You're going to die with the belief that a crime wasn't named. It's just a flat-out lie, and you don't care because you're just repeating a right wing lie. You have to repeat it, or you'll be excommunicated from the cult. So whatever
TRUMP VERDICT REACHED
- Thread starter Mt.DoraGator
- Start date
Setting yourself up for another whiny disappointment.
It is the law but you refuse accept it. Eventually you'll be complaining about the corrupt NY appeals courts because nobody knows NY law better than you!
6th amendment you idiot. What YOU said NY State law was is exactly OPPOSITE the 6th amendment. Geez, you are dumb
I did not say that, you did. I said that the process was respected.
Is saying that the process was respected not answering your question?
6th amendment you idiot. What YOU said NY State law was is exactly OPPOSITE the 6th amendment. Geez, you are dum
If the jury had three choices to pick from, how does Trump know what the vote count was on each one. Was it 12-0, or say 6-6 or say 4-4-4. How does he know which one or ones he was convicted on? Do you know?
Jesus also rose from the dead, brought people back to life, cured the sick and fed the hungry. He is also the Son of God. To compare Trump to Jesus....wow....I wouldn't want to be you on judgement day.
I didn't ask you that at all. I asked about the 6th amendment.
But see if you can clear up my confusion on this one. If you go to NY, get arrested in Central Park, and charged with a crime. Are you telling me and this board that NY State law says that the city or county jurisdiction does NOT have to tell you the crime you have been arrested for.
…something tells sadgator that Trump and Jesus wouldn’t exactly see eye to eye on a lot of stuff…
Just a guess…
Just a guess…
Anybody remember when that wacky Q thing and Ghost were predicting that Biden and Hilary Clinton would be arrested on Inauguration Day 2021 and we were supposed to “keep watching” and “connect the dots…”?!?!?
Man, it’s been a looooong 3.5 years….
Man, it’s been a looooong 3.5 years….
no I saw tour point. I just dismissed it immediately as a poorly thought out distinction. My point is that the PROSECUTION was political. I wasn’t referring to the political impact, which is what you were doing (Gary hart, John Edwards(?)). Impeachment is also a prosecution based on politics (you may try to argue with that because you don’t seem very bright). If your point is that Trump was prosecuted because he was running for president, then we do agree on that.
In fact the political IMPACT (again your point, trying to help you keep track) looks like it may be favorable to Trump.
Of course. What does that have to do with anything. You only support godly politicians? You must have a tough time.
Something tells me you haven’t ever read the word. Jesus came for the sinner, not the righteous.
But I do know that Joe is in for a tough judgement…those daddy daughter showers aren’t going to end well.
“But whoever shall offend one of these little ones who believe in Me, it would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were drowned in the depth of the sea.”
Thanks for validating the point. Evil was willing to persecute and murder Jesus. So seeing evil do the same here is no surprise. And as believers our job is to be steadfast in our beliefs. If believers still trust the Son of God who was persecuted and murdered under false accusations, then it won’t be difficult to stand by our beliefs here where Trump is being persecuted by evil with Trumped up nonsense. Funny eh? Clowning on Trump for being convicted, do you clown on Jesus as well? Just curious.
You support the party of evil. The party of pedophiles, baby murderers, globalists, con artists, extortionists, and war criminals. So you should probably make sure your glass house is in tact first. Might want to reevaluate what team you are on. I fight for the rights of those that cannot fight for themselves. You fight for the rights of someone to get a second choice because they didn’t like the results of their first choice.
As for me? My judgement day is solid. 💯
Why? Because I trust Jesus. But thanks for showing your ignorance of the written word.
Sad. You really don't want to be here right now (or when retribution comes down for this). Ms Sad is going to cut you off again. Now get back over the the other board before she puts your balls back in the fridge jar. 😂
Ms Sad doesn't exactly see eye to eye with Sad, but she still lets you live there. Sayin.
This dude is recommending someone amend their argument. Is this for real? Do you think we are engaging in a national debate? We are dangerously close to the “daddy hit mommy at the dinner table” moment, and you think we are having debate club. Rude awakening incoming.
Here is what you said, which is different from what you are saying now:
"I think a fair amount of us don’t like Trump’s behavior. But he’s not the only one getting over. It’s the selective application of the process that bothers me. If you told me every politician in DC that has traded on his/her office should be fired and jailed, I’d sign for that right now.
You’re a smart guy, it doesn’t bother you that legislators with $200k salaries build $50-$100m fortunes while in office? You don’t think there’s any criminality there? You think Trump is the only guy falsifying business records in Manhattan(think Wall Street). So why’s he the only high profile guy getting prosecuted for it (8 years after the fact and five months away from an election that he’s leading)?"
You where saying the prosecution was selective by comparing Trump to legislators. I just pointed out that your logic was flawed. You didn't just say it was political, you used other politicians and other wall street guys as a barometer which is a very flawed argument because they aren't running for president. Sorry if you don't like it.....but the facts are right here. My point was, and is, valid.
If you just wanted to say that prosecution of Trump was partly political.......of course it was. But it would have happened to any presidential hopeful who has pulled the shit that Trump has. Trump constantly gives the democrats the hammers to hit him over the head with. But both parties would use those hammers. Just ask Bill Clinton.
The law has always been selective. Blacks have been saying this for decades. Did you care then or only when it’s a billionaire crook??
Kal the statue of limitations had run out on the state crimes ( plus they where only misdemeanors ) he had to make up a way to use federal crime to charge a felony. The sane charge the FEC, southern district of Ny, Cyrus Vance would not charge him with.
There was no crime.
Kal
Alan Dershowitz said it didn't matter if the jury saw any evidence, any crime, if the understood the instructions they where going to convict him period. He said they didn't even pay attention.
He said they would convict Abe Lincoln, Allah, Moses, Jesus in the upper west side. He's said they don't want to face their friends. He says he lives their and he's been canceled.
He also said the need to go over the applette level because they all the leftist judges their and will do the same thing . That's why the regime wanted Trump tried in NYC west side
Alan Dershowitz said it didn't matter if the jury saw any evidence, any crime, if the understood the instructions they where going to convict him period. He said they didn't even pay attention.
He said they would convict Abe Lincoln, Allah, Moses, Jesus in the upper west side. He's said they don't want to face their friends. He says he lives their and he's been canceled.
He also said the need to go over the applette level because they all the leftist judges their and will do the same thing . That's why the regime wanted Trump tried in NYC west side
when they passed out brains you must have thought they said trains and you missed yours
You worry about yourself, son. You fully support a pedophile. I KNOW Jesus looks down on that WAY, WAY more
Then why didn't Trump go after Hillary Clinton with all the shit she pulled. Stick that pin in your both parties balloon hammer.
Simple but spot on. Trumps used to getting away with murder. He pushed his luck and he got caught. Just like any of us would have gotten caught
Wait what? You’re more worried about Trump paying a pornstar than Joe ‘s confirmed shower diddling his daughter?
Yikes. The TDS is strong. But hey, don’t take my word for it. Take it from lefty Snopes. Let’s see if you are the moral person you are trying to portray. Magic 8 ball says nope.
Let me help you with the important part.
“ Previous versions of this fact check noted "strong evidence" that the diary existed, but argued that no source had authenticated the contents of the pages published online, writing that "the authenticity of photographs purported to be from a diary is a separate question from the factual existence of a diary."
Ashley Biden's letter to the court, in Snopes' view, provides that authentication.
Did Ashley Biden Call Childhood Showers with Her Father 'Probably Inappropriate' in Leaked Diary?
"I will forever have to deal with the fact that my personal journal can be viewed online," Ashley Biden wrote to a district court judge.
www.snopes.com
Joe’s inappropriate showers have been confirmed, yet you’re worried about a payment to a pornstar. Smdh.
Ok then post where it explicitly states that the crime doesn’t need to be identified.
You're an awesome researcher so it’ll likely only take you a few seconds. It’s a law on the books, right?
Or do you want me to do it and prove you wrong?
What crime was named? By who? When?
And why did the Judge give 3 categories of crime if one was named?
I’ve been asking you for weeks and you’ve yet to answer.
Not to mention the bribery. Or the rape of Tarah Reid. Or the kid sniffing. Or the kid groping. Or the inability to walk off of a stage. Or the 3 times he fell down. Or the nonsense talk. Or the fact he married his babysitter. Or the racism.Wait what? You’re more worried about Trump paying a pornstar than Joe ‘s confirmed shower diddling his daughter?
Yikes. The TDS is strong. But hey, don’t take my word for it. Take it from lefty Snopes. Let’s see if you are the moral person you are trying to portray. Magic 8 ball says nope.
Let me help you with the important part.
“ Previous versions of this fact check noted "strong evidence" that the diary existed, but argued that no source had authenticated the contents of the pages published online, writing that "the authenticity of photographs purported to be from a diary is a separate question from the factual existence of a diary."
Ashley Biden's letter to the court, in Snopes' view, provides that authentication.
Did Ashley Biden Call Childhood Showers with Her Father 'Probably Inappropriate' in Leaked Diary?
"I will forever have to deal with the fact that my personal journal can be viewed online," Ashley Biden wrote to a district court judge.
Joe’s inappropriate showers have been confirmed, yet you’re worried about a payment to a pornstar. Smdh.
It all pales in comparison to improperly accounting for an NDA everyone knew about to shut a porn star extortionist who talked despite taking the money, despite denying anything happened until the dude ran for political office….jail for liiiiife!!!!
They are verifiably nuts and projecting when making accusations of cultism. That said…
They have no clue what’s happening.
Can you imagine the fervor and energy that KalimGoodman demonstrates toward the democrat party if he were a full blown liberal instead of just an "independent". He's unlike any other independent I've ever come across. Very unusual.
