OK, you were just guessing. Looks like the avg. non-officer is 24.Experience? The Marine Corps is mostly grunts, and grunts is not a career that courts longevity.
OK, you were just guessing. Looks like the avg. non-officer is 24.Experience? The Marine Corps is mostly grunts, and grunts is not a career that courts longevity.
I dont know where you got that from.OK, you were just guessing. Looks like the avg. non-officer is 24.
https://download.militaryonesource....graphics-active-duty-marine-corps-members.pdfI dont know where you got that from.
From 2020. What year is it now?
Here's the 2023 data. Must be the most recent. It's shows pretty much the same age numbers.From 2020. What year is it now?
Nevermind, I dont care.
Grunts. Not the whole Corps. The Marine Corps has the worst retention rate in the military.Here's the 2023 data. Must be the most recent. It's shows pretty much the same age numbers.
https://download.militaryonesource....graphics-active-duty-marine-corps-members.pdf
OK, man. Just make up whatever numbers you want.Grunts. Not the whole Corps. The Marine Corps has the worst retention rate in the military.
Youve admitted to doing the same. Not that you care to examine actual evidence when its presented to you.OK, man. Just make up whatever numbers you want.
Literally every suggestion he has made to address gun violence would make it WORSE.POOR Theo is SO confused. This whole issue was decided WAY BACK in time with the human races FIRST murder. Cain killed Abel with a rock. God blamed Cain...not the rock. THE END.
Where is the word family?But if your goal is protecting your family, how many guns do you need? One? Two? Is more than that even realistic? What real world scenario would require more guns? You think a gang is going to attack your house and stick around for a lengthy gun battle?
Where is the word family?
The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1791, states that "a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Ghost is on YOUR side!Youve admitted to doing the same. Not that you care to examine actual evidence when its presented to you.
Additionally, as this 88 page thread proves, you have no interest in debate, and as i dont give a loud fart in a hurricane about anything you or your buddy ghost think on the subject, ill leave you to your trolling.
I sincerely hope should you ever be the victim of an armed home invasion, the perpetrators are armed with melee weapons, so as an added bonus to the sound beating you're clearly in need of, youll have nothing to bitch about. Molon Labe.
No he isn't. He doesn't own a gun. Which makes him both a failure as a gun nut and a resident of the fine state of Alabama.Ghost is on YOUR side!
![]()
Serious question: How come the left never pushes to ban the manufacture of guns? They always want to stop law-abiding citizens from owning guns. They do everything in their power to make it harder to own a gun. Which as any sane person knows, will only make the gun violence problem worse.Where is the word family?
The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1791, states that "a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
There are people who want to ban certain guns but not ban the manufacture? That's an odd stance for someone to take. Do you know anyone who actually thinks that?Serious question: How come the left never pushes to ban the manufacture of guns? They always want to stop law-abiding citizens from owning guns. They do everything in their power to make it harder to own a gun. Which as any sane person knows, will only make the gun violence problem worse.
But if guns were illegal to make, that would immediately reduce the number of guns in circulation. Which is what @GatorTheo and his ilk claim they want.
And yet...they never push for that. I wonder why that is?
I don't know anyone wanting to ban the manufacture of guns. Seems...odd.There are people who want to ban certain guns but not ban the manufacture? That's an odd stance for someone to take. Do you know anyone who actually thinks that?
I think you're on to something big. You and your close ally @LordofallSocks ought to get together to formalize the official gun nut opinion on the topic.I don't know anyone wanting to ban the manufacture of guns. Seems...odd.
Do you even know what an actual Marine Corps Grunt is ????????OK, man. Just make up whatever numbers you want.
I think being a gun but is more honorable than being a coward, don’t you Teo?I think you're on to something big. You and your close ally @LordofallSocks ought to get together to formalize the official gun nut opinion on the topic.
He already admitted he made up the number but way to support the team.Do you even know what an actual Marine Corps Grunt is ????????
You're the one who feels like you need a gun to be a man.I think being a gun but is more honorable than being a coward, don’t you Teo?
I'm not supporting the team, I'm asking if you genuinely know what a Grunt is ?He already admitted he made up the number but way to support the team.
You're concerned about MY reading skills? Maybe take a look at what Socks said....."And 78 percent of the Marine Corps."I'm not supporting the team, I'm asking if you genuinely know what a Grunt is ?
My son was a Grunt for 4 years, he just chose to get out of his beloved Corps and his mother and I brought him back home this past weekend.
So when you start putting up "stats" that show the average age of enlisted Marines is 24.1 take into account that number reflects the entire Marine Corps ...... Grunts average age is lower, and that is what @LordofallSocks was talking about - but I suppose your reading skills need some more honing.
If he says it's more to the tune of 21 then I believe him because my son was in for the last 4 years and most of the guys that reported to Fleet the same time he did, that are Grunts like he is, are getting out just like he did.
That is that democrat in you son coming out..it ALWAYS does. I have the gun to help protect my family, and it is my RIGHT under our Constitution(something you will NEVER understand) And the COWARDS are people scared of an inanimate object so much that they would let harm come to their loved ones because of their cowardly phobia. Now I will not mention any names here...but we know those kind of people! How would you feel if your family needed you...but because of your cowardice...you could do nothing? You see...I will never have to answer that. Some may.....You're the one who feels like you need a gun to be a man.
![]()
The correct side.You're concerned about MY reading skills? Maybe take a look at what Socks said....."And 78 percent of the Marine Corps."
You are supporting the team. You simply want to be on Sock's side.
Futile trying to debate someone who is afraid of an inanimate object, and believes that they are scary and evilThe correct side.
The data seems to say otherwise. Anyway, I think you admitted your statement was hyperbole/exaggeration like you claim that I use.The correct side.
I was just wondering why you are supporting the gun manufacturer on this issue. Well to be fair, you are just going along with whatever the left's stance is, and you never thought about it. Like all good parrots do.I think you're on to something big. You and your close ally @LordofallSocks ought to get together to formalize the official gun nut opinion on the topic.
@LordofallSocks @Capt Ron 1 @nail1988 @fatman76I was just wondering why you are supporting the gun manufacturer on this issue. Well to be fair, you are just going along with whatever the left's stance is, and you never thought about it. Like all good parrots do.
Maybe you should. Why would the left not want to ban the manufactuer of guns? Refusing to adopt that stance is a wet kiss to gun manufactuerers.
I agree, I think we're onto something big here. Is the left really in bed with gun manufactuerers? Is Theo as well?
if i have time today ill call my buddy at marforres and get an exact age breakdown of of all Marines in the 0300 military occupation specialty that you won't read.The data seems to say otherwise. Anyway, I think you admitted your statement was hyperbole/exaggeration like you claim that I use.
That's fine. Perhaps your statement is true, or at least closer to true, about some segment of the Marines.if i have time today ill call my buddy at marforres and get an exact age breakdown of of all Marines in the 0300 military occupation specialty that you won't read.
I told you what I am talking about. I asked why doesn't the left support a ban on making guns?@LordofallSocks @Capt Ron 1 @nail1988 @fatman76
Guys! Please get in here and help Ghost figure out what he's talking about. Something about anti-gun people supporting gun companies.
Yes, he was specifically talking about and referencing Grunts.That's fine. Perhaps your statement is true, or at least closer to true, about some segment of the Marines.
He doesn’t know what 0300 means unless he googles it.if i have time today ill call my buddy at marforres and get an exact age breakdown of of all Marines in the 0300 military occupation specialty that you won't read.
Yes, the United States Marine Corps team, aka socks team.You're concerned about MY reading skills? Maybe take a look at what Socks said....."And 78 percent of the Marine Corps."
You are supporting the team. You simply want to be on Sock's side.
But that's not what he said.Yes, he was specifically talking about and referencing Grunts.
Yes, he absolutely did.But that's not what he said.
It would be like me saying Chevrolets can go 0-60 in 3 seconds.
Oh, I meant Corvettes.
I see your mistake. You picked up in the middle of a conversation so you don’t know what you’re talking about.Yes, he absolutely did.
Go back and read, again, post #3520 and 3526.
You don’t have to go too far back, it’s on this page.