He's wrong, but he could care less about being wrong.Meaning???
What was inaccurate?
He's wrong, but he could care less about being wrong.
BayouGator1995 can define all 7 components of critical thinking. His opponent cannot. Of course BayouGator ain't black. The plantation cracker in the White House tells me he ain't.Well they have to replace the previous liberal whack-job with another of their kind. They really want to pack the SCOTUS with more liberal pork anyways.
Judge Thomas looked me in the eye and promised to uphold the constitution. So far he has kept his promise. Roberts and Sotomayor lied to me. Our current nominee is a rubber stamper, as is Sotomayor.Did you hear about those whack-jobs hoping Clarence Thomas would die when it was announced he was hospitalized? Pathethic.
Well I said that one democrat withheld information. I didn't say the other stuff, so I'm right but wrong on something I never said. Wtf are you talking about. Drunk?One democrat may have withheld a very specific truth during his hearing. MANY obscured or obfuscated the truth.
That's where I was going so yes, in that sense it was entirely inaccurate.
👍🏽Oh my @kalimgoodman
First Liberty Lawyer: Ketanji Brown Jackson Can’t Uphold Constitution if She Thinks It’s Racist
![]()
Lawyer: KBJ Can't Defend the Constitution if She Thinks It's Racist
Keisha Toni Russell argued that Ketanji Brown Jackson cannot uphold the Constitution if she believes it is racist.www.breitbart.com
Obviously, you can't read or you deny the truth about this liberal hack being a liberal loser yourself. I've achieved far more than you have to the point where I am literally capitalizing on the mockery of your incompetence. I can tell you haven't done much in life plus it kills you when someone like me calls your kind out for as such. Because I am also calling YOU out all the same.You just name call and provide nothing.
I just don't agree that someone that graduated from Harvard and is a federal judge is a disgrace. That’s a great accomplishment. I wouldn't care if they are Republican or Democrat.
I hate Trump but the man graduated from Penn and become President. That’s a great accomplishment.
What the hell you accomplished in your life?
And another thing, does one graduate from Harvard in a political/legal field to allow pedophiles to get off the hook that easily?You just name call and provide nothing.
I just don't agree that someone that graduated from Harvard and is a federal judge is a disgrace. That’s a great accomplishment. I wouldn't care if they are Republican or Democrat.
I hate Trump but the man graduated from Penn and become President. That’s a great accomplishment.
What the hell you accomplished in your life?
Well I said that one democrat withheld information. I didn't say the other stuff, so I'm right but wrong on something I never said. Wtf are you talking about. Drunk?
Well they do not TOTALLY make chit up like you socialists do. I mean..RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA, Kavanaugh's improper touching all lies. And since many on the left have ZERO problems with child porn....I can see why you think not giving child porn criminals proper sentencing is a big deal.I admit I haven’t been following the confirmation hearing. But based on fact that they going after the lengths of her prison sentences, the GOP oppositional researchers must have whiffed bigly trying to find any real dirt.
Again, we get it. You are OK with child porn criminals We are different..it is NOT Ok with us.I wouldn't call a Harvard graduate person who made it as a federal judge and now is up for the SCOTUS a disgrace. Whether you like her decisions or not, that woman is a great success in life and accomplished things that plenty of people dream of.
People like you let the politics make you sound stupid.
I would disagree because I look at FACTS(I will explain what a FACT is later) WE want judges that will do their jobs, and interpret the laws based on the Constitution of the United States. Your side wants judges that will use liberal agendas of what you all THINK the law should be. We are VERY different than you losersdon't believe the last 3 were either. Party in power usually have the last say while the party not just bitches and bitches.
I said the one democrat and you laugh as if i was inaccurate. Looking for reasons to complain, I guess.No, were you drunk?
I never said that you said it. I freaking said it. Good Lord man.
@kalimgoodman lets his politics run his life. If this chick was nominated by Trump, he would have a laundry list of reasons why she wasn't qualified.Again, we get it. You are OK with child porn criminals We are different..it is NOT Ok with us.
In case you forgot, he has you on ignore. 🤣@kalimgoodman lets his politics run his life. If this chick was nominated by Trump, he would have a laundry list of reasons why she wasn't qualified.
Which he would be repeating from a libber blog.
For the rest of us, her views and rulings are disqualifying. Doesn't matter to us who nominated her and shouldn't matter to @kalimgoodman. Wrong is wrong.
If that's the case then @kalimgoodman won't mind me tagging him repeatedly.In case you forgot, he has you on ignore. 🤣
I said the one democrat and you laugh as if i was inaccurate. Looking for reasons to complain, I guess.
I will clear this up. KG said one democrat withheld information. That is all. Bama fan said yes, but other democrats knew this and are part of the problem. KG is claiming that Bamafan is accusing KG of saying that but that's not true. Bamafan is saying that those are his (Bama fan) own words, not that of KG. In actuality, Bamafan is accusing KG of inaccuracy for what KG DID NOT say which was that other democrats knew what Feinstein had done but KG paints a misleading picture that it's only one democrat.
I used to be a foreign language interpreter.
I was hoping I came close. I have been on several of those head banging failure to communicate exercises with him in the past only to walk away with the realization that he just didn't get the gist of the argument.I award you 1 million points. You may redeem them at your leisure.
"Feinstein has been a lightning rod for loud criticism from President Trump and quieter frustration from some fellow Democrats after she disclosed she received a letter in July from the woman that she did not share with Senate colleagues and federal law enforcement until last week"I will clear this up. KG said one democrat withheld information. That is all. Bama fan said yes, but other democrats knew this and are part of the problem. KG is claiming that Bamafan is accusing KG of saying that but that's not true. Bamafan is saying that those are his (Bama fan) own words, not that of KG. In actuality, Bamafan is accusing KG of inaccuracy for what KG DID NOT say which was that other democrats knew what Feinstein had done but KG paints a misleading picture that it's only one democrat.
I used to be a foreign language interpreter.
With @kalimgoodman it's all about deflecting from any information that makes dems look bad. Move the goalposts, lets talk about you, let's twist what you said, but the one thing we will NOT do is stay on topic.I will clear this up. KG said one democrat withheld information. That is all. Bama fan said yes, but other democrats knew this and are part of the problem. KG is claiming that Bamafan is accusing KG of saying that but that's not true. Bamafan is saying that those are his (Bama fan) own words, not that of KG. In actuality, Bamafan is accusing KG of inaccuracy for what KG DID NOT say which was that other democrats knew what Feinstein had done but KG paints a misleading picture that it's only one democrat.
I used to be a foreign language interpreter.
I was hoping I came close. I have been on several of those head banging failure to communicate exercises with him in the past only to walk away with the realization that he just didn't get the gist of the argument.
Next week I celebrate 20 years of retirement. My wife still asks if I need a job.You have a gift my friend. You'd probably make a good cop. Need a job? 😁
Isn't it just beyond the pale absurd? How can the leftist cucks here even defend their talking point marching orders? Just how effing stupid can they get? 😂
1) This guy is talking to himself,
NO, did you conveniently forget the make up of the Congress when the Trump nominees were elected? Sure you did.This confirmation hearing isn't going anything like the ones for Trump's nominees, is it?
They weren't elected, they were nominated and approved. And Congress didn't do it, the Senate did.NO, did you conveniently forget the make up of the Congress when the Trump nominees were elected? Sure you did.
Bamafan, this is why I don't bang my head dealing with him any more which is MY "why bother" back to him. He has a poor understanding of english composition. You see it in both his writing of contradictory ideas and just plain grammatical fracture.One democrat may have withheld a very specific truth during his hearing. MANY obscured or obfuscated the truth.
That's where I was going so yes, in that sense it was entirely inaccurate.