Plus he only prays for the families of the vocal public anti vaxxers who die.
He ignores those who have taken the shot and die.
Doesn’t align with his narrative I guess.
Proprietary COVID-19 and Vaccine thread
- Thread starter FresnoGator
- Start date
He ignores those who have taken the shot and die.
Doesn’t align with his narrative I guess.
Had an interesting conversation with a nurse friend of mine, I hadn’t talked to her since Covid started.
She’s pro vaxx and is about to get her booster - just so you know where she’s coming from. She was one of the first.
I noticed our shitty local paper wasn’t listing the percentages of unvaxxed in the hospital anymore. They had a graph as an attempt to get people to take the shot. Valley Health was the reporting agency here in the Shen Valley.
Turns out they stopped Sept 1. That update 37% of the hospitalized were vaxxed. Now I’m sure they did better once there than the unvaxxed, but it’s more mushroom treatment. We aren’t trusted with the truth.
She’s pro vaxx and is about to get her booster - just so you know where she’s coming from. She was one of the first.
I noticed our shitty local paper wasn’t listing the percentages of unvaxxed in the hospital anymore. They had a graph as an attempt to get people to take the shot. Valley Health was the reporting agency here in the Shen Valley.
Turns out they stopped Sept 1. That update 37% of the hospitalized were vaxxed. Now I’m sure they did better once there than the unvaxxed, but it’s more mushroom treatment. We aren’t trusted with the truth.
Makes it all the more believable they can’t share his name.
I just think we all expect more from someone in your profession.
You have excellent examples on this board and you refuse to follow them.
Numero Cincuenta is in a category along with BS Cuck, and Kalim. Nothing more than trolls. It is what it is.
Serious question - where did you find data on people dying as a result of the vaccine? I can find incidents of people dying who have been vaccinated (from various causes), but correlation does not imply causation. Curious about this.
I posted an article from Mass where a hospital reported that 106 vaccinated people died of Covid through July. It was just a compare/contrast with the anecdotes Rere shared of an old anti vaxxer and an obese anti vaxxer who passed from Reddit.
If you want I can pull some individual reports from VAERS where the medical personnel reported the cause if you want. It’s fairly simple.
Not trying to put you out. I can look through VAERS. I thought there might be some data about the vaccine causing deaths. I remember the blood clotting issue with J&J, but I haven't seen any incidents of deaths and thought I was missing something. If you come across any, let me know.
I had to use DuckDuckGo because Google censors, but this is the easiest way I’ve found to look through it.
Sort ages 12-18. Some really sad stories.
All COVID Reports - OpenVAERS
openvaers.com
I use DuckDuckGo for everything. I'll check that out.I had to use DuckDuckGo because Google censors, but this is the easiest way I’ve found to look through it.
Sort ages 12-18. Some really sad stories.
All COVID Reports - OpenVAERS
Of course. I think the key medical question is whether they would have likely lived if they had not contracted COVID. The comorbidities obviously render them susceptible COVID. It is clearly a multivariable situation, as we are dealing with complex biology that is well outside of my expertise.
I can tell you of one for sure happened to a family we know. The wife of a government official took the vaccine without having covid and within days was on a ventilator and within a month died. Was perfectly healthy.
What you need to understand is how the government of the USA who seems to just now be concerned about your health are not in it for that reason but for another. From the looks of this POS faux president, I'd say it is his concern to squash America and put in the Great Reset asap. Follow along sheeple and let's do this healthy thing. Oh, and if you can follow along with climate change and handing over your guns, it'll go a lot faster. What next great thing are they going to roll out for our pleasure once the hoax of vaccines and masks and covid lose their intended value (which they certainly are except for those sheeple who believe it.)
Yeah but the real question is how many of those people would’ve died this year from their comorbidities and they not gotten Covid. And the reality is the vast majority of them would have not died this year, well over 90% would be a good estimate. Not to mention all the much younger healthier people that are dying this go around. I mean how many 25 year old people die just because they’re fat? And the answer is very few. How many 25 year old people die because they’re fat and they get Covid and the answer is quite a few more.
So what’s the blame in that case? Clearly, the answer to me, is the Covid because they weren’t gonna die at 25 just from being fat.
I'm not positive, but I think that was debunked as being fake.
This is a perfect one that makes me distrustful of anyone claiming “zero” deaths. The reporter wonders aloud in the report how he’s supposed to determine the vaccine caused the sudden death. Feels like claiming no one has died is hiding behind the extremely complex reaction a medical treatment like these vaccines can create.
1114558 - All COVID Reports - OpenVAERS
openvaers.com
Description
Death sudden; This is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer. A 41-year-old male patient received BNT162B2 (PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE), the first dose on 18Jan2021 and the second dose on 06Feb2021, both via an unspecified route of administration at single dose for COVID-19 immunisation. Medical history included epilepsy (controlled). No allergies to medications, food, or other products. Concomitant medication included valproate sodium (DEPAKENE [VALPROATE SODIUM]). The patient experienced death sudden on 02Mar2021. The patient died on 02Mar2021. The event required a visit to the emergency room. An autopsy was performed. Reporter stated that: "I want to report that 3 weeks after receiving the second vaccination a healthy 41 year old male passed away suddenly last week. A post mortem is currently being carried out but this needs to be reported and logged as I am not sure how a post mortem would see if the vaccine had any impact on his death". Prior to vaccination, the patient was not diagnosed with COVID-19 and since the vaccination, the patient has not been tested for COVID-19. The information on the Lot / Batch number has been requested.; Reported Cause(s) of Death: Death sudden
Oh here we go with my best friends sister‘s cousin knows a guy that happen to get a shot and two weeks later he died so there’s your evidence
🙄🙄🙄
DuckDuckGo is actually pretty interesting. Google something controversial and then search the same on DDG. It’s shocking what Google does to search results.
I'm pretty sure the 'zero' claim is another example of him posting false medical information in an attempt to 'get a rise' out of posters here.This is a perfect one that makes me distrustful of anyone claiming “zero” deaths. The reporter wonders aloud in the report how he’s supposed to determine the vaccine caused the sudden death. Feels like claiming no one has died is hiding behind the extremely complex reaction a medical treatment like these vaccines can create.
1114558 - All COVID Reports - OpenVAERS
Description
Death sudden; This is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer. A 41-year-old male patient received BNT162B2 (PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE), the first dose on 18Jan2021 and the second dose on 06Feb2021, both via an unspecified route of administration at single dose for COVID-19 immunisation. Medical history included epilepsy (controlled). No allergies to medications, food, or other products. Concomitant medication included valproate sodium (DEPAKENE [VALPROATE SODIUM]). The patient experienced death sudden on 02Mar2021. The patient died on 02Mar2021. The event required a visit to the emergency room. An autopsy was performed. Reporter stated that: "I want to report that 3 weeks after receiving the second vaccination a healthy 41 year old male passed away suddenly last week. A post mortem is currently being carried out but this needs to be reported and logged as I am not sure how a post mortem would see if the vaccine had any impact on his death". Prior to vaccination, the patient was not diagnosed with COVID-19 and since the vaccination, the patient has not been tested for COVID-19. The information on the Lot / Batch number has been requested.; Reported Cause(s) of Death: Death sudden
There's no way he believes that.
That and news, Google does indeed manipulate results.
It sucks too, cause their UI is vastly superior to DDG's. But as you said, anything controversial, go with DDG or the results will be heavily censored.
It would be like trying to get the truth about covid by talking to internet doctors.
So what’s an autopsy going to show/look for in a sudden unexplained death after a vaccine?
Cause of death. There would be some adverse reaction to the vaccine that would presumably leave a trace.
Like I said earlier, politicization causes polarization...
The effects of political affiliation on vaccine hesitancy:
journals.plos.org
"The most commonly checked news source for Republicans was Fox News (Republicans: 50%, Democrats: 8%; χ2 = 164.55, p < .001) and for Democrats was CNN (Democrats: 47%, Republicans: 23%, χ2 = 43.08, p < .001, see S6 Table)."
Besides having two different belief systems, it is obvious that the two groups also consume vastly different information.
The χ2 is the notation for a chi-square test, which is to detect if there is a statistically significant difference between the expected proportional outcome (theoretical proportion) and actual proportions. The p < .001 is the p-value, or loosely the probability that the results of the study were a random effect. Of note, statistical significance is usually applied to a cutoff (known as alpha level) of 0.05. P-values less than this are generally considered statistically significant. While I don't agree wholeheartedly with this, it is standard practice.
The effects of political affiliation on vaccine hesitancy:
COVID-19 and vaccine hesitancy: A longitudinal study
How do attitudes toward vaccination change over the course of a public health crisis? We report results from a longitudinal survey of United States residents during six months (March 16 –August 16, 2020) of the COVID-19 pandemic. Contrary to past research suggesting that the increased salience...
"The most commonly checked news source for Republicans was Fox News (Republicans: 50%, Democrats: 8%; χ2 = 164.55, p < .001) and for Democrats was CNN (Democrats: 47%, Republicans: 23%, χ2 = 43.08, p < .001, see S6 Table)."
Besides having two different belief systems, it is obvious that the two groups also consume vastly different information.
The χ2 is the notation for a chi-square test, which is to detect if there is a statistically significant difference between the expected proportional outcome (theoretical proportion) and actual proportions. The p < .001 is the p-value, or loosely the probability that the results of the study were a random effect. Of note, statistical significance is usually applied to a cutoff (known as alpha level) of 0.05. P-values less than this are generally considered statistically significant. While I don't agree wholeheartedly with this, it is standard practice.
TENSE EXCHANGE: Nicki Minaj fires back at MSNBC host over COVID vaccine scolding
Rap superstar Nicki Minaj fired back at MSNBC host Joy Reid over the scolding she received for expressing skepticism toward the coronavirus vaccine.
This is an extremely important research topic. The results of the study clearly indicate that what was once normally expect it before the 24 hour news cycle, that the severity of a health crisis or pandemic would directly impact the willingness of people to receive a vaccine was proven to be wrong in this case. In fact as the pandemic became more severe this time fewer and fewer people were willing to take a vaccine when it became available according to the study.Like I said earlier, politicization causes polarization...
The effects of political affiliation on vaccine hesitancy:
COVID-19 and vaccine hesitancy: A longitudinal study
How do attitudes toward vaccination change over the course of a public health crisis? We report results from a longitudinal survey of United States residents during six months (March 16 –August 16, 2020) of the COVID-19 pandemic. Contrary to past research suggesting that the increased salience...
"The most commonly checked news source for Republicans was Fox News (Republicans: 50%, Democrats: 8%; χ2 = 164.55, p < .001) and for Democrats was CNN (Democrats: 47%, Republicans: 23%, χ2 = 43.08, p < .001, see S6 Table)."
Besides having two different belief systems, it is obvious that the two groups also consume vastly different information.
The χ2 is the notation for a chi-square test, which is to detect if there is a statistically significant difference between the expected proportional outcome (theoretical proportion) and actual proportions. The p < .001 is the p-value, or loosely the probability that the results of the study were a random effect. Of note, statistical significance is usually applied to a cutoff (known as alpha level) of 0.05. P-values less than this are generally considered statistically significant. While I don't agree wholeheartedly with this, it is standard practice.
The question becomes why, and clearly the implications of this study is because of miss information regarding potential vaccines being pushed in the 24 hour news cycle narrative largely along political lines. Clear evidence of the politicization of the Covid pandemic. Even more important, clear evidence of the impact misinformation has on the publics willingness to get vaccinated during a health crisis.
The low P values on the chi-square test indicate a strong likelihood of clinical significance to the Siri that Miss information lessons the publics willingness to receive a vaccination that could save their lives. Simply put, lying to the public lead to unnecessary deaths. The risk of the 24 hour ratings targeted New cycle in full display.
@testy524 @Tmi512 @dingyibvs @G8trDad3Like I said earlier, politicization causes polarization...
The effects of political affiliation on vaccine hesitancy:
COVID-19 and vaccine hesitancy: A longitudinal study
How do attitudes toward vaccination change over the course of a public health crisis? We report results from a longitudinal survey of United States residents during six months (March 16 –August 16, 2020) of the COVID-19 pandemic. Contrary to past research suggesting that the increased salience...
"The most commonly checked news source for Republicans was Fox News (Republicans: 50%, Democrats: 8%; χ2 = 164.55, p < .001) and for Democrats was CNN (Democrats: 47%, Republicans: 23%, χ2 = 43.08, p < .001, see S6 Table)."
Besides having two different belief systems, it is obvious that the two groups also consume vastly different information.
The χ2 is the notation for a chi-square test, which is to detect if there is a statistically significant difference between the expected proportional outcome (theoretical proportion) and actual proportions. The p < .001 is the p-value, or loosely the probability that the results of the study were a random effect. Of note, statistical significance is usually applied to a cutoff (known as alpha level) of 0.05. P-values less than this are generally considered statistically significant. While I don't agree wholeheartedly with this, it is standard practice.
Tagging you guys because of the importance of this article, thought it might help y’all at your local levels
For @fatman76 @jfegaly @kjfreeze
While clearly this is something we all knew and suspected, what does research article does is it takes something that we think is obvious and approves that it’s true in this case. Sometimes medical research or scientific research take something that we assume it’s obvious and then proves it to be wrong. Both are equally important..
Furthermore, there is a lot of foreign based disinformation (which is different from misinformation because disinformation is intentionally spreading false information whereas misinformation is spreading false information when you think it is true). The foreign aspect has arisen significantly in my own research. It is a bigger problem than people realize.
And it’s a way to target Americans for various unsavory reasons and to manipulate Americans into thinking the way they want you to think as opposed to going and finding the best actual medical evidence on a topic like this and then making your own informed decision with your doctor. Sometimes you guys don’t realize who’s pulling your strings with all these tweets
Exactly, but if people realized it they wouldn’t fall for it and they don’t target true freethinkers, just the ones that think they are free thinkers
Similar threads
