ADVERTISEMENT

In before the gun confiscation NUTS.....

I simply cannot believe this thread is still going on, but here it is.

Theo likes to argue, and he doesn't care about what. It's a classic debate exercise, take the opposite position and sharpen your skills by sticking to it even if you have to use logical fallacies to do so. Lather, rinse, repeat.

It appears to have been quite successful.

Carry on gents.
We call that trolling...but the bait that he uses is old and nothing bites it.
 
I simply cannot believe this thread is still going on, but here it is.

Theo likes to argue, and he doesn't care about what. It's a classic debate exercise, take the opposite position and sharpen your skills by sticking to it even if you have to use logical fallacies to do so. Lather, rinse, repeat.

It appears to have been quite successful.


Carry on gents.
Debaters use FACTS to win their arguments. Theo has NEVER...not once brought ANY FACTS to this discussion. He is your very typical lib. His argument is "guns are dangerous". It is a lie, but he defends it with we all are cultists, and only listen to the gun companies. You can go back and read every page. In this post, I have summed up everything he has brought to the table.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatman76
I asked if I've ever posted that you shouldn't be able to defend yourself. You couldn't find that but you found where I linked a supreme court decision that said knives are 'arms'.

Yeah, that's pretty much the same thing.
It is

A knife isn't going to stop a criminal with a gun, let alone something more significant happening (however remote that possibility is).

Your stance - 2 bolt action .22's is all the gov't is "required" to let you have - in general is a complete misread of the intent and historical context of the 2A.

We can rehash if you'd like, but it's a waste of time. You're emotional about the subject because you're terrified of inanimate objects, to the point you straw man, name call and cast anyone who disagrees with your position as a "cultist".

You're basically are the debate equivalent of a chimp throwing poop.
 
I'd like to see one of those posts.
No. That is not what I'm saying.

The 2nd amendment says govt. will not infringe on your right to bear arms.

If you have two guns, you are bearing arms.

So, someone could pass a law that you could only have two guns and it wouldn't be infringing on your right to bear arms (because you could still bear arms without infringement).
 
It is

A knife isn't going to stop a criminal with a gun, let alone something more significant happening (however remote that possibility is).

Your stance - 2 bolt action .22's is all the gov't is "required" to let you have - in general is a complete misread of the intent and historical context of the 2A.

We can rehash if you'd like, but it's a waste of time. You're emotional about the subject because you're terrified of inanimate objects, to the point you straw man, name call and cast anyone who disagrees with your position as a "cultist".

You're basically are the debate equivalent of a chimp throwing poop.
It's sad that reading has become such a lost art. It makes communication difficult but I guess that's messageboard life in 2023.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: fatman76
I'd like to see one of those posts.
No. That is not what I'm saying.

The 2nd amendment says govt. will not infringe on your right to bear arms.

If you have two guns, you are bearing arms.

So, someone could pass a law that you could only have two guns and it wouldn't be infringing on your right to bear arms (because you could still bear arms without infringement).
This is what Ghost said: "He spent a month trying to say that the Constitution didn't give you the right to own more than one gun."

I said I'd like to see one of those posts.

Your response was me saying if you had TWO guns, you were bearing arms.

Your response isn't an example of what he said. If you took an extra few moments to actually read what is being said, you wouldn't make these mistakes.
 
This is what Ghost said: "He spent a month trying to say that the Constitution didn't give you the right to own more than one gun."

I said I'd like to see one of those posts.

Your response was me saying if you had TWO guns, you were bearing arms.

Your response isn't an example of what he said. If you took an extra few moments to actually read what is being said, you wouldn't make these mistakes.
Do you not have better things to do that argue like a 1st grader? This sound like something a child would say
 
This is what Ghost said: "He spent a month trying to say that the Constitution didn't give you the right to own more than one gun."

I said I'd like to see one of those posts.

Your response was me saying if you had TWO guns, you were bearing arms.

