ADVERTISEMENT

SCOTUS Hearing

I admit I haven’t been following the confirmation hearing. But based on fact that they going after the lengths of her prison sentences, the GOP oppositional researchers must have whiffed bigly trying to find any real dirt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kalimgoodman
I admit I haven’t been following the confirmation hearing. But based on fact that they going after the lengths of her prison sentences, the GOP oppositional researchers must have whiffed bigly trying to find any real dirt.
This confirmation hearing isn't going anything like the ones for Trump's nominees, is it?
 
I admit I haven’t been following the confirmation hearing. But based on fact that they going after the lengths of her prison sentences, the GOP oppositional researchers must have whiffed bigly trying to find any real dirt.
That's because she really doesn't have anything bad. Her prison sentence is in line with plenty of Republican appointed judges too.

The hearing was pointless. It was full of Republican talking points, no creativity at all. Just CRT, trans, and pedophiles (Qanon). The main things the Republican party have been talking about since 2020. They used this platform to double down.
 
Why do leftists coddle pedophiles? Is that something independents support?
Did you fact check this?

In fact, three Republican-appointed judges served on the commission with Judge Jackson when the recommendations were released: Judge William H. Pryor Jr. of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, Judge Ricardo Hinojosa of the Southern District of Texas and Judge Dabney Friedrich, who was appointed to the District Court for the District of Columbia by President Donald J. Trump.

Judge Pryor told The New York Times that the panel’s recommendations were almost uniformly supported by its members.
 
That's because she really doesn't have anything bad. Her prison sentence is in line with plenty of Republican appointed judges too.

The hearing was pointless. It was full of Republican talking points, no creativity at all. Just CRT, trans, and pedophiles (Qanon). The main things the Republican party have been talking about since 2020. They used this platform to double down.
Have they started in on her High School year book yet? Are they down to brass tacks yet?

orly.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: BamaFan1137
I mean seriously Kal. How quickly they forget.
The way the one democrat held that info on Kavanaugh was not cool. It also wasn't cool that the Republicans didn't throughly investigate the situation. That hearing was a joke on both sides IMO.
 
The new "Stonewall Jackson." Our only hope is Manchin, Senema or both. And libs would burn their offices and homes down. In Manchin's case, they'd sink his DC houseboat. Truly embarrassing times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nail1988
That's because she really doesn't have anything bad. Her prison sentence is in line with plenty of Republican appointed judges too.

The hearing was pointless. It was full of Republican talking points, no creativity at all. Just CRT, trans, and pedophiles (Qanon). The main things the Republican party have been talking about since 2020. They used this platform to double down.
I guess you never watched ANY of the hearings for Repub nominees. This hearings is nothing compared to how Dems treat Repub nominees. She will be confirmed with a few Repubs (We all know which ones) voting for her.
 
I guess you never watched ANY of the hearings for Repub nominees. This hearings is nothing compared to how Dems treat Repub nominees. She will be confirmed with a few Repubs (We all know which ones) voting for her.
I never said the other's wasn't
 
Did you fact check this?

In fact, three Republican-appointed judges served on the commission with Judge Jackson when the recommendations were released: Judge William H. Pryor Jr. of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, Judge Ricardo Hinojosa of the Southern District of Texas and Judge Dabney Friedrich, who was appointed to the District Court for the District of Columbia by President Donald J. Trump.

Judge Pryor told The New York Times that the panel’s recommendations were almost uniformly supported by its members.
I could be wrong on this, but I thought they Repubs are pointing out the fact that she didn't follow the recommendations that you are talking about, she went light, and sometimes bigly.
 
I could be wrong on this, but I thought they Repubs are pointing out the fact that she didn't follow the recommendations that you are talking about, she went light, and sometimes bigly.
No, they are trying to point out one or two cases and focus on those. I get it, courts is now politically motivated but still. The dems do the same thing. This is why America politicians suck.
 
Why is she a disgrace and makes AA look terrible?
OMG....you ARE THAT DENSE! The writing is all over the place here! Soft on pedos, government overreach, doesn't know about her own gender......you know, if you had a smidget of common sense AND integrity you'd do yourself a favor and leave these boards. You are the protoypical, uniformed Democrat supporter.
 
I guess you never watched ANY of the hearings for Repub nominees. This hearings is nothing compared to how Dems treat Repub nominees. She will be confirmed with a few Repubs (We all know which ones) voting for her.
So because the pubs aren't making up shit about her like they did about Trump's nominees, there must not be anything wrong with her. 100% qualified.

The liberal mind is a scary thing. They can rationalize anything to themselves.
 
OMG....you ARE THAT DENSE! The writing is all over the place here! Soft on pedos, government overreach, doesn't know about her own gender......you know, if you had a smidget of common sense AND integrity you'd do yourself a favor and leave these boards. You are the protoypical, uniformed Democrat supporter.
I wouldn't call a Harvard graduate person who made it as a federal judge and now is up for the SCOTUS a disgrace. Whether you like her decisions or not, that woman is a great success in life and accomplished things that plenty of people dream of.

People like you let the politics make you sound stupid.
 
I wouldn't call a Harvard graduate person who made it as a federal judge and now is up for the SCOTUS a disgrace. Whether you like her decisions or not, that woman is a great success in life and accomplished things that plenty of people dream of.

People like you let the politics make you sound stupid.
And right on cue, you prove yourself to be a dunce in which you buy into these leftist frauds that the deep-state puts out there. Like AOC the bartender, Ilhan Omar the Somali illegal, not to mention this fraud POTUS Poopy Joe. What success is there in anything entailed in KBJ's track record?

People like you don't have a brain to function with.
 
So because the pubs aren't making up shit about her like they did about Trump's nominees, there must not be anything wrong with her. 100% qualified.

The liberal mind is a scary thing. They can rationalize anything to themselves.
After hearing about how she is basically refusing to answer questions or giving really dumb/smartass answers, she should be withdrwn from consideration. But we all know that will never happen. The Dems and MSM love her. All you heard on MSM was about how racist the Repubs have been.

Unbelievablly, even Manchine said he will vote for her. Not one single Dem will stand up and say enough of this garbage. She will get 50 Dem votes and probably about 5 or 6 Repubs. Romney and that whole bunch.
 
After hearing about how she is basically refusing to answer questions or giving really dumb/smartass answers, she should be withdrwn from consideration. But we all know that will never happen. The Dems and MSM love her. All you heard on MSM was about how racist the Repubs have been.

Unbelievablly, even Manchine said he will vote for her. Not one single Dem will stand up and say enough of this garbage. She will get 50 Dem votes and probably about 5 or 6 Repubs. Romney and that whole bunch.
Well they have to replace the previous liberal whack-job with another of their kind. They really want to pack the SCOTUS with more liberal pork anyways.
 
And right on cue, you prove yourself to be a dunce in which you buy into these leftist frauds that the deep-state puts out there. Like AOC the bartender, Ilhan Omar the Somali illegal, not to mention this fraud POTUS Poopy Joe. What success is there in anything entailed in KBJ's track record?

People like you don't have a brain to function with.
You just name call and provide nothing.

I just don't agree that someone that graduated from Harvard and is a federal judge is a disgrace. That’s a great accomplishment. I wouldn't care if they are Republican or Democrat.

I hate Trump but the man graduated from Penn and become President. That’s a great accomplishment.

What the hell you accomplished in your life?
 
  • Wow
Reactions: nail1988
This isn't true.

Look, I think she'll be confirmed (for better or for worse) but you are mischaracterizing the hell out of this...down party lines.

Odd for an independent.
I was wondering if you caught the inherent stupidity in these 2 conflicting sentences as said above. "The way the one democrat held that info on Kavanaugh was not cool. It also wasn't cool that the Republicans didn't throughly investigate the situation". So acknowledgment is made of Feinstein withholding for a week the charge against Kavanaugh as not cool. Ok, correct, but then in the next sentence criticizing the thoroughness of the Republican investigation. Did the person who wrote that ever consider the withholding of the information in the first place contributed to the thoroughness in the second place. So I'll ctiticize you for a crappy investigation even though I didn't even have the decency to provide you critical information to do a thorough investigation. Dumb.

Also, Ted Cruz had a chart showing more than one or two cases. The writer should be honest as he preaches to others all the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BamaFan1137
I was wondering if you caught the inherent stupidity in these 2 conflicting sentences as said above. "The way the one democrat held that info on Kavanaugh was not cool. It also wasn't cool that the Republicans didn't throughly investigate the situation". So acknowledgment is made of Feinstein withholding for a week the charge against Kavanaugh as not cool. Ok, correct, but then in the next sentence criticizing the thoroughness of the Republican investigation. Did the person who wrote that ever consider the withholding of the information in the first place contributed to the thoroughness in the second place. So I'll ctiticize you for a crappy investigation even though I didn't even have the decency to provide you critical information to do a thorough investigation. Dumb.

Also, Ted Cruz had a chart showing more than one or two cases. The writer should be honest as he preaches to others all the time.
No, but why bother.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT