You do know states were still counting in 2016 into the next days. When Obama won in 2012, they were still counting votes too. Shit, we was declared winner of FL for days. So your claim that this isn't normal is truly inaccurate but you'll find a way to please your ego.
We? I thought you were an independent. Come to find out, there is a WE in Democrat.
No. States like Michigan or Wisconsin were still being contested, by that independent whore whose name I can't remember. (Stein?) Funny, they recounted again, and Trump extended his lead.
and that would be a distinct possibility, so some may need to go to a different state in a worst case scenario ...
There is no FNG. They are just retreads of the same bunch that got hoodwinked into coming here because the tooth fairy told them Kap would be a starter this year.
AGAIN, when the FBUI is used to overthrow an election, failed..and got caught...YES, we look at things like this. Wouldnt you, or not smart enough? Very serious question
I would only look where Dim governors and mayors are in charge, because of their low character
No...no they do not. Remember we are dealing with the underprivilegedYou really are lowering your bar here. I'm embarrassed for you. Do even have an inkling of how electoral votes affect an election?
Seems like one of the VERY slow needs a dictionary to look up the meaning of that word "corruption" and come back and try again. You seem like you are afraid your gender may be forced on you when Trump wins in 2024https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/06/mat...s-poison-our-respect-for-fellow-citizens.html
Mattis blames Trump for violence at Capitol, says his actions ‘poison our respect for fellow citizens’
PUBLISHED WED, JAN 6 20218:03 PM ESTUPDATED WED, JAN 6 20218:30 PM EST
- Former Secretary of Defense James Mattis placed the blame squarely on President Donald Trump for the riot that ensued at the U.S. Capitol.
- Mattis, who served as Trump’s first defense secretary, said the president has used the nation’s highest role in government to “destroy trust in our election and to poison our respect for fellow citizens.”
https://www.businessinsider.com/joh...gone-to-the-capitol-on-january-6-book-2021-11
Ex-chief of staff John Kelly said if Trump was a 'real man' he would've gone to the Capitol on January 6 to stop the rioters: book
Oma Seddiq and John Haltiwanger
Nov 15, 2021, 9:17 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/12/top...rection-at-capitol-acknowledge-biden-win.html
Top military leaders condemn ‘sedition and insurrection’ at Capitol, acknowledge Biden win
PUBLISHED TUE, JAN 12 20214:17 PM ESTUPDATED TUE, JAN 12 20216:56 PM EST
Amanda Macias@AMANDA_M_MACIAS
SHARE
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/20...als-endorse-biden-including-some-who-n1240842
More than 200 retired generals, admirals endorse Biden, including some who served under Trump
"Our allies no longer trust or respect us, and our enemies no longer fear us," the former officers and officials wrote in a letter released Thursday.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/202...s-as-pussies-they-saw-him-as-completely-unfit
TRUMP SAW HIS GENERALS AS “PUSSIES.” THEY SAW HIM AS COMPLETELY UNFIT
Meanwhile, the president told Bob Woodward how he was instantly drawn to North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un.
Indeed, in excerpts published by the New York Times and Washington Post, Woodward captures Trump’s dislike for military officials and his impulsive, personality-driven approach to foreign policy—and officials’ concerns about his leadership. In one episode, Trump rails against military leaders for putting allies over his hardline negotiation strategy. “My ****ing generals are a bunch of pussies,” Trump told trade adviser Peter Navarro in 2017, per Woodward. “They care more about their alliances than they do about trade deals.” Among the allies he scorned? South Korea, which is “[allowed] to exist” only because of United States protection.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...s-and-why-the-feeling-is-mutual-idUSKCN26E2YV
How Trump fell out of love with his generals, and why the feeling is mutual
By Phil Stewart, Idrees Ali, Steve Holland
Critics say Trump has used the military as a prop and purposefully undermined Pentagon efforts to remain apolitical.
What does Congressional approval have to do with them being trump's generals?
They don't serve exclusively at his convenience but we'll allow you to live in your erroneous fantasy
Can Presidents ‘fire’ senior military officers? Generally, yes…but it’s complicated
A journalist recently asked me whether a President could “fire” a general. The answer – pardon the pun – is generally, yes…but there are some legal complications. The context we are addressing is …sites.duke.edu
The legitimacy of Congress imposing statutory restrictions on the authority of the President to remove military officers was initially “subject of doubt and discussion. It remains controversial even today, particularly since there doesn’t seem to be a case precisely on point as to the constitutionality.
Nevertheless, the better view does seem to suggest that Congress has the power to set some limits on the President’s dismissal authority – at least in times of peace. That power would be properly founded in Congress’ Article I, Section 8, Clause 14 authority to “make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces.” Still, the “President’s power of dismissal in time of war [is something] Congress has never attempted to limit.”
So what does 10 U.S.C. § 1161(a) provide? Here is the text:
(a) No commissioned officer may be dismissed from any armed force except—
(1) by sentence of a general court-martial;
(2) in commutation of a sentence of a general court-martial; or
(3) in time of war, by order of the President.
Are we currently in a “time of war” as used by this statute? Although the phrase “time of war” is used in many U.S. statutes, there is no universally accepted definition of precisely what it means. Some court decisions indicate it means war when declared by Congress, and some statutes do use the phrase the “time of war declared by Congress.” (
Well, I never said I caught the fish, you just assumed it. So that’s on you. You are just upset you got “hooked.”
Where to begin:https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/06/mat...s-poison-our-respect-for-fellow-citizens.html
Mattis blames Trump for violence at Capitol, says his actions ‘poison our respect for fellow citizens’
PUBLISHED WED, JAN 6 20218:03 PM ESTUPDATED WED, JAN 6 20218:30 PM EST
- Former Secretary of Defense James Mattis placed the blame squarely on President Donald Trump for the riot that ensued at the U.S. Capitol.
- Mattis, who served as Trump’s first defense secretary, said the president has used the nation’s highest role in government to “destroy trust in our election and to poison our respect for fellow citizens.”
https://www.businessinsider.com/joh...gone-to-the-capitol-on-january-6-book-2021-11
Ex-chief of staff John Kelly said if Trump was a 'real man' he would've gone to the Capitol on January 6 to stop the rioters: book
Oma Seddiq and John Haltiwanger
Nov 15, 2021, 9:17 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/12/top...rection-at-capitol-acknowledge-biden-win.html
Top military leaders condemn ‘sedition and insurrection’ at Capitol, acknowledge Biden win
PUBLISHED TUE, JAN 12 20214:17 PM ESTUPDATED TUE, JAN 12 20216:56 PM EST
Amanda Macias@AMANDA_M_MACIAS
SHARE
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/20...als-endorse-biden-including-some-who-n1240842
More than 200 retired generals, admirals endorse Biden, including some who served under Trump
"Our allies no longer trust or respect us, and our enemies no longer fear us," the former officers and officials wrote in a letter released Thursday.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/202...s-as-pussies-they-saw-him-as-completely-unfit
TRUMP SAW HIS GENERALS AS “PUSSIES.” THEY SAW HIM AS COMPLETELY UNFIT
Meanwhile, the president told Bob Woodward how he was instantly drawn to North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un.
Indeed, in excerpts published by the New York Times and Washington Post, Woodward captures Trump’s dislike for military officials and his impulsive, personality-driven approach to foreign policy—and officials’ concerns about his leadership. In one episode, Trump rails against military leaders for putting allies over his hardline negotiation strategy. “My ****ing generals are a bunch of pussies,” Trump told trade adviser Peter Navarro in 2017, per Woodward. “They care more about their alliances than they do about trade deals.” Among the allies he scorned? South Korea, which is “[allowed] to exist” only because of United States protection.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...s-and-why-the-feeling-is-mutual-idUSKCN26E2YV
How Trump fell out of love with his generals, and why the feeling is mutual
By Phil Stewart, Idrees Ali, Steve Holland
Critics say Trump has used the military as a prop and purposefully undermined Pentagon efforts to remain apolitical.
What does Congressional approval have to do with them being trump's generals?
They don't serve exclusively at his convenience but we'll allow you to live in your erroneous fantasy
Can Presidents ‘fire’ senior military officers? Generally, yes…but it’s complicated
A journalist recently asked me whether a President could “fire” a general. The answer – pardon the pun – is generally, yes…but there are some legal complications. The context we are addressing is …sites.duke.edu
The legitimacy of Congress imposing statutory restrictions on the authority of the President to remove military officers was initially “subject of doubt and discussion. It remains controversial even today, particularly since there doesn’t seem to be a case precisely on point as to the constitutionality.
Nevertheless, the better view does seem to suggest that Congress has the power to set some limits on the President’s dismissal authority – at least in times of peace. That power would be properly founded in Congress’ Article I, Section 8, Clause 14 authority to “make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces.” Still, the “President’s power of dismissal in time of war [is something] Congress has never attempted to limit.”
So what does 10 U.S.C. § 1161(a) provide? Here is the text:
(a) No commissioned officer may be dismissed from any armed force except—
(1) by sentence of a general court-martial;
(2) in commutation of a sentence of a general court-martial; or
(3) in time of war, by order of the President.
Are we currently in a “time of war” as used by this statute? Although the phrase “time of war” is used in many U.S. statutes, there is no universally accepted definition of precisely what it means. Some court decisions indicate it means war when declared by Congress, and some statutes do use the phrase the “time of war declared by Congress.” (
You're pathological. Seriously.
So @kalimgoodman once again slips up and tells on himself. @jfegaly about to go back on Fake Ignore.
So…about Kamala. When is she going to prison? Or are you just a hypocrite?https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/06/mat...s-poison-our-respect-for-fellow-citizens.html
Mattis blames Trump for violence at Capitol, says his actions ‘poison our respect for fellow citizens’
PUBLISHED WED, JAN 6 20218:03 PM ESTUPDATED WED, JAN 6 20218:30 PM EST
- Former Secretary of Defense James Mattis placed the blame squarely on President Donald Trump for the riot that ensued at the U.S. Capitol.
- Mattis, who served as Trump’s first defense secretary, said the president has used the nation’s highest role in government to “destroy trust in our election and to poison our respect for fellow citizens.”
https://www.businessinsider.com/joh...gone-to-the-capitol-on-january-6-book-2021-11
Ex-chief of staff John Kelly said if Trump was a 'real man' he would've gone to the Capitol on January 6 to stop the rioters: book
Oma Seddiq and John Haltiwanger
Nov 15, 2021, 9:17 AM
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/12/top...rection-at-capitol-acknowledge-biden-win.html
Top military leaders condemn ‘sedition and insurrection’ at Capitol, acknowledge Biden win
PUBLISHED TUE, JAN 12 20214:17 PM ESTUPDATED TUE, JAN 12 20216:56 PM EST
Amanda Macias@AMANDA_M_MACIAS
SHARE
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/20...als-endorse-biden-including-some-who-n1240842
More than 200 retired generals, admirals endorse Biden, including some who served under Trump
"Our allies no longer trust or respect us, and our enemies no longer fear us," the former officers and officials wrote in a letter released Thursday.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/202...s-as-pussies-they-saw-him-as-completely-unfit
TRUMP SAW HIS GENERALS AS “PUSSIES.” THEY SAW HIM AS COMPLETELY UNFIT
Meanwhile, the president told Bob Woodward how he was instantly drawn to North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un.
Indeed, in excerpts published by the New York Times and Washington Post, Woodward captures Trump’s dislike for military officials and his impulsive, personality-driven approach to foreign policy—and officials’ concerns about his leadership. In one episode, Trump rails against military leaders for putting allies over his hardline negotiation strategy. “My ****ing generals are a bunch of pussies,” Trump told trade adviser Peter Navarro in 2017, per Woodward. “They care more about their alliances than they do about trade deals.” Among the allies he scorned? South Korea, which is “[allowed] to exist” only because of United States protection.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...s-and-why-the-feeling-is-mutual-idUSKCN26E2YV
How Trump fell out of love with his generals, and why the feeling is mutual
By Phil Stewart, Idrees Ali, Steve Holland
Critics say Trump has used the military as a prop and purposefully undermined Pentagon efforts to remain apolitical.
What does Congressional approval have to do with them being trump's generals?
They don't serve exclusively at his convenience but we'll allow you to live in your erroneous fantasy
Can Presidents ‘fire’ senior military officers? Generally, yes…but it’s complicated
A journalist recently asked me whether a President could “fire” a general. The answer – pardon the pun – is generally, yes…but there are some legal complications. The context we are addressing is …sites.duke.edu
The legitimacy of Congress imposing statutory restrictions on the authority of the President to remove military officers was initially “subject of doubt and discussion. It remains controversial even today, particularly since there doesn’t seem to be a case precisely on point as to the constitutionality.
Nevertheless, the better view does seem to suggest that Congress has the power to set some limits on the President’s dismissal authority – at least in times of peace. That power would be properly founded in Congress’ Article I, Section 8, Clause 14 authority to “make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces.” Still, the “President’s power of dismissal in time of war [is something] Congress has never attempted to limit.”
So what does 10 U.S.C. § 1161(a) provide? Here is the text:
(a) No commissioned officer may be dismissed from any armed force except—
(1) by sentence of a general court-martial;
(2) in commutation of a sentence of a general court-martial; or
(3) in time of war, by order of the President.
Are we currently in a “time of war” as used by this statute? Although the phrase “time of war” is used in many U.S. statutes, there is no universally accepted definition of precisely what it means. Some court decisions indicate it means war when declared by Congress, and some statutes do use the phrase the “time of war declared by Congress.” (
This brings to my mind the time during the Korean conflict when Truman fired Macarthur.
Derp. Cool. So all we have to do is call Jan 6th a protest and that’s what it is. A protest. Good grief your hypocrisy knows no bounds.
www.the-sun.com
Actually I didn't read your "b...s" at all. I was just trying to make a comment on the general gist of what you were trying to say,
A small glimpse of the RIOTS. Errr peaceful protests Kamala was encouraging. Funny. August 27th she came out finally ehh? So after inciting these riots for over 2 months, she finally comes out telling folks not to riot. Yet you have a problem that after 2 hours Trump tells folks to peacefully go home. Hypocrisy proven.
www.thesun.co.uk
www.cbsnews.com
She was inciting riots for 2 months?
6 hours...nice try.
Again a timeline. On June 17th kamala calls for “protests” which were actually riots, to continue. After over 2 months if rioting, and political pressure, finally on August 27th (71 days of violence later) she calls on it to stop. After dozens of deaths and thousands of injuries.She was inciting riots for 2 months?
Then why did you only show her from the Colbert Show?
(An appearance which has be proven to be lie which you bought hook, line, & sinker)
Please show us all of the times over those two months where she was advocating violence
6 hours...nice try.
And I guess trump gaslighting about election fraud from as far back as 2016 doesn't count?
And I guess you've forgotten that trump declared that he loves the violent insurrectionists while he tweeted about going home...thought they were "very special" people too
But who's surprised? trump "loves" this guy also
And he swears these are "good" special people too
And she condemned the violent rioters her comments were specifically after the Blake shooting
But lets watch the hypocrisy monitor jfegaly explain this...
I guess he thinks I can't use a search function on a forum.
