Well she can go back to what she only knows, having sex with her brother.
Word to your mother, brother f---e-!
Word to your mother, brother f---e-!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think that surprises anyone here.All I can find is her denying it.
One of Sandler’s best moviesWell she can go back to what she only knows, having sex with her brother.
Word to your mother, brother f---e-!
Because She's anti-American and a whore for sleeping with her brother to gain citizenship.
"Where is my brother?"
No. She has no birth certificate so it can't be proven definitively.Is there proof of this stuff? Or just republican talking points?
What I find interesting is KalimGoodman's comfortable use of the term "talking points" but always preceeded by "Republican" or "Right-wing" or "Hannity" and never by "Democrat" or "Left-wing" or "Maddow". Only one side uses talking points? If he "leaned" any further left, he'd fall over. But he's not honest enough to claim partainship for the left as he loves to paint others on the right, the difference being all or most here on the right are honest about it. He ain't foolin' anybody.She was legally married to her brother.
What I find intresting is KalimGoodman's comfortable use of the term "talking points" but always preceeded by "Republican" or "Right-wing" or "Hannity" and never by "Democrat" or "Left-wing" or "Maddow". Only one side uses talking points? If he "leaned" any further left, he'd fall over. But he's not honest enough to claim partainship for the left as he loves to paint others on the right, the difference being all or most here on the right are honest about it. He ain't foolin' anybody.
Yes, he's very partisan and all things liberal which is sad. The common sense side of issues are squarely in the lap of the conservative party. He was pounding his chest over abortion rights the other day. No one with an ounce of humanity would celebrate abortion.What I find intresting is KalimGoodman's comfortable use of the term "talking points" but always preceeded by "Republican" or "Right-wing" or "Hannity" and never by "Democrat" or "Left-wing" or "Maddow". Only one side uses talking points? If he "leaned" any further left, he'd fall over. But he's not honest enough to claim partainship for the left as he loves to paint others on the right, the difference being all or most here on the right are honest about it. He ain't foolin' anybody.
Yes, he's very partisan and all things liberal which is sad. The common sense side of issues are squarely in the lap of the conservative party. He was pounding his chest over abortion rights the other day. No one with an ounce of humanity would celebrate abortion.
Kalim fools the slow.What I find interesting is KalimGoodman's comfortable use of the term "talking points" but always preceeded by "Republican" or "Right-wing" or "Hannity" and never by "Democrat" or "Left-wing" or "Maddow". Only one side uses talking points? If he "leaned" any further left, he'd fall over. But he's not honest enough to claim partainship for the left as he loves to paint others on the right, the difference being all or most here on the right are honest about it. He ain't foolin' anybody.
I would NEVER try to convince someone without the mental capacity to understand world events that have been out in public for "YEARS...as she admitted this. When you start paying attention more, and have a MUCH better grasp, I will expend energy to discuss with you. At this time, it would be a total waste of my timeJust looked and it seems to be unproven. More of crazy right media saying it's true. No real evidence that it's true or false.
Which VERY ironically, are people who think politically just like he does! LOLKalim fools the slow.
Did you see @gatordad3 's post above. Apparently a lot of money was spent obtaining DNA from both of them in a clandestine manner. 98% match. Someone also went to Somalia to investigate and an official said in fact that they were siblings. I read that long ago. In the Carlson interview with the reporter in the video above, apparently the FBI dropped the case over statue of limitations. Take it for what it's worth. There is plenty of smoke to suggest it's a fact.No. She has no birth certificate so it can't be proven definitively.
There are enough weird tie-ins between her first husband and her second husband to be extremely suspicious. Shared addresses and such.
If it could be proven she'd be chilling in Mogadishu, because that's obtaining citizenship by fraud which would get both of them deported.
Key word is clandestine. I'm not suggesting it's outside the realm of possibility. It's just not admissible in court. And having been to Somalia and most of West Africa, you can easily bribe pretty much any African official with relative ease.Did you see @gatordad3 's post above. Apparently a lot of money was spent obtaining DNA from both of them in a clandestine manner. 98% match. Someone also went to Somalia to investigate and an official said in fact that they were siblings. I read that long ago. In the Carlson interview with the reporter in the video above, apparently the FBI dropped the case over statue of limitations. Take it for what it's worth. There is plenty of smoke to suggest it's a fact.
I learned something on this board right after we moved over here...if you want to find something on a lib...go to Duck Duck, because it will NOIT show on google, or any of the normal search engines. I have found that to be 100% true. So a little education for our slowest...I would appreciate your comments after you read the article......
Claims DNA match proves Ilhan Omar married her brother
A supposed DNA match between Rep. Ilhan Omar and her second husband Ahmed Elmi claims to prove that the two are in fact siblings.www.dailymail.co.uk
Click Capn Ron's link before you decide. There is also the argument against it because Somalian trees don't have many branches. 😂Key word is clandestine. I'm not suggesting it's outside the realm of possibility. It's just not admissible in court. And having been to Somalia and most of West Africa, you can easily bribe pretty much any African official with relative ease.
Let's break this down and please respond.What I find interesting is KalimGoodman's comfortable use of the term "talking points" but always preceeded by "Republican" or "Right-wing" or "Hannity" and never by "Democrat" or "Left-wing" or "Maddow". Only one side uses talking points? If he "leaned" any further left, he'd fall over. But he's not honest enough to claim partainship for the left as he loves to paint others on the right, the difference being all or most here on the right are honest about it. He ain't foolin' anybody.
Nobody has been able to provide proof that she admitted it. All I could find was that she deny it. I don't believe in the "trust me" approach.I would NEVER try to convince someone without the mental capacity to understand world events that have been out in public for "YEARS...as she admitted this. When you start paying attention more, and have a MUCH better grasp, I will expend energy to discuss with you. At this time, it would be a total waste of my time
You did when The Daily Beast claimed that Trump was EATING classified documents.Nobody has been able to provide proof that she admitted it. All I could find was that she deny it. I don't believe in the "trust me" approach.
Simple. We don't bring talking points from EITHER side. We bring facts.Let's break this down and please respond.
Why would orange, Bama, fatman, freeze, NavigatorII, Dr, capton, Fresno, bills, sub, etc bring democrat or left wing talking points to the board? They are all conservative to far right. Please answer!
Well, we know there are at least 3 libs on the site and you listed 10 conservatives and your math says 99%?Let's break this down and please respond.
Why would orange, Bama, fatman, freeze, NavigatorII, Dr, capton, Fresno, bills, sub, etc bring democrat or left wing talking points to the board? They are all conservative to far right. Please answer!
You do know that this board is filled with Republicans and 99% of all threads are from a conservative to far right viewpoint?
To me, this was easy and not sure why you couldn't figure this out on your own.
If this board was filled with 99% liberal to far left leaning viewpoints, I would call out their talking points.
Let's break this down and please respond.
Why would orange, Bama, fatman, freeze, NavigatorII, Dr, capton, Fresno, bills, sub, etc bring democrat or left wing talking points to the board? They are all conservative to far right. Please answer!
You do know that this board is filled with Republicans and 99% of all threads are from a conservative to far right viewpoint?
To me, this was easy and not sure why you couldn't figure this out on your own.
If this board was filled with 99% liberal to far left leaning viewpoints, I would call out their talking points.
Nobody has been able to provide proof that she admitted it. All I could find was that she deny it. I don't believe in the "trust me" approach.
I don't have hard facts at my fingertips to prove beyond the slightest doubt that she's married to her biological brother. Based on the circumstantial evidence available to me I consider it totally plausible and fairly likely that this is true.Nobody has been able to provide proof that she admitted it. All I could find was that she deny it. I don't believe in the "trust me" approach.
Nobody has been able to provide proof that she admitted it. All I could find was that she deny it. I don't believe in the "trust me" approach.
What happened to "just trust the science, (like DNA)" 😂😂😂😂
Why not ? Your party relies on the “trust us” and just vote the way we tell you every election cycle.
This is a fair and reasonable opinion.I don't have hard facts at my fingertips to prove beyond the slightest doubt that she's married to her biological brother. Based on the circumstantial evidence available to me I consider it totally plausible and fairly likely that this is true.
I don't have a party but playing your game.😂😂😂
Why not ? Your party relies on the “trust us” and just vote the way we tell you every election cycle.