😝😝😝
Hell, we don’t even do that in hospitals anymore. Although we still mandate the influenza vaccine, though if you don’t get it, they only make you wear a mask
Hell, we don’t even do that in hospitals anymore. Although we still mandate the influenza vaccine, though if you don’t get it, they only make you wear a mask
Completely untrue and unrelated, but whatever makes you happy brotherCrazy they would do it when the stats show that heart attacks are up 66% still in 2024 for people 44 and younger since the vaccine was rolled out. I would love to see a large study comparing the vaccinated and unvaccinated of previously healthy people having a heart attack at 44 and under to see what it shows. Without that the powers that be will try to claim its Covid and not the shots that caused it like many of their earlier lies.
My wife used to go in a room with the person giving her the shot(she did not really take the shot) and go "OUCH" real loud.Hell, we don’t even do that in hospitals anymore. Although we still mandate the influenza vaccine, though if you don’t get it, they only make you wear a mask
I love itMy wife used to go in a room with the person giving her the shot(she did not really take the shot) and go "OUCH" real loud.
So it’s not true?😝😝😝
Well, if it’s on the Internet, it must be true
😝😝😝
Completely untrue and unrelated, but whatever makes you happy brother
Covid vaccine does rarely cause myocarditis, which is usually self limiting, and of course, like any vaccine it can cause anaphylaxis and extremely rare cases of Gullian Barre
WTF mandates flu vaccines? WTF??? I haven't had the flu in 30 years. I'm good without them.Hell, we don’t even do that in hospitals anymore. Although we still mandate the influenza vaccine, though if you don’t get it, they only make you wear a mask
Around 3-4 years ago ITT, three posters made claims about this issue.
The first poster claimed to be a doctor, and claimed that the covid shots posed no risk to children.
Several posters here questioned that claim.
To attempt to support his claim, the first poster offered studies.
Several posters here continued to question.
At this point, a second poster emerged. He claimed to be a statistician who understood studies and maths. He verified that the first poster's studies were legit.
Still, several posters here continued to question.
Finally, a third poster emerged. This third poster claimed that the first two posters were experts who should be listened to, and the several posters continuing to question were exhibiting classic signs of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
Now we know thanks to real studies done and reported on by real doctors, that the three posters were completely wrong.
With a half point given to the third poster: He was correct that some posters were falling victim to The Dunning-Kruger effect. He just picked the wrong posters.