ADVERTISEMENT

Proprietary COVID-19 and Vaccine thread



So covid patients who have recovered are still counted as covid patients.

So hospitals are intentionally inflating the number of covid patients in order to 'scare' the public into getting the shot.

You don't say...
 
  • Angry
Reactions: fatman76


So covid patients who have recovered are still counted as covid patients.

So hospitals are intentionally inflating the number of covid patients in order to 'scare' the public into getting the shot.

You don't say...
I know this will fall on deaf ears but that’s a semantics argument. If somebody was hospitalized for Covid they remain a Covid patient until they’re discharged from the hospital. Just like if somebody was hospitalized for myocardial infarction they remain MI patient for that hospitalization until they are discharged.

We call them Covid 90s but basically these are covered patients that survived the initial infection that are no longer infectious and starting a very slow long process of recovery.

They will forever be considered Covid patients, long Covid or Covid survivors or whatever you wanna college, but if their next admission they will be admitted for that problem and not Covid. And that’s when you no longer count them them

But don’t let that stand in the way of a good tweet
 
Just leave it up to people to make an informed decision, but the information has to be excellent in order to be fair.
The information we have on the vaccine risk profile long term is non existent.

We know short term there are some inflammation issues in a small % young people.

It seems like efficacy wanes.

The deaths by age are very well documented and don’t control for comorbidities. The numbers are extremely low.
 


So covid patients who have recovered are still counted as covid patients.

So hospitals are intentionally inflating the number of covid patients in order to 'scare' the public into getting the shot.

You don't say...
BTW, could we say this was a case of a hospital official admitting in private that they are going to intentionally misrepresent covid information in order to try to get a 'rise' out of people?
 
The information we have on the vaccine risk profile long term is non existent.

We know short term there are some inflammation issues in a small % young people.

It seems like efficacy wanes.

The deaths by age are very well documented and don’t control for comorbidities. The numbers are extremely low.
Long term obviously requires more time. It isn't through any fault or shortcoming that we don't have a long term profile, it is simply because the problem, COVID in its current form, is relatively new and therefore the solution to that problem is also new.
Why do you say the death do not control for comorbidities? I've seen studies where these are clearly outlined.
Here is one recent one I found:


What numbers are extremely low?
 
  • Like
Reactions: gator1776
Long term obviously requires more time. It isn't through any fault or shortcoming that we don't have a long term profile, it is simply because the problem, COVID in its current form, is relatively new and therefore the solution to that problem is also new.
Why do you say the death do not control for comorbidities? I've seen studies where these are clearly outlined.
Here is one recent one I found:


What numbers are extremely low?
I’m also still trying to figure out where @fatman76 Gets a 99.98% survival rate because that’s not what the numbers show.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SORT14
Was it? Then the hurricane excuse is null and void?

Oops.
Agreed, I had no idea I assumed because of your post that was played in New Orleans. So what point were you actually trying to make then if it was played in Jacksonville?
Can’t wait to see how you spend this one, lol.
 


Saints home opener.

Average home attendance in 2019 for the Saints was 73k. So requiring shots is costing them over half their attendance.

Good.

So now that we have established the game was in Jacksonville, lol, what point were you actually trying to make? That’s pretty amazing attendance for a game moved at the last second three states away over 600 miles away.
 
Was it? Then the hurricane excuse is null and void?

Oops.
You mean aside from the fact that they had to move the game to Jacksonville Florida because of the hurricane? Yeah, aside from that small fact the “hurricane excuse” for the Saints home opener attendance is null and void.
 


How does 'vaccinating' the 'unvaccinated' protect those who have already gotten the shot? So she's admitting the shot is worthless?

Notice the wording and goal: Protect the 'vaccinated'. If you are dumb enough to not get the shot, you don't deserve protection.

The 'us vs them' positioning from our government, the media is truly evil. Notice it's starting to get picked up by the shot cheerleaders.

This was never about covid.
 

According to VAERS Website:​

The US Is Averaging 70 Deaths per Day Due to COVID Vaccine Since July 24th — Or 3,296 COVID Total Vaccine Deaths​

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...-total-vaccine-deaths-recorded-vaers-website/

https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html

Hmmm..... Guess this doesn't make headline news or finds it way to the biased stat machine reporter: @gator1776
And now we have proof that hospital officials are attempting to inflate covid case numbers.

It's almost like this whole thing is a big scam.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kjfreeze


Fauci has said boosters are needed every 3-5 months.

Which internet doctor do you believe???

PS: More proof in a tweet. Just to anger shot cheerleaders that really don't care about the tweets, they just hate the truth getting out.
 

According to VAERS Website:​

The US Is Averaging 70 Deaths per Day Due to COVID Vaccine Since July 24th — Or 3,296 COVID Total Vaccine Deaths​

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...-total-vaccine-deaths-recorded-vaers-website/

https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html

Hmmm..... Guess this doesn't make headline news or finds it way to the biased stat machine reporter: @gator1776
Dude we’ve covered this like 15 times. How many times do you need me to keep pointing out to you there is no causation proven in VARES reporting. We even went through a wonderfully eloquent mathematical discussion about this showing to you that the death rate is not impacted by nor has a relation to vaccinations, it is not effected at all by the vaccination itself, and all you have to do is look at the data closely yourself and you would see it. But I guess it’s more fun to post articles that don’t pay attention to the data but have outrageous conspiracy theory headlines for click bait, so if you want to be obstinate, so be it.
 
Long term obviously requires more time. It isn't through any fault or shortcoming that we don't have a long term profile, it is simply because the problem, COVID in its current form, is relatively new and therefore the solution to that problem is also new.
Why do you say the death do not control for comorbidities? I've seen studies where these are clearly outlined.
Here is one recent one I found:


What numbers are extremely low?

412 lost between the ages of 0-17, that number is extremely low. That 412 number doesn't tell us how many of those kids were already very sick or had other significant risk factors (or where not killed by Covid but had it when they died).

Given the lack of ability to provide truly informed consent, along with the risk profile for kids, it's insane to even talk about mandates for kids IMO. The CFR is 0.0094%. The IFR is most certainly much lower.

I'm just not going to turn my sons into a spike protein-producing machines to save them from something they have a better than 99.9907% chance of beating. Playing Lacrosse is probably more dangerous to them than Covid.

Vax the most at risk. Let the rest develop their own vaccines. We may find out those antibodies are better anyway.

 
  • Like
Reactions: SORT14
412 lost between the ages of 0-17, that number is extremely low. That 412 number doesn't tell us how many of those kids were already very sick or had other significant risk factors (or where not killed by Covid but had it when they died).

Given the lack of ability to provide truly informed consent, along with the risk profile for kids, it's insane to even talk about mandates for kids IMO. The CFR is 0.0094%. The IFR is most certainly much lower.

I'm just not going to turn my sons into a spike protein-producing machines to save them from something they have a better than 99.9907% chance of beating. Playing Lacrosse is probably more dangerous to them than Covid.

Vax the most at risk. Let the rest develop their own vaccines. We may find out those antibodies are better anyway.

Thanks. I'll check this out a little later today or tomorrow morning. Appreciate you sharing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
Dude we’ve covered this like 15 times. How many times do you need me to keep pointing out to you there is no causation proven in VARES reporting. We even went through a wonderfully eloquent mathematical discussion about this showing to you that the death rate is not impacted by nor has a relation to vaccinations, it is not effected at all by the vaccination itself, and all you have to do is look at the data closely yourself and you would see it. But I guess it’s more fun to post articles that don’t pay attention to the data but have outrageous conspiracy theory headlines for click bait, so if you want to be obstinate, so be it.
Oh, okay. Wow. Like Dude. Like you really convinced me. Like this VARES stuff on the CDC website means nothing. BUT they do put on their website a biased, descriptive, underlined word to suggest it bogus: unverified. That makes it alright and automatically suggests all that data is unverified and unnecessary because we have a vaccine that has been pushed upon the public so fast (never in history has one been done so quickly) to save so many lives. May we all thank God for the government of the USA for distributing such a life-saving concoction. Oh, hey, I have on a daily basis patient after patient telling me stories of unverified suffering of symptoms and deaths from the vaccine. Oops, let me rephrase that this way: They didn't have symptoms before the vaccine and a couple have died since taking the vaccine, but let's not say it was the vaccine, okay? Why? Because YOU say it's all fine.
 
I’m also still trying to figure out where @fatman76 Gets a 99.98% survival rate because that’s not what the numbers show.
My post was about vaxxing kids. You're right, I was pretty far off.

The actual CFR for ages 0-17 is 99.9907%. IFR is, as I'm sure you'll agree, much lower.

Using John's Hopkins map - we've had 40.9MM cases and 659k deaths. That's a 98.39% CFR. Again, we all know that we don't catch every case. So it's likely at least a little better than 98.4%.
 
412 lost between the ages of 0-17, that number is extremely low. That 412 number doesn't tell us how many of those kids were already very sick or had other significant risk factors (or where not killed by Covid but had it when they died).

Given the lack of ability to provide truly informed consent, along with the risk profile for kids, it's insane to even talk about mandates for kids IMO. The CFR is 0.0094%. The IFR is most certainly much lower.

I'm just not going to turn my sons into a spike protein-producing machines to save them from something they have a better than 99.9907% chance of beating. Playing Lacrosse is probably more dangerous to them than Covid.

Vax the most at risk. Let the rest develop their own vaccines. We may find out those antibodies are better anyway.

Interesting follow-up to that, even though we seen a massive increase in the number of Covid cases the last two months the ratios of bad outcomes my age has remain the same as it was before so it is still extremely unlikely to kill anybody below the age of 20, but it has happened..
To more than reasonable discussion to say that people below certain age may not need the vaccine, we said it before, and I think now that we’ve reached close to hurt immunity it could be said again. I would definitely push it for anybody 25 and above though
 
Oh, okay. Wow. Like Dude. Like you really convinced me. Like this VARES stuff on the CDC website means nothing. BUT they do put on their website a biased, descriptive, underlined word to suggest it bogus: unverified. That makes it alright and automatically suggests all that data is unverified and unnecessary because we have a vaccine that has been pushed upon the public so fast (never in history has one been done so quickly) to save so many lives. May we all thank God for the government of the USA for distributing such a life-saving concoction. Oh, hey, I have on a daily basis patient after patient telling me stories of unverified suffering of symptoms and deaths from the vaccine. Oops, let me rephrase that this way: They didn't have symptoms before the vaccine and a couple have died since taking the vaccine, but let's not say it was the vaccine, okay? Why? Because YOU say it's all fine.
NIH and CDC are two sources that are either 100% accurate or 100% wrong according to him, based solely on whether or not he likes what data they are sharing at any moment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kjfreeze
My post was about vaxxing kids. You're right, I was pretty far off.

The actual CFR for ages 0-17 is 99.9907%. IFR is, as I'm sure you'll agree, much lower.

Using John's Hopkins map - we've had 40.9MM cases and 659k deaths. That's a 98.39% CFR. Again, we all know that we don't catch every case. So it's likely at least a little better than 98.4%.
Yeah I figured out that was the point you were making after the fact. Sorry I missed it first. See my response above I’m inclined to agree with you on this.
 
Oh, okay. Wow. Like Dude. Like you really convinced me. Like this VARES stuff on the CDC website means nothing. BUT they do put on their website a biased, descriptive, underlined word to suggest it bogus: unverified. That makes it alright and automatically suggests all that data is unverified and unnecessary because we have a vaccine that has been pushed upon the public so fast (never in history has one been done so quickly) to save so many lives. May we all thank God for the government of the USA for distributing such a life-saving concoction. Oh, hey, I have on a daily basis patient after patient telling me stories of unverified suffering of symptoms and deaths from the vaccine. Oops, let me rephrase that this way: They didn't have symptoms before the vaccine and a couple have died since taking the vaccine, but let's not say it was the vaccine, okay? Why? Because YOU say it's all fine.
I'm just not going to listen to anyone who says the vaccine has killed 0 people.

VAERS is unfortunately all we have. That fact by itself should make someone who questions things suspicious.
 
I'm just not going to listen to anyone who says the vaccine has killed 0 people.

VAERS is unfortunately all we have. That fact by itself should make someone who questions things suspicious.
The vaccine has killed zero people 🤣🤣
 


Read these back to back. Note my post above citing a CFR of 0.0094% for 0-17. Note: 412 deaths is all ages from 0-17. They won't tell us what the data are for ages 5-11. Just shut up and give the damn kids the shot?

@GhostOfMatchesMalone - has any of this been about Covid? Seems like money is somehow involved, but I am way too undereducated to sift through all of this confusing information.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jfegaly
YICm3WS.jpeg


viHr435.jpeg


DhP1HLM.jpeg


QtTMLuN.jpeg


GZa0fBe.jpeg


pAPZjFJ.jpeg


zVhiHuV.jpeg


4bO1rzn.jpeg



Jn3HC6n.jpeg


sl6xClA.jpeg


EJK39xO.jpeg


SVOEsy7.jpeg


JqlSFuF.jpeg
 
  • Sad
Reactions: gator1776
From Reddit:
w0ngcl13ipk71.jpg


brxqyg13ipk71.jpg


yurfuf13ipk71.jpg


37r2yg13ipk71.jpg


ks856h13ipk71.jpg


q573hk13ipk71.jpg


pj1x4j13ipk71.jpg


eogwqk13ipk71.jpg


6i4d9q13ipk71.jpg



nk8kyj13ipk71.jpg


llu2zr13ipk71.jpg


a7c9tk13ipk71.jpg
Props on spending half your day to tell us old guys and fat guys are Covid risks.

Now, I wonder if we could find an old fat guy who beat Covid. Oh yeah, my 76YO dad who's had a heart attack, two stents, and an aortic valve replacement...he's prediabetic, overweight and sedentary. He felt flu like for three days and was fine.

Point is, anecdotes are just that.
 
From Reddit:
w0ngcl13ipk71.jpg


brxqyg13ipk71.jpg


yurfuf13ipk71.jpg


37r2yg13ipk71.jpg


ks856h13ipk71.jpg


q573hk13ipk71.jpg


pj1x4j13ipk71.jpg


eogwqk13ipk71.jpg


6i4d9q13ipk71.jpg



nk8kyj13ipk71.jpg


llu2zr13ipk71.jpg


a7c9tk13ipk71.jpg
Here, 106 anecdotes. You better get to work on Facebook buddy. This is going to take you all week.

 
Here, 106 anecdotes. You better get to work on Facebook buddy. This is going to take you all week.

Can an internet doctor explain to me how someone who is 'vaccinated' against a virus can DIE from that virus?

Talk to me like I am @Uniformed_ReRe
 


Read these back to back. Note my post above citing a CFR of 0.0094% for 0-17. Note: 412 deaths is all ages from 0-17. They won't tell us what the data are for ages 5-11. Just shut up and give the damn kids the shot?

@GhostOfMatchesMalone - has any of this been about Covid? Seems like money is somehow involved, but I am way too undereducated to sift through all of this confusing information.
Maybe @gator1776 can give us an update on how he's getting rich pushing vaccines.

@Uniformed_ReRe Likes blindly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
Gut-wrenching. Hopefully more people will take stories like this seriously and get their obesity under control.

Do we know what state treated him?

Let me rephrase: Was it MS, AL or LA?

Apparently Numero cincuenta is ok with certain types of social media. Sort of reminds me of when he said “he never listens to the NIH” when he was arguing there were no treatments for covid. Then a couple weeks later links to the NIH to support his take on vaccines.

Good ol’ Numero Cincuenta. Add hypocrisy to his list of credits
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT