last night, and they said there were no security concerns.
@kalimgoodman is lying. Tucker never has.
This is why the dems hate Tucker. Cause he tells the truth about them.
If you know the answer, because I don't, why don't you just tell me. Now I happen to think it was a sham partisan committee, not looking for the truth, but having a different agenda. Part of that day also involves security at the Capitol, of which the Speaker of the House is a part. So I am curious as to why Pelosi was not a witness during the committee hearing. When you say, you hope this isn't a partisan question, I don't know what that means. I have never heard a reason for her lack of testimony which does add support to my impression of a sham hearing. So if you know the answer, say so, and if not say that?
Similar threads