Your response isn't an example of what he said. If you took an extra few moments to actually read what is being said, you wouldn't make these mistakes.
Yes absolutely. We need to take your trolling more seriously and actually read what you are saying.

We have the worst. The absolute worst.
 
What if due to open borders Palestinians come in and kill Jews. This kind of clear hate speech is being reported on college campus such as Columbia. Today. By CBSNews. Not newsmax.

College kids are scared - legitimately and this is not the BS kind of Riley Gaines so called "hate speech".

College campuses are doing nothing outside of some feel good emails after billionaire donors pull their money.

Cops are too scared to intervene after the George Floyd and defund the police movement.

Wake the F up, but enjoy your privledge and don’t you dare take my right to have a gun. Don't you dare.

The Founders got it right.
Hey Theo, Diddy is closer to being a moderate than you are. You might want to listen to him on this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RussellCasse
Yes absolutely. We need to take your trolling more seriously and actually read what you are saying.

We have the worst. The absolute worst.
If you're interested in engaging in a discussion, which you obviously are, you would look brighter if you responded to what was actually being said.
 
Still your charming self I see.
I mean your only contribution to this board seems to be to come to this thread and complain that you don't understand why people are posting here.

Ok, thanks for your contribution. But after the first reply here, you are now contributing to the problem that you complained about LOL

We got it. You don't like the thread. There's the door.
 
If you're interested in engaging in a discussion, which you obviously are, you would look brighter if you responded to what was actually being said.
I'm interested in engaging in conversation with people who are honest and open to the ideas of others.

You are probably the most disingenuous poster on this board, especially when it comes to guns. You misrepresent what you say almost as fluidly as you do the people you are replying to.

I will never understand why our trolls get offended when they aren't taken seriously. It's the most amazing dynamic I've ever seen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gatordad3
I mean your only contribution to this board seems to be to come to this thread and complain that you don't understand why people are posting here.

Ok, thanks for your contribution. But after the first reply here, you are now contributing to the problem that you complained about LOL

We got it. You don't like the thread. There's the door.
We, what are you, royalty?

I'm highly amused that a Bama fan thinks he runs something in here.

I believe probably 95 percent of the the same things you believe. I just have a sense of humor.

I don't believe I made a complaint, and I see this for what it is, a very good troll. I can't honestly believe Theo believes everything he said and I'm scratching my head that more than a few people who I think highly of are still engaging in this. It's a free country I suppose.
 
We, what are you, royalty?

I'm highly amused that a Bama fan thinks he runs something in here.

I believe probably 95 percent of the the same things you believe. I just have a sense of humor.

I don't believe I made a complaint, and I see this for what it is, a very good troll. I can't honestly believe Theo believes everything he said and I'm scratching my head that more than a few people who I think highly of are still engaging in this. It's a free country I suppose.
What have I said that you don't think I believe?

Please limit it to things I've actually said.....not stuff that Ghost made up.
 
What have I said that you don't think I believe?

Please limit it to things I've actually said.....not stuff that Ghost made up.
Nice try Theo, but I suspect in 40 pages there's some hyperbole, prevarication, and intentional misunderstanding at the very least.

I'm neither interested in changing your mind nor arguing with you about this. I'm bored and waiting for my wife to be done with her root canal and I'll leave you good folks to it.
 
Nice try Theo, but I suspect in 40 pages there's some hyperbole, prevarication, and intentional misunderstanding at the very least.

I'm neither interested in changing your mind nor arguing with you about this. I'm bored and waiting for my wife to be done with her root canal and I'll leave you good folks to it.
OK. Sounded like you knew specific things I said that you didn’t think I believed.
 
Before I exit the door I was shown, Senator John Kennedy R-Louisiana has proposed HR4366 that prevents veterans from being added to the NCIS registry without due process. I will be calling Senators Rubio and Scott to see if they will be giving their support to this endeavour or I'll know the reason why not. You should do the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RussellCasse
This is what Ghost said: "He spent a month trying to say that the Constitution didn't give you the right to own more than one gun."

I said I'd like to see one of those posts.

Your response was me saying if you had TWO guns, you were bearing arms.

Your response isn't an example of what he said. If you took an extra few moments to actually read what is being
said, you wouldn't make these mistakes.

I don't think I'm the one incapable of basic reading comprehension here...and Ghost only every brought up the 1 gun hypothetical to prove a point, that's certainly not his interpretation of the 2A.
You're only guaranteed the right to bear arms. If you have a rifle, you are armed. You could argue that 'bearing arms' is plural so you'd have to be allowed 2 weapons.
Correct. The Constitution however does not limit the number or type of guns that can be owned.

You know that, but you are ignore that. That's why you get accused of trolling. Because that's what you are doing.
It doesn't mention a number but it only commits to 'bearing arms'.

You are in fact 'bearing arms' when you have two qualifying weapons.
Correct. You are also exercising your constitutional rights if you own 2,000 qualifying weapons.
I'm still confused about how you read that the 2nd Amendment restricts the number of guns you can buy.
 
I don't think I'm the one incapable of basic reading comprehension here...and Ghost only every brought up the 1 gun hypothetical to prove a point, that's certainly not his interpretation of the 2A.
Thank you. More examples of @GatorTheo arguing for limits to a law-abiding citizens ability to own guns, and defend themselves with guns.

He's too terrified to realize that his stance actually leads to MORE gun violence.

Or maybe he's one of @goldmom's paid shills for the dems. That would actually make more sense since they love what Theo is pushing for here.
 
What have I said that you don't think I believe?

Please limit it to things I've actually said.....not stuff that Ghost made up.
I think he needs to get to know you better. I think he finds it VERY unbelievable someone could be this slow. I know I do. You are either slower than 32 degree syrup...or trolling
 
Thank you. More examples of @GatorTheo arguing for limits to a law-abiding citizens ability to own guns, and defend themselves with guns.

He's too terrified to realize that his stance actually leads to MORE gun violence.

Or maybe he's one of @goldmom's paid shills for the dems. That would actually make more sense since they love what Theo is pushing for here.
I think this proves beyond a shadow of a doubt it's about arguing and not the argument for him.

He doesn't even remember what position(s) he took in the same thread he's posting in.

Essentially it's the essence of a free message board troll...argue to get attention to make up for some other deficiency in life.
 
Serious question: Have you guys ever been tested for reading comprehension? It's like where you read a passage and have to answer questions or restate it in your own words.

I know they still do it in private schools but maybe they don't do it any more in public.
 
Serious question: Have you guys ever been tested for reading comprehension? It's like where you read a passage and have to answer questions or restate it in your own words.

I know they still do it in private schools but maybe they don't do it any more in public.
So lets sit back and look at this from above. We ALL say that you said that...and showed you in your posts that you said that..and you STILL want to argue that you did NOT say that? Now is is starting to make sense. Are you related to Joe Biden?
 
So lets sit back and look at this from above. We ALL say that you said that...and showed you in your posts that you said that..and you STILL want to argue that you did NOT say that? Now is is starting to make sense. Are you related to Joe Biden?
Read it again. There is no where I said the constitution limits you to one gun. I even said in the quoted posts that no number is mentioned.
 
I think this proves beyond a shadow of a doubt it's about arguing and not the argument for him.

He doesn't even remember what position(s) he took in the same thread he's posting in.

Essentially it's the essence of a free message board troll...argue to get attention to make up for some other deficiency in life.
I mean, he's got 100,000 posts over the last quarter century on Rivals. Obviously, trolling is a very important part of his amazing life.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: fatman76
For the last month you implied it limits you to 2 guns.

You live an amazing life.
No, please read carefully:

I said the only thing the constitution says is you have the right to 'bear arms'.

IF someone decided to pass a law where you could only have 2 guns, that would satisfy that your right to 'bear arms' wasn't infringed because you would be 'bearing arms'.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT