ADVERTISEMENT

Trump Isn’t Going Anywhere

And there is his angle to say he was a cop. Then will deny it, admit he is a cop, deny again, claim as a cop he made more than Trump, call us all pusses, call us sheep, lie some more, believe the lie, talk to the father running his church, get touched, come back here taking on all new cummers.

Did I miss anything? 😂😂😂

TRUTH! Glad he has been depantsed by all.
 


This was stated after rioting had begun. Now, imagine trump being interviewed during the middle of capital riots and saying this. Verbiage be damned. Remember you can call a riot a protest, but its still a riot.

Ludicrous effort to change her words from protests to riots. That's very dishonest. Pathetic actually.
 
So, you admit everyone else depantsed you? ROFLMAO.

as for the bet, I already won. Bet is closed, you welched.

fryboy

Ding. Still a puss.

Accept the bet. Name the lie. Simple as that Nancy Boy.
 
"It should not stop, it will not stop."

As a partisan you will say that she was ONLY referring to peaceful protests, whatever the hell that means.

No one gave a shit about actual peaceful protests...including Harris. The sausage was made, along with the news, in the unpeaceful protests. That's what she meant and everyone knew it. Honest people admit it.

You should, I hope, fully understand that your assertion would never come close to be allowed in court. It holds zero water, worse if you'd be honest you would admit it.
 
^ Village idiot!

53fb1a9aa33e5b8b38c1df888e4b349d.jpg

Sadly I think that's your most educated rebuttal ( see what I did there.) Funny, but telling.
 
Ding. Still a puss.

Accept the bet. Name the lie. Simple as that Nancy Boy.

the lies (plural) were shown over and over again in your tribute thread, oh pant less one. There is nothing to accept. The bet was settled, and you welched. you’re now a welcher and a liar
 
Ludicrous effort to change her words from protests to riots. That's very dishonest. Pathetic actually.

you really are this dumb aren’t you? one question for you. If you are at a baseball game, and someone calls it a wrestling match, does that mean it’s a wrestling match? Simple question
 
  • Like
Reactions: BamaFan1137
the lies (plural) were shown over and over again in your tribute thread, oh pant less one. There is nothing to accept. The bet was settled, and you welched. you’re now a welcher and a liar
No, all you did was quote posts which you clearly aren’t smart enough to understand. Your lack of intelligence is not proof of a lie.

Accept the bet. Name the lie. I’ll either prove it, or not.

Or continue to be a puss. I have a feeling I know which one you will choose, Nancy Boy.
 
No, all you did was quote posts which you clearly aren’t smart enough to understand. Your lack of intelligence is not proof of a lie.

Accept the bet. Name the lie. I’ll either prove it, or not.

Or continue to be a puss. I have a feeling I know which one you will choose, Nancy Boy.


its been done over and over again. The one thing you have proven to everyone is that you have no integrity to admit when you were caught lying.

so, if I prove a lie, you leave? For good?

we let the board decide if it’s a lie?
 
you really are this dumb aren’t you? one question for you. If you are at a baseball game, and someone calls it a wrestling match, does that mean it’s a wrestling match? Simple question

You cannot state someone said the word riots/rioters when they said protest/protesters. If I'm at a baseball game and you call it a wrestling match, I simply say you're as ridiculous as your claim that Harris said rioters. Your jumping to conclusions and assumptions to support your narrative fails miserably when you just invent words and actions.
 
You cannot state someone said the word riots/rioters when they said protest/protesters. If I'm at a baseball game and you call it a wrestling match, I simply say you're as ridiculous as your claim that Harris said rioters. Your jumping to conclusions and assumptions to support your narrative fails miserably when you just invent words and actions.
What happened at every protest over the summer? And I mean EVERY protest in every state.
 
You cannot state someone said the word riots/rioters when they said protest/protesters. If I'm at a baseball game and you call it a wrestling match, I simply say you're as ridiculous as your claim that Harris said rioters. Your jumping to conclusions and assumptions to support your narrative fails miserably when you just invent words and actions.

good grief. You literally just made my point for me. Kamala was at a baseball game (riots were what was occurring at the time of her comments) and she called it a wrestling match (protest). Get it now?

to put another way. If during the capital (riots), Trump said “the peaceful protests will not, and should not stop”, how would you react? You see, you cannot call it something that it isn’t and just have everyone go.....I know that I am at a baseball game, but Kamala said it’s a wrestling match, so it must be a wrestling match.
 
Last edited:
its been done over and over again. The one thing you have proven to everyone is that you have no integrity to admit when you were caught lying.

so, if I prove a lie, you leave? For good?

we let the board decide if it’s a lie?
And poof, he has disappeared
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly
In that situation, It’s a tough call, no doubt. Others aren’t such tough calls. I generally give the police the benefit of the doubt, but that doesn’t give the victims any solace when they make the wrong call. Most of the times, the courts have sided with the police. since intent is hard to discern.

But I doubt any officer ever goes into a situation with the intent to shoot an unarmed person. But cops aren’t perfect, as you know, and sometimes make the wrong call. Have you seen the video of the guy in the hotel who was just trying to pull his pants up?

But we were talking about funding the police, not how they are charged.

Intent? Why do I waste my time?

No, I haven’t seen the video.

When a DA and a jury have months to ponder a question that the officer had milliseconds to respond to....the advantage doesn't go to the officer.

You didn't answer my question btw. If you were the cop I described above, would you prefer a more liberal or conservative DOJ?
 
In that situation, It’s a tough call, no doubt. Others aren’t such tough calls.

Also, that tough call was mine and the others there with me. It wasn't my only one...just one that popped into my head as I responded.

That particular bad guy broke a female cops jaw about a year before that incident and was out on bond. The warrant we were serving was for him not showing up for court.

He broke her jaw while she fought to prevent him from pulling her gun out of her holster. She had both hands on the gun...so he pummeled her face when she wouldn't let go.
 
You should, I hope, fully understand that your assertion would never come close to be allowed in court. It holds zero water, worse if you'd be honest you would admit it.

I'm sorry counselor, I had forgotten that we were in court? WTH is wrong with you?

You have opinions about stuff Trump said. I have an opinion on this. Your opinion wouldn't hold up in court either...whatever the hell that's supposed to mean.
 
Also, that tough call was mine and the others there with me. It wasn't my only one...just one that popped into my head as I responded.

That particular bad guy broke a female cops jaw about a year before that incident and was out on bond. The warrant we were serving was for him not showing up for court.

He broke her jaw while she fought to prevent him from pulling her gun out of her holster. She had both hands on the gun...so he pummeled her face when she wouldn't let go.
Good shoot.
 
its been done over and over again. The one thing you have proven to everyone is that you have no integrity to admit when you were caught lying.

so, if I prove a lie, you leave? For good?

we let the board decide if it’s a lie?
What is? You must first enunciate the lie. But you can’t.

Because you are a puss.
 
Intent? Why do I waste my time?

No, I haven’t seen the video.

When a DA and a jury have months to ponder a question that the officer had milliseconds to respond to....the advantage doesn't go to the officer.

You didn't answer my question btw. If you were the cop I described above, would you prefer a more liberal or conservative DOJ?
This one. Good shoot?

 
What is? You must first enunciate the lie. But you can’t.

Because you are a puss.

Let the board decide fry boy? Come on. Walk the walk, but pull your pants back up first. I see you’re backing down.
 
Good shoot.

We didn't. Luckily, because he was so dangerous and because we were prepared (funded), he was hit with a bean bag round and a taser almost simultaneously.

That moment has haunted me. I didn't shoot him. It worked out...because he was armed with a tiny folding knife. But what if it had been a gun? Would my hesitation have cost someone their life? If I had fired, would that have cost me my freedom? Probably not...but what about my job and reputation?

The bottom line, if he had died that day, in my heart I 100% know that he would have been fully responsible for his death. But I may still have paid a price.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BSC911
We didn't. Luckily, because he was so dangerous and because we were prepared (funded), he was hit with a bean bag round and a taser almost simultaneously.

That moment has haunted me. I didn't shoot him. It worked out...because he was armed with a tiny folding knife. But what if it had been a gun? Would my hesitation have cost someone their life? If I had fired, would that have cost me my freedom? Probably not...but what about my job and reputation?

The bottom line, if he had died that day, in my heart I 100% know that he would have been fully responsible for his death. But I may still have paid a price.
That’s the risk you take as a LEO. It’s not an easy job.
 
That’s the risk you take as a LEO. It’s not an easy job.

That's an easy quote. But someone has to do that job. The statement that you just made makes that job more difficult (that's the risk you take).

The risk i take is perhaps not making it home. The other risks...losing my freedom, my job, my reputation because of the horrible decisions that this guy made are unacceptable. People, more to the point good and smart people, will not want to do this job anymore and your world will be less safe as a result.
 
That's an easy quote. But someone has to do that job. The statement that you just made makes that job more difficult (that's the risk you take).

The risk i take is perhaps not making it home. The other risks...losing my freedom, my job, my reputation because of the horrible decisions that this guy made are unacceptable. People, more to the point good and smart people, will not want to do this job anymore and your world will be less safe as a result.
Yep. That‘s what you signed up for.
 
Yep. That‘s what you signed up for.

And our military signs up to step on IED's too, right?

So...no real need to better protect them from the earth exploding underneath them.

That's ridiculous and you know it. We can do better. Cops can do better too...no one has denied that but F you and that statement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly
And our military signs up to step on IED's too, right?

So...no real need to better protect them from the earth exploding underneath them.

That's ridiculous and you know it. We can do better. Cops can do better too...no one has denied that but F you and that statement.
When you take the job, you know the risks. Yes, no different than joining the military.

Your safety is no more, or less, important than the safety of the citizens you are paid to protect.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT