And clearly we see that on display every day on here from all these free thinkers like @GhostOfMatchesMalone and @jfegaly and @fatman76 and @kjfreeze Who are unwitting pawns ♟ to some of the very people and governments they claim to be against every day.
I actually had an 18-year-old die last year from Covid infection induced myocarditis and coronary vasculitis. One of the saddest things I ever had to do was talk to her dad after her death. She would likely be alive today and she live long enough to get a vaccine.
Definitely see the symptoms of it. If anyone is formulating their world views in such a way, my hope is that they, at least initially, start to incorporate opposing views in order to escape any echo chamber they are in. The individual has to be willing to challenge their own views, and that is psychologically painful for many.
Absolutely. As a medical community we need to be able to be more open minded towards things like ivermectin pending good research. I make that argument all the time here at the hospital system I work at
I think it's hilarious how threatened he is by anyone who has actually done their research on covid. A man who claims he has mastered his craft should welcome discussion, not run away throwing memes back at it.
Agree. I would like to see a full-court press on IVM research as well.
It does happen. Far too often. These are the most deadly 'vaccines' ever created.
Funny how conservatives (Reagan definition not Trump populists) rarely have to do that. For example I got J&J and still do not fully trust the mRNA vaxxes. I think masks are useful in certain situations. I believe GW has occurred and is influenced by man but it is not a crisis and will not be a crisis. It definitely does not warrant the onerous "solutions" proposed by the left and has really stalled for better than a decade.
I respect that. I generally do not discuss politics online, as it seems to make things worse (everybody gets mad and it becomes a waste of time). But you are right, not all conservatives (or liberals) are the same, nor do they all represent the extreme political and social ideologies that often get associated with their views. Many liberals are for border control and many conservatives are pro-vaccination, for example. But when arguing political ideas, insults are often based upon the opposing views' extremes, and not so much the norms.
Once again...you can't on one hand tell me VAERS isn't valid for tracking deaths because the reporting is suspect and there's no causation investigated, and then use VAERS data to prove the vaccine is safe for young people.
I haven't made any claims about VAERS.
I'm done. Too many times he responds like a petulant 12 YO. Intellectual dishonesty is something I have a very short fuse for. Combined with the awful things he said about unvaxxed a few months ago (which he tried to claim was a troll), it was just time to move on.
Not @'ing you, I'm talking about the CDC and other "studies" that are trying to push for vaxxing kids.
Understood. For my information, do you happen to have any of those studies (regarding kids)?
The question is how and I do not see that in the article.33 districts in Uttar Pradesh are now Covid-free: State govt
Overall, the state has a total of 199 active cases, while the positivity rate came down to less than 0.01 per cent.www.hindustantimes.com
Actually what we said was the reporting is not suspect, what we said is you cannot draw an association through reporting. You use the reporting to decide what you need to study to see if there is an association.
I don't know. I'm guessing it's either used as a prophylactic or upon onset of symptoms...but that is a key question.
Main one that has my triggers is the CDC version 76 posted yesterday.
I work with large data sets ("big data"). Data are almost always and inevitably flawed. That is a reality of life in the research world. The presence of flaws alone is not enough to dismiss analyses that result from imperfect data sets. The severity of the flaws, if known, is what has to be considered. So it is certainly possible to reach an actionable conclusion even with imperfect data. Handling data flaws correctly is a highly technical skill and there are many sufficient approaches in doing so. Ultimately, though, if the data are just that bad, then it is what it is.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
www.anticancer.news
plantmedicines.org
I know, no data set is ever perfect. But the historical reviews of VAERS indicate it's not even close to real. I'm not sure, but I think the normal reporting requirements are voluntary and EUA are required. Even then, it's hard to find anyone who supports its accuracy - you have to sign an agreement to that effect to even use the database.
I think this is why I put him on Ignore more than the cheerleading. There were massive red flags in several of the studies that he and internet doctor glowed about. Such as selectively pulling data from patients in 13 areas around the country, then drawing conclusions about the population as a whole. That's obvious propaganda, but they waved it away with 'no data set is perfect, let's not ignore the findings' LOL. If the findings come from corrupted data, yeah....you ignore them.
For sure, and like I said, I'm not referring to VAERS, just a general observation. I have seen some pretty consistent criticisms of it, so I don't think it is anything out of line. It isn't a database that I work with or use in my own research (and probably won't if it is problematic).
The people blindly pushing vaccines are our enemies.
April 4-June 19
Mandates are almost always bad. Counterproductive to tell people what to do rather than inform them and let them make the personal choice. It was highly predictable that Biden's mandate would backfire.
@fatman76 what is your takeaway from this article?More of the ‘as vaccinations go up so too will those hospitalized despite vaccination’ narrative.
Just part of the math someone has to do. I get why, but it also points to flaws in how we’re trying to prevent the illness from this virus. Maybe if we did more with treatments and prophylactics…
Covid: 54% of hospital patients with virus are fully vaccinated
Rising proportion of vaccinated people in hospital reflects greater numbers in population getting vaccineswww.irishtimes.com
