How so? One thing I've learned from my posting time here is that teams do not benefit from a weaker schedule. It's been argued (ad nauseum) that teams who play "untested" throughout the year tend to falter come season's end. See FSU's NC record (3-6) for case/point. The weekly grind of the SEC better prepares teams. By that logic, if Clemson were to have played in the SEC they could have potentially doubled the scores vs OSU, OU, and LSU....heck, they'd have probably even picked up some "quality losses" along the way to those bowl games which could have catapulted them up the rankings!